2014MCM竞赛论文

2014MCM竞赛论文
2014MCM竞赛论文

analyze the performance of this rule in light and heavy traffic. In the paper, we developed four mathematical models to solve the problem that we find according to the topic, and then get the scientific and reliable conclusion from them. Finally, we designed some new arithmetic on the basis of our conclusion to effectively promote the traffic flow and safety in multi-lane freeways.

In light traffic, through in-depth analysis and demonstration, we developed a model of Queuing Theory to perform the Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule in light traffic. This model shows the relationship among traffic flow, speed and traffic density directly. So according to the model, we get the conclusion that the traffic rule can effectively promote the traffic flow and safety.

In heavy traffic, through the analysis of traffic condition in both single-lane and multi-lane, we developed a model of Enhanced Cellular Automation to perform the Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule in heavy traffic. In the process of solving this model, we use MATLAB, and finally prove that the principle cannot distinctly promote the traffic flow in heavy traffic, while it can only ensure the safety to some extent.

By using VISSIM Simulation System, we propose an effective arithmetic. This arithmetic is also proposed by analyzing the influence of the Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule on traffic flow in both light and heavy traffic. The arithmetic can effectively promote the traffic capacity; moreover we proved that it is also suitable for the countries where driving automobiles on the left is the norm. In this paper, we meticulously explained the using characters of the arithmetic under this kind of condition. Furthermore, in order to make it be suitable under the condition of intelligent system, we do scientific and reasonable adjustment of it. We also developed the model of HRRN on the basis of Cellular Automation. At the end of the paper, we rigorously analyze the sensitivity of the models and objectively evaluate the solution.

Contents

1. Introduction (1)

1.1 Restatement of the Problem (1)

1.2 Significance of Solving this Problem (1)

1.3 Theory Knowledge Introduction (2)

1.3.1 Queuing Theory (2)

1.3.2 Traffic Flow Simulation Theory (2)

1.3.3 Dynamics Lateral Model Differential Equation Theory (2)

1.3.4 Cellular Automata (CA) (3)

2. Analysis of the problem (3)

3. Assumptions, symbols and terminologies (4)

3.1Assumptions (4)

3.2 Symbols (4)

3.3 Terminology (5)

3.3.1 Queuing Theory (5)

3.3.2Cellular Automation Theory (CA) (5)

3.3.3 Traffic Flow Model (5)

3.3.4 State generator of the signal (5)

3.3.5 Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) (5)

3.3.6 VISSIM Software System (6)

4. Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule in Light Traffic (6)

4.1 Backgrounds (6)

4.2 Queuing Theory................................................................................. .6 4.2.1 Elementary Analysis (6)

4.2.2 Models (7)

4.2.3Two –lane and Three –lane Models (8)

4.3Collection of Data (9)

4.4 Analysis of the Queuing Theory Model (10)

4.5 Verification and Improvement of the Model (10)

4.6Further Discussion about Flow and Rate (11)

5. Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule in Heavy Traffic (12)

5.1Backgrounds (12)

5.2 Tradeoffs between Traffic Flow and Safety (12)

5.2.1 Analysis (12)

5.5 Models (14)

5.5.1Analusis of the Initial Model (14)

5.5.2 Cellular Automation Theory (CA) (14)

5.5.3 CA model and Studies (16)

5.5.4 The Arithmetic Model of MATLAB (17)

5.5Numerical Simulation of the Mode (20)

5.6Scientific Analysis of the Model (21)

6. The Keep-Left-Except-To-Pass Rule (22)

6.1Backgrounds (22)

6.2Improved Models (22)

7. Under the Control of Intelligence Traffic System (24)

7.1Analysis and Establishment (24)

7.1.1Analysis of the Model (25)

7.1.2The Establishment of Models (25)

7.2Model’s Solution and Testing (25)

7.3 Sensitivity Analysis and Evaluation (26)

8.Evaluation of the Model (27)

8.1Strengths (27)

8.2Weaknesses (28)

9. Future Work (32)

9.1 Generalizability of the Models (34)

9.2 The prospects of the Models’ Development (35)

10. References (35)

The Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule

Abstract

The object of this study is the Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule, and our target is to analyze the performance of this rule in light and heavy traffic. In the paper, we developed four mathematical models to solve the problem that we find according to the topic, and then get the scientific and reliable conclusion from them. Finally, we designed some new arithmetic on the basis of our conclusion to effectively promote the traffic flow and safety in multi-lane freeways.

In light traffic, through in-depth analysis and demonstration, we developed a model of Queuing Theory to perform the Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule in light traffic. This model shows the relationship among traffic flow, speed and traffic density directly. So according to the model, we get the conclusion that the traffic rule can effectively promote the traffic flow and safety.

In heavy traffic, through the analysis of traffic condition in both single-lane and multi-lane, we developed a model of Enhanced Cellular Automation to perform the Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule in heavy traffic. In the process of solving this model, we use MATLAB, and finally prove that the principle cannot distinctly promote the traffic flow in heavy traffic, while it can only ensure the safety to some extent.

By using VISSIM Simulation System, we propose an effective arithmetic. This arithmetic is also proposed by analyzing the influence of the Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule on traffic flow in both light and heavy traffic. The arithmetic can effectively promote the traffic capacity; moreover we proved that it is also suitable for the countries where driving automobiles on the left is the norm. In this paper, we meticulously explained the using characters of the arithmetic under this kind of condition. Furthermore, in order to make it be suitable under the condition of intelligent system, we do scientific and reasonable adjustment of it. We also developed the model of HRRN on the basis of Cellular Automation. At the end of the paper, we rigorously analyze the sensitivity of the models and objectively evaluate the solution.

Key words:Queuing Theory,Mathematical modeling, Cellular Automation Theory, keep-right-except-to-pass rule, traffic flow

1. Introduction

1.1 Restatement of the Problem

We know that in many countries such as USA, China and most other countries except for Great Britain, Australia, and some former British colonies where driving automobiles on the right is the rule, multi-lane freeways often adopt a rule that requires drivers to drive in the right-most lane unless they are passing another vehicle, in which case they move one lane to the left, pass, and return to their former travel lane. However, does this rule can effectively promote the traffic flow[1] and safety whether in light or heavy traffic? We suppose that the Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass

Rule is the optimal rule, so we develop a mathematical model and use many data to demonstrate our hypothesis.

If our hypothesis is right, then does this model suitable in countries where driving automobiles on the left is the norm or we need some additional requirements? If vehicle transportation on the same roadway was fully under the control of an intelligent system, to what extent would this change the results of your earlier analysis? We analyze these problems step by step and finally give our own models and methods.

1.2 Significance of Solving this Problem

With the development of our society, there are more and more cars, so more and more traffic problems occur in our daily life. So through in-depth studies about Keep-Right (or Keep-left) traffic rules, we can find many potential problems in it, thus we can avoid many traffic accidents and promote greater traffic flow. Furthermore, we can estimate the development of the transportation in the future, and find a more suitable traffic rule in future traffic system.

1.3 Theory Knowledge Introduction

1.3.1 Queuing Theory

As early as a few decades ago, queuing theory has already been widely applied to solve traffic flow problems. In any traffic sites, people must understand: 1) the distribution of vehicles after entering the queuing system[2]. 2) the source of cars is limited or not. 3) The distribution of service time in each traffic system. One of typical system in Queuing Theory is the rule of traffic flow enter or leave the parking garage. If cars come to the parking garage in random, and follow the rules of first come first service to enter or leave the garage, then the time that the vehicle required to come into or out of garage form a similar distribution of exponential function.

If the vehicle arrive a place randomly, then as for the time interval between two continuous arrived vehicles can be described as Poisson distribution. From a simple Poisson distribution model— Poisson distribution of vehicles only come from single lane – we can get the basic knowledge of queuing theory. In order to better understand Queuing Theory, knowing the waiting time (w) that cars spent before they got the service and the whole time needed to form a real queue (v) are as important as knowing expected number of the queue and the average length of the queue. Nowadays, the application of queuing theory is mainly manifested in following aspects: 1. study the relationship between departure intervals of two buses and length of queues.2.study vehicles queuing in parking places.3.study the relationship between vehicles queuing [3] and delaying before the intersection.

1.3.2 Traffic Flow Simulation Theory

Road traffic simulation model is to abstract the road traffic system based on the characteristics of simulation technology. It involves the basic elements of road traffic system and interactions between these factors and their change process. The characteristics of the road traffic system determines the complexity of the simulation mode, nevertheless, it become extraordinarily complex because the microscopic

simulation[4] model detailed description of the various elements in the system. The simulation study of traffic flow in expressway can realize dynamic virtual representation of traffic running state, and provide traffic management and traffic planning personnel with an effective experimental platform. Using traffic flow simulation model to make simulation experiments, and then through the analysis, comparison and evaluation of the simulation output result to obtain the parameters of the traffic flow. Finally we can use the parameters to provide gist of decision and technical support for the traffic management and control, traffic scheme[5] comparison and effect evaluation.

1.3.3 Dynamics Lateral Model Differential Equation Theory

When using the computer simulation, under normal circumstances we need to give a scientific mathematical model, so it is necessary to master a certain method to set up mathematical model. In dynamic systems, in most cases you can use the differential equation to represent the dynamic characteristics of a system, and can also simplify the system into state equation and difference equation model by using the differential equation. In real engineering, the system usually be divided into two types, one is the continuous system[6] in which the mathematical model is usually the high-order differential equation; The other is the discrete system, and its mathematical model is difference equation.

The vehicle dynamics model is made up by many sub-models, and there are many complex interactions between them. Under a certain sections, some sub-models may change more quickly, while others are relatively slowly. Accordingly, there are fast varying component and the slow varying component in the integral of differential equation to describe the process. If there is a large gap between fast-change sub-models and low-change sub-models[7], then it is called rigid equation in math. In lateral linear and nonlinear model, because the ratio of two characteristic values of matrix in the differential equation (Jacobi) has massive swings in the case of wheel speed change, so we can believe that the change of speed lead to the inconformity in the change of speed in Lateral model differential equation.

1.3.4 Cellular Automata (CA)

Cellular automata is a kind of local dynamic model in the form of spatial-temporal dispersions, and a typical method to research complex systems, particularly suitable for time and space dynamic simulation study. Cellular automata is not determined by strictly defined physical equation or function, but in the CA model, each cell that spreads in Lattice Grid has a limited discrete state, following a same reaction rules and occurring synchronous renewal according the same partial rule. A large number of cells through simple interaction constitute the evolution of the dynamic system. The characteristics of the CA model [8]: time, space, status are all scattered, each variable has limited multiple states, at the same time the rules of the state change in time and space are partial. It is composed of a series of rules which used to make model construction. As long as the models meet these rules then they can be called

automata model. Therefore, Cellular Automata is an ageneraldesignation of a kind of model, or a framework of a method.

The main advantages of CA model:

(1)The model is simple, particularly is easy to implement on a computer.

(2)Can represent the various complex phenomena in traffic, and reflect the traffic flow characteristics. People in the process of simulation by investigating the state change of cellular automata, can not only get cars‘ speed, displacement, and time headway to describe the micro-characteristic[9] of traffic flow but also get the parameters of average velocity, density and flow rate to present macro-characteristic of traffic flow.

(3)Can represent the Traffic Flow Modeling in one lane, multi-lane and road network; as well as Modeling of motor vehicles and non-motor vehicles.

2. Analysis of the problem

In the study, several crucial issues should be considered, and each of them contains many factors. After the comprehensive analysis about Problem A, we find the following questions.

(1)Analyzing the performance of the rule in TITLE in light and heavy traffic through examine tradeoffs between traffic flow and safety,the role of under- or over-posted speed limits (that is, speed limits that are too low or too high), and/or other factors that may not be explicitly called out in this problem statement.

(2)How to find alternatives that might promote greater traffic flow, safety, and/or other factors that we deem important and take rational analysis of them based on our quantitatively analysis about the keep-right-except-to-pass rule?s effe ct on traffic flow and safety.

(3)How to modify our mathematical models to make it suitable for countries where driving automobiles on the left is the norm.

(4)How to modify our mathematical models to make it suitable for vehicle transportation on the same roadway was fully under the control of an intelligent system.

Obviously, the four above-mentioned questions are the crucial part of the study, so they play an important role in solving these issues. First of all, some necessary assumptions must be considered. Firstly, whether motorcycle types (such as truck, car, motorcycle and so on) have impact on traffic flow and safety? Secondly, it is necessary to notice the different influences of multi-lanes (two-lane or three-lane) in the keep-right-except-to-pass rule? Thirdly, is it necessary to establish a model to describe velocity (too low or too high) influence on traffic and safety quantitatively? The data is the most reliable evidence to verify the theory, hence, how to get reliable data we need has come into question. In the process of establishing model, many other factors should be taken into consideration, so in order to make the model more practical in our daily life, appropriate improvement mast be made in different conditions (the keep-right-except-to pass rule, the keep-left rule and intelligent system)

3. Assumptions, symbols and terminologies

3.1Assumptions

3.1.1 Unidirectional lane is closed that is to say cars can either drive into or out the lane.

3.1.2 Regardless of motorcycle type in the whole experiment.

3.1.3 Ignore the driver's personal factors (such as drive skills, psychological quality, and moral quality).

3.1.4 The driving direction of vehicles is always consistent

3.1.5 There are no traffic accidents

3.1.6 Ignore the influence of weather conditions and the influence of Carioles Acceleration and earth magnetic field on cars.

3.2 Symbols

q ——estimated traffic flow be used to confirm the direction

x ——the number of car that driven to the opposite direction y ——net overtaking number of overtaking (the number of cars that surpass the target car)

a t —— the time that the car used to drive to backward

w t ——the time that the car used to drive to forward

t ——the average time that the car used to drive to forward

l —— the length of the whole lane

s u —— the car‘s average speed in the trial lane

c n —— the number of lanes

nl —— the length of the trial lane

v —— average speed

d —— number of tim

e o

f changin

g driving lane p —— the density of traffic flow

t d —— the Simulation Step Time, determining the change speed of the state of cellular automata

t n —— the simulation step number, determining the time that lasting time of the simulation

p f ——the probability of cars to enter the trial lanes, determining the density of traffic flow.

3.3 Terminology

3.3.1 Queuing Theory

It also called the theory of random service system. The content of its research has the following three parts:

A:Status. It studies the regularity of the probability of queuing system. The status contains instantaneous state and steady state.

B:Optimization. It contains the optimization in static and active state. The former optimization refers to the optimal design. The latter optimization refers to the optimal implement based on the existing queuing system.

C:Statistical inference. It refers to a method to estimate which model is suitable for a given queue, in order to take further study based on the Queuing Theory.

3.3.2Cellular Automation Theory (CA)

It is a dynamical system that is discrete in both space and time. Each cell that spreads in Lattice Grid has a limited discrete state, following a same reaction rules and occurring synchronous renewal according the same partial rule.

Traffic Flow Simulation Theory

3.3.3 Traffic Flow Model

Road traffic simulation model is to abstract the road traffic system based on the characteristics of simulation technology. Traffic simulator is a microscopic traffic flow simulation model; it includes car-following model and Lane-change model.

3.3.4 State generator of the signal

It refers to a control model of signal, and is based on simulation step to get the information from Traffic simulator, determining the state of the signal in next simulation time, at the same time, sending the information back to the Traffic simulator.

3.3.5 Intelligent Transportation System (ITS)

It is a Real-time, accurate and efficient integrated transportation and management system that combined advanced information technology, communication technology, sensor technology, control technology and computer technology together, and then to be used in the whole transport management system to solve the problem in a larger scale.

3.3.6 VISSIM Software System

It refers to the microscopic traffic flow simulation software system that designed for the PTV Company in Germany to be used in transportation systems for a series of operation analysis. It is an effective tool that has the functions of analyzing, evaluating optimizing the transportation network and designing scheme comparison, so it is an effective tool for the analysis of many traffic problems.

4. Performance of the Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule in Light Traffic

4.1 Backgrounds

To analyze the performance of The Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule in light traffic, we must abstract the actual road conditions, and then to develop reasonable mathematical models and to deeply analyze the performance in the traffic. In light traffic, the density of the trial lane is small, so almost all the cars are driving on the

right lane (also called the slow lane) under The Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule. If we want to test whether the rule can promote the traffic flow, then we must analysis each of the lane.

In the road traffic performance experiment, statistical analysis of the traffic flow is needed. Through the statistics and analysis of the number of cars (driven in or out of the trial lane), we can get find the rule‘s influence on the traffic flow in light flow. In the experiment, we pay more attention to the chosen of the experimental lane, because many kind of lanes (tunnels, cross-sea bridge),it is not allowed to overtake.

4.2 Queuing Theory

4.2.1 Elementary Analysis

In light traffic, the density of the right lane is the highest, while the lift is the smallest. First of all, we should establish a standard to identify ―light traffic‖. We know that the traffic flow is expedite, that is to say the car that driven into the experimental lane is smaller than the number of driven out. So we should establish a quantified model to define traffic flow.

Picture1

In light traffic, the relationship between speed (v) and density ( ) can be described as the following graph (the length of the experimental is 200km):

Picture2

The selected standard is the average ratio of the vehicles‘ number, which are from the entrance to the exit.

1N is the number of cars that driven into the experimental lane, 2N presents the

number of cars that driven into the experimental lane. The relationship between the two is:

1

2N F N =, 1121122221,T T T T N N N N N N =-=-. (1)

Analyzing the data, we can get the evaluation criteria of F in light traffic. Abstracting the case, we can get a method to calculate the traffic flow on one lane. According to the theory of traffic dynamics differential equation, we can get the functional relationship between traffic flow and the density[10] of the lane. It can be used to deeply study traffic flow under The Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule.

4.2.2 Models

Treat the traffic flow as the liquid, suppose (,),(,)q x t x t ρ and (,)u x t all can establish a continuous and differentiable functions with x and t, the following are the equations according to the conservation principle.

According to the integral, when the time is t, in section [a, b], the number of cars is (,)b

x t dx

a ρ?. (,)q a t means the number of cars that passed a in ten minutes; (,)q

b t means the number of cars that passed b in ten minutes

(,)(,)(,)b d q a t q b t x t dx dt a ρ-=?. (2)

This is the integral form of traffic flow, and it does not have continuous relationship with x. Under the Analyticity Properties of q and ρ, it can be changed into the following form:

(,)(,)(,)b q a t q b t q x t dx x a ?-=-??,

(,)(,)b b d x t dx x t dx dt t a a ρρ?=???0b q dx t x a ρ??=?

??(+).(3) We chose the section [a, b] randomly, so 0q t x ρ??=??+. This is the continuous traffic

flow equation.

When we find the function relationship between q and ρ——()q q ρ=, differential coefficient dq

d ρ is th

e known function, written as ()?ρ. We can get the conclusion:

().q dq x d x x ρρ?ρρ???==???

Then equation can be written as

()0,(),0,(,0)()dq t x t x d x f x ρρ?ρ?ρρρ???+==>-∞<<∞?????=? . (4)

F(x) represents the initial density,(,)x t ρ describe the distribution of the traffic flow in any time, and from ()q ρwe can get (,)q x t .The equation is a first order quasilinear partial differential equations:

0((),)()x t t f x ρ=, 000()(()),(0)x t f x t x x x ?=+= (5)

It is easy to prove that (4),(5)can be satisfied in (3). From ((),)(0)x t t f x ρ=,

we can get 0d dx dt t x dt ρρρ??=+=??. We can also get 0(())dx f x dt ?=.Put (4)into

()dx dt ?ρ=, we can get equation (3), so (4),(5)are satisfied in initial conditions (,0)()x f x ρ=.(4)and (5)have obvious geometric meaning, on the plane Oxt ,

(5)can be describe as a series of straight lines, they meet the x-axis in 0x , and it‘s slope is ()1

0k x ?-=????(the relationship between t and x). When ,f ? is fixed, 0x

change, then k will also change. (4)shows that on each of the characteristic line ()x x t =, the density of the traffic flow (,)x t ρ is a fixed number 0()f x , at the same time, in different characteristic line,(,)x t ρ change according to the change of 0x .The following chart describes the characteristic line of (3):

The choice of the time has an obvious influence on traffic loading. For example, there is a big difference of traffic between day and night. Based on this condition, we can control the traffic loading by choosing different experimental time. In the study, we choose the time on 6 o‘clock in the morning, when the road is in the light traffic condition.

4.2.3Two –lane and Three –lane Models

In Queuing Theory, if ()N t represent that at the time t , the number of the car in the specific traffic system, so {(),0}N t t ≥is a particular random process. If ―Birth ‖ means that the car drives into a specific highway in a particular time, the n ―Death ‖ is the car leaving ,as for many queuing processes,{(),0}N t t ≥is a particular Stochastic Process -Birth and Death Process. Generally, it is difficult to get the distribution of ()N t , which represents that ()P{N(t)n}(n 0,1

,2,)=== n P t , so it is usually try to find the distribution when the system keep balance, marked n p ,n 0,1,2,= to find the balance distribution under the light traffic, considering the possible state of system n . Assumption in a period time ,record the time of entrance state n and leaving state n , because the ―come ‖and ―leave ‖is alternative ,the two numbers is equal or the discrepancy is 1. On average, we can think they are equal. When the system became balance ,for any state n ,in unit time, the entrance time 0

equals the leaving time, this is the theory ―in =out ‖ under the condition of statistic balance .According to this theory, we can get equations:

0 1100p p μλ=

1

()2200111p p p μλλμ+=+ (6) ??

n ()1111n n n n n n n p p p μλλμ++--+=+ (7)

From the above, we can get: 0101p p λμ=, 10112111010222211(p p )o p p p p λλλλμλμμμμμ=+-==, (8)

101110111111(p p )n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n p p p p λλλλλμλμμμμμμ-+--++++=+-== .(9) If 10

11n n n n n C λλλμμμ-+= , n 0,1,2,= then the distribution of the steady state:

0=n n p c p .By the probability distribution requirements

01n n p ∞==∑, so 01[1]p 1

n n C ∞=+=∑,then 0111n n p C

∞==+∑. Attention: Only the serial 1n

n C

∞=∑is convergent ,that is 1n n C

∞=<∞∑.We can get the probability distribution of the

steady state from above .Thurs, in light traffic situations ,even there are several overtaking situations, they will not waste too much time, we can regard that the car drive fluently .So we can conclude that the rules are helpful in improving the traffic flow .

4.3Collection of Data

As for multi –lane and security coefficient date, we use the intelligent vehicle detection based on video technology. With the rapid development of intelligent transportation, vehicle detection based on video technology has become a famous research subject all over the world .The vehicle detection based on video technology got rapid development because of the advantages of wide detection range and it can provide the comprehensive traffic information . Intelligent transportation system requires real-time detection, in the process of testing in order to reduce the amount of calculation and improve the computing speed of the system, many algorithms are

adopted the way of setting detecting area, that is, in the video image just set the part of the detection area, it will ensure the accuracy of detection to improve the operation speed of the system.

The reported average annual daily traffic volumes on selected Interstate highways are given in Exhibit 8-18. Most of these high-volume freeways are found in the largest metropolitan areas. Daily traffic volumes on these heavily used highways exceed200, 000 veh/day. Exhibit 8-19 contains a sample of the maximum reported hourly one-way volumes and the average volumes per lane on rural and urban freeways in the United States. Most volumes in this table exceed 2,000 veh/ h/ln, with several freeways featuring average lane volumes of more than 2,400 veh/ h/ln. The highest reported lane volumes on selected freeways are given in Exhibit 8-20.Freeway capacity analysis procedures of this manual use a rate of flow of 2,400pc/h/ln for freeways with free-flow speeds of 70 to 75 mi/h and 2,300 pc /h/ln for freeways with free-flow speeds of 65 mi/h as the capacity under base conditions. Exhibit 8-19 contains observations of values higher than this standard, but these are the maximums reported on a given freeway and are not expected to be achieved on most other freeway segments [11].

Two-lane, two-way rural highways in the United States and Canada rarely operate at volumes approaching capacity, and thus the observation of capacity operations for such highways in the field is difficult. A sampling of high-volume observations is given in Exhibit 8-22, but it is emphasized that none may be taken to represent capacity for the facilities shown. Observations on two-lane, two-way rural highways in Europe have been reported at far higher volumes. Volumes of more than 2, 700 veh per hour have been observed in Denmark, more than 2,800 in France, more than 3,000 in Japan, and more than 2,450 in Norway. Some of these volumes have contained significant numbers of trucks, some as high as 30 percent of the traffic stream.

4.4 Analysis of the Queuing Theory Model

(1)In different lanes ,the flow is different ,the type of the car is different ,and the flow is changing all the time;

(2)When cars overtaking ,they need change the lane and will back to the previous lane after they do it, it will waste much time and effect the maximum traffic capacity ; (3)If it is light traffic ,we should limit the minimum speed .

4.5 Verification and Improvement of the Model

In this question ,under the light traffic condition ,the right lane will be crowded,we decided to use the queuing theory to solve this problem .Queuing is the normal phenomenon in our lives and it requires the number of service is larger than the capacity of service system. In this question, that is, arrival customer cannot get service im mediately, so they should queue. The line?s busy in telephone station ,bus station ,wharfs and other transportation junctions ?crowd ,and broken machines, all of them problems ?solving are about queuing phenomenon . This picture is a schematic diagram of our experiment:

Schematic diagram of queuing theory

According to the light traffic model ,the flow in middle and inner lane account for 90% among all lanes ,in test 1,in order to ensure cars get though the cross section at exit ,all crowded cars need to change the lanes once or twice,the twice one account for 35%among them, except the waste time ,the deceleration and cars ?waiting time will rise up . Except flow ,different type of cars is one of the reasons which make the difference of the highway real transportation capacity ,according to the ―The Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule‖ ,the speed is increasing in outside lane ,middle lane and inner lane .Though the model we established, wecan analysis that the rule can help improve the flow under light traffic situation. As for the security, just think that if drivers drive cars casually without a rule, the accident will be increasing definitely.

4.6Further Discussion about Flow and Rate

In order to seeing the influence of ―The Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule ‖ clearly ,adopted the ― floating car method ‖record the flow at a specific distance in a street. The method has two parts :(1) using float car to record the speed and time, the float car drives as fast as the car flow, this method need not accuracy equipment, so we cannot get the accuracy information either .This method can also be divided into two parts: people in the car record the speed and time or using the speed indicator;(2)This method can record speed and flow at the same time ,it is suitable in the fluent street and the highway without automatic testing instrument . This method

is based on observation cars drive on the road back and forth, the equations are as follows:

q ()/()x y t t αω=++ (10) /t t y q ω=-

(11)

/s u l t = (12)

Fix the time before testing ,the car should drive depends this time ,it allows stop at the side of the road .According to the national urban transport committee ,at the main road 19min/km ,at second road 6min/km ,it usually allows return and back 12~16times ,then we can get the result .Additional, the turn of the vehicle will affect the result, so, in this survey we should avoid the main entrance and exit.

5. Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule in Heavy Traffic

5.1Backgrounds

In heavy traffic, through careful observation and experiments, we can find that if we limit cars in a certain section of the road, then the high density of traffic can reduce the speed of the car. So from this we can know that in high traffic, The Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule cannot greater promote the traffic flow. However, this is just a intuitionistic and shallow conclusion that we got according to our daily experience. So we need further scientific experiments to prove that and get a reliable conclusion. The following picture shows the performance of The Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule. In heavy traffic, all the lanes may be occupied by cars, so even the cars in the left lanes have to follow this rule, in other words, the drivers are trying to drive into the right lane.

Picture3 the performance of The Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule

At the same time, in heavy traffic, we need to limit the speed of cars to ensure the safety. We know that the condition of the road is more complex than in light traffic, so if we was asked to follow the Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule all the time (regardless of the road condition), then the probability of traffic jam will rise, and it will also influence the safety. In order to solve this problem deeply and precisely, we should develop an appropriate mathematical model to show the performance of The Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule, and compare the traffic flow with safety.

5.2 Tradeoffs between Traffic Flow and Safety

5.2.1 Backgrounds

In 1967, GWYnn first began to study the relationship between traffic flow and safety. He studied the relationship between traffic accidents and traffic flow (per hour) when he evaluated the safety of the four-lane road in New Jersey. He believed that when, the traffic volume is small, the accident rate is high; however, when the traffic volume reaches a certain value, it will get the lowest casualty ratio of accident. In other words, the relationship between accident rate and traffic flow can be shown as a U-bend. Following GWYnn.Ceder(1982), Franrzeskaki(1987), Pendelton(1989) and Martin(2002)made further studies of the issue and enhance the conclusion. Cederetal(1982)and Martin (2002)have studied the relationship between traffic accidents (single car accident and multi vehicle accident) and traffic flow (per hour), and proved that the relationship between them can also be shown as a U-bend. Figure 1.1 shows the relationship between them. In single car accident, traffic volume is smaller, accident rat is higher. And with the increase of traffic volume, the accident rate reduces gradually.

Picture4

Garber and Golob T. F(2001) studied relationships among traffic accidents, the state of traffic flow, weather condition and lighting condition. In different condition of weather and lighting, they divided into traffic flow parameters into speed, speed difference, flow and flow difference, and analyze them in different kind of combinations, and provided theoretical basis for the daily safety management of highway.

Nicholas J.,Garber and Angeka A.Ehrhart studied the relationship among speed, traffic flow, the shape of the lane and different kind of traffic accidents, and developed different kinds of models in different traffic flow. They proved that with the increase of the speed discretely, the accident rate will always rise in any

conditions of traffic flow. And the influence of traffic flow and average speed on accident rate will change according to the change of lane types.

Canadian scientist Dominique Lord et al. (2005) got the relationship between traffic accident and traffic density as well as V/C. They are showed in Figure 1.2.Cirillstudied the condition of highway and rural way in both daytime and night. He proved the conclusion of Solomon, and perfected the curve which showed the relationship between speed discrete size and accident rate. It is showed in figure 1.3.Through the picture, we can see that when the accident rate is lowest, the speed discrete size is bigger than 0 km/h,the speed become biger, the discrete accident rate become higher.

Picture 1.4 showed that,the accident rate increases with the increase of speed standard deviation. We can ignore the time error, when the number of the overtaking is small. But when the number of the overtaking increase, the time error will play a more important role on it. At the same time, the speed of cars will be reduced, and safety will become lower correspondingly[11], so the keep-right rule is far from suitable in this condition.

5.5 Models

5.5.1Analusis of the Initial Model

Queuing Theory is also called the theory of random service system,and is designed to solved this kind of problems. We mainly using queuing theory to get the Preliminary statistics and inference of inward and outward flow, the length of the queues and waiting time in trial section. Later, when we describe the performance of the Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule light and heavy traffic, we used SPSS software to analyze the two sets of data and find the significant difference between them, at last, we explain the difference by using Queuing Theory.

In the study of the road performance in high traffic,we find that the effect of the Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule is not significant. So a new program (based on the

initial model) must be put forward to solve the problem. Our final target is to develop a suitable model to greater promote traffic flow and safety.

Picture 5

5.5.2 Cellular Automation Theory (CA)

(1)Definition

A:Cellular Automation Theory is a kind of dynamical system which space and time are all discrete.

B:Each cell that spreads in Lattice Grid has a limited discrete state, following a same reaction rules and occurring synchronous renewal according the same partial rule. A large number of cell through simple interaction, constituting the evolution of the dynamic system.

C:The characteristics of the CA model: time, space, status are all scattered, each variable has limited multiple states, at the same time the rules of the state change in time and space are partial. It is composed of a series of rules which used to make model construction. As long as the models meet these rules then they can be called automata model. Therefore, Cellular Automata is a general designation of a kind of model, or a framework of a method.

(2)The neighbor of Cellular and boundary conditions

A: Boundary conditions

Theoretically,the space of the cellular can be expended infinitely, and this is good for studies and inference, the in practice, we cannot realize the ideal condition. So, to sum up, there are three kinds of boundary conditions-- Periodic Boundary, Constant Boundary and Reflective Boundary). Something that needs to be particularly point out is that in practice, we can combined the three kinds of Boundary conditions together. For example, in the two-dimensional space, the Upper and Lower boundaries usd Reflective Boundary, and the Right and Left boundaries use Periodic Boundary. The Cellular is far from neighbor only shows the Static components. In order to introduce dynamic into the system, the evolution rules must be added. In Cellular Automation, these rules are define d in partial space, that is to say, at next period of time a Cellar‘s state can determine its own state and the state of the neighboring Cellular. See the following picture:

全国数学建模竞赛一等奖论文

交巡警服务平台的设置与调度 摘要 由于警务资源有限,需要根据城市的实际情况与需求建立数学模型来合理地确定交巡警服务平台数目与位置、分配各平台的管辖范围、调度警务资源。设置平台的基本原则是尽量使平台出警次数均衡,缩短出警时间。用出警次数标准差衡量其均衡性,平台与节点的最短路衡量出警时间。 对问题一,首先以出警时间最短和出警次数尽量均衡为约束条件,利用无向图上任意两点最短路径模型得到平台管辖范围,并运用上下界网络流模型优化解,得到A区平台管辖范围分配方案。发现有6个路口不能在3分钟内被任意平台到达,最长出警时间为5.7分钟。 其次,利用二分图的完美匹配模型得出20个平台封锁13个路口的最佳调度方案,要完全封锁13个路口最快需要8.0分钟。 最后,以平台出警次数均衡和出警时间长短为指标对方案优劣进行评价。建立基于不同权重的平台调整评价模型,以对出警次数均衡的权重u和对最远出警距离的权重v 为参数,得到最优的增加平台方案。此模型可根据实际需求任意设定权重参数和平台增数,由此得到增加的平台位置,权重参数可反映不同的实际情况和需求。如确定增加4个平台,令u=0.6,v=0.4,则增加的平台位置位于21、27、46、64号节点处。 对问题二,首先利用各区平台出警次数的标准差和各区节点的超距比例分析评价六区现有方案的合理性,利用模糊加权分析模型以城区的面积、人口、总发案次数为因素来确定平台增加或改变数目。得出B、C区各需改变2个平台的位置,新方案与现状比较,表明新方案比现状更合理。D、E、F区分别需新增4、2、2个平台。利用问题一的基于不同权重的平台调整评价模型确定改变或新增平台的位置。 其次,先利用二分图的完美匹配模型给出80个平台对17个出入口的最优围堵方案,最长出警时间12.7分钟。在保证能够成功围堵的前提下,若考虑节省警力资源,分析全市六区交通网络与平台设置的特点,我们给出了分阶段围堵方案,方案由三阶段构成。最多需调动三组警力,前后总共需要29.2分钟可将全市路口完全封锁。此方案在保证成功围堵嫌疑人的前提下,若在前面阶段堵到罪犯,则可以减少警力资源调度,节省资源。 【关键字】:不同权重的平台调整评价模糊加权分析最短路二分图匹配

数学建模优秀论文设计模版

承诺书 我们仔细阅读了中国大学生数学建模竞赛的竞赛规则. 我们完全明白,在竞赛开始后参赛队员不能以任何方式(包括、电子、网上咨询等)与队外的任何人(包括指导教师)研究、讨论与赛题有关的问题。 我们知道,抄袭别人的成果是违反竞赛规则的, 如果引用别人的成果或其他公开的 资料(包括网上查到的资料),必须按照规定的参考文献的表述方式在正文引用处和参 考文献中明确列出。 我们重承诺,严格遵守竞赛规则,以保证竞赛的公正、公平性。如有违反竞赛规则 的行为,我们将受到严肃处理。 我们授权全国大学生数学建模竞赛组委会,可将我们的论文以任何形式进行公开展 示(包括进行网上公示,在书籍、期刊和其他媒体进行正式或非正式发表等)。 我们参赛选择的题号是(从A/B/C/D中选择一项填写): 我们的参赛报名号为(如果赛区设置报名号的话): 所属学校(请填写完整的全名): 参赛队员 (打印并签名) :1. 2. 3. 指导教师或指导教师组负责人 (打印并签名): 日期:年月日赛区评阅编号(由赛区组委会评阅前进行编号):

编号专用页 赛区评阅编号(由赛区组委会评阅前进行编号): 全国统一编号(由赛区组委会送交全国前编号):全国评阅编号(由全国组委会评阅前进行编号):

题目(黑体不加粗三号居中) 摘要(黑体不加粗四号居中) (摘要正文小4号,写法如下) (第1段)首先简要叙述所给问题的意义和要求,并分别分析每个小问题的特点(以下以三个问题为例)。根据这些特点对问题 1 用······的方法解决;对问题 2 用······的方法解决;对问题3 用······的方法解决。 (第2段)对于问题1,用······数学中的······首先建立了······ 模型I。在对······模型改进的基础上建立了······模型II。对模型进行了合理的理论证明和推导,所给出的理论证明结果大约为······,然后借助于······数学算法和······软件,对附件中所提供的数据进行了筛选,去除异常数据,对残缺数据进行适当补充,并从中随机抽取了3 组数据(每组8 个采样)对理论结果进行了数据模拟,结果显示,理论结果与数据模拟结果吻合。(方法、软件、结果都必须清晰描述,可以独立成段,不建议使用表格) (第3段)对于问题2用······ (第4段)对于问题3用······ 如果题目单问题,则至少要给出2种模型,分别给出模型的名称、思想、软 件、结果、亮点详细说明。并且一定要在摘要对两个或两个以上模型进行比较, 优势较大的放后面,这两个(模型)一定要有具体结果。 (第5段)如果在……条件下,模型可以进行适当修改,这种条件的改变可能来自你的一种猜想或建议。要注意合理性。此推广模型可以不深入研究,也可以没有具体结果。 关键词:本文使用到的模型名称、方法名称、特别是亮点一定要在关键字里出现,5~7个较合适。 注:字数700-1000 之间;摘要中必须将具体方法、结果写出来;摘要写满几乎 一页,不要超过一页。摘要是重中之重,必须严格执行!。 页码:1(底居中)

数学建模及全国历年竞赛题目

数学建模及全国历年竞赛题目 (2010-09-28 21:58:01) 标签: 分类:专业教学 数学建模 应用数学模型 教育 一、数学建模的涵 (一)数学建模的概念 数学建模是一种数学的思考方法,是运用数学的语言和方法,通过抽象、简化建立能近似刻画并"解决"实际问题的一种强有力的数学手段。使用数学语言描述的事物就称为数学模型,这个建立数学模型的全过程就称为数学建模。(二)应用数学模型 应用数学去解决各类实际问题,把错综复杂的实际问题简化、抽象为合理的数学结构。通过调查、收集数据资料,观察和研究实际对象的固有特征和在规律,抓住问题的主要矛盾,建立起反映实际问题的数量关系,然后利用数学的理论和方法去分析和解决问题。需要诸如数理统计、最优化、图论、微分方程、计算方法、神经网络、层次分析法、模糊数学,数学软件包如 Mathematica,Matlab,Lingo,Spss,Mapple的使用,甚至排版软件等知识的基础。

(三)数学建模的特点 数学建模具有难度大、涉及面广、形式灵活,对教师和学生要求高等特点;数学建模的教学本身是一个不断探索、不断创新、不断完善和提高的过程。(四)数学建模的指导思想 数学建模的指导思想就是:以实验室为基础、以学生为中心、以问题为主线、以培养能力为目标来组织教学工作。 (五)数学建模的意义 数学建模是联系数学与实际问题的桥梁,是数学在各个领械广泛应用的媒介,是数学科学技术转化的主要途径。通过教学使学生了解利用数学理论和方法去分析和解决问题的全过程,提高他们分析问题和解决问题的能力;提高他们学习数学的兴趣和应用数学的意识与能力,使他们在以后的工作中能经常性地想到用数学去解决问题,提高他们尽量利用计算机软件及当代高新科技成果的意识,能将数学、计算机有机地结合起来去解决实际问题。 1.培养创新意识和创造能力; 2.训练快速获取信息和资料的能力; 3.锻炼快速了解和掌握新知识的技能; 4.培养团队合作意识和团队合作精神; 5.增强写作技能和排版技术;

数学建模国家一等奖优秀论文

2014高教社杯全国大学生数学建模竞赛 承诺书 我们仔细阅读了《全国大学生数学建模竞赛章程》和《全国大学生数学建模竞赛参赛规则》(以下简称为“竞赛章程和参赛规则”,可从全国大学生数学建模竞赛网站下载)。 我们完全明白,在竞赛开始后参赛队员不能以任何方式(包括电话、电子邮件、网上咨询等)与队外的任何人(包括指导教师)研究、讨论与赛题有关的问题。 我们知道,抄袭别人的成果是违反竞赛章程和参赛规则的,如果引用别人的成果或其他公开的资料(包括网上查到的资料),必须按照规定的参考文献的表述方式在正文引用处和参考文献中明确列出。 我们郑重承诺,严格遵守竞赛章程和参赛规则,以保证竞赛的公正、公平性。如有违反竞赛章程和参赛规则的行为,我们将受到严肃处理。 我们授权全国大学生数学建模竞赛组委会,可将我们的论文以任何形式进行公开展示(包括进行网上公示,在书籍、期刊和其他媒体进行正式或非正式发表等)。 我们参赛选择的题号是(从A/B/C/D中选择一项填写):B 我们的报名参赛队号为(8位数字组成的编号): 所属学校(请填写完整的全名): 参赛队员(打印并签名) :1. 2. 3.

指导教师或指导教师组负责人(打印并签名): ?(论文纸质版与电子版中的以上信息必须一致,只是电子版中无需签名。以上内容请仔细核对,提交后将不再允许做任何修改。如填写错误,论文可能被取消评奖资格。) 日期: 2014 年 9 月15日 赛区评阅编号(由赛区组委会评阅前进行编号):

2014高教社杯全国大学生数学建模竞赛 编号专用页 赛区评阅编号(由赛区组委会评阅前进行编号):赛区评阅记录(可供赛区评阅时使用):

2013全国数学建模大赛a题优秀论文

车道被占用对城市道路通行能力的影响 摘要 随着城市化进程加快,城市车辆数的增加,致使道路的占用现象日益严重,同时也导致了更多交通事故的发生。而交通事故发生过程中,路边停车、占道施工、交通流密增大等因素直接导致车道被占用,进而影响了城市道路的通行能力。本文在视频提供的背景下通过数据采集,利用数据插值拟合、差异对比、车流波动理论等对这一影响进行了分析,具体如下: 针对问题一,首先根据视频1中交通事故前后道路通行情况的变化过程运用物理观察测量类比法、数学控制变量法提取描述变量(如事故横断面处的车流量、车流速度以及车流密度)的数据,从而通过研究各变量的变化,来分析其对通行能力的影响。而视频1中有一些时间断层,我们可根据现有的数据先用统计回归对各变量数据插值后再进行拟合,拟合过程中利用残差计算值的大小来选择较好的模型来反应各变量与事故持续时间的关系,进而更好地说明事故发生至撤离期间,事故所处横断面实际通行能力的变化过程。 针对问题二:沿用问题一中的方法,对视频2中影响通行能力的各个变量进行数据采集,同样使用matlab对时间断层处进行插值拟合处理,再将所得到的的变化图像与题一中各变量的变化趋势进行对比分析,其中考虑到两视频的时间段与两视频的事故时长不同,从而采用多种对比方式(如以事故发生前、中、后三时段比较差值、以事故相同持续时间进行对比、以整个事故时间段按比例分配时间进行对比)来更好地说明这一差异。由于小区口的位置不同、时间段是否处于车流高峰期以及1、2、3道车流比例不同等因素的影响,采用不同的数据采集方式使采集的变量数据的实用性更强,从而最后得到视频1中的道路被占用影响程度高于视频2中的影响程度,再者从差异图像的变化波动中得到验证,使其合理性更强。 针对问题三:运用问题1、2中三个变量与持续时间的关系作为纽带,再根据附件5中的信号相位确定出车流量的测量周期为一分钟,测量出上游车流量随时间的变化情况,而事故横断面实际通行能力与持续时间的关系已在1、2问中由拟合得到,所以再根据波动理论预测道路异常下车辆长度模型的结论,结合采集数据得到的函数关系建立数学模型,最后得出事故发生后,车辆排队长度与事故横断面实际通行能力、事故持续时间以及路段上游车流量这三者之间的关系式。 针对问题四:在问题3建立的模型下,利用问题4中提供的变量数据推导出其它相关变量值,然后代入模型,估算出时间长度,以此检验模型的操作性及可靠性。 关键词:通行能力车流波动理论车流量车流速度车流密度

全国大学生数学建模竞赛论文模板

2009高教社杯全国大学生数学建模竞赛 承诺书 我们仔细阅读了中国大学生数学建模竞赛的竞赛规则. 我们完全明白,在竞赛开始后参赛队员不能以任何方式(包括电话、电子邮件、网上咨询等)与队外的任何人(包括指导教师)研究、讨论与赛题有关的问题。 我们知道,抄袭别人的成果是违反竞赛规则的, 如果引用别人的成果或其他公开的资料(包括网上查到的资料),必须按照规定的参考文献的表述方式在正文引用处和参考文献中明确列出。 我们郑重承诺,严格遵守竞赛规则,以保证竞赛的公正、公平性。如有违反竞赛规则的行为,我们将受到严肃处理。 我们参赛选择的题号是(从A/B/C/D中选择一项填 写): 我们的参赛报名号为(如果赛区设置报名号的 话): 所属学校(请填写完整的全 名): 参赛队员 (打印并签名) : 1. 2.

3. 指导教师或指导教师组负责人 (打印并签名):指导教师组 日期:年月日 赛区评阅编号(由赛区组委会评阅前进行编号): 2009高教社杯全国大学生数学建模竞赛 编号专用页 赛区评阅编号(由赛区组委会评阅前进行编号): 赛区评阅记录(可供赛区评阅时使用):

全国统一编号(由赛区组委会送交全国前编号): 全国评阅编号(由全国组委会评阅前进行编号): 论文标题 摘要 摘要是论文内容不加注释和评论的简短陈述,其作用是使读者不阅读论文全文即能获得必要的信息。 一般说来,摘要应包含以下五个方面的内容: ①研究的主要问题; ②建立的什么模型; ③用的什么求解方法; ④主要结果(简单、主要的); ⑤自我评价和推广。

摘要中不要有关键字和数学表达式。 数学建模竞赛章程规定,对竞赛论文的评价应以: ①假设的合理性 ②建模的创造性 ③结果的正确性 ④文字表述的清晰性 为主要标准。 所以论文中应努力反映出这些特点。 注意:整个版式要完全按照《全国大学生数学建模竞赛论文格式规范》的要求书写,否则无法送全国评奖。 一、问题的重述 数学建模竞赛要求解决给定的问题,所以一般应以“问题的重述”开始。 此部分的目的是要吸引读者读下去,所以文字不可冗长,内容选择不要过于分散、琐碎,措辞要精练。 这部分的内容是将原问题进行整理,将已知和问题明确化即可。 注意: 在写这部分的内容时,绝对不可照抄原题!

数学建模经验谈

数学建模个人经验谈 1国赛和美赛 要在全国赛中取得好成绩经验第一,运气第二,实力第三,这种说法是功利了点但是在现在中国这种科研浮躁的大环境中要在全国赛中取得好成绩经验是首要的。不说明美赛中经验不重要,在美赛中经验也是首位的,但是较之全国赛就差的远多这是由于两种比赛的不同性质造成的。全国赛注重\稳",与参考答案越接近,文章就可以有好成绩了,美赛则注重\活",只要有道理,有思想就会有不错的成绩,这体现了两个国家的教育现状,这个就不扯开去了。 在数模竞赛中经验会告诉我们该怎么选题,怎么安排时间,怎么控制进度,知道么是最重要的,该怎么写论文......,或许有人会认为选题也需要经验吗?经过参多次比赛后觉的是有技巧的,选个好题成功的机会就大的多,选题不能一味的根据的兴趣或能力去选,还要和全体参赛队互动下(这个开玩笑了,不大容易做到,只在极小的范围内做到),分析下选这个题的利弊后决定选哪个题,这里面道道也不后面会详细的展开谈谈。 2组队和分工 数学建模竞赛是三个人的活动,参加竞赛首要是要组队,而怎么样组队是有讲究的。此外还需要分工等等。一般的组队情况是和同学组队,很多情况是三个人都是系,同一专业以及一个班的,这样的组队是不合理的。让三人一组参赛一是为了培作精神,其实更为重要的原因是这项工作需要多人合作,因为人不是万能的,掌握不是全面的,当然不排除有这样的牛人存在,事实上也是存在的,什么都会,竞赛一个人独立搞定。但既然允许三个人组队,有人帮忙总是好的,至少不会太累。而人同系同专业甚至同班的话大家的专业知识一样,如果碰上专业知识以外的背景那较麻烦的。所以如果是不同专业组队则有利的多。 众所周知,数学建模特别需要数学和计算机的能力,所以在组队的时候需要优先虑队中有这方面才能的人,根据现在的大学专业培养信息与计算科学,应用数学专较为有利,尤其是信息与计算科学可以说是数学和计算机专业的结合,两方面都有顾,虽然说这个专业的出路不是很好,数学和计算机都涉及点但是都没有真正的学两门专业的,但对于弄数学建模来说是再合适不过了。应用数学则偏重于数,但是来讲玩计算机的时间不会太少,尤其是在科学计算和程序设计都会设计到比较多,深厚的数学功底,也是很不错的选择。 有不少的人会认为第一人选是数学方面的那第二人选就应该考虑计算机了,因为计算机的会程序,其实这个概念可以说是对也可以说是不对的。之所以需要计算机

数学建模知识竞赛题库

数学建模知识竞赛题库 1.请问计算机中的二进制源于我国古代的哪部经典? D A.《墨经》 B.《诗经》 C.《周书》 D.《周易》 2.世界上面积最大的高原是?D A.青藏高原 B.帕米尔高原 C.黄土高原 D.巴西高原 3.我国海洋国土面积约有多少万平方公里? B A.200 B.300 C.280 D.340 4.世界上面值最高的邮票是匈牙利五百亿彭哥,它的图案是B A.猫 B.飞鸽 C.海鸥 D.鹰 5. 龙虾是我们的一种美食、你知道它体内的血是什么颜色的吗?B A.红色 B.蓝色 C.灰色 D.绿色 6.MATLAB使用三维向量[R G B]来表示一种颜色,则黑色为(D ) A. [1 0 1] B. [1 1 1] C. [0 0 1] D. [0 0 0] 7.秦始皇之后,有几个朝代对长城进行了修葺? A A.7个 B.8个 C.9个 D.10个 8.中国历史上历时最长的朝代是?A A.周朝 B.汉朝 C.唐朝 D.宋朝 9我国第一个获得世界冠军的是谁?C A 吴传玉 B 郑凤荣 C 荣国团 D 陈镜开 10.我国最早在奥运会上获得金牌的是哪位运动员?B A.李宁 B.许海峰 C.高凤莲 D.吴佳怩

11.围棋共有多少个棋子?B A.360 B.361 C.362 D.365 12下列属于物理模型的是:A A水箱中的舰艇 B分子结构图 C火箭模型 D电路图 13名言:生命在于运动是谁说的?C A.车尔尼夫斯基 B.普希金 C.伏尔泰 D.契诃夫 14.饱食后不宜剧烈运动是因为B A.会得阑尾炎 B.有障消化 C.导致神经衰弱 D.呕吐 15、MATLAB软件中,把二维矩阵按一维方式寻址时的寻址访问是按(B)优先的。 A.行 B.列 C.对角线 D.左上角16红军长征中,哪次战役最突出反应毛泽东的军事思想和指挥才?A A.四渡赤水B.抢渡大渡河C.飞夺泸定桥D.直罗镇战役 17色盲患者最普遍的不易分辨的颜色是什么?A A.红绿 B.蓝绿 C.红蓝 D.绿蓝 18下列哪种症状是没有理由遗传的? A.精神分裂症 B.近视 C.糖尿病 D.口吃 19下面哪个变量是正无穷大变量?(A )

全国数模竞赛优秀论文

一、基础知识 1.1 常见数学函数 如:输入x=[-4.85 -2.3 -0.2 1.3 4.56 6.75],则: ceil(x)= -4 -2 0 2 5 7 fix(x) = -4 -2 0 1 4 6 floor(x) = -5 -3 -1 1 4 6 round(x) = -5 -2 0 1 5 7 1.2 系统的在线帮助 1 help 命令: 1.当不知系统有何帮助内容时,可直接输入help以寻求帮助: >>help(回车) 2.当想了解某一主题的内容时,如输入: >> help syntax(了解Matlab的语法规定) 3.当想了解某一具体的函数或命令的帮助信息时,如输入: >> help sqrt (了解函数sqrt的相关信息)

2 lookfor命令 现需要完成某一具体操作,不知有何命令或函数可以完成,如输入: >> lookfor line (查找与直线、线性问题有关的函数) 1.3 常量与变量 系统的变量命名规则:变量名区分字母大小写;变量名必须以字母打头,其后可以是任意字母,数字,或下划线的组合。此外,系统内部预先定义了几个有特殊意 1 数值型向量(矩阵)的输入 1.任何矩阵(向量),可以直接按行方式 ...输入每个元素:同一行中的元素用逗号(,)或者用空格符来分隔;行与行之间用分号(;)分隔。所有元素处于一方括号([ ])内; 例1: >> Time = [11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10] >> X_Data = [2.32 3.43;4.37 5.98] 2 上面函数的具体用法,可以用帮助命令help得到。如:meshgrid(x,y) 输入x=[1 2 3 4]; y=[1 0 5]; [X,Y]=meshgrid(x, y),则 X = Y =

美国大学生数学建模竞赛优秀论文翻译

优化和评价的收费亭的数量 景区简介 由於公路出来的第一千九百三十,至今发展十分迅速在全世界逐渐成为骨架的运输系统,以其高速度,承载能力大,运输成本低,具有吸引力的旅游方便,减少交通堵塞。以下的快速传播的公路,相应的管理收费站设置支付和公路条件的改善公路和收费广场。 然而,随着越来越多的人口密度和产业基地,公路如花园州公园大道的经验严重交通挤塞收费广场在高峰时间。事实上,这是共同经历长时间的延误甚至在非赶这两小时收费广场。 在进入收费广场的车流量,球迷的较大的收费亭的数量,而当离开收费广场,川流不息的车辆需挤缩到的车道数的数量相等的车道收费广场前。因此,当交通繁忙时,拥堵现象发生在从收费广场。当交通非常拥挤,阻塞也会在进入收费广场因为所需要的时间为每个车辆付通行费。 因此,这是可取的,以尽量减少车辆烦恼限制数额收费广场引起的交通混乱。良好的设计,这些系统可以产生重大影响的有效利用的基础设施,并有助于提高居民的生活水平。通常,一个更大的收费亭的数量提供的数量比进入收费广场的道路。 事实上,高速公路收费广场和停车场出入口广场构成了一个独特的类型的运输系统,需要具体分析时,试图了解他们的工作和他们之间的互动与其他巷道组成部分。一方面,这些设施是一个最有效的手段收集用户收费或者停车服务或对道路,桥梁,隧道。另一方面,收费广场产生不利影响的吞吐量或设施的服务能力。收费广场的不利影响是特别明显时,通常是重交通。 其目标模式是保证收费广场可以处理交通流没有任何问题。车辆安全通行费广场也是一个重要的问题,如无障碍的收费广场。封锁交通流应尽量避免。 模型的目标是确定最优的收费亭的数量的基础上进行合理的优化准则。 主要原因是拥挤的

数学建模竞赛论文模板

数码相机定位模型(题目) 摘要 此处为摘要正文 一定要写好。主要写三个方面: 1. 解决什么问题(一句话) 2. 采取什么方法(引起阅卷老师的注意,不能太粗,也不能太细) 3. 得到什么结果(简明扼要、生动、公式要简单、必要时可采用小图表) 关键词:差分近似,误差补偿算法,Simpson积分公式3-5关键词即可

目录 1.问题重述..........................................................................................................................错误!未定义书签。 2.模型假设..........................................................................................................................错误!未定义书签。 3.符号说明..........................................................................................................................错误!未定义书签。…………………………… 说明:目录页可以没有,如果内容比较多,可以有目录页

一问题重述 二问题分析 三模型假定 四问题分析 五模型建立与求解

六模型检验 七模型评价 八模型推广结合社会实际问题

九参考文献 [1] 吕显瑞等,数学建模竞赛辅导教材,长春:吉林大学出版社,2002。 [2] 刘来福,曾文艺,数学模型与数学建模北京:北京师范大学出版社,1997。 [3] 陈如栋,于延荣,数学模型与数学建模,北京:国防工业出版社,2006。 [4] 姜启源,谢金星,叶俊,数学模型(第三版),北京:高等教育出版社,2003。 [5] 梁炼,数学建模。华东理工大学大学出版社 2005.3。 [6] 周义仓,赫孝良,西安交通大学出版社,1998.8。 [7] 邓俊辉译,计算几何-算法与应用(第二版)北京:清华大学出版社,2005.9。 [8] 刘卫国,MATLAB程序设计教程,北京:中国水电水利出版社,2005。 [9] 熊慧,论人口预测对上海市未来十年人口总数的预测,人口研究,28(1):88-90,2003。 [10] 2003年国民经济和社会发展统计公报,https://www.360docs.net/doc/056866442.html,。2008年9月20日。

全国数学建模大赛题目

2010高教社杯全国大学生数学建模竞赛题目 A题储油罐的变位识别与罐容表标定 通常加油站都有若干个储存燃油的地下储油罐,并且一般都有与之配套的“油位计量管理系统”,采用流量计和油位计来测量进/出油量与罐内油位高度等数据,通过预先标定的罐容表(即罐内油位高度与储油量的对应关系)进行实时计算,以得到罐内油位高度和储油量的变化情况。 许多储油罐在使用一段时间后,由于地基变形等原因,使罐体的位置会发生纵向倾斜和横向偏转等变化(以下称为变位),从而导致罐容表发生改变。按照有关规定,需要定期对罐容表进行重新标定。图1是一种典型的储油罐尺寸及形状示意图,其主体为圆柱体,两端为球冠体。图2是其罐体纵向倾斜变位的示意图,图3是罐体横向偏转变位的截面示意图。 请你们用数学建模方法研究解决储油罐的变位识别与罐容表标定的问题。 (1)为了掌握罐体变位后对罐容表的影响,利用如图4的小椭圆型储油罐(两端平头的椭圆柱体),分别对罐体无变位和倾斜角为α=4.10的纵向变位两种情况做了实验,实验数据如附件1所示。请建立数学模型研究罐体变位后对罐容表的影响,并给出罐体变位后油位高度间隔为1cm的罐容表标定值。 (2)对于图1所示的实际储油罐,试建立罐体变位后标定罐容表的数学模型,即罐内储油量与油位高度及变位参数(纵向倾斜角度α和横向偏转角度β)之间的一般关系。请利用罐体变位后在进/出油过程中的实际检测数据(附件2),根据你们所建立的数学模型确定变位参数,并给出罐体变位后油位高度间隔为10cm的罐容表标定值。进一步利用附件2中的实际检测数据来分析检验你们模型的正确性与方法的可靠性。 附件1:小椭圆储油罐的实验数据 附件2:实际储油罐的检测数据 地平线油位探针

数学建模论文格式官方要求

二、论文格式规范 (一)“论文首页”编写 竞赛论文首页为“编号页”,只包含队号、队员姓名、学校名信息,第二页起为摘要页和正文页。参赛队有关信息不得出现于首页以外的任何一页,包括摘要页,否则视为违规。 (二)“论文摘要页”编写 竞赛使用“统一摘要面”。为了保证评审质量,提请参赛研究生注意摘要一定要将论文创新点、主要想法、做法、结果、分析结论表达清楚,如果一页纸不够,摘要可以写成两页。

(三)“论文文本”要求————“全国研究生数学建模竞赛论文 格式规范” ●每个参赛队可以从A、B、C、D、E题中任选一题完成论文。(赛题类型以 比赛下载为准) ●论文用白色A4版面;上下左右各留出至少2.5厘米的页边距;从左侧装订。 ●论文题目和摘要写在论文封面上,封面页的下一页开始论文正文。 ●论文从编号页开始编写页码,页码必须位于每页页脚中部,用阿拉伯数字从 “1 ”开始连续编号。 ●论文不能有页眉,论文中不能有任何可能显示答题人身份的标志。 ●论文题目用三号黑体字、一级标题用四号黑体字,并居中。论文中其他汉字 一律采用小四号宋体字,行距用单倍行距。程序执行文件,和源程序一起附在电子版论文中以备检查。 ●请大家注意:摘要应该是一份简明扼要的详细摘要(包括关键词),请认真 书写(注意篇幅一般不超过两页,且无需译成英文)。全国评阅时对摘要和论文都会审阅。 ●引用别人的成果或其他公开的资料(包括网上甚至在“博客”上查到的资料) 必须按照规定的参考文献的表述方式在正文引用处和参考文献中明确列出。 正文引用处用方括号标示参考文献的编号,如[1][3]等;引用书籍还必须指出页码。参考文献按正文中的引用次序列出,其中书籍的表述方式为:[编号] 作者,书名,出版地:出版社,出版年。 参考文献中期刊杂志论文的表述方式为: [编号] 作者,论文名,杂志名,卷期号:起止页码,出版年。 参考文献中网上资源的表述方式为: [编号] 作者,资源标题,网址,访问时间(年月日)。 全国研究生数学建模竞赛评审委员会 2011年9月20日修订

1996年全国大学生数学建模竞赛题目A题最优捕鱼策略B题节水

1996年全国大学生数学建模竞赛题目...................................................................... 错误!未定义书签。 A题最优捕鱼策略.............................................................................................. 错误!未定义书签。 B题节水洗衣机................................................................................................ 错误!未定义书签。1997年全国大学生数学建模竞赛题目...................................................................... 错误!未定义书签。 A题零件的参数设计........................................................................................ 错误!未定义书签。 B题截断切割.................................................................................................... 错误!未定义书签。1998年全国大学生数学建模竞赛题目...................................................................... 错误!未定义书签。 A题投资的收益和风险...................................................................................... 错误!未定义书签。 B题灾情巡视路线.............................................................................................. 错误!未定义书签。1999创维杯全国大学生数学建模竞赛题目.............................................................. 错误!未定义书签。 A题自动化车床管理.......................................................................................... 错误!未定义书签。 B题钻井布局...................................................................................................... 错误!未定义书签。 C题煤矸石堆积.................................................................................................. 错误!未定义书签。 D题钻井布局(同 B 题)................................................................................ 错误!未定义书签。2000网易杯全国大学生数学建模竞赛题目.............................................................. 错误!未定义书签。 A题 DNA分子排序............................................................................................. 错误!未定义书签。 B题钢管订购和运输........................................................................................ 错误!未定义书签。 C题飞越北极.................................................................................................... 错误!未定义书签。 D题空洞探测.................................................................................................... 错误!未定义书签。2001年全国大学生数学建模竞赛题目...................................................................... 错误!未定义书签。 A题血管的三维重建........................................................................................ 错误!未定义书签。 B题公交车调度................................................................................................ 错误!未定义书签。 C题基金使用计划............................................................................................ 错误!未定义书签。 D题公交车调度................................................................................................ 错误!未定义书签。2002高教社杯全国大学生数学建模竞赛题目.......................................................... 错误!未定义书签。 A题车灯线光源的优化设计............................................................................ 错误!未定义书签。 B题彩票中的数学............................................................................................ 错误!未定义书签。 C题车灯线光源的计算.................................................................................... 错误!未定义书签。 D题赛程安排.................................................................................................... 错误!未定义书签。2003高教社杯全国大学生数学建模竞赛题目.......................................................... 错误!未定义书签。 A题 SARS的传播............................................................................................... 错误!未定义书签。 B题露天矿生产的车辆安排.............................................................................. 错误!未定义书签。 C题 SARS的传播............................................................................................... 错误!未定义书签。 D题抢渡长江...................................................................................................... 错误!未定义书签。2004高教社杯全国大学生数学建模竞赛题目.......................................................... 错误!未定义书签。 A题奥运会临时超市网点设计........................................................................ 错误!未定义书签。 B题电力市场的输电阻塞管理.......................................................................... 错误!未定义书签。 C题饮酒驾车...................................................................................................... 错误!未定义书签。 D题公务员招聘.................................................................................................. 错误!未定义书签。2005高教社杯全国大学生数学建模竞赛题目.......................................................... 错误!未定义书签。 A题: 长江水质的评价和预测............................................................................ 错误!未定义书签。 B题: DVD在线租赁........................................................................................... 错误!未定义书签。 C题雨量预报方法的评价................................................................................ 错误!未定义书签。

2014年数学建模国家一等奖优秀论文设计

2014高教社杯全国大学生数学建模竞赛 承诺书 我们仔细阅读了《全国大学生数学建模竞赛章程》和《全国大学生数学建模竞赛参 赛规则》(以下简称为“竞赛章程和参赛规则”,可从全国大学生数学建模竞赛下载)。 我们完全明白,在竞赛开始后参赛队员不能以任何方式(包括、电子、网上咨询等) 与队外的任何人(包括指导教师)研究、讨论与赛题有关的问题。 我们知道,抄袭别人的成果是违反竞赛章程和参赛规则的,如果引用别人的成果或 其他公开的资料(包括网上查到的资料),必须按照规定的参考文献的表述方式在正文 引用处和参考文献中明确列出。 我们重承诺,严格遵守竞赛章程和参赛规则,以保证竞赛的公正、公平性。如有违 反竞赛章程和参赛规则的行为,我们将受到严肃处理。 我们授权全国大学生数学建模竞赛组委会,可将我们的论文以任何形式进行公开展 示(包括进行网上公示,在书籍、期刊和其他媒体进行正式或非正式发表等)。 我们参赛选择的题号是(从A/B/C/D中选择一项填写): B 我们的报名参赛队号为(8位数字组成的编号): 所属学校(请填写完整的全名): 参赛队员 (打印并签名) :1. 2. 3.

指导教师或指导教师组负责人 (打印并签名): (论文纸质版与电子版中的以上信息必须一致,只是电子版中无需签名。以上容请仔细核对,提交后将不再允许做任何修改。如填写错误,论文可能被取消评奖资格。) 日期: 2014 年 9 月 15日赛区评阅编号(由赛区组委会评阅前进行编号):

2014高教社杯全国大学生数学建模竞赛 编号专用页 赛区评阅编号(由赛区组委会评阅前进行编号):赛区评阅记录(可供赛区评阅时使用):

数学建模应该注意问题

一.关于参赛时间分配,竞赛共72个小时完成。 下题:今年是9月11日早上8:00在https://www.360docs.net/doc/056866442.html,下载,9月14日早8:00交试题。 选题:这三天的时间按排基本如下:11日8:00-15:00左右选题,选题分为粗选,细选。粗选就是直观的看这两道题是否平时练习相关问题或方法的,选题要对每试题的每一问都要认真分析,大至看看基本能用哪些方法,做到心中有数,对两道题都分析后在选择自已能够容易完成的一题去做。选题的过程中要去查资料、找数据、看论文,通过这些工作,你可以发现找到的东西能否够解决你选的题。 做题:11日15点-13日22点左右。从第一天下午开始去做题,做题的过程分为问题分析,数据处理,模型建立,模型求解等,一会在下边要专门讨论。 换题:如果选题后做一些后其它问题不好处理,或者没有办法处理,有人就会想到换题,当然尽可能的不要换题,要是换题一定不能晚于11日20:00,否则就有做不完题的可能。当然也因人而宜。 写论文:最迟要在13日22:00开始,到14日凌晨5:00写完,尽可能让指导教师帮着修改。7:00打印,打印好后要仔细看一遍,有问题在修改。8:00交论文。写论文的过程贯穿于选题做题过程之中,我们在选题做题时就把做的一些东西分别处理好,只是这说的写论文就是把所做的题目的不同问题,不同部分都贯穿在一起,形成一篇有血有肉的论文。论文写作应该专门有一人在做题的过程中进行。 二、关于写论文 1.正确的论文格式: 论文属于科学性的文章,它有严格的书写格式规范,因此一篇好的论文一定要有正确的格式,就拿摘要来说吧,它要包括6 要素(问题,方法,模型,算法,结论,特色),它是一篇论文的概括,摘要的好坏将决定你的论文是否吸引评委的目光,但听阅卷老师说,有些论文的摘要里出现了大量的图表和程序,这都是不符合论文格式的,这种论文也不会取得好成绩,因此我们写论文时要端正态度,注意书写格式。 2、论文的写作: 论文的写作是至关重要的,其实大家最后的模型和结果都差不多,为什么有些队可以送全国,有些队可以拿省奖,而有些队却什么都拿不到,这关键在于论文的写作上面。一篇好的论文首先读上去便使人感到逻辑清晰,有条例性,能打动评委;其次,论文在语言上的表述也很重要,要注意用词的准确性;另外,一篇好的论文应有闪光点,有自己的特色,有自己的想法和思考在里面,总之,论文写作的好坏将直接影响到成绩的优劣。

相关文档
最新文档