法律英语重点

解决争议disputes are resolved 起诉sue 习惯法common law 成文法statute law

法律僵化legal rigid 社会意识sense of community 刑事责任criminal responsibility

违约default 特许权franchise 民事诉讼civil litigation 人身伤害personal injury

地方政府local government 行为犯conduct crimes 听审oyer 上诉法院court of appeal 行政部门administrative department of 履行职责execution of duty

宪法权constitutional right to 属人管辖personal jurisdiction

Common law 的重要含义，解释是什么？

Common law have three connotations to the term:

1,one is used to disitinguish the authority that promulgated a particular proposition of law.

2,the second distinguishes “common law”jurisdictions that place great weight on such common law decisions,from”civil law”or”code”jurisdictions

3,the third distinguishes”common law”from”equity”.

具体犯罪意图的行为要见有哪3个？

The actus reus is the physical element of a crime.it can include conduct,circumstance and consequence.the actus reus must be a coluntary positive act.an act is voluntary if it consciously willed and deliberate.

行政程序的优点2个以上

Advantages of the administrative process:

a,the same power to initiate and control investigations;

b,the power to supervise the parties after a case has been decided;

3,the ability to provide expert knowledge in technical field;

建立合同需要哪些要见

contract

First,there must be two or more parties,each of whom has the legal capatity to enter into an agreement.

Second ,there must be an offer and acceptance,or consent,which reflects a mutual understanding between the parties about the essential elements of the contract.

Third,the agreement must be supported by consideration or obligation.

Courts look to three factors:the capacity of the parities,offer and acceptance,and consideration.

作文

中美法学的差异

大学教育理论与实践的问题

中美法学教育的差异

中美法律教育的共同点

第一，法律教育的承担者相同。中美两国的法律教育的承担者主要是各大学的法学院。

第二，法律教育与科研任务并重。中美两国高等法学院系以教学任务为主，兼法学的科学研究任务。

中美法律教育的不同点

第一，入学资格不同。中国法学院的入学资格主要以高考成绩入学标准；美国法律教育的入学资格之一，要求申请入学者以大学本科和LSAT的成绩合格为入学标准。

第二，教学目标不同。中国法学院的教学目标更侧重于知识性的训练；美国法学院的教学目标更侧重于职业训练。

第三，教学模式不同。中国的教学模式一般以教员系统讲授为主；美国的教学模式主要有课堂讨论法和判例教学法两种

The common point of the legal education between China and America First, the undertaker of the legal education in China and the United States are mainly the University School of law.

Second,it will pay equal attention to the legal education and scienti fic research task in China and the United States.

The different point of the legal education between China and America First, the different point of admission. The standers of the admissio n of the China law school is the college entrance examination scores; One of the admission of the USA legal education that require the prop oser to be the eligible of the scores of the undergraduate college an d the Law School Admission Test.

Second, the different of the teaching goals. There is more emphasis i n teaching objectives on knowledge training in the Chinese law school ; And more focused on the occupation training in the American law sch ool.

Third, different teaching models. The Chinese teaching mode also teac hing with the faculty system; USA teaching mode mainly have two,one i s classroom discussion ,the case teaching is another one

First, relative to an y kind of theory, it is a theory, practice is much, a theory of multiple practice can be effective. Conve rsely, relative to a practice speaking, p ractice is a, a theory is much, a practice must involve multiple theory. The theo ry a nd practice of the relationship is a two-wa y interwea ve a m uch relationship, not a single theory dominated the relationship. Practice

Second, is theory will "clear", will be logical to test, then, will strive to public a universally, with will "with". Is the pract ice will "want to complete", cannot RenSiLi - as long as a and rejects the rest, will consider all the comprehensive factors and pl ay to steal their long, the integrate d optimization thing itself, will "and different". N either with practical way theo ry, also cannot use up the theory of p ractice, to make divi sion of wa y and complementary.

Third, the theory or p ractice or are pe rsonnel, are people ha ve to do, is people just can do. But person is limited, as is limited, the person is in the beings of cognised behavior, whe re it came from, would ha ve to go back to whe re go to, so can't forgotten found ation, must foreve r "what spirit and" destiny "consciousness, and the theory and practice in the final as the benchmark.