“英语科技论文写作”讲义要点

“英语科技论文写作”讲义要点
“英语科技论文写作”讲义要点

“英语科技论文写作”讲义要点

Lecture Notes on

English Writing of Scientific Papers

(As Reprinted from Published Sources in English)

内容简介“英语科技论文的写作与发表”(简称“英语科技论文写作”)课面向中石化北京化工研究院的研究生与科研人员,共安排12周,每周2小时。课堂教学采用“原理-实例”教学法,并有课外写作练习。本课程旨在让学生掌握用英语写作科技论文的基本技巧,以及如何在英文期刊上发表所写论文的有效方法。主要围绕以下20余个与论文有关的教学内容展开教学:论文题目、作者署名、通讯地址、论文摘要、引言、实验材料和方法、论文结论、讨论、致谢、参考文献、数据列表、制图、文字处理、投稿、审稿意见处理、出版环节、订购论文抽印本、综述论文、会议论文、学位论文等。

教学进度安排(Course Outline)

“英语科技论文写作”课(English Writing of Scientific Papers)

Day 01 --- Nov. 18Lecture 01Introduction on Scientific Writing

1.1 About This Short Course 1.2 What Is a Scientific Paper

Day 02 --- Nov. 20 Lecture 02 Components of a Paper

2.1 How to Prepare the Title 2.2 How to List the Authors

Day 03 --- Nov. 25

2.3 How to List the Addresses 2.4 How to Prepare the Abstract

2.5 How to Write the Introduction 2.6 How to Write the Materials and Methods Section Day 04 --- Nov. 27

2.7 How to Write the Results 2.8 How to Write the Discussion

2.9 How to Cite Acknowledgments Day 05 --- Dec. 02

2.10 How to Prepare the Literature Cited 2.11 How to Design Effective Tables

Day 06 --- Dec. 04

2.12 How to Prepare Effective Illustrations 2.13 How to Type the Manuscript

Day 07 --- Dec. 09 Lecture 03Publication of a Paper

3.1 Where and How to Submit the Manuscript

3.2 How to Deal with Editors(The Review Process)Day 08 --- Dec. 11

3.3 How to Deal with Printers (The Publishing Process)

3.4 How to Order and Use Reprints

Day 09 --- Dec. 16 Lecture 04Writing of Other Types of Scientific Literature

4.1 How to Write a Review Paper 4.2 How to Write a Conference Report

4.3 How to Write a Thesis

Day 10--- Dec. 18 Lecture 05Ethics, Rights, and Permissions

5.1 Importance of Originality 5.2 Copyright Considerations

Lecture 06Writing Styles

6.1 Use and Misuse of English

Day 11--- Dec. 236.2 Avoiding Jargon 6.3 How and When to Use Abbreviations Day 12--- Dec. 25 Lecture 07Summary and Discussion on Scientific Writing

7.1 A Personalized Summary 7.2 Discussion with the Participants

Lecture 01 Introduction on Scientific Writing

1.1 About This Short Course1.1.1 The Importance of Publication

The Man of Science appears to be the only

man who has something to say just now — and the

only man who does not know how to say it.

“科学之人”看似唯一欲言之人—却也为难以为之之人。

— SIR JAMES BARRIE

詹姆斯·巴里爵士

We in science, of necessity, must contribute to the glut of information. But let us

·do it with love, especially love of the English language, which is the cornerstone of the intellectual heritage of the western world;

·also do it with energy, the energy we need to put into the scientific paper so that the reader will not need to use much energy to get the information out of the paper;

·husband our materials, especially our words, so that we do not waste inordinate quantities of paper and ink (or bits) in trying to tell the world more than we know.

运转寰球的四大件:

关爱(LOVE)↓↓↓能量(ENERGY)↓↓

材料(MA TERIALS)↓信息(INFORMA TION)↑

Publish or Perish?

Whether or not one wholly subscribes to the “publish or perish” adage, there is no question but that the goal of scientific research is publication. And scientisits are measured, and become known (or remain unknown), by their publication.

The publication of research results is an essential part of the research process.

A scientific experiment, no matter how spectacular the result, is not completed until the results are published. In fact, the cornerstone of the philosophy of science is based on the fundamental assumption that original research must be published; only this can new scientific knowledge be authenticated and then added to the existing data base that we call science.

The research scientist, perhaps uniquely among the trades and professions, must provide a written document showing what he did, why he did it, how he did it, and what he learned from it.

Thus the scientist must not only “do” science; he must “write” science. Although good writing does not lead to the publication of bad science, bad writing can and often does prevent or delay the publication of good science.

1.1.2The Purpose of This Short Course

By presenting certain basic principles that are accepted in most scientific disciplines, it is hoped that this course will help scientist and students to prepare manuscripts that will have a high probability of being accepted for publication and of being completely understood when they are published.1. Define a Scientific Paper

·To write a scientific paper, the writer must know exactly what it is he is doing and why he is doing it.

·To be guilty of dual publication, or to use the work of others without appropriate attribution, is the type of breach in scientific ethics that is regarded as unforgivable by one’s peers. Therefore, exact definition of what my go into a scientific paper, and what may not, is of prime importance.

2. Parts Analysis of a Scientific Paper

·Each individual element of the scientific paper is analyzed, item by item.

·Fortunately, there are certain commonly accepted rules regarding the construction of the title, the Abstract, the Introduction, etc., so that this parts analysis, once mastered, should serve the scientist throughout his research career.

3.Associated Information Either Technical or Related to the Post Writing Stages

·Technical information: e.g., how to prepare illustrative material;

·Information Related to the Post Writing Stages: e.g., submission, review, and publication processes.

4. Rules Relating to Primary Scientific Papers Are Adjusted to Fit Different Circumstances

These circumstances include the writing of review papers, conference reports, and theses.

5. Additional Topics

·Some of the rules of English as applied to scientific writing;

·A sermon against jargon;

·A discussion of abbreviations

·A sermon against sin.

1.2 What Is a Scientific Paper

1.2.1 Inexact and Exact Definitions

Inexact Definitions:

·Perhaps the b est answer to the question “What is a scientific paper” was provided by the wag who described a drug as “any substance which, when injected into a laboratory rat, produces a scientific paper.”·It was once said that a scientific paper is not designed to be read. It is designed to be published. Although this was said in jest, there is much truth to it. And, actually, if the paper is designed to be published, it will also be in a prescribed form that can be read, or at least its contents can be grasped quickly and easily by the reader.

·A scientific paper is (i) the first publication of original research results, (ii) in a form whereby peers of the author can repeat the experiments and test the conclusions, and (iii) in a journal or other source document which is readily available within the scientific community. Or as Debakey (1976) said it, “the contents of an article shall be new, true, important, and comprehensible

Exact Definitions:

In 1968, the Council of Biology Editors (CBE) arrived at the following definition:

An acceptable primary scientific publication must be the first disclosure (N.B. Now entry into a computer data base) containing sufficient information to enable peers (1) to assess observations, (2) to repeat experiments, and (3) to evaluate intellectual processes; moreover, it must be susceptible to sensory perception, essentially permanent, available to the scientific community without restriction, and available for regular screening by one or more of the major recognized secondary services (e.g., currently, Biological Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, etc., in the United States and similar facilities in other countries).

N.B. This definition excludes publication such as newsletters and house organs.

1.2.2 Organization and Language of a Scientific Paper

A scientific paper is, or should be, highly stylized, with distinctive and dearly evident component parts. Each scientific paper should have, in proper order, its Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, and Discussion.

“Good organization is the key to good writing” —by M S Peterson (1961)

(i) What was the problem? →the Introduction;

(ii) How did you study the problem? →the Materials and Methods;

(iii) What did you find? →the Results;

(iv) What do these findings mean? →the Discussion.

Some people think that the preparation of a scientific paper has almost nothing todo with writing, per se. it is a question of organization.

In addition to organization, the second principal ingredient of a scientific paper should be appropriate language within that organization. We keep emphasizing proper use of English, because it is in this area that most scientists have trouble.

David B Truman said it well: ”In the complexities of contemporary existence the specialist who is trained but uneducated, technically skilled but actually incompetent, is a menace.”Language need not be difficult. In scientific writing, we say: “The best English is that which gives the sense in the fewest short words.” Literary tricks, metaphors and the like, divert attention from the message to the style. They should be used rarely, if at all, in scientific writing.

1.2.3 Other Definitions

Original research report →scientific paper;

·Research report that are not original, or not scientific, or somehow fail to qualify as scientific papers →a review paper, a conference report, a meeting abstract, etc. A review paper may review almost anything, most typically the recent work in a defined subject area or the work of a particular individual or group. Thus, the review paper is designed to summarize, analyze, or synthesize information that has already been published (research reports in primary journals). Although much or all of the material in a review paper has previously been published, the spectre of dual publication does not normally arise because the review nature of the work is usually obvious (often in the title of the publication, such as Microbiological Reviews, Annual Review of Biochemistry, etc.).

A conference report is a paper published in a book or journal as part of the proceedings of a symposium, national or international congress, workshop, round table, or the like. Rarely, such conferences are designed for the presentation of original data, and the resultant proceeding (book or journal) qualifies as primary publication. More often, such conference presentations are

basically review papers, presenting reviews of recent work of particular scientists or recent work in particular laboratories. Some of the material reported at some conferences (especially the exciting ones) is mainly in the form of preliminary reports, in which new, original data are reported, often accompanied by interesting speculation. But, usually, these preliminary reports do not qualify, nor are they intended to qualify, as scientific papers. Later, often much later, such work is validly published in a primary journal; by this time, the loose ends have been tied down, all essential experimental details are recorded (so that a competent worker could repeat the experiments), and the speculations are now recorded as conclusions.

Therefore, the vast conference literature that appears in print normally is not primary. If original data are presented in such contributions, the data can and should be published (or republished) in an archival (primary) journal. Otherwise, the information may be effectively lost. If publication in a primary journal follows publication in a conference report, there may be copyright and permission problems affecting portions of the work (see later discussion on this subject), but the more fundamental problem of dual publication normally does not and should not arise.

Meeting abstracts, like conference proceedings, are of several widely varying types. Conceptually, however, they are similar to conference reports in that they can and often do contain original information. They are not primary publications, nor should publication of an abstract be considered as a bar to later publication of the full report.

In the past, there has been little confusion regarding the typical one-paragraph abstracts published as part of the program or distributed along with the program of a national meeting or international congress. It was usually understood that the papers presented at these meetings would later be submitted for publication in primary journals. More recently, however, there has been a strong trend towards extended abstracts (or “synoptics”). Because it is very expensive to publish all of the full papers presented at a large meeting, such as a major international congress, and because such publication is still not a substitute for the valid publication offered by the primary journal, the movement to extended abstract makes a great deal of sense. The extended abstract can supply virtually as much information as a full paper; basically, what it lacks is the experimental detail. However, precisely because it lacks experimental detail, it cannot qualify as a scientific paper. Conclusion:General acceptance of such definition will greatly clarify both primary and secondary communication of scientific information.

Lecture 07 Summary and Discussion on Scientific Writing 7.1 A Personalized Summary

Through the years, I have had many occasions to visit various scientific laboratories. Almost always, I have been impressed, sometimes awed, by the obvious quality of the laboratories themselves and of the equipment and supplies contained therein. Judging by appearances, one could only believe that the newest and best (and most expensive) instruments and reagents were used in these laboratories.

During those same years, I have seen thousands of the products of those same laboratories. Some of these products (scientific papers) properly reflected the quality and expense that went into their generation. But many did not.

I want to talk about the many that did not. I ask you, as I have often asked myself, why it is that so many scientists, while capable of brilliant performance in the laboratory, write papers that would be given failing marks in a seventh-grade composition class. I ask you why it is that some scientists will demand the newest ultracentrifuge, even if it costs $40,000, and then refuse to pay $20 to a commercial artist to draw a proper graph of the results obtained with the ultracentrifuge. About a dozen similar questions leap to my mind. Unfortunately, I do not know the answers

and I doubt that anyone does.

Perhaps there are no "answers." If there are no answers, that leaves me free to do a little philosophizing. (If you have gotten this far in this book, you can heroically hang on for another few paragraphs.)

If we view knowledge as the house we live in, scientific knowledge will tell us how to construct our house. But we need artistic knowledge to make our house beautiful, and we need humanistic knowledge so that we can understand and appreciate life within our house.

If we view a scientific paper as the culmination of scientific research, which it is, we can, if we but try, make it more beautiful and more understandable; we can do this by enriching our scientific knowledge with a bit of the arts and humanities. A well-written scientific paper is the product of a well-trained scientist, yes; but the scientist capable of writing a really good paper will also be a cultured man or woman.

Students of the sciences must not content themselves with study of the sciences; science will be more meaningful if studied against a background of other knowledge.

Especially, students must learn how to write, because science demands written expression. To learn to write, you must learn to read. To learn to write well, you should read good writing. Read your professional journals, yes, but also read Shakespeare.

Many universities now provide courses in scientific writing. Those that do not should be ashamed of themselves.

What I have said in this book is this: Scientific research is not complete until the results have been published. Therefore, a scientific paper is an essential part of the research process. Therefore, the writing of an accurate, understandable paper is just as important as the research itself. Therefore, the words in the paper should be weighed as carefully as the reagents in the laboratory. Therefore, the scientist must know how to use words. Therefore, the education of a scientist is not complete until the ability to publish has been established.

科技论文写作复习资料

2008年专业技术人员科技论文写作考试 一、单选题(每题1分,共20题)14 1、论文得不到公认,就是不科学的: A、对 B、不全对 C、错 正确答案:B 2、检验理论正确的实验是必须能够重演的: A、是 B、不一定 C、不是 答案:A 3、称赞你的论文的人都是: A、坚持真理的人 B、认同你的观点的人 C、奉承你的人 答案:B 4、摘要的风格: A、可以用第一人称 B、摘要大小不宜超过论文字数的5% C、可以使用文学性修饰 D、可以包含作者未来的计划 E、可以自我评价 正确答案:B 5、论文引言就是: A、前言 B、绪论 C、引论 正确答案:C 6、参考文献的顺序依: A、在文中出现的次序排列 B、按作者已经收集到的文献序号排序 C、以文献的重要程度排列 答案:A 7、参考文献的编号一律用什么括号括起: A、大括号 B、中括号 C、小括号 答案:B 8、在正文中,当需要说明引用内容出处时,应把引用的参考文献编号连同方括号,写在标注的: A、右上角 B、右下角 C、左上角 D、左下角 答案:A 9、参考文献号一律用:

A、阿拉伯数字 B、汉字 C、英文 答案:A 10、论文中对重要的公式: A、应编号 B、不应编号 答案:A 11、论文中对图的题目位置要求是: A、图的题目在图上部 B、图的题目在图下部 C、随便什么位置 答案:B 正确答案:A 12、论文中使用别人公开发表的结论,并注明出处的属于: A、引用 B、抄袭 C、剽窃 答案:A 13、论文中大量使用别人公开发表的内容,不注明出处的属于: A、抄袭 B、剽窃 C、借用 答案:A 14、论文中使用别人的未公开发表的内容: A、剽窃 B、抄袭 C、引用 答案:A 15、连接相关数字用符号: A、“-” B、“∽ ” C、“~” 正确答案:C 16、近似用符号: A、“≈” B、“≌” C、“~” 答案:A 17、世纪、年代、年、月、日的记数应使用: A、阿拉伯数字 B、汉字 C、英文 答案:A 18、论文是如何写出的: A、研究后写出的 B、编写出的

科技论文写作要点

科技论文写作要点 一、科技论文写作要有:创新性、科学性、学术性、规范性、可读 性。 二、科技论文要写成议论文,论点、论据、论证逻辑、结论要齐全, 逻辑要清晰,观点要鲜明。 三、结构:题目、作者署名及所在单位、摘要、关键词、引言、正 文、结论/结语、参考文献,八个内容缺一不可 四、题目:鲜明、具体、切合文章主旨,不可大、不可空,21个 字以内 五、作者署名及所在单位:所在单位要写全、准确 六、摘要:全文概况,200-300字。 四要素:目的、方法、结果和结论。 忌:自我评价,图、表、数学公司、化学结构等。 例:为了(目的)……,采用(方法)……,对(过程)…….,(通过…….方法实施)结果表明(结果)……,(结论)……。 七、关键词:关键词的目的在于为论文检索提供便利,5-8个词,反映论文中心内容的词或词组。准确,不要笼统,不用大词 八、引言:(或者前言、引论),保持鲜明的层次感和极强的逻辑性。首先阐述写作背景,写作内容在相关领域的地位、作用、意义等,其次文献总回顾,简述相关前人、同行、国内外的研究成果、进展,再次通过对比,分析过去研究的缺陷性,阐明自己的创新点,最后总结性描述论文的研究内容,可以分为一二三四几个方面描述,为引言做

最后收尾工作。 引言部分600-1000字,不用插图、图标、公式、化学结构等。九、正文:明确论点、摆明论据、再总结。 十:结论/结语:学术性、技术性文章用结论,评述性文章用结语 研究的结果说明了什么问题;研究结果对前人成果做了哪些修改、补充、发展、论证或否定;指出本文研究的不足之处及今后研究方向等。结语一般不分段叙述,要求内容明确具体、概括准确、简短精炼、措辞严谨、同时不做自我评价。 十一:参考文献:参考文献尽量选取近5年之内的研究成果,至少15个,参考文献的翻译要选择原文翻译,不可自行翻译;通过参考文献可以反映出本论文的起点和深刻程度。 十二、论文撰写步骤 共7步:选题—材料收集—构思—提纲—草稿—修改—定稿 其中材料收集非常重要,大约占论文撰写总时间的2/3。收集途径包括现场调研、试验研究、他人已发表的文章等,注重素材的平时积累。撰写过程中,要端正学术态度,原文摘抄内容不得大于总内容的15%。

科技论文写作的一般格式

三一文库(https://www.360docs.net/doc/9917748291.html,)/毕业论文/论文格式 科技论文写作的一般格式 论文写作一般涉及有:题目、作者姓名和单位、摘要、关键词、引言、正文、结论、致谢、参考文献……等等以上方面内容,但不一定每篇论文都要由以上内容,可视论文需要取舍,现分述如下: 一、题目 题目要准确得体,简短精练,外延和内涵恰如其分,醒目。 1.准确得体:论文题目能准确表达论文内容,恰当反映研究的范围和深度。提要扣文,文要扣题。 2.简短精练:题目字数要少,用词精选,读起来要赶紧利落,简短明了。若简短提名不足以显示论文内容或者性质,则可利用正、副标题的方法解决,使标题称为既充实准确有不流于笼统和一般化。 3.外延和内涵要恰如其分:“外延”和“内涵”属于刑事逻辑中的概念。所谓外延是指一个概念所反映的每一个对象;而所谓内涵,则是指对每一个概念对象特有属性的反映。

4.醒目:题目是否醒目,其产生的效果是相距甚远的。 二、作者姓名和单位 论文署名一是为了表明文责自负,二是记录劳动成果,三是便于读者与作者的联系。若是多作者论文,则按署名顺序列为第一作者,第二作者。。。。。。对研究工作与论文撰写为了实际贡献最大者列为第一作者,贡献次之的列为第二作者,余类推。重要的是坚持实事求是的态度。 三、摘要 论文一般应由摘要,它是论文内容不加注释和评论的简短评述。摘要应包含以下内容: 1.从事这一研究的目的和重要性。 2.研究的重要内容,指明完成了那些工作。 3.获得的基本结论和研究成果,突出论文的新见解。 4.结论与结果的意义。 论文摘要文字必须十分简练内容亦需充分概括和浓缩。论文摘要不要列举 例证,不讲研究过程,不用图表、公式,也不要做自我评价。 四、关键词

大学科技论文写作范文

大学科技论文写作范文 以下是为大家整理的大学科技论文写作范文的相关范文,本文关键词为大学,科技,论文写作,范文,本文,word,格式,下载,编辑,您可以从右上方搜索框检索更多相关文章,如果您觉得有用,请继续关注我们并推荐给您的好友,您可以在论文资料中查看更多范文。 本文为word格式,下载后可编辑修改,也可直接使用 大学科技论文写作范文 大学科技论文的写作范文要从哪几个方面来写呢?下面是风林网络的小编为大家整理的“大学科技论文写作范文”,内容仅供参考,欢迎大家阅读! 大学科技论文写作范文 摘要:在科技迅猛发展的今天,如果企业可以充分的在营销过程中与科技发展密切结合,将会实现巨大的发展。尤其是对于中小微型企业来说,科技的合理使用将会起到至关重要的作用。因此本文对科

技型小微企业营销策略,做出仔细的分析研究,并针对一些突出的问题给出合理的解决策略。关键词:科技型小微企业;营销策略;分析研究 所谓的科技型中小企业主要是指一些新型的、依靠互联网科技或者是商业资源发展起来的中小型企业,这些企业大多都较依赖资金和技术,对于经济的抵抗能力较弱,所以说解决目前中小企业的问题已经势在必行。只有解决了中小型企业的营销问题,才可以更好地将企业的产品与市场密切结合起来,实现科技型中小企业的发展与资金的流通,促进科技型中小企业经济效益的进一步提高。因此本文将从科技型中小企业的营销现状、科技型中小企业创业初期的营销困境以及科技型中小企业的营销策略等三个方面展开分析,来进一步促进企业的快速发展。一、科技型中小企业的营销现状 对于目前的科技型中小企业来讲,在未来的经济发展过程中,并没有十分巨大的优势。根据数据调查显示,中小型企业虽然数量较多,但是竞争优势不大,例如在企业的营销资金上,中小型企业并不具备和大型企业一争高下的优势,这样就使得竞争力远远不如大型企业;而且除此之外,中小企业的科技发展水平较低,尤其是对一些新技术的研发与使用方面还有点提高。这样的发展现状就使得中小企业的营

科技论文写作格式与基本要求

科技论文写作格式与基本要求 建筑机械化杂志社 科技论文是进行科学技术交流的主要载体,是获得科技信息、促进科学技术发展的重要途径。我国著名化学家卢嘉锡指出:“一个只会创造不会表达的人,不算一个真正的科技工作者。”科技论文写作水平的高低,会直接影响科研工作的进展。希望各位工程技术人员在注重技术研究的同时,做好科技论文撰写工作。 1 科技论文写作的基本要求 科技论文应具有创新性、科学性、可读性和规范性。 1)创新性:没有创新性,就没有必要写科技论文。所谓创新,是指在认识中有新的突破和新的发现,在应用中有新理论、新技术、新方法的提出,研究成果显著。 2)科学性:建立在试验和推理的基础上,论点鲜明,经得起推敲,论据确凿,经得起论证。 3)可读性:文章结构合理,层次清楚,逻辑性强。语句通顺、概念准确、语言表达清晰。 4)规范性:符合国家有关标准和期刊投稿规定。 2 科技论文的写作格式 科技论文一般包括以下8个部分:题名、作者署名、摘要、关键词、引言、正文、结论和参考文献 2.1题名 题名应以最恰当、简明的词语反映出文章中最重要的特定内容。题名要简明、准确、醒目,有利于读者阅读和文献检索。题名一般不超过20字,因此,题名尽可能删弃多余的词语,避免将同义词或近义词连用,如常见的有“……的研究和探讨”,“……的分析研究”,一般可删去其中的一个。 2.2作者署名 作者姓名一般应列于题名下方,表示文章作者声明对论文拥有著作权,愿意文责自负,同时便于读者与作者联系。对于多作者论文,按署名顺序列为第一作者、第二作者……。对研究工作与论文撰写实际贡献最大的列为第一作者,贡献次之的,列为第二作者,依次类推。作者姓名下一行是工作单位及所在省市、邮编。 2.3摘要 论文一般都应有摘要,它是论文内容不加注释和评论的简短陈述,是文章内容的高度概括,使读者不阅读全文即能获得必要的信息。其主要内容包括:该项研究工作的内容、目的、实验方法,研究成果和结论。摘要不能写成论文前言。摘要要求用第三人称的方式写作,力求简短精练,具体明确,内容完整,独立成段。摘要以100一300字为宜。摘要的写作应字字推敲,力求做到“多一字有余,少一字则不足”。 2.4关键词 关键词是为了文献标引工作,特别是适应计算机自动检索的要求,从文章中选取出来用以表示全文主题信息的单词或术语。关键词可从文章的四个部位去寻找:题名、摘要、论文的小标题、结论。每篇文章关键词选取3~8个词,关键词与关键词之间用分号,置于摘

科技论文写作英语写作

科技论文写作英语写作

Research Reports for Business and Technical Writing Wayne Losano A surprising amount of one's time as a student and professional is spent reporting the results of one's research projects for presentation to teachers, managers, and clients. Indeed, without basic research skills and the ability to present research results clearly and completely, an individual will encounter many obstacles in school and on the job. The need for some research-writing ability is felt nearly equally by college students in all fields, engineering and science as well as business and the humanities. Graduate study often makes great demands on the student's research-writing skills, and most professions continue the demand; education, advertising and marketing, economics and accounting, science and engineering, psychology, anthropology, the arts, and agriculture may all require regular reporting of research data. ELEMENTS OF THE RESEARCH PAPER The standard research report, regardless of the field or the intended reader, contains four major sections. These sections may be broken down into a variety of subsections, and they may be arranged in a

科技论文范文

描述: 科技论文在情报学中又称为原始论文或者一次文献,它是科学开发技术人员或者科研人员在科学实验或者试验的基础上对实验或者试验的项目进行科学的分析,综合的研究和阐述,在对自然的科学研究,工程技术科学研究,以及人文艺术研究方面的论文,在对其研究项目的一些结果和结论,按照一定文本或者电子书面的表达。 科技论文也是一种学术论文,在把论文发表在相对应的期刊上面和广大科研技术人员的一种交流学术贡献。 依照专业领域来讲科学论文又可以分为几个大类,生物工程科学,临床医学,物理科研,机械工程,计算机领域的研究,社会经济管理学等几大类科技论文,研究的方法不同也可以对科技论文分为理论类科技论文,实验科研类,描述类。 科技类论文的核心特点,学术针对性较强有科研创新和科学性,它往往是客观地真实准确的衡量一个研究的项目,能经得起别人的验证研究重复检验。 我站为科技论文设置专门的栏目,合理的选择论文的发表期刊,对发表论文的学者科研人员的评定职称等级等有所依据。对应期刊也分为三等级,分别为核心期刊,省级期刊和国家级期刊,其中核心期刊是审核周期较长,发表所需要的费用也多,通过率也相对省级和国家级的论文要难。 近年来,电子技术、计算机技术、通信技术和自动化技术的高速发展,对检测仪器检测速度、准确度以及检测功能等整个性能方面提出了更高要求。而这些技术的发展也推动了电子测量技术的快速发展。同时也给测量仪器提供了巨大的市场,大量的新型产品都需要通过仪器的测量才能投放市场,所以这就对仪器的功能及测量能力有一个新的要求,以帮

助工程技术人员在生产中适应众多的工业标准和有效的处理各种问题。除以上技术外,现代监测和传感技术,显示技术、数字信号处理技术和系统理论研究,也为检测过程的数字化、智能化创造了条件。总体来看,检测仪器的发展到目前已经经历了三个阶段:第一代是模拟仪器;第二代是数字式仪器,它是以数字电路进行信息的数字化处理,然后数字显示,这种仪器比模拟仪器的测量精度要高,响应速度快;第三代仪器是智能化仪器,它内部含有单片机,无论数字采集和处理都是由单片机控制。 在智能仪器中,它们结构与计算所相同而能完成仪器的有关功能,是因为智能仪器中利用单片机的算术逻辑处理能力和以软件取代过去的电子线路和硬件功能,软件的灵活性使得智能仪器可以用各种软件和处理方法进行信息的采集、处理和存储,而无需专用的电子线路,从而大大简化了智能仪器的控制结构。对于智能仪器而言,其硬件是数据采集技术及输入输出技术,包括单片机、接口和输入输出设备;而软件实现数据处理包括采样、滤波、处理,把输入信息进行加工后产生所需的输出信号送到输出电路去显示或传送。 为了提高仪器的精确度,在智能仪器中有的还设置了自动校正、自选量程等功能。例如青岛艾诺智能仪器有限公司生产的9601型耐电压测试仪的输出电压,就采用分段软件补偿,消除变压器、电感等器件的不一致性带来的细小偏差,使0~5KV全量程电压相对误差精度保持在3%以内。部分仪器为了扩展自身功能,在智能仪器中设置了多种物理测量功能,如:量制变换功能、间接结果计算功能、自动控制功能、打印功能、停电保存功能、自诊断和自测试等一些传统仪器无法实现的功能,所以智能仪器不再是一种功能单一的仪器,而是一台多功能仪器。 智能仪器和传统仪器无论在结构上或技术上都有很大区别,现代化的绝大多数测

科技论文写作规范

科技论文写作规范 国家标准GB7713-87规定:“引言(或绪论)简要说明研究工作的目的、范围、相关领域的前人工作和知识空白、理论基础和分析、研究设想、研究方法和实验设计、预期结果和意义等。引言应言简意赅,不要与摘要雷同,不要成为摘要的注释。一般教科书中已有的知识,在引言中不必赘述。比较短的论文可以只用小段文字起着引言的效用。学位论文为了需要反映作者已掌握了坚实的基础理论和系统的专门知识,具有开阔的科学视野,对研究方案作了充分论证,因此有关历史回顾和前人工作的综合评述,以及理论分析等,可以单独成章,用足够的文字叙述”。 引言的目的是给出作者进行本项工作的原因,企图达到的目的。因此应给出必要的背景材料,让对这一领域并不特别熟悉的读者能够了解进行这方面研究的意义,前人已达到的水平,已解决和尚待解决的问题,最后应用一两句话说明本文的目的和主要创新之处。引言最基本一点是介绍主要研究成果。 有的作者常常不在引言中指明他们的重要发现,或从摘要中删除那些重要的研究成果,而到论文的后部分才指明。对科技论 归纳、 ,Results, ●材料与方法(怎么研究这个问题) 材料包括:材料来源、性质、数量、选取和处理事项等。 方法包括:实验仪器、设备、实验条件、测试方法等。 ●结果(你发现了些什么) 以图或表等手段整理实验结果,进行结果的分析和结果的讨论,包括:通过数理统计和误差分析说明结果的可靠性,可重复性,范围等;进行实验结果与理论计算结果的比较(包括不正常现象和数据的分析);结果部分的讨论(结果直接相关部分,如讨论内容涉及全篇,应留在讨论部分进行)。值得注意的是:必须在正文中说明图表的结果及其直接意义;复杂图表应指出作者强调或希望读者注意的问题。 ●讨论(这些发现有什么科学意义) 讨论部分也称结论或建议,其目的是综合说明全文结果的科学意义。结论应写得象法律条文,即只有一种解释,不能模棱两可,不用“大概、也许、可能”等词。结论应简练,不用“通过理论分析和实验验证可得如下结论”等废话。结论要注意分寸,不

【免费下载】中英文科技论文写作教程

中英文科技论文写作教程 标题 一、英文文章标题(Title)的结构: 1.完整句子作为题目,这是一种常见的结构,尤其在报刊中常用: Fuzhou Strives for Better Exports (由于是题目,在句尾不能用句号) 2.名词+动词不定式结构:这种结构表示将来,因在题目中一般不用will或shall The Chinese Communist Party to Hold Its 18th Congress 3.名词或名词短语+过去分词。这种结构常用于报道已做过的事情. Capital International Airport Enlarged. 北京国际机场扩建 4.现代分词短语结构。 Visiting a Friend on a Snowy Night 5.介绍短语结构 In Memory of …. 6.名词或名词短语+介词短语结构 Home for the Sailors 7.以动词原形开始的短语结构,这种结构常用于带有号召性的题目中。 Server the People 8.名词或名词短语结构,例如 A small Green City 二、注意题目字母的大小写问题 1. 题目中除介词、冠词、和连接词的字母全部小写外,其它的词的第一个字母要大写(介词和冠词在题目开头时第一个字母也要大写) My Family and Myself 2.题目中全部字母大写,这种形式大多用于书籍封面上的题目,例如: 上海简介 A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO SHANGHAI 3.题目第一个词的第一个字母大写外,其它字母一律小写,但遇到专门名词时,该词的第一个字母仍须大写,现在报纸上的题目大都采用这种形式,主要是便于排版。 中国体操选手夺得七枚金牌 Chinese gymnasts sweep away seven gold medals 三.在英语文章题目中,冠词常可省略,例如 美国总统在西方 U.S. President in West 四、英文文题的一般性原则 *文题应准确而清晰反映文章的内容和重点。就根据情况,不一定要逐字译出题目中常有的“谈谈”,“浅析”,“初探”,“试论”,“我见”等字样。例如: 浅谈高等院校的短跑训练 Dash Training in Colleges and Universities 英文文题应尽量避免像“on the ”,“report on ”,“regarding”,“use of”,“research on ”,“a study of ”,“studies on…”,“investigation of …”,“relationship between …and …”,之

最新科技论文写作考试题及答案

本文从网络收集而来,上传到平台为了帮到更多的人,如果您需要使用本文档,请点击下载,另外祝您生活愉快,工作顺利,万事如意! 最新科技论文写作考试题及答案

姓名:学院(系):班级: 学号:成绩:_____________ 一、简答题(每题5分,共20分) 1、为什么说技术需要“社会协作”? 答:因为技术具有以下特点: ①技术新成果的高速增长 ②科技新成果从发现、发明到实际应用的周期越来越短,开发速度不断加快 ③新技术及其产品的更新速度越来越快,工程技术人员的知识半衰期越来越短 ④技术信息的增长速度更为惊人。 通过技术的特点可看出:单凭个人的能力是不能完成技术的进步的,所以说技术 需要“社会协作”。 2、撰写科技论文能锻炼我们的什么? 答:撰写科技论文首先能让我们对自己的学术研究认识更加深刻,能够科学的看待客 观事物,激发我们的创造性; 其次,能够锻炼我们考虑事物的严密性、逻辑性,使我们在遇到复杂工作时能够 认真、系统的将其完成;

再次,在撰写科技论文时,必然要阅读很多文献,书籍,查阅很多参考资料,因 此将锻炼我们搜集资料,整理资料提取有用信息的能力; 最后,还能锻炼我们的写作能力,若课题比较大,需要多人完成,还能锻炼我们 的团队协作能力。 3、科技论文怎样做到“论证有力”? 答:首先从科技论文的表达方法上做到“论证有力”即:叙述、说明、议论。 叙述,是用来交待与揭示某一事物或某一现象发生、发展、变化过程的一种表达方 式。议论就是议事说理,它是运用概念、判断、推理等逻辑形式,通过摆事实、讲 道理、辨是非,对客观事物、事理进行科学的分析论证,以表达作者的观点和态度。 它的作用在于使文章鲜明、深刻,具有较强的哲理性和理论深度。说明是使用简洁 的语言把实体事物的形态、构造、性质、特征、功能、成因、关系与抽象事物的概 念、特点、原理、演变、异同等解说清楚的表达方式。要求内容科学、表述明确、 态度客观。

[科技论文写作]科技论文范文3000字

[科技论文写作]科技论文范文3000字 **交通大学网络教育课程作业年级:2014 层次:高升专专业名称:铁道工程技术课程名称: 科技论文写作 A 学号:14**721 姓名:王** 科技论文写作A练习题第1章课程简介一、简答题 1.《科技论文写作A》与《科技论文写作B》是什么关系?答:.科技论文写作分为《科技论文写作A》和《科技论文写作B 》两门课程。其中《科技论文写作A》着重讲解如何撰写本科毕业设计(论文)和专科毕业报告,《科技论文写作B 》主要介绍除毕业设计(论文)、毕业报告之外的其他各种科技论文的写作知识。 2.学习科技论文写作应采取什么方法?答:应采取知行结合的方法,具体而言,就是理论联系实际,强化实践、练习在教学中的关键作用。科技论文写作是一门实践性很强的课程,只有通过大量的阅读、思考、实践、练习,我们的科技写作能力才能得到提高。 第2章科技论文一、多项选择题 1.科技论文具有()。ACDE A.创新性B.艺术性C.专业性D.应用性 E.科学性 2.科技论文写作应遵循()原则。ABD A严谨周密.B.简洁务实C.跌宕起伏D.符合标准E.形散神不散 3.本科毕业设计(论文)可分为()ABCE A.理论型 B.设计型 C.实验型 D.描述型 E.调研型二、简答题1.什么是科技论文?答:科技论文主要是指对科学技术领域的新见解、新成果、新知识、新进展进行论述的文章。 2.科技论文可分为那几种类型?答:理论型:如《对“媒介即信息”理论的再思考》实证型:如《厌氧氨氧化处理养殖废水启动试验研究》设计型:如《网络虚拟校园系统设计》描述型:如《试论转轨以来俄罗斯总统制的特点及其影响》第3章专科毕业报告的写作1、简答题 1. **交通大学网络教育专科毕业报告的基本要求是什么?答:正文字数不少于4000字。 选题分导师命题与自主选题两种,自主选题需经导师批准。 学生的毕业报告选题与所学专业有关联性。 毕业报告要求条理清楚,逻辑性强。 严禁抄袭,毕业报告中必须装入本人签字的诚信承诺书。 应理论联系实际,学会收集整理相关资料,恰当运用已有研究成果,综合运用自己所学习的知识,提高自己分析和解决问题的能力。 2. 简述专科毕业报告标题、摘要、目录、正文、致谢的写作规范。 答:.标题:标题应简短、明确。标题字数一般不宜超过20字。采用单标题。 摘要:简要阐述毕业报告的研究对象、主要方法、成果、结论。摘要字数为200字左右。目录:标注到二级标题即可。 正文主要包括绪论、主体和结论三大部分。 (1)绪论主要包括:本课题的选题理由; 文献综述; 研究的基本思路与采用的方法。 (2)主体主要包括:核心观点、分论点、论据与论证,对研究内容、成果(尤其是创新之处)进行详细、客观阐述。 (3)结论是对毕业报告主要成果的总结。在结论中应明确指出本研究的创新之处及其应

英文科技论文写作模板

Research on Trigonometric Leveling Freedu School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University,Wuhan430079,China E-mail:1111111111@https://www.360docs.net/doc/9917748291.html, Abstract —As the total station trigonometric leveling can survey without the restrictions oftopography. So, we can use it to survey the third &fourth order level survey in some special areas.In this article, we propose a new total station measuring method from combining the defect of traditional measurementmethods. The advantages of this method is that it can improve the precision without measuring height of device and prism, and it canreplace the third and fourth level of measurement under certain conditions. This method can greatly improve efficiency and shortenthe project duration in the construction survey . Keywords- trigonometric leveling ;total station ;error analysis I. I NTRODUCTION Engineering construction often relates to height measurement. Thetraditional measurement methods are leveling surveying andtrigonometry trigonometric leveling. Although the two methods have their own characteristics, but there are shortcomings.With the widespread use of the Total Station and using the track rod with the total station method to measure the elevation of the increasingly popular, traditional trigonometric leveling method has shown its limitations.After a long journey, a new trigonometric leveling method has been summed up.This approach combines the advantages of two traditional approaches to further improve the accuracy of the trigonometric leveling and tosurvey faster. This article systematically expounds the principle of traditional trigonometric leveling methods and the new methods, compares their advantages and disadvantages, and analyses the main errors and measurement accuracy in the process of trigonometric leveling. II. P RINCIPLE OF T RADITIONAL T RIGONOMETRIC L EVELING AND THE N EW M ETHOD The basic formula of the traditional trigonometric leveling: tan B A H H D i t α=++- (1) where A H is the elevation of a known point, B H is the elevation of the unknown point, D is the horizontal distance between the two points, αis the vertical angle when observe from point A to point B,i is instrument height, t is the height of the prism. For traditional methods, total station must be set up in the known elevation point. At the same time, you must measure out the height ofboth the instrument and the prism if you want to measure the elevation of the unknown points. If we can measure the elevation of the measured point while set point of total station arbitrarily like leveling surveying, instead of set it on a known elevation point, and do not measure out instrument and prism,speed of measurement will be faster. As shown in the figure 1, assuming that the elevation of the point A is known, the elevation of the point B is unknown, here we measurethe elevation of other points by total station. Figure 1. Diagram for trigonometric leveling Firstly, seen by trigonometric leveling principle: (tan )B A H H D i t α=-+- (2) where i, t is unknown, but one thing is sure that once the instrument set, value of i will remain unchanged.At the same time choose tracking lever as a reflecting prism, assume that the value of t is also fixed. Seen from formula (2), tan B A H i t H D W α+-=-= (3) By formula (3),the value of W will remain unchanged in any station. And while both A H and tan D αare known, it is possible to calculate the value of W . Operation of this new method is as follows: Shown in Figure 2, elevation of point A is known, elevation of point B is unknown, and the instrument is set up at point C between A and B. The instruments sight point A to get the reading 1V . That 1V =1D 1tan α, and calculate the value of W, W = A H +1D 1tan α. At this time related constants such as elevation of station, instrument height and prism height can beof any value, not necessary to set before measuring. And then set elevation of point Cto W , set the instrument height and prism height to 0. Then elevation of point C is known. Finally sight the target point B and measured its elevation, that is 22tan B H W D α=+ (4) Therefore, using the new method, elevation of point B is 1122tan tan B A H H D D αα=-+ (5)

写好英语科技论文的诀窍(周耀旗)

写好英语科技论文的诀窍: 主动迎合读者期望,预先回答专家可能质疑 周耀旗 印地安那大学信息学院 印地安那大学医学院计算生物学和生物信息中心 以此文献给母校中国科技大学五十周年校庆 前言 我的第一篇英语科技论文写作是把在科大的学士毕业论文翻译成英文。当我一九九零年从纽约州立大学博士毕业时,发表了20多篇英语论文。但是,我对怎样写高质量科技论文的理解仍旧处于初级阶段,仅知道尽量减少语法错误。之所以如此,是因为大多数时间我都欣然接受我的博士指导老师Dr. George Stell和Dr. Harold Friedman的修改,而不知道为什么要那样改,也没有主动去问。这种情况一直持续到我去北卡州立大学做博士后。我的博士后指导老师Dr. Carol Hall建议我到邻近的杜克大学去参加一个为期两天的写作短训班。这堂由Gopen教授主办的短训班真使我茅塞顿开。第一次,我知道了读者在阅读中有他们的期望,要想写好科技论文,最有效的方法是要迎合他们的期望。这堂写作课帮我成功地完成了我的第一个博士后基金申请,有机会进入哈佛大学Dr. Martin Karplus组。在哈佛大学的五年期间,在Karplus教授的指导下,我认识到一篇好的论文需要从深度广度进行里里外外自我审查。目前,我自己当了教授,有了自己的科研组,也常常审稿。我觉得有必要让我的博士生和博士后学好写作。我不认为我自己是写作专家。我的论文也常常因为这样或那样的原因被退稿。但是我认为和大家共享我对写作的理解和我写作的经验教训,也许大家会少走一些我走过的弯路。由于多年未用中文写作,请大家多多指正。来信请寄:yqzhou@https://www.360docs.net/doc/9917748291.html,。 欢迎访问我的网站:https://www.360docs.net/doc/9917748291.html,。 导言 通常来讲,研究生和博士后从他的导师那儿得到研究方向。经过多次反复试验,得到一些好的结果。接下来他们需要对得到的数据进行总结和分析,写成论文。一篇精写的论文更容易被高档杂志接受。而写得不好的论文很可能被退稿。论文的数量和质量是学生和导师事业发展的敲门砖。不成文,便成仁,是学术生涯的写照。 很多学生以为当结果到手的时候研究就结束了。他们写的草稿,常常把原始数据放在一起,没有对方法和数据进行详细分析,没有对当今论文的评述。事实上,写作是研究不可分割的一部分。此刻是弄懂方法的成功与失败,寻找结果的解释及其隐含的意义,以及与其他相关研究进行比较的时候。 我们为什么需要在写作上如此认真努力?原因很简单。一个研究结果只有在被别人使用时才有意义。而想被别人使用,文章必须能引起其他科学家的兴趣,而且得保证其他人能看懂并可以重复和再现你的结果。只有可以被理解的研究才会被重复,也只有可以被再现的工作才能导致别人的引用和跟踪。而你的论文被引用的数量常常用来衡量研究的影响力。从某种角度看,写作就象是把你的工作成果推销给其他的科学家。 为了更好的推销,科学论文必须满足它独特的顾客:由聪明能干的科学家组成的尖端读者。它必须能先说服(通常也是竞争对手的)同行们,因为他们的评审是文章在发表前的第一道关口。同时,它也必须满足一般读者的要求。为了达到这个目标,我们首先要理解他们需要什么? 读者需要什么 你的文章的潜在读者可能有刚进入这领域的新手,大学生和研究生,也有专家(潜在审稿人),他们对你的领

科技论文致谢范文.doc

科技论文致谢范文 学生论文上,致谢词是必然的一项工作。下面是我整理的科技论文致谢范文,欢迎大家阅读借鉴,希望对你有所帮助。 篇一:科技论文致谢范文 时光荏苒,岁月如梭,转眼毕业在即。回想在大学求学的五年,心中充满无限感激和留恋之情。感谢母校为我们提供的良好学习环境,使我们能够在此专心学习,陶冶情操。谨向我的论文指导老师王蕾老师致以最诚挚的谢意!王老师不仅在学业上言传身教,而且以其严谨务实的学术作风给我以人生上的指导。本文的写作更是直接得益于她的悉心指点,从论文的选题到体系的安排,从观点推敲到字句斟酌,无不凝聚着她的心血。滴水之恩,当以涌泉相报,师恩重于山,师恩难报。我只有在今后的学习、工作中,继承轮胎品格,发扬科大精神,努力做出成绩,以回报母校老师们的谆谆教导。 另外,我必须感谢我的父母。焉得谖草,言树之背,养育之恩,无以回报。作为他们的孩子,我秉承了他们朴实、坚韧的性格,也因此我有足够的信心和能力战胜前进路上的艰难险阻;也因为他们的日夜辛劳,我才有机会如愿完成自己的大学学业,进而取得进一步发展的机会。 感谢五年中陪伴在我身边的同学、朋友,感谢他们为我提出的有益的建议和意见,有了他们的支持、鼓励和帮助,我才能充实的度过了五年的学习生活。

最后,对本文借鉴引用著作的学术界前辈们,以及百忙之中抽出时间审阅本论文的专家学者,表示由衷的谢意。 篇二:科技论文致谢范文 在xx大学度过了四年的紧张学习时光,系统地学习了XX专业的各方面知识,深深的佩服各位专业老师的学识,从中我不仅学习到管理知识,而且学到很多做人、做事、做学问的道理,在此表示真挚的谢意。在论文即将完成之际,我要感谢我的导师xxx教授。在论文撰写的整个过程中,从论文选题、到撰写开题报告、最后到正文撰写,x老师都提出了很多宝贵意见。x老师指出的每一个问题,指导的每一个思路,都使我有醍醐灌顶之感。给我感受最深的是x老师严谨治学的态度,无论从格式规范、论文要点、还是文章结构,于老师都不厌其烦,给予我及时的帮助,使我能够最后顺利完成论文写作工作。 在此我要感谢xx大学xx系的所有老师,你们无私的奉献精神和爱岗敬业的治学态度,不仅使我对管理理论有了更进一步的理解,将理论和自己的工作互相印证,受益匪浅。而且使我能够将所学理论应用于对现实问题的分析和解决,继而提高自己的管理水平。 感谢我的各位同学,是你们的无私帮助让我感受到校园的温暖,在我的论文写作过程当中,多位同学为我提供了信息支持,在此一并表示感谢。最后再次感谢xx大学为我提供了宝贵的学习机会,使我能够走上一个新的平台,幵始一段新的人生! 篇三:科技论文致谢范文 六月,总是阳光灿烂。六月,总要曲终人散。六月,我们拒绝

科技论文写作英语写作

Research Reports for Business and Technical Writing Wayne Losano A surprising amount of one's time as a student and professional is spent reporting the results of one's research projects for presentation to teachers, managers, and clients. Indeed, without basic research skills and the ability to present research results clearly and completely, an individual will encounter many obstacles in school and on the job. The need for some research-writing ability is felt nearly equally by college students in all fields, engineering and science as well as business and the humanities. Graduate study often makes great demands on the student's re-search-writing skills, and most professions continue the demand; educa-tion, advertising and marketing, economics and accounting, science and engineering, psychology, anthropology, the arts, and agriculture may all require regular reporting of research data. ELEMENTS OF THE RESEARCH PAPER The standard research report, regardless of the field or the intended reader, contains four major sections. These sections may be broken down into a variety of subsections, and they may be arranged in a variety of ways, but they regularly make up the core of the report.

相关文档
最新文档