新老GRE题号对比argument

新老GRE题号对比argument
新老GRE题号对比argument

GRE写作Argument具体性指令有哪些

GRE写作Argument具体性指令有哪些? Q:Argument的具体性指令有哪些? A:Argument的具体性指令主要有8种,分别是: 1. Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument. 这个具体指令中不需要写出前提,重点是分析有哪些具体的例证可以削弱和加强该结论。 2. Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted. 该具体指令要求重点分析前提条件,然后分析怎么削弱或加强这个前提条件。并且需要分析没有假设前提会导致什么结果。该指令出现以下若干变形: 3. Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions

gre写作issue与argument的异同

gre写作issue与argument的异同 在gre写作考试中会有issue和argument。那么,各位对gre 作文issue、gre作文argument有没有进行过了解呢?下面就和大家分享gre写作issue与argument的异同,希望能够帮助到大家,来欣赏一下吧。 gre写作issue与argument的异同 考生想要在gre写作中取得好成绩,就需要同时写出两篇不错的*来,这对于不少英语基础一般,写作水平也普通的同学来说并不容易做到。不过,如果大家能够充分了解gre作文issue 和argument的异同点,并进行足够的练习,高分作文也还是很有把握的。下面就为大家全面解析gre写作两篇作文的异同之处,帮助大家练好写作思路确保作文高分。 gre写作两篇作文相同点 虽然gre作文argument和issue有很多不同之处,但在一些基本的规范和要求上还是有共通之处的: 1. *基本要求相同 gre两篇作文的考试时间都是30分钟。考生需要在30分钟内完成从审题到构思到最后成文的整个流程。而两篇*的文体风

格也基本相同,都是属于议论文性质的写作。因此,很多考生比较惧怕的描述类*就不会有所涉及了。同时,虽然gre考试本身并没有做出任何字数方面的限制和要求,但根据历年来的高分范文总结,一般作文字数在400-500字左右是比较稳妥的,这一点ISSUE和ARGUMENT两篇作文也没有太大区别。 2. *评分标准相同 除了规范要求外,gre两篇作文在评分标准上也是基本相同的。大致都可以分为*整体结构、逻辑思维能力、对于词句语法的运用以及论据素材的使用这几个方面。当然,由于两篇*本身具体写作要求的区别,可能在一些评分细节上还存在不同。 3. 官方复习资源相同 无论是ISSUE作文还是ARGUMENT作文,两篇gre作文的复习资源也是基本相同的。除了官方公布的作文练习题外,高分范文、黄金词句和论据素材都是帮助考生练习写作能力锻炼作文水平需要用到的复习必备材料。 gre写作两篇作文不同点 说完了相似之处,接下来为大家介绍一下两篇作文的不同之处: 1. 写作具体要求区别

GRE写作ARGUMENT逻辑技巧

GRE写作ARGUMENT逻辑技巧 GRE作文argument为批判性论述文,需要对给出的一段论述文字进行分析,找到其逻辑漏洞并加以攻击。下面就和大家分享GRE写作ARGUMENT区分主次要逻辑技巧,来欣赏一下吧。 GRE写作ARGUMENT区分主次要逻辑技巧 GRE写作怎样判断主次要逻辑漏洞? 如上文所说,其实很多时候一篇argument题目素材里,存在的逻辑漏洞往往不止一处,对于一些写作驳论文经验丰富的考生来说,有些题目甚至一眼望去就是千疮百孔的。但这并不代表大家随便抓住一点就可以写出很有说服力的*。学会区分逻辑漏洞的主要和次要,集中精力从主要漏洞入手进行写作才能让*更有说服力。下面通过一个实例为大家分析: GRE写作ARGUMENT真题实例分析 The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine. A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the

executives need and the success of their firms. Of the advertising firms studied those whose executives reported needing no more than 6 hours of sleep per night had higher profit margins and faster growth. These results suggest that if a business wants to prosper, it should hire only people who need less than 6 hours of sleep per night. Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted. 作文题目翻译 最近一项研究根据每晚平均睡眠时间对300名男性和女性Mentian广告经理需要的睡眠总量与他们公司的成功之间的关联。被研究的广告公司中,那些报告每晚需要的睡眠不超过6小时的经理有较高的利润率和较快的增长。这些结果表明,如果一个企业想要成功,就应该雇佣那些每晚只需要不超过6小时睡眠时间的人。 写一篇回应*,探讨上述论据中明示和/或隐含的假设,并解释该论据如何建立在这些假设之上;如果这些假设不合理,会对该论据产生什么影响";

新GRE写作Argument范文

新GRE写作Argument范文 来源:互联网 新对于国内考生比较难的一个问题就是中国人的思维与西方人不同,所以的方式也不太一样。因此,大家可以通过参考一些优秀的新GRE的范文来提高自己的写作水平。 Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. following appeared in a memorandum written by the vice president of Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products. "Previous experience has shown that our stores are most profitable in areas where residents are highly concerned with leading healthy lives. We should therefore build our next new store in Painesville, which has many such residents. Painesville merchants report that sales of running shoes and exercise clothing are at all-time highs. The local health club, which nearly closed five years ago due to lack of business, has more members than ever, and the weight training and aerobics classes are always full. We can even anticipate a new generation of customers: Painesville's schoolchildren are required to participate in a 'fitness for life' program, which emphasizes the benefits of regular exercise at an early age." following appeared in a letter sent by a committee of homeowners from the Deer haven Acres to all homeowners in Deer haven Acres.

GRE的Argument写作方法:让步式攻击法

GRE的Argument写作方法:让步式攻击法 本文是为广大考生整理的GRE Argument写作技巧:让步式攻击,希望协助大家解决GRE考试难题,取得好的成绩。 让步式攻击: 首先,攻击原文第一个错误,例如是调查类错误,攻击其调查过程、调查数据是否具有代表性等等。 然后,在攻击第二个错误时,假定上面的调查即便是在没有错误的情况下实行的,也不能导出作者原文的第二个论断,言外之意就是何况这个调查还是有错误的。 最后,在攻击第三个错误时,假定第二个问题也是成立的(没有错误),也无法导出第三个论断。这样一种让步式的体系,到最后就彻底驳斥了原文的整个逻辑体系,让原文的逻辑无法成立,题目最后的结论自然就成为了空中楼阁。 下面我们拿例题来做一个讲解 Argument The following memo appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council. “An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby East Meria, where fish consumption is very high, people visit the doctor only once or twice per year for the treatment of colds. Clearly, eating a substantial amount of fish can prevent colds. Since colds are the reason most frequently given for absences from school and work, we recommend the daily use of

英语考试作文-【作文分析】GRE写作Argument高分范文用法真题实例讲解

英语考试作文 【作文分析】GRE写作Argument高分范文用 法真题实例讲解 GRE考试中,考生最不容易把握的一个部分可能就是作文了。虽然GRE官方公开了作文题库,但想要全部练习一遍花费时间精力太多并不现实,也无法确保高分。更好的提分做法无疑就是看官方范文练写作。不过,即使如此范文在使用上也是有注意事项的,错误使用只会适得其反,下面就为大家具体介绍GRE写作Argument作文的高分范文用法。GRE作文避免扣分词汇语法要过关 GRE写作Argument高分范文真题实例分析 真题实例 The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper: “Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion. 高分范文 This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that

GRE作文Argument模板+错误分类

Argument Example 调查 1, Selective sample:样本选择,一部分被排除在外 One major problem is about the sample the author studied in the survey. the author considers only...(selective sub-groups) although (the sub-groups the author studied) do constitute a significant part of (the whole general population), however, (many other sub-groups)are actually excluded from the survey. Perhaps...or...without ruling out all the possibilities above, the author could not make any general conclusion about...merely based on (selective sub-groups). 4,14,16,45,63,65,67,80,84,88,90,97,123,146,154,156,168,179,185,193,196,207,227,231,232,236,238,239 2, Quantity of the sample样本数量 ( pointing out that the current sample is too small in its size)(the fact cited by the author) could hardly illustrate the assumption that... because the author provides only N samples of (the general population),however, (the limited sample) might not be representative of the whole general group. thus we cannot accept the author’s conclusion that...before he/she coul d provide more statistic data about (the situation of other sub-groups). 10,14,33,40,53,69,95,115,123,132,139,150,154,158,167,179,180,188,191,239 3, Do the statistics make any difference:调查只调查了部分情况,忽略了一部分 The information provided by the author is insufficient for the author to reach the conclusion. the survey only studies the situation of ...(an(some) insignificant case(s)), however, many other more essential cases (related to the final conclusion)were ignored in the survey.(we need to know the condition of some other cases about which we care more/ the current case studied in the survey makes little sense on the final conclusion, the author should provide some more important information about the case he studied. )Lacking further studies on these important issues, the author could not hastily conclude that...merely based on the insignificant study. 158,165,183,202,211,217 17,115,147,220 5, Who conducted the survey:结果扭曲,调查者为了自己的利益 The reliability of the survey is also open to doubt due to the organization who conducted the survey. (the organization)has vested interest in the final decision/conclusion which was based on the result of the survey, and thus might distort the actual answers of the respondents.(the institution/individuals may benefit greatly from the result if the result was interpreted as was currently ) Thus, the author should cite a survey which is conducted by an independent institution to convince us that (the assumption). 115,156 6, When was the survey conducted:时间变化 The effectiveness of the result of the survey cited by the author as main evidence is also open to doubt. The survey was conduct (during a special period, or a long time ago), thus may not reflect the current situations accurately. It is true that ( the survey may reflect the opinions or situations of respondents at the time when it was conducted), but people’s opinion toward (the subject surveyed)may have changed greatly during the past time (or, while this fact could not sufficiently illustrate that (the general group) will also...all the time)(many factors that could influence the validity of the survey will change in the future, or respondents may act differently during the period when the survey was conducted, thus the result of the survey could not represent the all-time situation. ) Thus, a more recent survey, if a survey is needed at all, should be provided to sufficiently illustrate the author’s assumption that...

GREARGUMENT写作范文之

GRE ARGUMENT写作范文之二 题目:123题 The following appeared in a health newsletter. Eating a heavy meal may increase the risk of heart attack. A recent survey of 2,000 people who had had a heart attack revealed that 158 of them said they had eaten a heavy meal within 24 hours before their heart attack, and 25 of them said they had eaten a heavy meal within 2 hours before their heart attack. Eating and digesting food releases hormones into the bloodstream and temporarily increases heart rate and blood pressure slightly. Both of these things put stress on the heart. Therefore, people who are at risk of having a heart attack can lower that risk by not overeating. 范文 475 words 庄子 2004-3-9 嘉仕花园广州 On the basis of a recent survey, the author of the article claims that eating a heavy meal may increase the risk of heart attack, and then concludes that not overeating can lower the risk of heart attacks. However, the author’s reasoning suffers several alarmingly obvious logical flaws. First of all, suppose that a heavy meal definitely results in high risks of heart attack. It is logically unconvincing to conclude that not overeating will necessarily lower the risks of heart attack. Logically speaking, if one event sufficiently triggers the other event, then without the former it is still possible that the latter happens. In fact this is also a common sense. For example, if it rains the ground may become wet. However, if it has not rained at all, the ground still can be wet for many other reasons. Similarly, not overeating will not necessarily reduce the possibility of suffering heart attacks. Secondly, the argument that eating a heavy meal increases the risk of heart attack is dubious. The sole evidence is a recent survey. However, the sample of the survey covered only 2,000 people. However, these people might be neither typical nor representative to all the population of those who are at the risk of heart attack. If the population is 200 million, the 2,000 people under survey are clearly insufficient to make the reasoning sound. Even if the survey makes a sense, the reasoning is also weakened by a logical flaw called Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc. Put is precisely, although the 158 people said that they had had a heavy meal within 24 hours before their heart attack, and 25 of them said they had eaten a heavy meal within 2 hours before their heart attack, it is hard to believe that it is the heavy meal that caused their heart attack. For no evidence has been offered to establish the cause-effect relationship between the

新GRE作文ARGUMENT官方题库+翻译

This page contains the Argument topics for the Analytical Writing section of the GRE?revised General Test. When you take the test, you will be presented with one Argument topic from this pool. Each Argument topic consists of a passage that presents an argument followed by specific task instructions that tell you how to analyze the argument. The wording of some topics in the test might vary slightly from what is presented here. Also, because there may be multiple versions of some topics with similar or identical wording but with different task instructions, it is very important to read your test topic and its specific task directions carefully and respond to the wording as it appears in the actual test. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a"Palean"basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean. Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument. 一种具有独特花纹的编织篮子以前只在史前村庄Palea的临近地区发现过,因而被认为是Palea居所独有的。然而最近,考古学家在一个与Palea隔着一条叫做Brim河的村庄Lithos发现了一个这样的Palea篮子。Brim河很深很宽,所以古代Palea人只能坐船穿过它,但没有证据表明Palea人拥有船只。这表明那种所谓的Palea篮子并不是那里所独有的。 1)the author fails to consider the possibility that the Palean may arrived in Lithos through other means 2)the Palean basket could arrive other place through many possible methods such as trade, or boats possessed by other culture. 3)In Palean times, the Brim River may not be as deep and broad as it is currently. 4)This may also result from migration. 5)没有证据表明palea和brim是同时期存在的,不同时期情况更复杂 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2) The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal. "A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations(such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey),firstborn infant monkeys produce up to twice as much of the hormone cortisol, which primes the body for increased activity levels, as do their younger siblings. Firstborn humans also produce relatively high levels of cortisol in stimulating situations (such as the return of a parent after an absence).The study also found that during pregnancy, first-time mother monkeys had higher levels of cortisol than did those who had had several offspring." Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation(s) can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument. 最近一项对恒河猴的调查揭示了出生顺序对于个体刺激水平的影响。调查显示在受到刺激的环境下(例如遇到一个不熟悉的猴子),头胎小猴的皮质醇分泌会翻倍,这样增加了它及其兄弟姐妹的身体灵活度。人类的头胎孩子在遇到刺激(例如父母外出回家)时也会分泌出相对浓度的皮质醇。研究同时还发现在怀孕期间,第一次为人母的猴子的皮质醇要比生过几次孩子后的猴子水平高很多。1)任何猴子不是一类,不能归于一谈

GREargument八种题型分析

改革后的新gre考试更加注重题目要求更加具体,考察考生完成题目过程中是否融合批判性思维,以下是小编为大家搜索综合整理有关新gre作文题库,argument introduction 的8种区别,希望能给大家新gre作文题库写作方面带来帮助。 introduction的重要性,我就不再多做复述了;因为多了这个货,AW的难度又因此提高了;以前的话argument只要侧重于把错误给找出来,然后把现成的模板一套上去,就能够解决问题;现在论证方法被定死的情况下,就会有一种无从下手的感觉。那么应该如何应对呢?我个人的想法就是,改变一下应试思路,拿到题目先看introduction,确定相应的框架,然后再看题目确定具体的讨论内容;也就是说,对于目前的八个introduction,我们可以做一个总结,等以后碰到题目,遇到什么样的,就拿什么样的框架去套,并配以相应的一些常用短语等等,这样就能够节约掉一大堆的思考时间了吧。argument本来的论证就不算太难,这样做应该会有效果;issue也许要复杂一点,等以后再慢慢研究吧。 虽然把introduction的分析给写出来了,但不是说你就可以不用看那些英文了;建议是把introduction原文和我的分析对照着看,防止出现误会。 1) Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument. 2) Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions, and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

举例说明什么是GRE写作Argument

举例说明什么是GRE写作Argument Argument的本质——大家来找茬+逻辑的暗战 很多同学对到底什么是Argument还是没有一个具体明确的概念, 话不多说,我们举个例子大家就明白了。 Two years ago, consultants predicted that West Egg's landfill, which is used for garbage disposal, would be completely filled within five years. During the past two years, however, the town's residents have been recycling twice as much material as they did in previous years. Next month the amount of recycled material—which includes paper, plastic, and metal—should further increase, since charges for pickup of other household garbage will double. Furthermore, over 90 percent of the respondents to a recent survey said that they would do more recycling in the future. Because of our town's strong commitment to recycling, the available space in our landfill should last for considerably longer than predicted. Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument. 这个故事说的是:两年前,顾问预言West Egg用于投放垃圾的填 埋地将在五年内完全被填满。不过在过去的两年中,市民循环再利用 材料的数量比以前翻了一番。因为下个月其他家庭的垃圾处理费将会 加倍,循环再利用材料(包括纸张、塑料和金属)的数量将进一步增加。而且,在最近一次调查中,超过90%的回应者表示他们在未来将会做更多的循环再利用工作。因为居民对循环再利用的有力支持,我们填埋 地可利用空间的使用时间将比预期的长得多。

相关主题
相关文档
最新文档