Association of Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Cardiovascular Death in Patients With Prostate

合集下载

激素类药物在抗肿瘤方面的研究进展

激素类药物在抗肿瘤方面的研究进展

激素类药物在抗肿瘤方面的研究进展摘要:肿瘤是人们身体健康的大杀手之一,因此它的治疗也成为了这个世纪亟待解决的问题,迄今为止也有很多类的抗肿瘤药物问世,比如甲氨蝶呤等化疗药物和干扰素等生物制剂。

化疗药物中的激素类药物在近二三十年来也成了一个热点,其通过调节体内激素平衡来控制肿瘤,主要包括以他莫西芬为代表的抗雌激素类药物、以氟他胺为代表的抗雄激素类药物、依西美坦等芳香化酶抑制剂和诺雷德等LH-RH拮抗剂/激动剂。

关键词:激素类药物;抗肿瘤;抗雌激素;芳香化酶抑制剂;RH-LH激动剂/拮抗剂恶性肿瘤是严重威胁人类健康的常见病和多发病,尤其是当今社会环境污染严重,导致肿瘤的发病率更高。

因此抗肿瘤药物的研究也就成了当今医药界的热门项目。

迄今为止,也有了很多能够有效抑制、治疗肿瘤的药物诞生。

激素类药物是以人体或动物激素(包括与激素结构、作用原理相同的有机物)为有效成分的药物。

激素类药物作为一种药效迅速明显但副作用同时也很严重的药物,一直以来都是备受争议,但是近年来的一些研究表明能够通过和一些药物连用来降低激素的强烈副作用。

激素类药物在各个疾病领域都有不错的疗效,近年来激素类抗肿瘤药物研究有很大进展,除了一些传统的激素类用于抗肿瘤外,并有新的抗雌激素、抗雄激素、LH-RH激动剂/拮抗剂及芳香酶抑制剂等激素类药物用于肿瘤临床。

作者于本文中对不同类的激素药物做简要叙述。

1 抗雌激素类药物抗雌激素疗法是雌激素受体依赖型乳腺癌内分泌疗法的重要手段之一,这类药物可在肿瘤细胞水平与雌二醇竞争性结合雌激素受体,在细胞浆内形成与雌激素受体配体-受体的二聚体复合物[1],继而进入细胞核内,影响DNA和mRNA的合成,从而抑制癌细胞的增殖,达到治疗、控制乳腺癌的目的。

同时部分抗雌激素类药物也可以用于治疗卵巢癌和其他一些癌症的辅助治疗。

1.1他莫昔芬他莫西芬(Tamoxifen,TAM,又名三苯氧胺)是一种非激素类抗癌药, 由于其能够封闭雌激素受体(ER)所中介的细胞增殖活性而呈现拮抗雌激素作用, 故被广泛用于治疗雌激素依赖性乳腺癌和卵巢癌等恶性肿瘤[2,3]。

前列腺癌药物去势治疗随访管理专家共识2024(完整版)

前列腺癌药物去势治疗随访管理专家共识2024(完整版)

前列腺癌药物去势治疗随访管理专家共识2024(完整版)摘要随着诊疗技术的进步,前列腺癌患者的5年生存率显著提升,前列腺癌进入慢性疾病管理时代。

雄激素剥夺治疗是晚期前列腺癌患者的基石治疗方案,并贯穿患者治疗的各阶段。

前列腺癌药物去势治疗后的疾病进展、治疗相关不良反应以及相关并发症已成为前列腺癌长期管理的一大难题,影响患者的生存及生活质量。

除了在诊断和治疗过程中需要注重前列腺癌的疾病管理,更应该密切随访药物去势治疗后患者的整体情况,尤其对于处于疾病治疗关键阶段的患者,应在疾病重要节点(疾病阶段起始点和治疗切换点)监测睾酮或其他指标,避免错过最佳治疗窗口期。

前列腺癌随访管理应该兼顾疾病本身治疗阶段特点(疾病分期、既往症状、预后因素及治疗方案)和患者自身诉求,定制个性化的随访策略,更好地提高患者治疗依从性,改善预后。

目前中国尚缺乏前列腺癌患者药物去势治疗后随访及生活质量管理的指南或共识,为此,中国前列腺癌研究协作组组织国内相关专家制定了前列腺癌药物去势治疗随访管理中国专家共识(2024版),以期为接受药物去势治疗前列腺癌患者的随访及生活管理提供参考,进一步改善中国前列腺癌患者的预后及生活质量。

【关键词】前列腺肿瘤;药物去势;随访;生活质量;共识在全球范围内,前列腺癌作为男性的第2大常见肿瘤,已成为一项重大的公共健康问题。

随着医学诊疗技术的进步以及前列腺癌早筛意识的不断普及,前列腺癌患者的5年生存率显著改善。

美国癌症协会发布的2023年恶性肿瘤统计数据显示,美国前列腺癌患者的5年相对生存率已达97.0%,仅次于甲状腺癌。

中国前列腺癌患者的5年生存率虽然与美国存在差距,但2012—2015年中国前列腺癌患者的年龄标化5年相对生存率也已从2003—2005年的53.8%提高至66.4%。

生存时间的延长预示前列腺癌进入慢性疾病管理阶段。

在长期的治疗和康复过程中,患者的生活质量、疾病认知、心理状态等问题应在随访期间给予相应的支持和指导。

前列腺癌化疗的发展及未来

前列腺癌化疗的发展及未来

前列腺癌化疗的发展及未来瓦斯里江·瓦哈甫;牛亦农;邢念增【摘要】前列腺癌是全球范围内男性第二常见恶性肿瘤,化学药物治疗(以下简称化疗)是晚期前列腺癌的主要治疗手段.自1997年以来,国内外已先后批准米托蒽醌、多西他赛和卡巴他赛等作为前列腺癌的化疗药物,其中多西他赛作为目前为止唯一的晚期前列腺癌阶段一线化疗药物,参与多项临床随机对照研究,用来评估新药、联合用药、序贯治疗以及早期用药对前列腺癌预后的影响.本文就前列腺癌化疗的发展历史和近年来的研究方向做一综述.【期刊名称】《首都医科大学学报》【年(卷),期】2016(037)003【总页数】8页(P299-306)【关键词】前列腺癌;化疗;预后【作者】瓦斯里江·瓦哈甫;牛亦农;邢念增【作者单位】首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院泌尿外科,北京100020;首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院泌尿外科,北京100020;首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院泌尿外科,北京100020【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R737.25在全世界范围内,前列腺癌是男性第二常见恶性肿瘤,也是男性癌症中排名第五的死亡原因[1]。

国内前列腺癌发生率也逐步攀升,全国及北京肿瘤统计为男性第五位,值得关注的是全球死于前列腺癌的患者中有5%生活在中国[2-3]。

这主要是由于国内将近2/3的初诊患者已局部进展或远处转移,丧失了根治性治疗的机会,而在美国局限性前列腺癌病例占81%,淋巴结和远处转移的患者仅占12%和4%[3-4]。

前列腺癌内分泌治疗中位缓解时间为18~24个月,之后进展成去势抵抗性前列腺癌(castration resistant prostate cancer, CRPC),化学药物治疗(以下简称化疗)是转移性CRPC(metastatic CRPC,mCRPC)的重要治疗手段。

最早针对前列腺癌化疗的随机临床研究(randomized clinical trial,RCT)要追溯到1973年采用环磷酰胺和5-氟尿嘧啶的美国前列腺癌计划(National Prostatic Cancer Project),在此之前报道的化疗病例不超过100例[5-7]。

前列腺癌多学科病例讨论:盆腔淋巴结转移的前列腺癌

前列腺癌多学科病例讨论:盆腔淋巴结转移的前列腺癌

前列腺癌多学科病例讨论:盆腔淋巴结转移的前列腺癌戴波;叶定伟;姚伟强;程竞仪;张盛;甘华磊;刘晓航【期刊名称】《现代泌尿外科杂志》【年(卷),期】2016(021)009【总页数】4页(P705-708)【关键词】前列腺癌;盆腔淋巴结转移;内分泌治疗;前列腺癌根治术;前列腺癌根治性放疗;全身化疗【作者】戴波;叶定伟;姚伟强;程竞仪;张盛;甘华磊;刘晓航【作者单位】复旦大学附属肿瘤医院泌尿外科,上海200032;复旦大学附属肿瘤医院泌尿外科,上海200032;复旦大学附属肿瘤医院放疗科,上海200032;复旦大学附属肿瘤医院核医学,上海200032;复旦大学附属肿瘤医院肿瘤内科,上海200032;复旦大学附属肿瘤医院病理科,上海200032;复旦大学附属肿瘤医院放射诊断科,上海200032【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R737主持人:复旦大学附属肿瘤医院泌尿外科病例汇报人:复旦大学附属肿瘤医院泌尿外科讨论嘉宾:复旦大学附属肿瘤医院放射诊断科复旦大学附属肿瘤医院病理科复旦大学附属肿瘤医院核医学科复旦大学附属肿瘤医院放疗科复旦大学附属肿瘤医院肿瘤内科2.1 病例介绍患者男性,年龄70岁,汉族,已婚。

因“排尿费力、排尿中断6个月”就诊。

入院行直肠指检发现前列腺Ⅲ度大,中央沟消失,双侧叶质硬如石,表面结节感明显,与直肠无明显粘连。

相关实验室检查无明显异常发现。

进一步的专科检查显示:前列腺特异性抗原(prostate special antigen,PSA)181.6 ng/mL,f/t PSA:0.21。

尿流率检查示:最大尿流率下降至5.1 mL/s。

经直肠B超:前列腺实质不均质增大,符合前列腺恶性肿瘤。

患者既往无手术外伤史。

家族史无特殊。

系统回顾:高血压病史10年,口服降压药物,血压控制好。

肺片和腹盆腔彩超均无明显异常。

全身同位素发射计算机辅助断层显像(Emission Computed Tomography,ECT)骨扫描未见明显异常。

晚期前列腺癌的雄激素阻断医治

晚期前列腺癌的雄激素阻断医治

晚期前列腺癌的雄激素阻断医治【摘要】探讨间歇性雄激素阻断医治与持续性雄激素阻断医治晚期前列腺癌的疗效和不良反映。

方式65例晚期前列腺癌患者分为两组,A组34例行间歇性雄激素阻断(IAB)医治,B组31例行持续性雄激素阻断(CAB)医治,比较两组在疾病进展时间和不良反映方面的不同。

结果A组中位随访时间为个月,B组中位随访时间为个月。

A、B组疾病进展率别离为%和%,两组比较不同有统计学意义(P=)。

A、B组疾病中位进展时间别离为个月、个月,两组比较不同有统计学意义(P=)。

在有骨转移患者中,A、B组疾病中位进展时间别离为个月、个月,两组比较不同有统计学意义(P=)。

在无骨转移患者中,A、B组疾病中位进展时间别离为个月、个月,两组比较不同有统计学意义(P=)。

不良反映发生率别离为A组发生潮热症状%、乳腺肿痛%、骨质疏松%。

B组发生潮热症状%、乳腺肿痛%、骨质疏松%。

两组比较不同有统计学意义:潮热症状P=,乳腺肿痛P=,骨质疏松P=。

结论对晚期前列腺癌患者IAB医治可以延缓病变的进展,减少雄激素阻断致使的不良反映,提高患者的生活质量,应作为晚期前列腺癌患者的首选医治。

【关键词】前列腺肿瘤雄激素阻断不良反映[Abstract]Objective To compare the efficacy of intermittent androgen blockade (IAB )versus total continuous androgen blockade(CAB )in the treatment of late prostate The study included 65 patients with late prostate patients (group A )received IAB,and 31 patients (group B )received time to disease progression and side effect rates was compared between the 2 The median follow-up was months in group A and months in group disease progression rate was % in group A and % in group B,with significant difference between the 2 groups (P=).The median time to disease progression was months in group A and months in group B,there was significant difference between the 2 groups (P= ).In patients with skeletal metastasis,the median time to disease progression was months in group A and months in group B,with significant difference between the 2 groups (P= ).In patients without skeletal metastasis,the median time to disease progression was months in group A and months in group B,with significant difference between the 2 groups (P= ).Side effect rates were found in more patients of group B than in group A,including hot flash (% vs %,P=),gynecomastia (% vs %,P=),osteoporosis (% vs %,P= ).Conclusion IAB is the first choice of endocrine treatment for late prostate cancer.[Key words]prostatic neoplasm; androgen blockade;side effect前列腺癌是老年男性最多见的肿瘤之一,其发病率呈逐年上升趋势[1],雄激素阻断是已失去根治机缘的晚期前列腺癌患者的首选医治方式。

内分泌治疗 英语

内分泌治疗 英语

内分泌治疗英语Endocrine TherapyThe endocrine system is a complex network of glands and hormones that play a crucial role in regulating various physiological processes within the human body. Hormones, the chemical messengers produced by these glands, are responsible for maintaining homeostasis, controlling growth and development, and influencing a wide range of bodily functions, from metabolism to mood. When the endocrine system malfunctions, it can lead to a variety of health issues, ranging from hormonal imbalances to chronic diseases. In such cases, endocrine therapy emerges as a vital treatment approach, aiming to restore the delicate balance of hormones and alleviate the associated symptoms.Endocrine therapy, also known as hormone therapy, is a medical treatment that involves the administration of synthetic or natural hormones to address hormonal imbalances or to target specific hormone-dependent conditions. This therapeutic approach is particularly effective in the management of various endocrine-related disorders, including thyroid dysfunction, diabetes, and certain types of cancer.One of the primary applications of endocrine therapy is in the treatment of thyroid disorders. The thyroid gland, located in the neck, is responsible for producing hormones that regulate metabolism, body temperature, and other vital functions. When the thyroid gland becomes underactive (hypothyroidism) or overactive (hyperthyroidism), it can lead to a range of symptoms, such as fatigue, weight changes, and mood disturbances. Endocrine therapy, typically in the form of synthetic thyroid hormones (e.g., levothyroxine), can be used to restore the proper balance of thyroid hormones, effectively managing the symptoms and preventing long-term complications.Another significant application of endocrine therapy is in the treatment of diabetes, a chronic condition characterized by thebody's inability to regulate blood sugar levels effectively. In type 1 diabetes, the pancreas fails to produce insulin, a hormone essential for glucose metabolism. In type 2 diabetes, the body becomes resistant to the effects of insulin. Endocrine therapy in the form of insulin administration or the use of other antidiabetic medications (e.g., metformin, GLP-1 agonists) can help maintain healthy blood sugar levels, reducing the risk of diabetic complications such as nerve damage, kidney disease, and cardiovascular problems.Endocrine therapy also plays a crucial role in the management ofhormone-dependent cancers, such as breast cancer and prostate cancer. These types of cancers are fueled by the presence of specific hormones, which promote the growth and proliferation of cancer cells. Endocrine therapy in this context aims to disrupt the cancer's dependence on hormones, either by blocking the production or action of these hormones or by directly targeting the cancer cells. This approach can be highly effective in slowing the progression of the disease, improving patient outcomes, and enhancing quality of life.In the case of breast cancer, endocrine therapy may involve the use of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), such as tamoxifen, or aromatase inhibitors, which block the conversion of androgens to estrogens. These medications can significantly reduce the risk of recurrence and improve survival rates in patients with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. Similarly, in prostate cancer, endocrine therapy may involve the use of androgen-deprivation therapies, which suppress the production or action of testosterone, the primary male sex hormone.Beyond these well-established applications, endocrine therapy is also being explored for the management of other health conditions, such as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), infertility, and certain endocrine-related mental health disorders. In PCOS, for instance, endocrine therapy may involve the use of oral contraceptives orinsulin-sensitizing medications to regulate hormonal imbalances and alleviate symptoms like irregular menstrual cycles, acne, and excessive hair growth.The success of endocrine therapy is largely dependent on the accurate diagnosis and monitoring of the underlying endocrine condition. Healthcare providers, such as endocrinologists, work closely with patients to develop personalized treatment plans, which may involve a combination of medication, lifestyle modifications, and regular monitoring of hormone levels. Patients play a crucial role in the treatment process, as adherence to the prescribed regimen and regular follow-up appointments are essential for achieving optimal outcomes.In conclusion, endocrine therapy is a vital component of modern healthcare, providing effective solutions for a wide range of endocrine-related disorders. By leveraging the power of hormones and targeted interventions, healthcare professionals can help patients restore hormonal balance, manage chronic conditions, and improve their overall health and well-being. As research in this field continues to evolve, the potential of endocrine therapy to address complex health challenges is expected to grow, offering new hope and improved quality of life for those affected by endocrine system disorders.。

前列腺小细胞癌1例报道并文献复习

前列腺小细胞癌1例报道并文献复习

前列腺小细胞癌1例报道并文献复习张国庆;郑辉;张圣明;常金;张本华【期刊名称】《泰山医学院学报》【年(卷),期】2017(038)009【总页数】3页(P1065-1067)【关键词】前列腺小细胞癌;放射治疗;化学治疗【作者】张国庆;郑辉;张圣明;常金;张本华【作者单位】泰山医学院附属医院肿瘤科,山东泰安 271000;泰山医学院附属医院风湿科,山东泰安 271000;泰山医学院附属医院肿瘤科,山东泰安 271000;泰山医学院附属医院肿瘤科,山东泰安 271000;泰山医学院附属医院肿瘤科,山东泰安271000【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R737.25前列腺小细胞癌非常罕见,约占前列腺肿瘤的0.5%~2%[1]。

相对于前列腺腺癌,前列腺小细胞癌有独特的临床特点,其恶性程度高,局部症状明显,远处转移风险大,诊断时多数为晚期,且对激素治疗效果差。

手术放疗化疗等常规治疗手段可以改善局部症状,但容易快速进展,整体预后较差。

既往文献报道不多,2014年10月本院收治患者1例并复习既往文献,以提高对前列腺小细胞癌疾病认识。

患者,男,55岁,因“出现尿路梗阻予以留置导尿管1周”于2014年10月15日入院。

肛诊:前列腺III度肿大,以左侧为主。

PSA 0.78 ng/ml,fPSA 0.336ng/ml,MRI:前列腺结构失常,不规则软组织肿块,符合前列腺占位表现,向上侵入膀胱,向两旁侵犯双侧精囊腺体,直肠前壁不排除受侵;直肠周围脂肪层多发肿大淋巴结;骶骨右侧份及左侧髂骨异常信号。

考虑骨转移。

CT:双肺多发结节考虑转移,肝内多发低密度灶,不除外转移瘤。

遂在B超引导下行前列腺活检术,术后病理:前列腺穿刺Y1-3,左X1-6 中X1-2 右X1均见完全性前列腺小细胞癌,免疫组化:CK(+)CgA( +) SYN(+ )KI-67( 60%) PSA(-)。

肿瘤标志物CEA 14.75 ng/ml,NSE 138 ng/ml,proGRP 156 ng/ml。

前列腺癌的CAB及IHT治疗

前列腺癌的CAB及IHT治疗

单用抗雄激素药 雌激素治疗 甾体类及非甾体类 抗雄激素药物 肾上腺来源雄激素 的抑制剂
内分泌治疗的方式(2)
新辅助内分泌治疗 (NHT)
辅助内分泌治疗(AHT) 间歇性内分泌治疗(IHT)
手术去势与药物去势
药物去势与手术去势等效。 药物去势: 优点:无手术危险, 无潜在精神创伤, 可间歇治疗。
患者更愿意接受LHRHa的治疗。 缺点:费用高,需每月去医院注射。 睾丸切除: 优点:单次治疗,费用低。 缺点:手术风险,潜在精神创伤,不能间歇治疗。
患者选择LHRHa的理由
避免手术(36%) 治疗有效(18%) 药物治疗方便(10%) 医生建议(10%)
MAB或CAB机制
肾上腺产生的睾酮:5~10% 睾丸产生睾酮:90~95%
LHRHa通过抑制垂体LH而抑制睾丸产生睾酮, 手术去势直接去除睾丸来源的雄激素,但均对肾 上腺来源的睾酮没有影响。
目的
减少肿瘤体积、降低临床分期、进而延 长生存率、同时将根治术的适应症扩大至 T3期。
——前列腺癌诊断治疗指南
根治术前新辅助治疗
Neoadjuvant hormonal ablative therapy
药物的选择
LHRH-A和抗雄激素 LHRH-A 抗雄激素药物 雌二醇氮芥
MAB方法疗效更为可靠。时间 3-9个 月。
T1 1/1项 有降低的趋势,但无统计学意义 T2 7/7项 降低的幅度为%至%(统计学意义) T3 3/5项 切缘阳性率从 61%-64% 降至26%-42% (统计学 意义)
2/5项 有降低的趋势,但无统计学意义 对于新辅助治疗可以降低前列腺切缘肿瘤阳性率的结论,几乎没 有异议。
——前列腺癌诊断治疗指南
• 内分泌治疗或观察等待治疗
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

REVIEWAssociation of Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Cardiovascular Deathin Patients With Prostate CancerA Meta-analysis of Randomized TrialsPaul L.Nguyen,MDYoujin Je,MSFabio A.B.Schutz,MDKaren E.Hoffman,MD,MPH,MHScJim C.Hu,MD,MPHArti Parekh,BAJoshua A.Beckman,MD,MScToni K.Choueiri,MDA N D R O G E N D E P R I V A T I O Ntherapy(ADT)in the form ofa gonadotropin-releasing hor-mone(GnRH)agonist is amainstay of prostate cancer treat-ment,but several studies have sug-gested that ADT may increase a pa-tient’s risk of dying from cardiovascularcauses.In2006,Keating et al1found thatGnRH agonist use was associated witha44%increased risk of incident diabe-tes,16%increase in coronary heartdisease,11%increase in myocardialinfarction(MI),and16%increase insudden cardiac death in the nationalSurveillance,Epidemiology,and EndResults–Medicare database.In2007,Tsai et al2found that ADT was associ-ated with a2.6-times increase in car-diovascular death among men receiv-ing radical prostatectomy in theCAPSURE database.In addition,D’Amico et al3reanalyzed data from2randomized trials and found that ADTuse was associated with a shorter time to fatal MI in a subgroup of men olderthan65years.On the basis of theseand other studies,4the American HeartAssociation,the American Cancer Author Affiliations are listed at the end of this article. Corresponding Author:Paul L.Nguyen,MD,Depart-ment of Radiation Oncology,Dana-Farber Cancer In-stitute,Brigham and Women’s Hospital,75Francis St, Boston,MA02115(pnguyen@).Context Whether androgen deprivation therapy(ADT)causes excess cardiovascu-lar deaths in men with prostate cancer is highly controversial and was the subject of ajoint statement by multiple medical societies and a US Food and Drug Administrationsafety warning.Objective To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trialsto determine whether ADT is associated with cardiovascular mortality,prostate cancer–specific mortality(PCSM),and all-cause mortality in men with unfavorable-risk,non-metastatic prostate cancer.Data Sources A search of MEDLINE,EMBASE,and the Cochrane Central Registerof Controlled Trials databases for relevant randomized controlled trials in English be-tween January1,1966,and April11,2011.Study Selection Inclusion required nonmetastatic disease,intervention group withgonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist–based ADT,control group with no imme-diate ADT,complete information on cardiovascular deaths,and median follow-up ofmore than1year.Data Extraction Extraction was by2independent reviewers.Summary incidence,rela-tive risk(RR),and CIs were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models.Results Among4141patients from8randomized trials,cardiovascular death in pa-tients receiving ADT vs control was not significantly different(255/2200vs252/1941events;incidence,11.0%;95%CI,8.3%-14.5%;vs11.2%;95%CI,8.3%-15.0%;RR,0.93;95%CI,0.79-1.10;P=.41).ADT was not associated with excesscardiovascular death in trials of at least3years(long duration)of ADT(11.5%;95%CI,8.1%-16.0%;vs11.5%;95%CI,7.5%-17.3%;RR,0.91;95%CI,0.75-1.10;P=.34)or in trials of6months or less(short duration)of ADT(10.5%;95%CI,6.3%-17.0%;vs10.3%;95%CI,8.2%-13.0%;RR,1.00;95%CI,0.73-1.37;P=.99).Among4805patients from11trials with overall death data,ADT was associated with lowerPCSM(443/2527vs552/2278events;13.5%;95%CI,8.8%-20.3%;vs22.1%;95%CI,15.1%-31.1%;RR,0.69;95%CI,0.56-0.84;PϽ.001)and lower all-cause mor-tality(1140/2527vs1213/2278events;37.7%;95%CI,27.3%-49.4%;vs44.4%;95%CI,32.5%-57.0%;RR,0.86;95%CI,0.80-0.93;PϽ.001).Conclusion In a pooled analysis of randomized trials in unfavorable-risk prostate can-cer,ADT use was not associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death butwas associated with a lower risk of PCSM and all-cause mortality.JAMA.2011;306(21):For editorial comment see p2382.©2011American Medical Association.All rights reserved.JAMA,December7,2011—Vol306,No.212359Society,the American Urological Association,and the American Society for Radiation Oncology issued a joint scientific report to raise awareness of the potential linkage between ADT and cardiovascular events and stated “at this point,it is reasonable,on the basis of the above data,to state that there may be a relation between ADT and cardiovascular events and death.”5 Similarly,the US Food and Drug Administration issued a safety warning on October20,2010,requiring label-ing on GnRH agonists warning about an“increased risk of diabetes and cer-tain cardiovascular diseases(heart attack,sudden cardiac death,stroke) in men receiving these medications for the treatment of prostate cancer.”6 However,other studies have not confirmed these findings7-9and,due to the significant controversy and clini-cal concern over this issue,we per-formed an up-to-date meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to de-termine whether ADT is associated with cardiovascular mortality,pros-tate cancer–specific mortality(PCSM), and all-cause mortality in men with unfavorable-risk,nonmetastatic pros-tate cancer.METHODSSelection of StudiesWe reviewed MEDLINE and EMBASE citations between January1,1966,and April11,2011,and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database through April11,2011.The search terms used were prostate cancer and(androgen deprivation or androgen suppression or hormone or gonadotro-pin),with the results limited to ran-domized controlled trials in the Eng-lish language.We included only trials focused on patients with nonmeta-static and non−hormone-refractory disease and that had an intervention group with immediate ADT and a con-trol group of patients receiving no immediate ADT.For inclusion in our study,the trial had to predominantly use a GnRH agonist,have adequate information on cardiovascular deaths, and have a median follow-up of at least1year.We required a GnRH ago-nist because the large observationalstudy by Keating et al1found an excessrisk of coronary heart disease,MI,andsudden cardiac death among menwho received GnRH agonists but notthose who received orchiectomy,andbecause orchiectomy is much lesscommonly used in modern practice.When more than1publication wasidentified from the same clinical trial,we used the most recent or completereport of that trial.Quality of the trialswas assessed using the Jadad/Oxfordquality scoring system.10For analysisof PCSM and all-cause mortality,werequired trials to report those2endpoints but did not require that theyreport cardiovascular mortality.Data Extractionand Clinical End PointsData abstraction was conducted inde-pendently by2investigators(P.L.N.andA.P.)according to the Preferred Re-porting Items for Systematic Reviewsand Meta-analyses statement11and anydiscrepancies between reviewers wereresolved by consensus.For each study,we extracted the following informa-tion:first author’s name,year of pub-lication,median age of patients,num-ber of enrolled patients,inclusioncriteria,treatment groups,type of ADT,duration of ADT,number of cardiovas-cular deaths in ADT and control groups,definition of cardiovascular death,me-dian follow-up,number of PCSMdeaths,and number of overall deaths.The definition of cardiovascular deathwas accepted as defined by the studyauthors.If it was not specifically de-fined in the study,then we includedevents broadly related to cardiac dis-ease and vascular disease.Definitionsof cardiovascular disease for each in-cluded study are shown in the T ABLE,alongside the study information.3,8,9,12-19Statistical AnalysisFor the calculation of incidence,thenumber of patients with cardiovascu-lar death and the number of patientswho were treated with ADT or pla-cebo were extracted from the indi-vidual selected clinical trials.The pro-portion of patients with those adverseoutcomes and95%CIs were derivedfrom each trial.We also calculated rela-tive risks(RRs)and95%CIs of cardio-vascular death in patients assigned toADT vs controls in the same trial.Tocalculate95%CIs,the variance of a log-transformed study-specific RR was de-rived using the␦method.For studiesreporting zero events in a treatment orcontrol group,we applied a classic half-integer continuity correction to calcu-late RR and variance.We then re-peated this for the end points of PCSMand all-cause mortality.Statistical heterogeneity among trialsincluded in the meta-analysis was as-sessed by using the Cochran Q statis-tic,and inconsistency was quantifiedwith the I2statistic[100%ϫ(Q−df)/Q],which estimates the percentage oftotal variation across studies due toheterogeneity rather than chance.20Theassumption of homogeneity was con-sidered invalid for PϽ.10.Summary in-cidence and RRs were calculated usingrandom-effects or fixed-effects mod-els depending on the heterogeneity ofincluded studies.When substantialheterogeneity was not observed,thesummary estimate calculated on the ba-sis of the fixed-effects model was re-ported by using the inverse variancemethod.When substantial heteroge-neity was observed,the summary esti-mate calculated on the basis of the ran-dom-effects model was reported byusing the DerSimonian and Lairdmethod that considers both within-study and between-study variations.21For studies with separate treatmentgroups evaluating varying durations ofADT,we combined the2ADT groupsfor the overall analysis.To determine the RR of cardiovas-cular death due to ADT within particu-lar groups,we performed subgroupanalyses on trials of short course(ADTforՅ6months)or long course(ADTforՆ3years),trials with median ageof younger than70years or70years orolder,and trials in which radiation wasused.To further test for variation in theRR of cardiovascular death due to ADTADT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN PROSTATE CANCER2360JAMA,December7,2011—Vol306,No.21©2011American Medical Association.All rights reserved.by duration of ADT or median age of patients,we conducted a meta-regression analysis by modeling a log-transformed study-specific RR as a de-pendent variable and duration of ADT (Յ6months orՆ3years)or median age (Ͻ70orՆ70years)as an indepen-dent variable.In addition,publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots(ie,plots of study results against pre-cision)and with the Begg and Eggertests.Two-tailed PϽ.05was consid-ered statistically significant.All statis-tical analyses were performed by usingStata/SE version12.0software(StataCorp).RESULTSSelection of TrialsOur initial search yielded1041studies(268from MEDLINE,211fromEMBASE,and562from the CochraneCentral Register of Controlled Trials).After removing386duplicate studies,we evaluated the abstracts of655stud-Table.Baseline Characteristics and Number of CV Deaths for the Selected Trials of ADT in Nonmetastatic Prostate CancerSource MedianAge,yDefinition of CVDeath From Article StageADT MedianFollow-up,yTreatmentGroupsNo.ofPatientsNo.ofDeathsNo.ofPCSMDeathsNo.ofCVDeathsType LengthD’Amico et al,32008(DFCI95-096)73(range,49-82)Fatal MI T1b-T2b,N0Leuprolideϩflutamide6mo7.6(range,0.5-11.0)70GyϩADT1023041370Gy104441413Messing et al,122006(ECOG/EST3886)66(range,45-78)Two by vasculardisease(1ischemic bowel,1peripheral andCV);1bypulmonaryembolism;1bycerebrovasculardiseasepNϩGoserelin ororchiectomyLifelong11.9(range,9.7-14.5)RPϩADT471773RP5128251Bolla et al,132010(EORTC22863)71(IQR,67-75)70(IQR,65-75)CV death T1-T4,N0-1Goserelin3y9.1(IQR,5.1-12.6)70GyϩADT20780262270Gy2081125717Schro¨der et al,142009(EORTC30846)67(range,52-77)64(range,46-79)CV and other causes(excluded othercancers,infection,unknown causes,and prostatecancer deaths)T0-T4,pN1-3Zoladexϩcyproteroneacetate ororchiectomyLifelong a13ImmediateADT119966910DelayedADT115977010Studer et al,152006(EORTC30891)73(range,52-81)Death due to CVdiseasesT1-T4,N0-1Buserelinϩcyproteroneacetate ororchiectomyLifelong7.8ImmediateADT4922579488DeferredADT4932849997Efstathiou et al,82009(RTOG85-31)70Death from coronaryartery disease,CVdisease,CHF,cardiac arrest,cardiomyopathy,CV arrhythmia,MI,or suddendeathT3orpNϩGoserelin Lifelong8.1(range,0.2-15.1)70GyϩADT477269825270Gy46830611365Roach et al,92008(RTOG86-10)70(range,50-88)71(range,49-84)Death from MI,CHF,cardiac arrest,cardiac,arteriosclerotic CVdisease,orcardiopulmonaryarrestT2-T4,N0-1Goserelinϩflutamide4mo11.913.270GyϩADT224164653170Gy2321849626Denham et al,162011(TROG96.01)68(range,41-87)67(range,51-80)Cardiac death T2c-T4,N0Goserelinϩflutamide3-6mo10.6(IQR,6.9-11.6)66GyϩADT532198893666Gy2701367023Aus et al,172002(Aus)67(range,50-77)66(range,54-77)NA T1b-T3aNX,M0Triptorelinϩcyproteroneacetate3mo 6.8(range,0.67-8.7)ADTϩRP63113NARP alone6393NASchulman etal,182000(ESGNTPC)NA NA T2-T3,NxM0Goserelinϩflutamide3mo NA ADTϩRP19283NARP alone21085NAYee et al,192010(MSKCC)61(IQR,57-66)61(IQR,57-65)NA T1-T2,N0MxGoserelinϩflutamide3mo8.0(range,0.1-15.3)ADTϩRP72101NARP alone6450NAAbbreviations:ADT,androgen deprivation therapy;CHF,congestive heart failure;CV,cardiovascular;IQR,interquartile range;MI,myocardial infarction;NA,not applicable;PCSM,pros-tate cancer–specific mortality;RP,radical prostatectomy.a Median duration of ADT in the EORTC30846trial was5.1(95%CI,3.9-6.5)years for immediate ADT.b Median duration of ADT in the RTOG85-31trial was4.2years.ADT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN PROSTATE CANCER ©2011American Medical Association.All rights reserved.JAMA,December7,2011—Vol306,No.212361ies.After evaluating the abstract of each study,637studies were excluded because they did not meet inclusion criteria.Subsequently,we carefully read the full text of each of the re-maining18trials and excluded1trial for having a follow-up of less than1 year(n=167patients)22and6trials (n=1105patients)22-28for no mention of mortality outcomes,which resulted in11trials with4805patients for PCSM and all-cause mortality end points.3,8,9,12-19Three of these trials (n=664patients)17-19had no informa-tion on cardiovascular deaths;there-fore,the remaining8trials(n=4141 patients)were ultimately selected for inclusion in the cardiovascular death meta-analysis.3,8,9,12-16Median follow-up in these8included trials ranged between7.6and13.2years.A detailed selection process is shown in F IGURE1.The baseline characteristics ofeach trial are shown in the Table.Allselected trials included patients withnonmetastatic disease who weretreated with immediate predomi-nantly GnRH-agonist–based ADT vsno immediate ADT.Local therapyconsisted of external beam radiation(5trials),surgery(4trials),or nolocal therapy(2trials).Three trialsincluded a substantial proportion ofpatients with lymph node involve-ment.The duration of ADT variedfrom3months to lifelong.Quality of the Studiesand Publication BiasAll trials included in the meta-analysis were randomized,multi-center,phase3trials.All of the trialswere open label and have all been pub-lished in full manuscript form.The Ja-dad/Oxford quality scales require adouble-blinded placebo for2of the5points.Because this would have re-quired sham injections,none of the11trials included a double-blinded pla-cebo;therefore,their maximum scorewas3out of5points(7trials),and4trials scored2out of5points.10No evi-dence of publication bias was detectedfor RR of cardiovascular death by eitherBegg test(P=.54)or Egger test(P=.11),or for the RR of PCSM(Begg test,P=.53;Egger test,P=.24),or for the RR of all-cause mortality(Begg test,P=.76;Eg-ger test,P=.72).Incidence and RRof Cardiovascular DeathAmong the2200patients who weretreated with ADT,there were255cardiovascular deaths.The overallincidence of cardiovascular deathwas11.0%(95%CI,8.3%-14.5%)inthe ADT group(heterogeneity test:Q=33.58;PϽ.001;I2=79.2%).Forthe control group,there were1941patients and252cardiovasculardeaths,for an overall incidence of11.2%(95%CI,8.3%-15.0%;hetero-geneity test:Q=33.81;PϽ.001;I2=79.3%).The corresponding RR ofcardiovascular death for ADT vs con-trol was not significant(RR,0.93;95%CI,0.79-1.10;P=.41).No sig-nificant heterogeneity was observedin the RR analysis of cardiovasculardeath(heterogeneity test:Q=5.12;P=.64;I2=0%).Results of individualtrials are shown in F IGURE2.Variation of Associationby Duration of ADTThree trials(DFCI95-096,3TROG96.01,16and RTOG86-109)with1464patients used ADT for6months or less(range,3-6months),and5trials(EORTC22863,13RTOG85-31,8EORTC30891,15EORTC30846,14andECOG/EST388612)with2667pa-tients used ADT for at least3years(range,3years to lifelong).Among pa-tients in short-course ADT trials,the in-cidence of fatal cardiovascular eventsfor ADT vs control was10.5%(95%CI,6.3%-17.0%)vs10.3%(95%CI,8.2%-13.0%),respectively,and the RR of car-diovascular death was1.00(95%CI,0.73-1.37;P=.99).Among patients inlong-course ADT trials,the incidenceof fatal cardiovascular events for ADTvs control was11.5%(95%CI,8.1%-16.0%)vs11.5%(95%CI,7.5%-17.3%),respectively,and the RR of car-diovascular death was0.91(95%CI,0.75-1.10;P=.34).When comparingthe RRs of cardiovascular death due toADT among long-course trials withshort-course trials,we did not observea statistically significant difference(P=.63).Variation of Associationby Median Age in StudyAmong the5trials with a median ageof70years or older(DFCI95-096,3RTOG85-31,8RTOG86-10,9EORTC22863,13and EORTC3089115),therewas no association between ADT andcardiovascular death(13.3%;95%CI,10.4%-16.7%;vs13.1%;95%CI,9.6%-17.6%;RR for ADT vs no ADT,0.95;95%CI,0.79-1.13;P=.53;test forheterogeneity:Q=3.49;P=.48;I2=0%).Among the3trials with a median ageof younger than70years(TROG96.01,16ECOG/EST3886,12andEORTC3084614),there was also no evi-dence of an association between ADTFigure1.Article SelectionADT indicates androgen deprivation therapy;GnRH,gonadotropin-releasing hormone.ADT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN PROSTATE CANCER2362JAMA,December7,2011—Vol306,No.21©2011American Medical Association.All rights reserved.and cardiovascular death (7.1%;95%CI,5.4%-9.2%;vs 8.2%;95%CI,5.9%-11.3%;RR,0.88;95%CI,0.58-1.34;P =.55;test for heterogeneity:Q=1.53;P =.46;I 2=0%).When comparing the RRs of cardiovascular death due to ADT among trials with median age of younger than 70years vs 70years or older,we did not observe a statisti-cally significant difference (P =.77).Findings in Patients Who Received Radiation TherapyWhen analysis was limited to the 5trials in which definitive radiation was used (DFCI 95-096,3TROG 96.01,16RTOG 85-31,8RTOG 86-10,9and EORTC 2286313),there was also no evidence of excess cardiovascular death due to ADT (10.5%;95%CI,8.1%-13.6%;vs 11.5%;95%CI,9.8%-13.3%;RR,0.94;95%CI,0.76-1.17;P =.57;test for heteroge-neity:Q=3.87;P =.42;I 2=0%).Association of ADT With PCSMThere were 443PCSM deaths among 2527patients in the ADT group and 552PCSM deaths among 2278patients in the control group.The incidence of PCSM among men receiving ADT vs control was 13.5%(95%CI,8.8%-20.3%)vs 22.1%(95%CI,15.1%-31.1%).The RR was 0.69(95%CI,0.56-0.84;P Ͻ.001;heterogeneity test:Q=24.57;P =.006;I 2=59.3%),favor-ing ADT use (F IGURE 3).Association of ADT With Overall SurvivalThere were 1140total deaths among 2527patients in the ADT group and 1213total deaths among 2278pa-tients in the control group.The inci-dence of all-cause mortality among men receiving ADT vs control was 37.7%(95%CI,27.3%-49.4%)vs 44.4%(95%CI,32.5%-57.0%).The RR of death was 0.86(95%CI,0.80-0.93;P Ͻ.001;heterogeneity test:Q=16.86;P =.08;I 2=40.7%)(F IGURE 4).COMMENTWhether ADT causes excess cardio-vascular mortality in men with pros-tate cancer has been highly controver-sial for the last 5years and recently led to a joint statement by the Ameri-can Heart Association,the American Cancer Society,the American Uro-logical Association,and the American Society for Radiation Oncology that there may be a relationship between ADT and cardiovascular events and death,and a safety warning by the Food and Drug Administration requiring GnRH agonist manufactur-ers to warn about an increased risk of diabetes,heart attack,sudden cardiac death,and stroke.5,6Because most of the data raising concern about the effect of ADT on cardiovascular events and cardiovascular death has been retrospective,we performed ameta-analysis of prospective random-ized trials comparing immediate GnRH-agonist–based ADT vs no ADT or deferred ADT for men with non-metastatic,unfavorable-risk prostate cancer.In our study of 4141patients in 8randomized trials with median follow-up of 7.6to 13.2years,we could not find any evidence that ADT causes excess cardiovascular mortal-ity.Our study suggests that for the population as a whole,there is either no adverse effect of ADT on cardio-vascular mortality or the magnitude of this effect is likely rather small.In our analysis,we could not find a subgroup in which ADT was associ-ated with excess cardiovascular mor-tality.Specifically,we did not see an ex-cess risk of cardiovascular mortality due to ADT among men receiving short-course ADT (Յ6months),men receiv-ing long-course ADT (Ն3years),men receiving radiation,or in trials in which the median age of enrollment was 70years or older.As shown in some of the individual trials,our meta-analysis found that the use of ADT in men with unfavorable-risk prostate cancer is as-sociated with improved prostate can-cer–specific survival and overall sur-vival.Of note,these improved survival findings only apply to men with unfa-vorable-risk prostate cancer,because the trials analyzed generally did not contain men with low-risk disease,aFigure 2.Relative Risk of Cardiovascular Deaths Associated With ADT Among Patients With Prostate CancerRelative Risk (95% CI)No./Total No. of EventsSourceADT Control Relative Risk (95% CI)P Value D’Amico et al,3 2008 (DFCI 95-096)13/10213/104 1.02 (0.50-2.09).96Bolla et al,13 2010 (EORTC 22863)22/20717/208 1.30 (0.71-2.38).39Schröder et al,14 2009 (EORTC 30846)10/11910/1150.97 (0.42-2.23).94Studer et al,15 2006 (EORTC 30891)88/49297/4930.91 (0.70-1.18).4752/47765/468Efstathiou et al,8 2009 (RTOG 85-31)0.78 (0.56-1.10).17Roach et al,9 2008 (RTOG 86-10)31/22426/232 1.23 (0.76-2.01).40Denham et al,16 2011 (TROG 96.01)36/53223/2700.79 (0.48-1.31).37OverallTest for heterogeneity: Q = 5.12; P = .64; I 2 = 0%255/2200252/19410.93 (0.79-1.10).41Messing et al,12 2006 (ECOG/EST 3886)3/471/51 3.26 (0.35-30.2).30ADT indicates androgen deprivation therapy.The summary relative risk of cardiovascular deaths was calculated using a fixed-effects model.The size of the squares indicates the weight of the study,which is the inverse variance of the effect estimate.The diamond indicates the summary relative risk.ADT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN PROSTATE CANCER©2011American Medical Association.All rights reserved.JAMA,December 7,2011—Vol 306,No.212363group for whom there is no compel-ling evidence that ADT improves sur-vival.Overall,the results of our study should be generally reassuring to most men with unfavorable-risk prostate cancer considering ADT,because it was associated with improved survival without a measurable excess in cardio-vascular mortality,but a few impor-tant points need to be raised.First,none of the trials were stratified by preexisting cardiovascular comorbid-ity;therefore,our study cannot exclude the possibility that a small subgroup of men with underlying car-diac disease (even if controlled)could experience excess cardiovascular mor-tality due to ADT.29For example,a post hoc reanalysis of one of the trials included in our meta-analysis (DFCI 95-0963)found that men with moder-ate to severe comorbidity (mainly car-diac)appeared to have poorer overall survival when treated with ADT and radiation vs radiation alone,although this difference was not statistically significant (P =.08).3In addition,a retrospective review of a large data set of men who were treated with brachytherapy-based radiation found that although 95%of the men were not harmed by ADT,the 5%of men with a prior history of MI or conges-tive heart failure (CHF)appeared to have a higher incidence of all-causeFigure 3.Relative Risk of Prostate Cancer–Specific Mortality Associated With ADT Among Patients With Prostate CancerRelative Risk (95% CI)No./Total No. of EventsSourceADT Control Relative Risk (95% CI)P Value Aus et al,17 2002 (Aus)3/633/63 1.00 (0.21-4.77)>.99D’Amico et al,3 2008 (DFCI 95-096)4/10214/1040.29 (0.10-0.86).03Bolla et al,13 2010 (EORTC 22863)26/20757/2080.46 (0.30-0.70)<.001Schröder et al,14 2009 (EORTC 30846)69/11970/1150.95 (0.77-1.18).65Studer et al,15 2006 (EORTC 30891)94/49299/4930.95 (0.74-1.23).70Yee et al,19 2010 (MSKCC)1/720/64 2.67 (0.11-64.4).373/1925/210Schulman et al,18 2000 (ESGNTPC)0.66 (0.16-2.71).5582/477113/468Efstathiou et al,8 2009 (RTOG 85-31)0.71 (0.55-0.92).009Roach et al,9 2008 (RTOG 86-10)65/22496/2320.70 (0.54-0.91).007Denham et al,16 2011 (TROG 96.01)89/53270/2700.65 (0.49-0.85).002OverallTest for heterogeneity: Q = 24.57; P = .006; I 2 = 59.3%443/2527552/22780.69 (0.56-0.84)<.001Messing et al,12 2006 (ECOG/EST 3886)7/4725/510.30 (0.15-0.64).002ADT indicates androgen deprivation therapy.The summary relative risk of prostate cancer–specific mortality was calculated using a random-effects model.The size of the squares indicates the weight of the study,which is the inverse variance of the effect estimate.The diamond indicates the summary relative risk.Figure 4.Relative Risk of All-Cause Mortality Associated With ADT AmongPatients With Prostate CancerRelative Risk (95% CI)No./Total No. of EventsSourceADT Control Relative Risk (95% CI)P Value Aus et al,17 2002 (Aus)11/639/63 1.22 (0.54-2.74).63D’Amico et al,3 2008 (DFCI 95-096)30/10244/1040.70 (0.48-1.01).06Bolla et al,13 2010 (EORTC 22863)80/207112/2080.72 (0.58-0.89).002Schröder et al,14 2009 (EORTC 30846)96/11997/1150.96 (0.85-1.08).46Studer et al,15 2006 (EORTC 30891)257/492284/4930.91 (0.81-1.02).09Yee et al,19 2010 (MSKCC)10/725/64 1.78 (0.64-4.93).278/1928/210Schulman et al,18 2000 (ESGNTPC) 1.09 (0.42-2.86).86269/477306/468Efstathiou et al,8 2009 (RTOG 85-31)0.86 (0.78-0.96).005Roach et al,9 2008 (RTOG 86-10)164/224184/2320.92 (0.83-1.02).13Denham et al,16 2011 (TROG 96.01)198/532136/2700.74 (0.63-0.87)<.001OverallTest for heterogeneity: Q = 16.86; P = .08; I 2 = 40.7%1140/25271213/22780.86 (0.80-0.93)<.001Messing et al,12 2006 (ECOG/EST 3886)17/4728/510.66 (0.42-1.04).07ADT indicates androgen deprivation therapy.The summary relative risk of all-cause mortality was calculated using a random-effects model.The size of the squares indicates the weight of the study,which is the inverse variance of the effect estimate.The diamond indicates the summary relative risk.ADT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN PROSTATE CANCER2364JAMA,December 7,2011—Vol 306,No.21©2011American Medical Association.All rights reserved.。

相关文档
最新文档