美国联邦民事诉讼规则

美国联邦民事诉讼规则
美国联邦民事诉讼规则

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

I.SCOPE OF RULES ONE FORM OF ACTION

Rule1 Scope and Purpose of Rules

These rules govern the procedure in the United States district courts in all suits of a civil nature whether cognizable as cases at law or in equity or in admiralty, with the exceptions stated in Rule 81. They shall be construed and administered to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action.

Rule 2 One Form of Action

There shall be one form of action to be known as civil action.

II. COMMENCEMENT OF ACTION; SERVICE OF PROCESS, PLEADINGS, MOTIONS, AND ORDERS

Rule 3 Commencement of Action

A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the court.

Rule 4 Summons

(a) Form. The summons shall be signed by the clerk, bear the seal of the court, identify the court and the parties, be directed to the defendant, and state the name and address of the plaintiff's attorney or, if unrepresented, of the plaintiff. It shall also state the time within which the defendant must appear and defend, and notify the defendant that failure to do so will result in a judgment by default against the defendant for the relief demanded in the complaint. The court may allow a summons to be amended.

(b) Issuance. Upon or after filing the complaint, the plaintiff may present a summons to the clerk for signature and seal. If the summons is in proper form, the clerk shall sign, seal, and issue it to the plaintiff for service on the defendant. A summons, or a copy of the summons if addressed to multiple defendants, shall be issued for each defendant to be served.

(c) Service with Complaint; by Whom Made.

(1) A summons shall be served together with a copy of the complaint. The plaintiff is

responsible for service of a summons and complaint within the time allowed under subdivision

(m) and shall furnish the person effecting service with the necessary copies of the summons

and complaint.

(2) Service may be effected by any person who is not a party and who is at least 18 years of age. At the request of the plaintiff, however, the court may direct that service be effected by a United States marshal, deputy United States marshal, or other person or officer specially appointed by the court for the purpose. Such an appointment must be made when the plaintiff is authorized to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to28 U.S.C. §1915 or is authorized to proceed as a seaman under 28 U.S.C. §1916

(d) Waiver of Service; Duty to Save Costs of Service; Request to Waive.

(1) A defendant who waives service of a summons does not thereby waive any objection to

the venue or to the jurisdiction of the court over the person of the defendant.

(2) An individual, corporation, or association that is subject to service under subdivision

(e), (f), or (h) and that receives notice of an action in the manner provided in this paragraph has a duty to avoid unnecessary costs of serving the summons. To avoid costs, the plaintiff may notify such a defendant of the commencement of the action and request that the defendant waive service of a summons. The notice and request.

(A) shall be in writing and shall be addressed directly to the defendant,

if an individual, or else to an officer or managing or general agent (or other

agent authorized by appointment or law to receive service of process) of a

defendant subject to service under subdivision (h) ;

(B) shall be dispatched through first-class mail or other reliable means;

(C) shall be accompanied by a copy of the complaint and shall identify the

court in which it has been filed;

(D) shall inform the defendant, by means of a text prescribed in an official

form promulgated pursuant to Rule 84, of the consequences of compliance and

of a failure to comply with the request;

(E) shall set forth the date on which request is sent; (F) shall allow the

defendant a reasonable time to return the waiver, which shall be at least

30 days from the date on which the request is sent, or 60 days from that date

if the defendant is addressed outside any judicial district of the United

States; and

(G) shall provide the defendant with an extra copy of the notice and request,

as well as a prepaid means of compliance in writing.

If a defendant located within the United States fails to comply with a request

for waiver made by a plaintiff located within the United States, the court

shall impose the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service on the

defendant unless good cause for the failure be shown.

(3) A defendant that, before being served with process, timely returns a waiver so requested is not required to serve an answer to the complaint until 60 days after the date on which the request for waiver of service was sent, or 90 days after that date if the defendant was addressed outside any judicial district of the United States.

(4) When the plaintiff files a waiver of service with the court, the action shall proceed, except as provided in paragraph (3), as if a summons and complaint had been served at the time of filing the waiver, and no proofs of service shall be required.

(5) The costs to be imposed on a defendant under paragraph (2) for failure to comply with

a request to waive service of a summons shall include the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service under subdivision (e), (f), or (h), together with the costs, including a reasonable attorney's fee, of any motion required to collect the costs of service.

(e) Service Upon Individuals Within a Judicial District of the United States. Unless otherwise provided by federal law, service upon an individual from whom a waiver has not been obtained and filed, other than an infant or an incompetent person, may be effected in any judicial district of the United States:

(1) pursuant to the law of the state in which the district court is located, or in which

service is effected, for the service of a summons upon the defendant in an action brought

in the courts of general jurisdiction of the State; or

(2) by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the individual personally

or by leaving copies thereof at the individual's dwelling house or usual place of abode

with some person of suitable age and discretion then residing therein or by delivering

a copy of the summons and of the complaint to an agent authorized by appointment or by

law to receive service of process.

(f) Service Upon Individuals in a Foreign Country. Unless otherwise provided by federal law, service upon an individual from whom a waiver has not been obtained and filed, other than an infant or an incompetent person, may be effected in a place not within any judicial district of the United States:

(1) by any internationally agreed means reasonably calculated to give notice, such as those

means authorized by the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial

Documents; or

(2) if there is no internationally agreed means of service or the applicable international

agreement allows other means of service, provided that service is reasonably calculated

to give notice:

(A) in the manner prescribed by the law of the foreign country for service

in that country in an action in any of its courts of general jurisdiction;

or

(B) as directed by the foreign authority in response to a letter rogatory

or letter of request; or

(C) unless prohibited by the law of the foreign country, by

(i) delivery to the individual personally of a copy of the

summons and the complaint; or

(ii) any form of mail requiring a signed receipt, to be

addressed and dispatched by the clerk of the court to the party

to be served; or

(3) by other means not prohibited by international agreement as may be directed by the

court.

(g) Service Upon Infants and Incompetent Person. Service upon an infant or an incompetent person in a judicial district of the United States shall be effected in the manner prescribed by the law of the state in which the service is made for the service of summons or like process upon any such defendant in an action brought in the courts of general jurisdiction of that state. Service upon an infant or an incompetent

person in a place not within any judicial district of the United States shall be effected in the manner prescribed by paragraph (2)(A) or (2)(B) of subdivision (f) or by such means as the court may direct.

(h) Service Upon Corporations and Associations. Unless otherwise provided by federal law, service upon a domestic or foreign corporation or upon a partnership or other unincorporated association that is subject to suit under a common name, and from which a waiver of service has not been obtained and filed, shall be effected:

(1) in a judicial district of the United States in the manner prescribed for individuals

by subdivision (e)(1), or by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to an

officer, a managing or general agent, or to any other agent authorized by appointment or

by law to receive service of process and, if the agent is one authorized by statute to

receive service and the statute so requires, by also mailing a copy to the defendant, or

(2) in a place not within any judicial district of the United States in any manner prescribed

for individuals by subdivision (f) except personal delivery as provided in paragraph

(2)(C)(i) thereof.

(i) Serving the United States, Its Agencies, Corporations, Officers, or Employees.

(1) Service upon the United States shall be effected

(A) by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the United

States attorney for the district in which the action is brought or to an

assistant United States attorney or clerical employee designated by the

United States attorney in a writing filed with the clerk of the court or by

sending a copy of the summons and of the complaint by registered or certified

mail addressed to the civil process clerk at the office of the United States

attorney and

(B) by also sending a copy of the summons and of the complaint by registered

or certified mail to the Attorney General of the United States at Washington,

District of Columbia, and

(C) in any action attacking the validity of an order of an officer or agency

of the United States not made a party, by also sending a copy of the summons

and of the complaint by registered or certified mail to the officer or agency.

(2)(A) Service on an agency or corporation of the United States, or an officer or employee

of the United States sued only in an official capacity, is effected by serving the United

States in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 (i)(1) and by also sending a copy of the summons

and complaint by registered or certified mail to the officer, employee, agency, or

corporation.

(B) Service on an officer or employee of the United States sued in an

individual capacity for acts or omissions occurring in connection with the

performance of duties on behalf of the United States whether or not the

officer or employee is sued also in an official capacity is effected by

serving the United States in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 (i)(1) and by

serving the officer or employee in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 (e), (f),

or (g).

(3) The court shall allow a reasonable time to serve process under Rule 4 (i) for the purpose

of curing the failure to serve:

(A) all persons required to be served in an action governed by Rule 4 (i)(2)(A),

if the plaintiff has served either the United States attorney or the Attorney

General of the United States, or

(B) the United States in an action governed by Rule 4 (i)(2)(B), if the

plaintiff has served an officer or employee of the United States sued in an

individual capacity.

(j) Service Upon Foreign, State, or Local Governments.

(1) Service upon a foreign state or a political subdivision, agency, or instrumentality

thereof shall be effected pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1608

(2) Service upon a state, municipal corporation, or other governmental organization subject

to suit, shall be effected by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to

its chief executive officer or by serving the summons and complaint in the manner prescribed

by the law of that state for the service of summons or other like process upon any such

defendant.

(k) Territorial Limits of Effective Service.

(1) Service of a summons or filing a waiver of service is effective to establish jurisdiction

over the person of a defendant

(A) who could be subjected to the jurisdiction of a court of general

jurisdiction in the state in which the district court is located, or

(B) who is a party joined under Rule 14 or Rule 19 and is served at a place

within a judicial district of the United States and not more than 100 miles

from the place from which the summons issues, or

(C) who is subject to the federal interpleader jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1335, or

(D) when authorized by a statute of the United States.

(2) If the exercise of jurisdiction is consistent with the Constitution and laws of the

United States, serving a summons or filing a waiver of service is also effective, with

respect to claims arising under federal law, to establish personal jurisdiction over the

person of any defendant who is not subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of general

jurisdiction of any state.

(l) Proof of Service. If service is not waived, the person effecting service shall make proof thereof to the court. If service is made by a person other than a United States marshal or deputy United States

marshal, the person shall make affidavit thereof. Proof of service in a place not within any judicial district of the United States shall, if effected under paragraph (1) of subdivision (f), be made pursuant to the applicable treaty or convention, and shall, if effected under paragraph (2) or (3) thereof, include a receipt signed by the addressee or other evidence of delivery to the addressee satisfactory to the court. Failure to make proof of service does not affect the validity of the service. The court may allow proof of service to be amended.

(m) Time Limit for Service. If service of the summons and complaint is not made upon a defendant within 120 days after the filing of the complaint, the court, upon motion or on its own initiative after notice to the plaintiff, shall dismiss the action without prejudice as to that defendant or direct that service be effected within a specified time; provided that if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court shall extend the time for service for an appropriate period. This subdivision does not apply to service in a foreign country pursuant to subdivision (f) or (j)(1).

(n) Seizure of Property; Service of Summons Not Feasible.

(1) If a statute of the United States so provides, the court may assert jurisdiction over

property. Notice to claimants of the property shall than be sent in the manner provided

by the statute or by service of a summons under this rule.

(2) Upon a showing that personal jurisdiction over a defendant cannot, in the district

where the action is brought, be obtained with reasonable efforts by service of summons

in any manner authorized by this rule, the court may assert jurisdiction over any of the

defendant's assets found within the district by seizing the assets under the circumstances

and in the manner provided by the law of the state in which the district court is located.

Rule 4.1. Service of Other Process

(a) Generally. Process other than a summons as provided in Rule 4 or subpoena as provided in Rule 45 shall be served by a United States marshal, a deputy United States marshal, or a person specially appointed for that purpose, who shall make proof of service as provided in Rule 4 (1). The process may be served anywhere within the territorial limits of the state in which the district court is located, and, when authorized by a statute of the United States, beyond the territorial limits of that state.

(b) Enforcement of Orders: Commitment for Civil Contempt. An order of civil commitment of a person held to be in contempt of a decree or injunction issued to enforce the laws of the United States may be served and enforced in any district. Other orders in civil contempt proceedings shall be served in the state in which the court issuing the order to be enforced is located or elsewhere within the United States if not more than 100 miles from the place at which the order to be enforced was issued.

Rule 5 Service and Filing of Pleadings and Other Papers

(a) Service: When Required. Except as otherwise provided in these rules, every order required by its terms to be served, every pleading subsequent to the original complaint unless the court otherwise orders because of numerous defendants, every paper relating to discovery required to be served upon a party unless the court otherwise orders, every written motion other than one which may be heard ex parte, and every written notice, appearance, demand, offer of judgment, designation of record on appeal, and similar paper shall be served upon each of the parties. No service need be made on parties in default for failure to appear except that pleadings asserting new or additional claims for relief against them shall be served upon them in the manner provided for service of summons in Rule 4.

In an action begun by seizure of property, in which no person need be or is named as defendant, any service required to be made prior to the filing of an answer, claim, or appearance shall be made upon the person having custody or possession of the property at the time of its seizure.

(b) Same: How Made. Whenever under these rules service is required or permitted to be made upon a party represented by an attorney the service shall be made upon the attorney unless service upon the party is ordered by the court. Service upon the attorney or upon a party shall be made by delivering a copy to the attorney or party or by mailing it to the attorney or party at the attorney's or party's last known address or, if no address is known, by leaving it with the clerk of the court. Delivery of a copy within this rule means: handing it to the attorney or to the party; or leaving it at the attorney's or party's office with a clerk or other person in charge thereof; or, if there is no one in charge, leaving it in a conspicuous place therein; or, if the office is closed or the person to be served has no office, leaving it at the person's dwelling house or usual place of abode with some person of suitable age and discretion then residing therein. Service by mail is complete upon mailing.

(c) Same: Numerous Defendants. In any action in which there are unusually large numbers of defendants, the court, upon motion or of its own initiative, may order that service of the pleadings of the defendants and replies thereto need not be made as between the defendants and that any cross-claim, counterclaim, or matter constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense contained therein shall be deemed to be denied or avoided by all other parties and that the filing of any such pleading and service thereof upon the plaintiff constitutes due notice of it to the parties. A copy of every such order shall be served upon the parties in such manner and form as the court directs.

(d) Filing; Certificate of Service. All papers after the complaint required to be served upon a party, together with a certificate of service, must be filed with the court within a reasonable time after service, but disclosures under Rule 26 (a)(1) or (2) and the following discovery requests and responses must not be filed until they are used in the proceeding or the court orders filing: (i) depositions, (ii) interrogatories, (iii) requests for documents or to permit entry upon land, and (iv) requests for admission.

(e) Filing With the Court Defined. The filing of papers with the court as required by these rules shall be made by filing them with the clerk of court, except that the judge may permit the papers to be filed with the judge, in which event the judge shall note thereon the filing date and forthwith transmit them to the office of the clerk. A court may by local rule permit papers to be filed, signed, or verified by electronic means that are consistent with technical standards, if any, that the Judicial Conference of the United States establishes. A paper filed by electronic means in compliance with a local rule constitutes a written paper for the purpose of applying these rules. The clerk shall not refuse to accept for filing any paper presented for that purpose solely because it is not presented in proper form as required by these rules or any local rules or practices.

Prospective amendment:

Amendment of Rule 5, effective December 1, 2001. By order dated April 23, 2001, the Supreme Court of the United States approved the following amendments to Rule 5, effective December 1, 2001, and authorized their transmission to Congress in accordance with 28 USCS § 2072

Rule 5. Service and Filing of Pleadings and Other Papers

(b) Making Service.

(1) Service under Rules 5(a) and 77(d) on a party represented by an attorney is made on

the attorney unless the court orders service on the party.

(2) Service under Rule 5(a) is made by:

(A) Delivering a copy to the person served by:

(i) handing it to the person;

(ii) leaving it at the person's office with a clerk or other

person in charge, or if no one is in charge leaving it in a

conspicuous place in the office; or

(iii) if the person has no office or the office is closed,

leaving it at the person's dwelling house or usual place of

abode with someone of suitable age and discretion residing

there.

(B) Mailing a copy to the last known address of the person served. Service

by mail is complete on mailing.

(C) If the person served has no known address, leaving a copy with the clerk

of the court.

(D) Delivering a copy by any other means, including electronic means,

consented to in writing by the person served. Service by electronic means

is complete on transmission; service by other consented means is complete

when the person making service delivers the copy to the agency designated

to make delivery.

If authorized by local rule, a party may make service under this subparagraph

(D) through the court's transmission facilities.

(3) Service by electronic means under Rule 5(b)(2)(D) is not effective if the party making service learns that the attempted service did not reach the person to be served.

Rule 6 Time

(a) Computation. In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by these rules, by the local rules of any district court, by order of court, or by any applicable statute, the day of the act, event, or default from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period so computed shall be included, unless it is a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday, or, when the act to be done is the filing of a paper in court, a day on which weather or other conditions have made the office of the clerk of the district court inaccessible, in which event the period runs until the end of the next day which is not one of the aforementioned days. When the period of time prescribed or allowed is less than 11 days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays shall be excluded in the computation. As used in this rule and in Rule 77 (c), legal holiday includes New Year's Day, Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr., Washington's Birthday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day, and any other day appointed as a holiday by the President of the Congress of the United States, or by the state in which the district court is held.

(b) Enlargement. When by these rules or by a notice given thereunder or by order of court an act is required or allowed to be done at or within a specified time, the court for cause shown may at any time in its discretion (1) with or without motion or notice order the period enlarged if request therefor is made before the expiration of the period originally prescribed or as extended by a previous order, or (2) upon motion made after the expiration of the specified period permit the act to be done where the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect; but it may not extend the time for taking any action under Rules 50 (b) and (c)(2), 52 (b), 59 (b), (d), and (e), and 60(b), except to the extent and under the conditions stated in them.

(c) Unaffected by Expiration of Term. [Rescinded Feb. 28, 1966, eff. July 1, 1966.]

(d) For Motions Affidavits. A written motion, other than one which may be heard ex parte, and notice of the hearing thereof shall be served not later than 5 days before the time specified for the hearing, unless a different period is fixed by these rules or by order of the court. Such an order may for cause shown be made on ex parte application. When a motion is supported by affidavit, the affidavit shall be served with the motion; and, except as otherwise provided in Rule 59 (c), opposing affidavits may be served not later than 1 day before the hearing, unless the court permits them to be served at some other time.

(e) Additional Time After Service by Mail. Whenever a party has the right or is required to do some act or take some proceedings within a prescribed period after the service of a notice or other paper upon the party and the notice or paper is served upon the party by mail, 3 days shall be added to the prescribed period.

Prospective amendment:

Amendment of Rule 6, effective December 1, 2001. By order dated April 23, 2001, the Supreme Court of the United States approved the following amendments to Rule 6, effective December 1, 2001, and authorized their transmission to Congress in accordance with 28 USCS§ 2072

Rule 6. Time

(e) Additional Time After Service under Rule 5(B)(2)(B), (C), or (D). Whenever a party has the right or is required to do some act or take some proceedings within a prescribed period after the service of a notice or other paper upon the party and the notice or paper is served upon the party under Rule 5(b)(2)(B), (C), or (D), 3 days shall be added to the prescribed period.

III. PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS

Rule 7 Pleadings Allowed : Form of Motions

(a) Pleadings. There shall be a complaint and an answer; a reply to a counterclaim denominated as such; an answer to a cross-claim, if the answer contains a cross-claim; a third-party complaint, if a person who was not an original party is summoned under the provisions of Rule 14; and a third-party answer, if a third-party complaint is served. No other pleading shall be allowed, except that the court may order a reply to an answer or a third-party answer.

(b) Motions and Other Papers

(1) An application to the court for an order shall be by motion which, unless made during

a hearing or trial, shall be made in writing, shall state with particularity the grounds

therefor, and shall set forth the relief or order sought. The requirement of writing is

fulfilled if the motion is stated in a written notice of the hearing of the motion.

(2) The rules applicable to captions and other matters of form of pleadings apply to all

motions and other papers provided for by these rules.

(3) All motions shall be signed in accordance with Rule 11.

(c) Demurrers, Pleas, etc., Abolished. Demurrers, pleas, and exceptions for insufficiency of a pleading shall not be used.

Rule 8 General Rules of Pleading

(a)Claims for Relief. A pleading which sets forth a claim for relief, whether an original

claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, shall contain (1) a short and

plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends, unless

the court already has jurisdiction and the claim needs no new grounds of jurisdiction

to support it, (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader

is entitled to relief, and (3) a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks.

Relief in the alternative or of several different types may be demanded.

(b) Defenses; Form of Denials. A party shall state in short and plain terms the party's

defenses to each claim asserted and shall admit or deny the averments upon which the

adverse party relies. If a party is without knowledge or information sufficient to

form a belief as to the truth of an averment, the party shall so state and this has

the effect of a denial. Denials shall fairly meet the substance of the averments denied.

When a pleader intends in good faith to deny only a part or a qualification of an averment,

the pleader shall specify so much of it as is true and material and shall deny only

the remainder. Unless the pleader intends in good faith to controvert all the averments

of the preceding pleading, the pleader may make denials as specific denials of

designated averments or paragraphs or may generally deny all the averments except such

designated averments or paragraphs as the pleader expressly admits; but, when the

pleader does so intend to controvert all its averments, including averments of the

grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends, the pleader may do so by general

denial subject to the obligations set forth in Rule 11.

(c) Affirmative Defenses. In pleading to a preceding pleading, a party shall set forth affirmatively accord and satisfaction, arbitration and award, assumption of risk, contributory negligence, discharge in bankruptcy, duress, estoppel, failure of consideration, fraud, illegality, injury by fellow servant, laches, license, payment, release, res judicata, statute of frauds, statute of limitations, waiver, and any other matter constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense. When a party has mistakenly designated a defense as a counterclaim or a counterclaim as a defense, the court on terms, if justice so requires, shall treat the pleading as if there had been a proper designation.

(d) Effect of Failure To Deny. Averments in a pleading to which a responsive pleading is required, other than those as to the amount of damage, are admitted when not denied in the responsive pleading. Averments in a pleading to which no responsive pleading is required or permitted shall be taken as denied or avoided.

(e) Pleading to be Concise and Direct; Consistency.

(1) Each averment of a pleading shall be simple, concise, and direct. No technical forms

of pleading or motions are required.

(2) A party may set forth two or more statements of a claim or defense alternately or

hypothetically, either in one count or defense or in separate counts or defenses. When

two or more statements are made in the alternative and one of them if made independently

would be sufficient, the pleading is not made insufficient by the insufficiency of one

or more of the alternative statements. A party may also state as many separate claims or

defenses as the party has regardless of consistency and whether based on legal, equitable,

or maritime grounds. All statements shall be made subject to the obligations set forth

in Rule 11.

(f) Construction of Pleadings. All pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial justice.

Rule 9 Pleading Special Matters

(a) Capacity. It is not necessary to aver the capacity of a party to sue or be sued or the authority of a party to sue or be sued in a representative capacity or the legal existence of an organized association of persons that is made a party, except to the extent required to show the jurisdiction of the court. When a party desires to raise an issue as to the legal existence of any party or the capacity of any party to sue or be sued or the authority of a party to sue or be sued in a representative capacity, the party desiring to raise the issue shall do so by specific negative averment, which shall include such supporting particulars as are peculiarly within the pleader s knowledge.

(b) Fraud, Mistake, Condition of the Mind. In all averments of fraud or mistake, the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake shall be stated with particularity. Malice, intent, knowledge, and other condition of mind of a person may be averred generally.

(c) Conditions Precedent. In pleading the performance or occurrence of conditions precedent, it is sufficient to aver generally that all conditions precedent have been performed or have occurred. A denial of performance or occurrence shall be made specifically and with particularity.

(d) Official Document or Act. In pleading an official document or official act it is sufficient to aver that the document was issued or the act done in compliance with law.

(e) Judgment. In pleading a judgment or decision of a domestic or foreign court, judicial or quasi-judicial tribunal, or of a board or officer, it is sufficient to aver the judgment or decision without setting forth matter showing jurisdiction to render it.

(f) Time and Place. For the purpose of testing the sufficiency of a pleading, averments of time and place are material and shall be considered like all other averments of material matter.

(g) Special Damage. When items of special damage are claimed, they shall be specifically stated.

(h) Admiralty and Maritime Claims. A pleading or count setting forth a claim for relief within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction that is also within the jurisdiction of the district court on some other ground may contain a statement identifying the claim as an admiralty or maritime claim for the purposes of Rule 14 (c),38(e), 82, and the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims. If the claim is cognizable only in admiralty, it is an admiralty or maritime claim for those purposes whether so identified or not. The amendment of a pleading to add or withdraw an identifying statement is governed

by the principles of Rule 15. A case that includes an admiralty or maritime claim within this subdivision is an admiralty case within 28 U.S.C.§1292(a)(3).

Rule 10 Form of Pleadings

(a) Caption; Names of Parties. Every pleading shall contain a caption setting forth the name of the court, the title of the action, the file number, and a designation as in Rule 7 (a). In the complaint the title of the action shall include the names of all the parties, but in other pleadings it is sufficient to state the name of the first party on each side with an appropriate indication of other parties.

(b) Paragraphs; Separate Statements. All averments of claim or defense shall be made in numbered paragraphs, the contents of each of which shall be limited as far as practicable to a statement of a single set of circumstances; and a paragraph may be referred to by number in all succeeding pleadings. Each claim founded upon a separate transaction or occurrence and each defense other than denials shall be stated in a separate count or defense whenever a separation facilitates the clear presentation of the matters set forth.

(c) Adoption by Reference; Exhibits. Statements in a pleading may be adopted by reference in a different part of the same pleading or in another pleading or in any motion. A copy of any written instrument which is an exhibit to a pleading is a part thereof for all purposes.

Rule 11 Signing of Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to Court; Sanctions

(a) Signature. Every pleading, written motion, and other paper shall be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney's individual name, or, if the party is not represented by an attorney, shall be signed by the party. Each paper shall state the signer's address and telephone number, if any. Except when otherwise specifically provided by rule or statute, pleadings need not be verified or accompanied by affidavit. An unsigned paper shall be stricken unless omission of the signature is corrected promptly after being called to the attention of attorney or party.

(b) Representations to Court. By presenting to the court (whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating) a pleading, written motion, or other paper, an attorney or unrepresented party is certifying that to the best of the person's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances,

(1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause

unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation;

(2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions therein are warranted by existing

law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing

law or the establishment of new law;

(3) the allegations and other factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if

specifically so identified, are likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable

opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and

(4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically

so identified, are reasonably based on a lack of information or belief.

(c) Sanctions. If, after notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond, the court determines that subdivision (b) has been violated, the court may, subject to the conditions stated below, impose an

appropriate sanction upon the attorneys, law firms, or parties that have violated subdivision (b) or are responsible for the violation.

(1) How Initiated.

(A) By Motion. A motion for sanctions under this rule shall be made separately

from other motions or requests and shall describe the specific conduct

alleged to violate subdivision (b). It shall be served as provided in Rule

5, but shall not be filed with or presented to the court unless, within 21

days after service of the motion (or such other period as the court may

prescribe), the challenged paper, claim, defense, contention, allegation,

or denial is not withdrawn or appropriately corrected. If warranted, the

court may award to the party prevailing on the motion the reasonable expenses

and attorney's fees incurred in presenting or opposing the motion. Absent

exceptional circumstances, a law firm shall be held jointly responsible for

violations committed by its partners, associates, and employees.

(B) On Court's Initiative. On its own initiative, the court may enter an order

describing the specific conduct that appears to violate subdivision (b) and

directing an attorney, law firm, or party to show cause why it has not violated

subdivision (b) with respect thereto.

(2) Nature of Sanction; Limitations. A sanction imposed for violation of this rule shall

be limited to what is sufficient to deter repetition of such conduct or comparable conduct

by others similarly situated. Subject to the limitations in subparagraphs (A) and (B),

the sanction may consist of, or include, directives of a nonmonetary nature, an order to

pay a penalty into court, or, if imposed on motion and warranted for effective deterrence,

an order directing payment to the movant of some or all of the reasonable attorneys' fees

and other expenses incurred as a direct result of the violation.

(A) Monetary sanctions may not be awarded against a represented party for

a violation of subdivision (b)(2).

(B) Monetary sanctions may not be awarded on the court's initiative unless

the court issues its order to show cause before a voluntary dismissal or

settlement of the claims made by or against the party which is, or whose

attorneys are, to be sanctioned.

(3) Order. When imposing sanctions, the court shall describe the conduct determined to

constitute a violation of this rule and explain the basis for the sanction imposed.

(d) Inapplicability to Discovery. Subdivisions (a) through (c) of this rule do not apply to disclosures and discovery requests, responses, objections, and motions that are subject to the provisions of Rules 26 through 37.

Rule 12 Defenses and Objections –When and How Presented – By Pleading or Motion- Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

(a) When Presented.

(1) Unless a different time is prescribed in a statute of the United States, a defendant

shall serve an answer

(A) within 20 days after being served with the summons and complaint, or

(B) if service of the summons has been timely waived on request under Rule

4 (d), within 60 days after the date when the request for waiver was sent,

or within 90 days after that date if the defendant was addressed outside any

judicial district of the United States.

(2) A party served with a pleading stating a cross-claim against that party shall serve

an answer thereto within 20 days after being served. The plaintiff shall serve a reply

to a counterclaim in the answer within 20 days after service of the answer, or, if a reply

is ordered by the court, within 20 days after service of the order, unless the order

otherwise directs.

(3)(A) The United States, an agency of the United States, or an officer or employee of

the United States sued in an official capacity, shall serve an answer to the complaint

or cross-claim or a reply to a counterclaim within 60 days after the United States attorney

is served with the pleading asserting the claim.

(B) An officer or employee of the United States sued in an individual capacity

for acts or omissions occurring in connection with the performance of duties

on behalf of the United States shall serve an answer to the complaint or

cross-claim or a reply to a counterclaim within 60 days after service on the

officer or employee, or service on the United States attorney, whichever is

later.

(4) Unless a different time is fixed by court order, the service of a motion permitted

under this rule alters the periods of time as follows:

(A) if the court denies the motion or postpones its disposition until the

trial on the merits, the responsive pleading shall be served within 10 days

after notice of the court's action; or

(B) if the court grants a motion for a more definite statement, the responsive

pleading shall be served within 10 days after the service of the more definite

statement.

(b) How Presented. Every defense, in law or fact, to a claim for relief in any pleading, whether a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, shall be asserted in the responsive pleading thereto if one is required, except that the following defenses may at the option of the pleader be made by motion: (1) lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, (2) lack of jurisdiction over the person, (3) improper venue, (4) insufficiency of process, (5) insufficiency of service of process, (6) failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, (7) failure to join a party under Rule 19. A motion making any of these defenses shall be made before pleading if a further pleading is permitted. No defense or objection is waived by being joined with one or more other defenses or objections in a responsive pleading or motion. If a pleading sets forth a claim for relief to which the adverse party is not required to serve a responsive pleading, the adverse party may assert at the trial any defense in law or fact to that claim for relief. If, on a motion asserting the defense numbered (6) to dismiss for failure of the pleading to state a

claim upon which relief can be granted, matters outside the pleading are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Rule 56, and all parties shall be given reasonable opportunity to present all material made pertinent to such a motion by Rule 56.

(c) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. After the pleadings are closed but within such time as not to delay the trial, any party may move for judgment on the pleadings. If, on a motion for judgment on the pleadings, matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Rule 56, and all parties shall be given reasonable opportunity to present all material made pertinent to such a motion by Rule 56.

(d) Preliminary Hearings. The defenses specifically enumerated (1) - (7) in subdivision (b) of this rule, whether made in a pleading or by motion, and the motion for judgment mentioned in subdivision (c) of this rule shall be heard and determined before trial on application of any party, unless the court orders that the hearing and determination thereof be deferred until the trial.

(e) Motion For More Definite Statement. If a pleading to which a responsive pleading is permitted is so vague or ambiguous that a party cannot reasonably be required to frame a responsive pleading, the party may move for a more definite statement before interposing a responsive pleadings. The motion shall point out the defects complained of and the details desired. If the motion is granted and the order of the court is not obeyed within 10 days after notice of the order or within such other time as the court may fix, the court may strike the pleading to which the motion was directed or make such order as it deems just.

(f) Motion To Strike. Upon motion made by a party before responding to a pleading or, if no responsive pleading is permitted by these rules, upon motion made by a party within 20 days after the service of the pleading upon the party or upon the court's own initiative at any time, the court may order stricken from any pleading any insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.

(g) Consolidation of Defenses in Motion. A party who makes a motion under this rule may join with it any other motions herein provided for and then available to the party. If a party makes a motion under this rule but omits therefrom any defense or objection then available to the party which this rule permits to be raised by motion, the party shall not thereafter make a motion based on the defense or objection so omitted, except a motion as provided in subdivision (h)(2) hereof on any of the grounds there stated.

(h) Waiver or Preservation of Certain Defenses

(1) A defense of lack of jurisdiction over the person, improper venue, insufficiency of

process, or insufficiency of service of process is waived (A) if omitted from a motion

in the circumstances described in subdivision (g), or (B) if it is neither made by motion

under this rule nor included in a responsive pleading or an amendment thereof permitted

by Rule 15 (a) to be made as a matter of course.

(2) A defense of failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, a defense of

failure to join a party indispensable under Rule 19, and an objection of failure to state

a legal defense to a claim may be made in any pleading permitted or ordered under Rule

7 (a), or by motion for judgment on the pleadings, or at the trial on the merits.

(3) Whenever it appears by suggestion of the parties or otherwise that the court lacks

jurisdiction of the subject matter, the court shall dismiss the action.

Rule 13 Counterclaim and Cross-claim

(a) Compulsory Counterclaims. A pleading shall state as a counterclaim any claim which at the time of serving the pleading the pleader has against any opposing party, if it arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party's claim and does not require for its adjudication the presence of third parties of whom the court cannot acquire jurisdiction. But the pleader need not state the claim if (1) at the time the action was commenced the claim was the subject of another pending action, or (2) the opposing party brought suit upon the claim by attachment or other process by which the court did not acquire jurisdiction to render a personal judgment on that claim, and the pleader is not stating any counterclaim under this Rule 13.

(b) Permissive Counterclaims. A pleading may state as a counterclaim any claim against an opposing party not arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party's claim.

(c) Counterclaim Exceeding Opposing Claim. A counterclaim may or may not diminish or defeat the recovery sought by the opposing party. It may claim relief exceeding in amount or different in kind from that sought in the pleading of the opposing party.

(d) Counterclaim Against the United States. These rules shall not be construed to enlarge beyond the limits now fixed by law the right to assert counterclaims or to claim credits against the United States or an officer or agency thereof.

(e) Counterclaim Maturing or Acquired After Pleading. A claim which either matured or was acquired by the pleader after serving a pleading may, with the permission of the court, be presented as a counterclaim by supplemental pleading.

(f) Omitted Counterclaim. When a pleader fails to set up a counterclaim through oversight, inadvertence, or excusable neglect, or when justice requires, the pleader may by leave of court set up the counterclaim by amendment.

(g) cross-claim Against Co-Party. A pleading may state as a cross-claim any claim by one party against a co-party arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter either of the original action or of a counterclaim therein or relating to any property that is the subject matter of the original action. Such cross-claim may include a claim that the party against whom it is asserted is or may be liable to the cross-claimant for all or part of a claim asserted in the action against the cross-claimant.

(h) Joinder of Additional Parties. Persons other than those made parties to the original action may be made parties to a counterclaim or cross-claim in accordance with the provisions of Rules 19 and 20.

(i) Separate Trials; Separate Judgments. If the court orders separate trials as provided in Rule 42 (b), judgment on a counterclaim or cross-claim may be rendered in accordance with the terms of Rule 54 (b) when the court has jurisdiction so to do, even if the claims of the opposing party have been dismissed or otherwise disposed of.

Rule 14 Third-Party Practice

(a) When Defendant May Bring in Third Party. At any time after commencement of the action a defending party, as a third-party plaintiff, may cause a summons and complaint to be served upon a person not a party to the action who is or may be liable to the third-party plaintiff for all or part of the plaintiff's claim against the third-party plaintiff. The third-party plaintiff need not obtain leave to make the service if the third-party plaintiff files the third-party complaint not later than 10 days after serving the original answer. Otherwise the third-party plaintiff must obtain leave on motion upon notice to all parties to the action. The person served with the summons and third-party complaint, hereinafter called the third-party defendant, shall make any defenses to the third-party plaintiff's claim as provided in Rule 12 and any counterclaims against the third-party plaintiff and cross-claims against other third-party defendants as provided in Rule 13. The third-party defendant may assert against the plaintiff any defenses which the third-party plaintiff has to the plaintiff's claim. The third-party defendant may also assert any claim against the plaintiff arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the plaintiff's claim against the third-party plaintiff. The plaintiff may assert any claim against the third-party defendant arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the plaintiff's claim against the third-party plaintiff, and the third-party defendant thereupon shall assert any defenses as provided in Rule 12 and any counterclaims and cross-claims as provided in Rule 13. Any party may move to strike the third-party claim, or for its severance or separate trial. A third-party defendant may proceed under this rule against any person not a party to the action who is or may be liable to the third-party defendant for all or part of the claim made in the action against the third-party defendant. The third-party complaint, if within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, may be in rem against a vessel, cargo, or other property subject to admiralty or maritime process in rem, in which case references in this rule to the summons include the warrant of arrest, and references to the third-party plaintiff or defendant include, where appropriate, a person who asserts a right under Supplemental Rule C (6)(b)(i) in the property arrested.

(b) When Plaintiff May Bring in Third Party. When a counterclaim is asserted against a plaintiff, the plaintiff may cause a third party to be brought in under circumstances which under this rule would entitle a defendant to do so.

(c) Admiralty and Maritime Claims. When a plaintiff asserts an admiralty or maritime claim within the meaning of Rule 9 (h), the defendant or person who asserts a right under Supplemental Rule C (6)(b)(i), as a third-party plaintiff, may bring in a third-party defendant who may be wholly or partly liable, either to the plaintiff or to the third-party plaintiff, by way of remedy over, contribution, or otherwise on account of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences. In such a case the third-party plaintiff may also demand judgment against the third-party defendant in favor of the plaintiff, in which event the third-party defendant shall make any defenses to the claim of the plaintiff as well as to that of the third-party plaintiff in the manner provided in Rule 12 and the action shall proceed as if the plaintiff had commenced it against the third-party defendant as well as the third-party plaintiff.

Rule 15 Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

(a) Amendments. A party may amend the party's pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served or, if the pleading is one to which no responsive pleading is permitted and the action has not been placed upon the trial calendar, the party may so amend it at any time within 20 days after it is served. Otherwise a party may amend the party's pleading only by leave of court or by written consent of justice so requires. A party shall plead in response to an amended pleading within the time remaining for response to the original pleading or within 10 days after service of the amended pleading, whichever period may be the longer, unless the court otherwise orders.

(c)Amendments to Conform to the Evidence. When issues not raised by the pleadings are tried by

express or implied consent of the parties, they shall be treated in all respects as if they

had been raised in the pleadings. Such amendment of the pleadings as may be necessary to cause

them to conform to the evidence and to raise these issues may be made upon motion of any party

at any time, even after judgment; but failure so to amend does not affect the result of the

trial of these issues. If evidence is objected to at the trial on the ground that it is not

within the issues made by the pleadings, the court may allow the pleadings to be amended and

shall do so freely when the presentation of the merits of the action will be subserved thereby

and the objecting party fails to satisfy the court that the admission of such evidence would

prejudice the party in maintaining the party's action or defense upon the merits. The court

may grant a continuance to enable the objecting party to meet such evidence.

(c) Relation Back of Amendments. An amendment of a pleading relates back to the date of the original pleading when (1) relation back is permitted by the law that provides the statute of limitations applicable to the action, or (2) the claim or defense asserted in the amended pleading arose out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth or attempted to be set forth in the original pleading, or (3) the amendment changes the party or the naming of the party against whom a claim is asserted if the foregoing provision (2) is satisfied and, within the period provided by Rule 4 (m) for service of the summons and complaint, the party to be brought in by amendment (A) has received such notice of the institution of the action that the party will not be prejudiced in maintaining a defense on the merits, and (B) knew or should have known that, but for a mistake concerning the identity of the proper party, the action would have been brought against the party.

The delivery or mailing of process to the United States Attorney, or United States attorney's designee, or the Attorney General of the United States, or an agency or officer who would have been a proper defendant if named, satisfies the requirement of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of this paragraph (3) with respect to the United States or any agency or officer thereof to be brought into the action as a defendant.

(d) Supplemental Pleadings. Upon motion of a party the court may, upon reasonable notice and upon such terms as are just, permit the party to serve a supplemental pleading setting forth transactions or occurrences or events which have happened since the date of the pleading sought to be supplemented. Permission may be granted even though the original pleading is defective in its statements of a claim for relief or defense. If the court deems it advisable that the adverse party plead to the supplemental pleading, it shall so order, specifying the time therefor.

Rule 16 Pretrial Conference; Scheduling; Management

(a) Pretrial Conferences; Objectives. In any action, the court may in its discretion direct the attorneys for the parties and any unrepresented parties to appear before it for a conference or conferences before trial for such purposes as

(1) expediting the disposition of the action;

(2) establishing early and continuing control so that the case will not be protracted

because of lack of management;

(3) discouraging wasteful pretrial activities;

(4) improving the quality of the trial through more thorough preparation, and;

(5) facilitating the settlement of the case.

(b) Scheduling and Planning. Except in categories of actions exempted by district court rule as inappropriate, the district judge, or a magistrate judge when authorized by district court rule, shall, after receiving the report from the parties under Rule 26 (f) or after consulting with the attorneys for the parties and any unrepresented parties by a scheduling conference, telephone, mail, or other suitable means, enter a scheduling order that limits the time

(1) to join other parties and to amend the pleadings;

(2) to file motions; and

(3) to complete discovery.

The scheduling order may also include

(4) modifications of the times for disclosures under Rules 26 (a) and 26 (e)(1) and of

the extent of discovery to be permitted;

(5) the date or dates for conferences before trial, a final pretrial conference, and trial;

and

(6) any other matters appropriate in the circumstances of the case.

The order shall issue as soon as practicable but in any event within 90 days after the appearance of a defendant and within 120 days after the complaint has been served on a defendant. A schedule shall not be modified except upon a showing of good cause and by leave of the district judge or, when authorized by local rule, by a magistrate judge.

(c) Subjects for Consideration at Pretrial Conferences. At any conference under this rule consideration may be given, and the court may take appropriate action, with respect to

(1) the formulation and simplification of the issues, including the elimination of

frivolous claims or defenses;

(2) the necessity or desirability of amendments to the pleadings;

(3) the possibility of obtaining admissions of fact and of documents which will avoid

unnecessary proof, stipulations regarding the authenticity of documents, and advance

rulings from the court on the admissibility of evidence;

(4) the avoidance of unnecessary proof and of cumulative evidence, and limitations or

restrictions on the use of testimony under Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence;

(5) the appropriateness and timing of summary adjudication under Rule 56;

(6) the control and scheduling of discovery, including orders affecting disclosures and

discovery pursuant to Rule 26 and Rules 27 through 37;

(7) the identification of witnesses and documents, the need and schedule for filing and

exchanging pretrial briefs, and the date or dates for further conferences and for trial;

(8) the advisability of referring matters to a magistrate judge or master;

(9) settlement and the use of special procedures to assist in resolving the dispute when

authorized by statute or local rule;

(10) the form and substance of the pretrial order;

(11) the disposition of pending motions;

(12) the need for adopting special procedures for managing potentially difficult or

protracted actions that may involve complex issues, multiple parties, difficult legal

questions, or unusual proof problems;

(13) an order for a separate trial pursuant to Rule 42 (b) with respect to a claim,

counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, or with respect to any particular issue

in the case;

(14) an order directing a party or parties to present evidence early in the trial with

respect to a manageable issue that could, on the evidence, be the basis for a judgment

as a matter of law under Rule 50 (a) or a judgment on partial findings under Rule 52 (c);

(15) an order establishing a reasonable limit on the time allowed for presenting evidence;

and

(16) such other matters as may facilitate the just, speedy, and inexpensive disposition

of the action.

At least one of the attorneys for each party participating in any conference before trial shall have authority to enter into stipulations and to make admissions regarding all matters that the participants may reasonably anticipate may be discussed. If appropriate, the court may require that a party or its representatives be present or reasonably available by telephone in order to consider possible settlement of the dispute.

(d) Final Pretrial Conference. Any final pretrial conference shall be held as close to the time of trial as reasonable under the circumstances. The participants at any such conference shall formulate a plan for trial, including a program for facilitating the admission of evidence. The conference shall be attended by at least one of the attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of the parties and by any unrepresented parties.

(e) Pretrial Orders. After any conference held pursuant to this rule, an order shall be entered reciting the action taken. This order shall control the subsequent course of the action unless modified by a subsequent order. The order following a final pretrial conference shall be modified only to prevent manifest injustice.

(f) Sanctions. If a party or party's attorney fails to obey a scheduling or pretrial order, or if no appearance is made on behalf of a party at a scheduling or pretrial conference, or if a party or party's attorney is substantially unprepared to participate in the conference, or if a party or party's attorney fails to participate in good faith, the judge, upon motion or the judge's own initiative, may make such orders with regard thereto as are just, and among others any of the orders provided in Rule 37 (b)(2)(B), (C), (D). In lieu of or in addition to any other sanction, the judge shall require the party or the attorney representing the party or both to pay the reasonable expenses incurred because of any noncompliance with

法官助理制度中的相关问题研究(一)

法官助理制度中的相关问题研究(一) 法官助理是法官职业化建设的重要组成部分,在新型审判组织模式中具有承上启下关键作用。最高人民法院在第一个《人民法院五年改革纲要》中就设立法官助理制度提出了初步构想,02年11月最高人民法院制定下发的《关于加强法官队伍职业化建设的若干意见》中对法官助理制度予以了肯定,随后在全国范围内选择了几个具有地域代表性的中级和基层人民法院进行了法官助理制度的改革试点。江苏省高级人民法院于去年7月在全省范围内选择了三家法院作为法官助理制度的改革试点,其中一家就是镇江市京口区人民法院。笔者拟从该院的具体实践出发,以理性的视角,对法官助理制度中的相关问题作一些探讨和研究。尽管有“窥一斑以见全豹”之嫌,但“解剖麻雀”也是一种研究方法,期这种“以点带面”的研究和思考能对全省乃至全国的法官助理制度的改革实践提供一些可资借鉴的东西。 一、法官助理的工作性质 这是研究法官助理制度必须首先要搞明白的一个问题,即在新的审判组织模式中,法官助理到底扮演一个什么样的角色。只有搞清楚这个问题,我们才能够对法官助理制度作更深层次的探讨和研究。 (一)国外法官助理的工作性质 法官助理制度,以美国最具典型性和代表性。美国法律规定,法官按照法院的级别不同可以有1-4名法官助理,并配有秘书、和书记员,其中法官助理与法官业务联系最为紧密,被称为“不穿法袍的法官”。 在法国,虽然没有法官助理这一职位,但法院却有着数量可观的司法助理人员,其分工更细,包括书记官、送达执行官、司法鉴定人、秘书、社会工作者、顾问律师等等。 在德国,承担法官助理职责的是各级法院的司法公务员,其基本职能也是“不享有审判权的法官助手,在法官的指导下,协助法官完成判决以外的法律性任务”。 各国法官助理基于国情和文化差异,虽然承担的工作内容不尽相同,称呼不一,但就其基本性质来说都是法官的助手,承担判决以外的法律性事务。 (二)国内关于法官助理性质的几种观点。 由于我国引入法官助理制度的时间不长,司法实践也处于尝试摸索阶段,对法官助理的定性还没有统一的衡量标准,导致改革中各地法院在实践中对法官助理究竟是一个什么定位,认识上有诸多分歧。从目前的情况来看,大体上主要存在以下两种观点:一种是法官助理有权论,一种是法官助理无权论。有权论中,又细分为有完整的审判权和无审判权但有调解权两种观点。推行有权论的法院,在实践中直接将助理审判员更名为法官助理,或将竞选职业法官落选的审判员调整到法官助理岗位,法官助理享有一定的裁判权或调解权,法官助理在调解书上署名。关于无权论,也有两种不同的认知,一为法官助理既无审判权也无调解权,一为法官助理可以主持调解,但不能以自己的名义制作调解书,也即无署名权。 (三)京口法院关于法官助理的定位。 法官职业化的核心是法官的精英化,法官的精英化确立了法官在新的审判组织中的中心地位,在这一组织模式下,法官助理只能是法官的助手,在法官的指挥下开展工作。在关于法官助理有权还是无权的争论中,京口法院的改革者们在确认“法官+法官助理+书记员”这一审判组织模式中法官助理没有审判权,只是法官法律事务的助手的前提下,根据法官助理的来源身份不同,区别确定法官助理的调解权和署名权。该院规定法官助理不行使审判权,但具有主持庭前调解的职责,调解书必须得到主审法官的确认,由法官签发。也就是说,法官助理的调解权来源于法官的委托,这在事实上形成了法官助理对法官的一种依附。对于能否以自己的名义制作调解书,也即调解书的署名权问题,该院针对下列两种情况分别作出不同的授权:一是对于原是助理审判员身份担任法官助理的,可以在调解书上署名;二是对于具有公务员身份的书记员或事业编制人员担任法官助理的,只能以法官的名义制作调解书,调解书上的

产业集群竞争优势分析

[摘要] 产业集群强劲而持久的竞争优势成为国家或地区竞争力的主要来源。本文首先分析了产业集群的内涵和特征,提出产业集群的主要竞争优势表现为外 部经济、社会资本、创新和创新网络四个方面。 [关键词] 产业集群竞争优势创新 一、产业集群的内涵与特征 产业集群是在特定领域中,一群在地理上临近、有交互关联性的企业和相 关法人机构,并以彼此的共同性和互补性相联结。产业集群不是单纯的产业空 间集聚,而是根植于地方社会文化环境,包括各种正式合作关系和非正式交流 的社会经济网络。 典型的产业集群具有以下四个主要特征:1.空间集聚特征:任何一个产业集群都是大量企业在空间的汇集,成员企业和辅助机构被共同“锁定”在一定区域,使经济活动高度密集,可以较容易地获得专业化的、弹性的劳动力,具有 较强的地域相关性。2.专业化特征:产业集群的生产经营具有很强的专业化特征,企业成员之间围绕产业链及其服务性机构、行业组织实行精细的专业分工,形 成了社会化分工网络。3.根植性特征:所谓根植性是指通过集体性组织来建立 信任和承诺,使得不同利益各方协同作用,从而获得好处,同时保持高度的灵 活性。共同的社会文化环境使集群内产业家产生信任、理解和相互合作,并形 成集群内企业间的一种特殊黏合剂,使众多产业粘结在一起,既营造了区域创 新环境,又使产业深深扎根于当地。4.网络创新特征:集群内的成员企业和辅 助机构通过长期的联系形成本地化网络,网络中的各行为主体之间以正式或非 正式的关系,频繁地进行着商品、服务、信息、劳动力等贸易性或非贸易性的 交易、交流和互动,相互学习,密切合作,共同推动区域的发展和产业的持续 创新。 二、产业集群的竞争优势 产业集群之所以在激烈的全球经济竞争中表现出良好的竞争态势,在于产 业集群作为一种大量企业及相关支撑机构在地理空间的集聚,能够形成其他区 域所没有的强劲而持续的竞争优势。 1.外部经济优势。产业集群的外部竞争优势包括规模经济、范围经济和劳 动力市场共享的优势。通过这三种外部经济优势间的相互作用,降低了产业的 生产成本,有利于集群开展低成本战略参与市场竞争,并通过区域品牌获取整 体营销优势。 (1)规模经济优势。产业在地理上的集聚,形成了产品的规模生产和大规模的市场需求,使集群内企业获得从原材料到人才的低成本供给。如大批量购买 原材料,不仅使原材料价格降低,也节约了单位运输成本。产业集群可以通过建 立区位品牌,使集群内的单个企业借助集群的整体品牌效用获得营销的规模经济优势。 (2)范围经济优势。外部范围经济是由集群内企业间的分工与合作而形成的。由于集群内专业化程度很高,企业往往集中于生产某一专门的产品,同时利用 自身的技能与其他企业紧密合作,协同参与价值链的全部增值活动。在这种情 况下,生产系统被肢解为许多部分,分散在许多小企业中,企业之间再通过建

审计准则考试试题

审计学原理 第十一章审计准则 一、单选 1、世界上最早的审计准则是(A ) A美国注册会计师协会于1947年公布的《审计准则试行办法》 B美国总审计署于1972年颁布的《政府的机构、计划项目、活动和职责的审计准则》C我国审计署于1996年颁布的《中华人民共和国国家审计基本准则》 D1993年我国颁布的《中华人民共和国注册会计师法》 2、下列选项中,属于我国《独立审计基本准则》的一般准则的有(AD ) A注册会计师应遵守职业道德规范,恪守独立、客观、公正原则 B注册会计师执行审计业务应编制审计计划 C注册会计师进行符合性测试和实质性测试时,一般应采用抽样审计 D注册会计师对于审计过程中知悉的商业秘密应当保密 3、我国第一部正式的国家审计准则是(A ) A我国审计署于1996年颁布的《中华人民共和国国家审计基本准则》 B 1993年我国颁布的《中华人民共和国注册会计师法》 C 1996年1月1日实施的《独立审计基本准则》 D 1980年财政部颁发的《关于成立会计顾问处的暂行规定》 4.下列关于审计准则的表述中,错误的是:(C ) A.审计准则是确定和解脱审计责任的依据 B.审计准则是衡量审计质量的尺度 C.审计准则是评价被审计单位的标准 D.审计准则是审计人员必须遵守的行为规范

5.在我国《独立审计基本准则》中,下列各项均属一般准则的内容,除了( D ) A.对独立审计目标的表述 B.对注册会计师业务素质的要求 C.对注册会计师和被审计单位双方责任的规定 D.对编制审计计划的规定 6.独立审计基本准则中的一般准则包括( A ) A.注册会计师保持独立的观念与态度 B.注册会计师如果在审计时配有助手,必须注意监督 C.注册会计师应适当评估被审计单位的内部控制制度 D.注册会计师应在接受业务之前,与客户签订业务委托书 7.最早的审计准则出现在( A ) A.美国 B.英国 C.日本 D.中国 8.审计准则发端于( C )。 A中国B英国C美国D德国 9.工作准则亦被称为审计的( D )准则。 A.行为 B.运用C.内勤D.外勤 10.( B )主持独立审计准则的研究编制工作。 A.审计署B.财政部C.国务院D.中纪委 11.《中国注册会计师职业道德基本准则》的“专业胜任能力与技术规范”中要求注册会计师在执业时要保持应有的( A )。 A 职业谨慎 B 职业道德 C 职业纪律D职业法规 12、( B )是查明审计客体的行为规范。 A审计准则B审计依据C审计证据D审计报告 13、我国独立审计准则的制定依据是( C )。P458 A、《审计法》 B、《会计法》 C、《注册会计师法》 D、《企业会计准则》 14.国家出台审计准则的主要原因是增强的( B )的可信性。 A、会计档案 B、会计报表 C、会计账簿 D、会计凭证 15..民间审计的《独立审计基本准则》的主要内容不包括 ...( D )A.一般准则 B.外勤准则 C.报告准则 D.处理、处罚准则 16、独立审计准则体系中哪项内容不具有强制性( C ) A独立审计基本准则B独立审计具体准则C执业规范指南D独立审计实务公告 17.下列有关重大错报风险的表述中,正确的是:( A ) A.财务报表在审计前存在重大错报的可能性 B.财务报表在审计后依然存在重大错报的可能性 C.审计人员未能发现重大错报的可能性

国内外标准化教育的现状及对我国的启示分析-模板

国内外标准化教育的现状及对我国的启示分析 前言 随着经济全球化发展,标准在经济和社会发展中的作用日益凸显。由于标准化是组织现代化生产的重要手段和必要条件,对于促进科技商业化、促进商业和贸易、推动创新等方面起到一定的积极作用,因而各行各业对高质量的标准化人才的需求也日益迫切。标准化教育作为贯彻标准化理念的有效手段,引起了世界各国的广泛关注。 世界上许多标准化机构和国家也开展了相关的标准化教育活动,如国际标准化组织、国际标准化教育组、欧盟、韩国、日本等。标准化教育不仅仅提高了大众的标准化意识,有助于在世界范围内传播标准化理念和知识,更有助于通过一支高水平标准化人才队伍的建立,提高产业和的核心竞争力,从而更好地抢占国际竞争的制高点。 1国外标准化教育发展概况 国际及地区组织标准化教育发展概况 由于推进标准化教育能带来技术、经济和社会效益,越来越多的标准机构和教育机构逐渐意:识到这一特点,因此标准化教育日益受到重视。 二国际标准化组织认识到教育机构在提:高标准化意识和认识标准化发挥着极大的作用,开展了大量标准化教育培训工作。20XX年,专门针对高等院校设立了高等教育奖,对开展标准化活动的先锋教育机构进行奖励。该奖项:从20XX年开始每两年颁发一次,要求参评院校应有两年以上开发标准化课程或培训项目的成功经验。另外,ISO还组织参与了各类国际标准化教:育会议和学术研讨活动,包括国际标准化教育合作组织年会和世界标准合作学术周/学术日会议,以方便各国利用以上交流平台,对标准化教育问题进行探讨。20XX年,工SO制定《20XX-20XX年战略规划》。该规划确定了标准化教育的战略地位,为ISO 开展标准化教育活动指明了方向。该战略规划中第6个目标明确指出,要将标准化内容纳入教育课程,并提出了要加强信息交流、制定教材、召开会议、开展培训、设立奖励机制等具体措施,以达到良好的教育效果,实现 ISO 的战略目标。同年,ISO 与瑞士日内瓦大学合作开设了为期两年的标准化、社会规范和可持续性发展硕士学历教育课程。在 19 门必修课程中,与标准化直接相关的课程包括5 门:协调标准、管理体系标准、合格评定、标准的国际政治经济学、风险管理

企业竞争优势可持续发展的来源解析

企业竞争优势可持续发展的来源

浅析法官助理制度问题

浅析法官助理制度问题 浅析法官助理制度试行中存在的问题 为建设一支高素质的德才兼备的职业法官队伍, 推动法官的职业化、精英化建设~不断适应依法治国、建设社会主义法治国家的需要~最高人民法院从2003年起在全国范围内逐步开展法官助理试点工作。经过近5、6年的探索实践~法官助理制度取得了较好的运行效果。 1、实行法官助理制度有利于提高审判效率。随着我国市场经济的有序发展~人民法院案件数量激增~最明显的是民事与刑事案件数量的增长。设立法官助理~可以帮助法官承担大量的审判辅助性工作~使其能够从这些事务性工作中脱身出来~专心致力于“审”与“判”。实行法官助理制度~是实现审、助、书不同角色科学定位的有效途径~审判流程将会更加科学、规范~可以有效地促进审判效率的提高。实行法官助理制度也有利于促进司法分工的科学化和审判资源的优化配置~使各类人员各尽其能~各安其位~各乐其业。同时~司法分工的科学化也有助于实现人民法院不同岗位人员的分类管理~构建符合审判规律的法院管理体制。 2、实行法官助理制度有利于法官静心深造、潜心研究。案件类型的变化对理论功底的要求与审判人员工作繁重而无暇研究的矛盾日益明显。在案件数量增长的同时~案件类型也向多元化、新颖化、专业化发展~法官判案思路正向深度与广度发展~对于审判人员法律的运用与把握提出了较高的要求~在繁重的工作压力下~审判人员往往利用业余时间加班结案~缺少足够的时间去钻研案件、著述深造。法官助 1 理可以使法官摆脱事务性工作束缚~有足够的时间去学习新条规~研究新案件。

3、实行法官助理制度~可以避免法官庭前预断、先入为主~有利于法官保持在审判活动中的中立性~从而有利于保障司法公正。一方面~负责案件审理和裁判的法官不与当事人直接接触,另一方面~与当事人接触的法官助理则不会参与案件的审理与裁判。这就能够在一定程度上割断法官与当事人及案件的联系~有助于维护司法的独立和公正。 4、实行法官助理制度~可以建立一支素质较高、实践经验比较丰富的法官助理队伍~可以为选任法官提供充足而坚实的人才储备~不断提高法官队伍素质。 但我们也要清楚的认识到~因为我国法官助理制度实行时间较短~相关的配套制度和职责分工还没有建立起来~因此在实行过程中并未完全实现其理论上的优越性~还存在一定的问题和不足~主要表现在以下几个方面: 1、法官助理的定位尚不明确~各地法院对法官助理制度也处于尝试摸索阶段~对法官助理的定位还没有统一的衡量标准~导致改革中各地法院在实践中对法官助理究竟是一个什么定位~认识上有诸多分歧。法官和法官助理之间~法官助理和书记员之间的职责划分不明确~很多法官助理仍然从事书记员的各种工作~法官助理及书记员的工作权限在实践中难以划分一定程度上影响了法官助理岗位职责意识的提高。 2 2、法官助理职责的划分欠缜密~职责过于繁杂。一些法院对法官助理职责规定为除参与庭审裁判案件及开庭记录装订卷宗外的几乎工作。这种划分的益处在于~将大量事务性的工作交由法官助理完成。法官可以从大量事务性的工作中解脱出来~从而将大部分精力用于案件的思考和法学理论的研究~使法官能够专司裁判。但这种规定也存在问题:这样的职责划分~片面的夸大了助理的职责。法官助理职责象一个大口袋~法官和书记员职责中装不下的都装到了法官助理职责中~法官助

产业集群的动力机制与竞争优势分析

116商业时代 (原名 《商业经济研究》 ) 2010年25期产业集群的动力机制 产业集群指具有产业关联性的企业在一定地理范围内的集中,相互之间具有竞合关系,且共享基础设施。和企业集中在一起还包括各种相关机构如中介机构、科研机构、金融机构等。产业集群动力机制是指驱动产业集群发展和演化的力量结构体系及其运行规则,它具有一定的稳定性和规律性,在产业集群发展过程中不断的发挥作用。 马歇尔认为企业集中在一起可以获得外部经济,因此相同或相近的企业在一定地理范围内集聚,这样可以获得其他企业没有的优势,这些使企业降低了生产成本和交易费用,拥有了集聚优势。为获得外部经济而集聚在一起就是集群产生的动力。韦伯从区位因素角度分析,并认为大量集聚因素是产业集聚的动力。威廉姆斯从交易费用角度说明了集群的产生,集群是介于企业和市场之间的最优效率的经济组织。克鲁格曼从规模报酬递增方面说明了企业集聚的原因。波特指出产业集群的存在可以使钻石模型的要素得到更好的发挥。Best (1999)认为产业集群存在四种主要动力:集中专业化、知识外溢、技术多样化和水平整合及再整合,它们依次对产业 产业集群的 动力机制与竞争优势分析 ■于树江 博士 刘静霞 李艳双(河北工业大学管理学院 天津300130) ▲基金项目:河北省自然科学基金资助项目(G2007000121),河北省社科基金委托项目(HB2009WT62)◆ 中图分类号:F062.2 文献标识码:A 内容摘要:产业集群的动力机制把集群原有的生产要素转变成了集群的竞争优势,使集群在竞争处于有利地位。本文描述了产业集群的动力机制构成以及产业集群的竞争优势,同时指出了两者之间的相互关系。 关键词:产业集群 动力机制 竞争优势 集群的发展产生作用,并形成循环状的稳 定结构,这就是主体动力机制。 国内对产业集群动力机制的研究是基于不同的集群提出不同的动力机制。鲁桃珍(2007)在对湖南产业集群研究的基础上提出该地产业集群动力因素是政府和市场,政府要为集群发展创造软环境和硬环境,制定有利于集群发展的产业政策,引导集群发展。市场的推动是产业集群产生和发展的另一要素,它通过企业之间的网络化和中小企业集中来发挥作用。集群内企业之间的分工合作提高了生产率,集群可以获得规模经济(生产规模的扩大)和外部经济(共享基础实施或其他公共支出),促进集群发展。候志茹(2008)认为产业集群发展的动力机制由内源动力机制和外源动力机制组成。内源动力机制包括产业价值链、社会资本与网络、外部经济、集群技术创新与知识外溢等;在全球价值链分工背景下,外源动力机制包括政府的促导行为、外部竞争、区域创新环境以及制度文化等要素。 产业集群动力因素包括外部经济,集聚经济,地理位置,低交易费用,企业家精神,政府作用,市场推动,社会资本与网络,集群技术创新等。但外部经济、集聚经济、地理位置等因素在集群产生后,其作用逐渐消失,随着集群发展,政府、集群网络和集群创新的作用不断地稳定并且具有规律性。政府的职能由为集群创 造良好的外部环境,吸引投资转变成为企业联系科研机构,帮助企业融资,协调集 群内各机构之间的关系。集群不断发展,企业越来越多,企业之间的联系越来越紧密,由原来的血缘关系发展到以地缘、业缘更大范围的网络关系,分散了企业的创新风险,使企业之间的交流合作更加密切,促进了企业的协调和沟通,同时集群内知识传播更加迅速,隐性知识也被大多数人了解了。网络中的中介结构和科研机构等机构组织,共同形成了集群的创新环境,而集群的不断创新是集群发展的不竭动力。 产业集群的竞争优势 竞争优势是某个产业集群在某些方面比其他的产业集群或其他组织结构更能带来利润或效益的优势。产业集群的竞争优势包括成产成本优势,基于质量基础的产品差异化优势,区域营销优势,市场竞争优势,企业家资源,专业市场,区域创新能力等。 在产业集群内,集群内企业之间的分工提高了劳动生产率,企业共同进行生产和销售活动,共用基础设施,由于地理接近而减少物质和信息流的运移费,同时共同的产业文化和价值观,使企业间建立了以合作与信任为基础的社会网络,从而使双方更容易达成合约降低了交易成本。劳动力市场的存在使企业可以随时调整员工数量和结构,减少了工资费用;另一方面劳动力之间的自由流动也促进了信息和思想的传播、扩散,扩大了企业的信息流。以上这些的存在降低了集群内企业的生产成本,使集群具有生产成本竞争优势。在集群内,基于质量基础的产品差异化使企业满足了顾客多样化和个性化的需求,使顾客认为该产品有别于其他企业同类产品,进而形成对该产品的依赖,这样产品的价格弹性就不明显,能够带来较高的边际利润。同时为竞争对手设置产业进入障碍。 产业集群形成自己的区域品牌,调动 了企业投入的积极性,改变了单个大企业 产业观察Estate Observation

美国政府审计准则─电算化系统审计汇总

美国政府审计准则─电算化系统审计(1) 政府经济效益和项目成果审计的第五项检查和评价准则是: 审计人员应当: 1.检查数据处理系统中的一般控制,以确定:(a)设计的控制是否符合管理方针和法律要求;(b)控制能否有效地发挥作用,保证数据处理的可靠性和安全性; 2.检查数据处理系统中的应用控制,并据此评价应用控制在保证数据处理的及时性、准确性和完整性方面的可靠程度; 除检查一般控制和应用控制外,审计人员还应参与新数据处理系统或应用项目的设计与开发以及其后所进行的重大修改工作。 可能的情况是,开发出来的数据处理系统缺乏控制措施,因此管理人员和审计人员就不能依赖其完整性。所以,如果管理部门指望正在开发的系统在可审性和适当控制方面得到合理的保证,那么审计人员在系统设计与开发过程中的检查就是至关重要的。要达到这一目标并不总是可行的,因为审计机构可能没有检查系统设计与开发所需的资源或人力。但是,这项检查应当作为一个审计目标。 一、电算化系统一般控制的检查 数据处理方式由机械处理向自动化处理的转变,需要改进传统的审计方法“自动化数据处理系统的复杂性和范围的广泛性,要求审计人员给予处理数据的系统和数据本身更多的关注。如果系统在安全性方面得到合理的保证并具有足够的控制,审计人员就可以信赖被处理的报告的数据。审计人员应该区别一般控制和应用控制。”一般控制通常适用于系统进行的大部分数据处理,而应用控制则可能因应用项目而异,而要分别加以检查。在检查个别应用控制时,审计人员应考虑被查系统一般控制的效果; 1.组织控制。职权和责任的分配必须以能够保证有效果、高效率地实现组织目标的方式进行。审计人员应该检查被审单位的组织结构、职权和责任的分配与分工情况、其目的在于确定职责分工是否能够提供有力的内部控制,例如,程序与系统开发、计算机操作、输入数据的控制、以及保持应用控制的控制小组等职责,在可行的情况下应予以分离。同时,审计人员应从“整个系统”的角度加以考虑。 在检查职责分工情况时,审计人员应该评价控制的强度并报告由于职责分工不够而暴露的弱点。职工定期轮换工作岗位及强制性休假等制度有利于管理部门维持足够的职责分工。审计人员应对这些制度的执行情况加以检查。

竞争优势理论

竞争优势理论 竞争优势理论流程图 竞争优势理论,经济学理论,由哈佛大学商学研究院迈克尔?波特提出,波特的国际竞争优势模型(又称钻石模型)包括四种本国的决定因素(country specific determinants)和两种外部力量。四种本国的决定因素包括要素条件,需求条件,相关及支持产业,公司的战略、组织以及竞争。两种外部力量是随机事件和政府。 目录 1基本内容 1.1作者 1.2竞争力量三种战略 1.3钻石体系 编辑本段 基本内容 国际竞争优势理论[1]传统的以H-O理论基本上是一个静态的理论体系,缺乏动态的眼光分析各国资

源禀赋和比较优势。为了克服传统国际贸易理论的缺陷,一些经济学家开始在H-O理论的框架之外 寻求新的贸易理论和贸易政策选择,目前在这方面最有影响的理论是国家竞争优势理论。 波特认为,一国的贸易优势并不象传统的国际贸易理论宣称的那样简单地决定于一国的自然资源、劳动力、利率、汇率,而是在很大程度上决定于一国的产业创新和升级的能力。由于当代的国际竞争更多地依赖于知识的创造和吸收,竞争优势的形成和发展已经日益超出单个企业或行业的范围,成为一个经济体内部各种因素综合作用的结果,一国的价值观、文化、经济结构和历史都成为竞争优势产生的来源。 通过对竞争优势相关文献的查阅,竞争优势理论大体可以分为S-C-P梅森-贝恩范式(E.S.Masson,1939/1949;J.S.Bain,1959)、波特产业结构分系方法(Porter,1985)、Wernerfelt(1984)和Barney (1986)等人的资源基础论、普拉哈拉德C.K.Prahalad(1990)和Gary.Hamel(1990)等人的和核心能力理论、teece(1997)等人的动态能力理论以及后来以Grant、Spender和野中郁次郎等人为代表的企 业知识基础论。我国学者李政(2005)将企业竞争优势分为外生论和内生论两个阶段;陈泽明、芮 明杰(2006)将其分为环境论、能力论、资源论三类,并厘清了三者的关系。结合相关文献,本文 将竞争优势理论分为结构论和能力论。 作者 迈克尔?波特(Michael E.Porter)是哈佛大学商学研究院著名教授,当今世界上少数最有影响 的管理学家之一。他曾在1983年被任命为美国总统里根的产业竞争委员会主席,开创了企业竞争战 略理论并引发了美国乃至世界的竞争力讨论热潮。他还是世界各地很多企业领导和政府官员的顾问。他先后获得过威尔兹经济学奖、亚当?斯密奖、三次获得麦肯锡奖,拥有很多大学的名誉博士学位。到现在为止,波特已有十四本著作,其中最有影响的有《品牌间选择、战略及双边市场力量》(1976)、《竞争战略》(1980)、《竞争优势》(1985)、《国家竞争力》(1990)等。 竞争力量三种战略 波特对于竞争战略理论做出了非常重要的贡献,“五种竞争力量”——分析产业环境的结构化方法就是他的杰出思想(参见SWOT分析);他更具影响的贡献是在《竞争战略》一书中明确地提 出了三种通用战略。 波特认为,在与五种竞争力量的抗争中,蕴涵着三类成功型战略思想,这三种思路是:1、总 成本领先战略;2、差异化战略;3、专一化战略。波特认为,这些战略类型的目标是使企业的经营在产业竞争中高人一筹:在一些产业中,这意味着企业可取得较高的收益;而在另外一些产业中,一种战略的成功可能只是企业在绝对意义上能获取些微收益的必要条件。有时企业追逐的基本目标可能不止一个,但波特认为这种情况实现的可能性是很小的。因为有地贯彻任何一种战略,通常都需要全力以赴,并且要有一个支持这一战略的组织安排。如果企业的基本目标不只一个,则这些方面的资源将被分散。 1、总成本领先战略 成本领先要求坚决地建立起高效规模的生产设施,在经验的基础上全力以赴降低成本,抓紧成本与管理费用的控制,以及最大限度地减小研究开发、服务、推销、广告等方面的成本费用。为了达到这些目标,就要在管理方面对成本给予高度的重视。尽管质量、服务以及其它方面也不容忽视,但贯穿于整个战略之中的是使成本低于竞争对手。该公司成本较低,意味着当别的公司在竞争过程中已失去利润时,这个公司依然可以获得利润。 赢得总成本最低的有利地位通常要求具备较高的相对市场份额或其它优势,诸如与原材料供应方面的良好联系等,或许也可能要求产品的设计要便于制造生产,易于保持一个较宽的相关产品线以分散固定成本,以及为建立起批量而对所有主要顾客群进行服务。 总成本领先地位非常吸引人。一旦公司赢得了这样的地位,所获得的较高的边际利润又可以重新对新设备、现代设施进行投资以维护成本上的领先地位,而这种再投资往往是保持低成本状态的

波特钻石模型分析产业集群竞争力

运用波特钻石模型分析产业集群竞争力 以海门叠石桥家纺产业集群为例 一、海门家纺产业集群的背景海门市家纺产业主要分布在三星、德胜、天补、三和、海门等乡镇,依托叠石桥国际家纺城形成。地处海门、通州两市交界处的叠石桥,当地群众素有从事家纺品生产的历史。改革开放以后,叠石桥家纺业发展驶人了快车道,家纺的品种款式由小到多,生产企业由弱到强,经营规模由小到大,生产设备由落后到先进,辐射面由狭到宽,形成了生产规模化、分工社会化、设备智能化、产品系列化和营销国际化的格局。海门市政府先后投人10亿多元,对市场经过六次扩建、改造,目前叠石桥已形成绣品城、家纺城、商贸城、名品广场等四大经营区域,拥有5000多个摊位和2000多个精品门店,营业面积达到30多万平方米,日人流量3万人次,并形成了与之相配套的物流中心、研发中心、信息中心和餐饮娱乐业等。在叠石桥市场的带动下,从事家纺产业的人员覆盖周边三个县市10多个乡镇,人数20多万,生产的产品包括被套、被罩、床单、窗帘、被子、凉席、帐子等,不但畅销全国,还远销30多个国家和地区。2005年,叠石桥家纺市场实现成交额巧0亿元,成为全国同类行业中规模最大、品种最全、交易额最高、市场前景最为看好的市场。 二、海门家纺产业集群竞争力分析 运用波特的“钻石”模型理论对海门家纺产业集群竞争力进行分析。 1.要素条件。波特认为,生产要素可以被归纳为人力资源、天然资源、知识资源、资本资源以及基础设施五类,这些生产要素一般是混合出现的,但每个产业对其依赖程度又随产业性质而定。海门家纺产业集群的生产要素表现在以下方面: (1)资本资源。叠石桥家纺市场强大的吸引力和产业的集聚效应吸引了全球家纺企业来到海门发展。在这片神奇的热土上,汇集了全国最优秀的企业群体和高素质的专业人才,成为中国最大、全球前三的家纺产品集散地。在叠石桥国际家纺城所在的三星镇,建起了2.8平方公里的工业园区。园区建成三年来,已有进区企业194家,总投人35亿元,其中产值超千万元企业有103家,超亿元企业有10家。浙江、上海、广东等地资金以及美、欧、非、亚等大洲20多个国家外资纷纷涌人,争抢发展先机。在该市海门、三和、天补、德胜等紧邻叠石桥家纺市场的乡镇,外资同样纷至沓来,推动海门2005年总体利用外资列苏中、苏北

利用技术变革学习:新版《美国国家学生教育技术标准》解读

龙源期刊网 https://www.360docs.net/doc/bf2969785.html, 利用技术变革学习:新版《美国国家学生教育技术标准》解读 作者:杨金勇孟红娟 来源:《中国电化教育》2018年第06期 摘要:《国家教育技术标准:学生标准》由美国国际教育技术协会制定,在《美国国家教育技术标准》体系中具有枢纽地位。该文基于《美国国家教育技术标准》发展演变,结合新时代中国特色教育信息化事业的创新发展,对最新版本《国家教育技术标准:学生标准》的内容进行了深入解读,揭示了该标准从早期“学习使用技术”到其后“使用技术学习”再到如今“利用 技术变革学习”演进的内在逻辑及其意义,并认为新标准的启示在于:重视信息素养,构建符合国情的学生信息素养评价指标体系和评估模型;倡导创客学习,推行整合知、行、思、创过程的新型学习方式;推进课程改革,实现信息技术与学科课程的深度有效融合,并把其从信息技术与单一学科课程教学的融合推进到信息技术支持下的跨学科课程教学的融合,真正实现信息技术支持下学生学习方式的转变。 关键词:国际教育技术协会;美国国家学生教育技术标准;学习变革;创新人才培养 《美国国家教育技术标准》(National EducationalTechnology Standards,简称NETS)是 由知名专业组织美国国际教育技术协会(International Society for Technologyin Education,简称ISTE)颁布的一系列教育技术标准,包括《国家教育技术标准:学生标准》(NationalEducational Technology Standards for Students,简称NETS-S1、《国家教育技术标准:教师标准》(National Educational Technology Standardsfor Teachers,简称NETS-T)和《国家教育技术标准:管理者标准》(National Educational TechnologyStandards for Administrators,简称NETS-A)。这套具有鲜明体系化特征的标准因其高屋建瓴的战略眼光、面向实践的现实可操作性,以及多次与时俱进修订发布,世界各地产生了广泛影响,引领了信息技术在学校教学、学习与管理中的深度应用。其中《教师标准》在国内备受关注,不仅学术界有较多关注和研究,某种程度上也促进了我国相关标准的发布,例如由教育部主导,于2004年12月印发了《中小学教师教育技术能力标准f试行)》,2014年5月印发了《中小学教师信息技术应用能力标準f试行)》。 然而,国内关于《学生标准》和《管理者标准》的研究则相对较少。在“以学定教”成为普遍共识的今天,《学生标准》相对于《教师标准》来说,具有更根本、更重要的地位与价值。笔者认为《学生标准》在NETS标准体系中具有重要核心地位,如果没有对《学生标准》的深刻理解与科学把握,就很难对《教师标准》和《管理者标准》,进而对信息技术在学校教育中的推广应用形成更加深刻认识。为此,笔者尝试通过解读最新版《学生标准》,深化对21世纪新一代学习者的认识,为我国新时代教育信息化2.0行动计划的创新发展和人才培养提供有益启示。

我国法官助理制度完善

我国法官助理制度的完善 摘要:法官助理这个词语是一个舶来品,国外的司法机关早就设置了这一职位,并且形成了完善的法官助理制度。而在我国,这还是一项崭新的司法制度,建立法官助理制度的目的是将审判实践中的审判性事务和辅助性事务分开,法官助理从事辅助性事务而法官专事案件的审理与裁决,从而提高审判的效率。 abstract: judge assistant , as an imported words, may sounds new for us, in reality it was long ago set up by foreign judicial department and with a fair system being built over time.while here in china, it is a breakthrough arrangement to improve the efficiency of judgement by seperating judging issues and assistant issues, through the judge specializing on the former and it’s assistant on the latter. 关键词:司法改革:公正;效率;法官助理制度;重构 key words: judicial reform, fairness, effieciency, judge assistant system, reconstruction 一、法官助理制度概述 当前,我国正在进行全面深入的司法改革,最高人民法院亦于2002年7月提出了具体的改革方案,目的是要加快法官队伍的职业化建设,建立一支高素质的职业法官队伍。在该改革方案中,最引人瞩目的措施之一就是为法官配备法官助理,这标志着我国也开始试行法官助理制度。但作为一个新生的制度,许多人对此并不了解,

广东省产业集群竞争力调查方案

广东省产业集群竞争力 调查方案 内部编号:(YUUT-TBBY-MMUT-URRUY-UOOY-DBUYI-0128)

“广东省产业集群综合竞争力评估与分析”课题 实施方案 一、课题背景 广东作为我国产业集群的主要经济带,目前已经形成了300余个各具特色的产业集群。但与西方的产业集群带相比,广东产业集群除了面临着资源集约利用、国际贸易环境、环境保护和宏观调控等外部环境的挑战外,还受到资金、技术、组织结构等内部因素的约束。很多集群带普遍存在大集群小企业的现象,缺乏"领头羊"。 针对这种现象,2008年底,广东省省情调查研究中心与联合国工业发展组织共同在珠三角推动"支持中国产业集群与资本运作国际示范项目",首个试点城市已确定为佛山。该项目旨在将联合国的全球资源以及国际国内产业资本引入珠三角,与具有良好发展潜力的产业集群进行对接,用金融资本和创新技术等来推动产业结构调整和升级,使珠三角产业集群能够更好更快地发展,更能适应环境保护和国际贸易环境发展的需要,在国际产业分工中获得更多更大的话语权。 在联合国工业发展组织中国投资促进处的支持下,广东省省情调查研究中心联合相关区域经济发展研究机构以"广东省产业集群竞争力评估分析"的课题形式,对广东的产业集群发展状况做一次全面的调查和了解,并将就其竞争力与发展潜力展开评估和分析。 课题组希望通过权威专家的严谨分析与科学评估后,能出具一套全面的研究报告为省委省政府及各级政府、相关职能管理部门提供决策参考,总结出一些新的发展思路,使广东产业集群能够在全球范围内保持长期的、永续的竞争力,同时也为社会各界提供一个具有较强投资与决策指导意义的“产业集群投资风向标”。 二、组织架构

美国国家教育技术标准

美国国家教育技术标准-教师版(NETS·T-2008) 关键词:美国国家教育技术标准教师版ISTE NETS·T 秦炜炜译 南京大学教育科学与管理系网络化学习与管理研究所 1. 促进学生学习、激发学生创造力[1] 教师能够运用其学科知识,通过教学、学习和技术提高自身在面授或虚拟学习环境中促进学生学习、激发学生创意与创新能力的经验。 (1)能够提升和支持自身的创造性思维与独创能力并为学生树立典范。 (2)能使学生积极运用数字化工具和资源探究并解决现实世界中的真实问题。(3)能够运用协作工具促进学生反思,从而了解(reveal)和澄清学生对概念的理解、 思考,设计与创造性过程。 (4)能够通过与学生、同事以及他人在面对面或虚拟学习环境中共同学习而在协作知 识建构方面为学生树立榜样。 2. 设计、开发数字化时代的学习经验与评估工具 教师能够设计、开发和评价融合了现有数字化工具和资源的真实的学习经验与评估以优化学生在特定情境下的学习从而使NETS·S-2008中所规定的学生的知识、技能和态度得到发展。 (1)能够运用数字化工具和资源设计或调整有关学习经验以促进学生的学习与创造力。 (2)能够开发技术化的学习环境从而使所有学生能满足他们各自的好奇心,能使学生 自主设定教育目标、管理学习和评估学习过程,最终成为积极的参与者。 (3)能为学生定制个性化的学习活动以适应学生多样化的学习风格、学习策略和数字 化工具与资源的使用能力。 (4)能为学生提供与学习内容与技术标准相一致的多种多样的形成性评估与总结性评估,并能利用评估结果和数据支持教学与学习。 3. 树立数字化时代学习与工作的典范 教师应成为全球化与数字化社会中创新型专业人士在知识、技能和工作过程方面的典型代表。 (1)能够熟练使用技术系统,并能将现有知识熟练地迁移到新技术和新情境中去。 (2)能够运用数字化工具和资源与学生、同事、家长以及社区成员展开协作以促进学 生的成功与创新。 (3)能够使用多种数字化媒体形式与学生、同事、家长就有关信息和思想展开有效地 交流与沟通。 (4)能够有效运用现有的和新兴的数字化工具查找、分析、评价和使用信息资源以支 持研究和学习。

比较优势与竞争优势的比较分析.doc

比较优势与竞争优势的比较分析 ———兼论新竞争经济学及其启示 比较优势论是传统国际贸易理论的基石。美国哈佛大学商学院的波特教授在80年代发表了其著名的三部曲,即《竞争战略》(1980年)、《竞争优势》(1985年)、《国家竞争优势》(1990年),系统地提出了自己的竞争优势理论。那么,比较优势论与竞争优势论到底有何异同?这不仅是一个理论问题,而且关系到我国对外贸易发展的战略取向。有的学者认为,我国应追求竞争优势来发展对外贸易,另一些学者认为,我国发展对外贸易还是应该以比较优势为基础。本文首先从学术背景上对这两个理论进行概念辨析,然后介绍波特教授最新提出的新竞争经济学及其对我们的启示。 一、比较优势的内涵是不断发展变化的 萨缪尔森认为,比较优势这一概念是经济学中的一种美妙想法。对于这一经济学概念的内涵,80年代初期我国国际贸易学界曾经热烈讨论过。正是通过对它的讨论,迎来了我国对外开放的新局面。确实,比较优势是一个古老而又年轻的概念。说它古老,因为在古典经济学时代,李嘉图就创立了它;说它年轻,是因为其内涵在当代还在发展。比较优势概念内涵的发展过程大体上可分为三个阶段。 1.古典经济学时期,比较优势的含义是比较成本。 李嘉图坚持劳动价值论,他本人提出的是比较成本论。他以英国和葡萄牙生产毛呢和葡萄酒为例,证明对外贸易发生的原因是两国劳动生产率差异造成的劳动成本的不同。李嘉图也考察了技术对贸易的影响。但他没有考察技术进步的原因,即技术是外生决定的。以现代经济学的眼光来看李嘉图的例子,李嘉图确实具有机会成本的思想,只不过他考察的只有劳动这一稀缺要素。 2.新古典经济学阶段,比较优势的含义是机会成本。 新古典经济学研究的中心问题是市场交换关系,而不是生产关系。经济学的研究对象变成对稀缺资源如何进行配置。实质上是论证亚当·斯密所说的“看不见的手”即市场价格机制的作用。这样,比较优势这一概念,实际上是机会成本概念在国际贸易领域的应用。这一传统一直延续到当代。俄林运用一般均衡价格理论和经济地理理论,提出要素比例论,认为一国比较优势的源泉在于其天然要素禀赋,包括劳动和其他生产要素。 3.当代经济学阶段,强调比较优势的内生性与动态性。 传统国际贸易理论强调的是比较优势的外生性与静态性,如李嘉图的外生技术比较优势、俄林的外生资源禀赋比较优势。它们需要一系列严格的前提假设才能成立,包括规模报酬不变、完全竞争、产品无差别、技术水平不变、要素质量相同及数量保持固定不变、要素在两国之间完全不流动、不考虑需求差别、无交易成本、

相关文档
最新文档