论罗密欧与朱丽叶的爱情观--毕业论文

论罗密欧与朱丽叶的爱情观--毕业论文
论罗密欧与朱丽叶的爱情观--毕业论文

【标题】论罗密欧与朱丽叶的爱情观

【作者】陈雪松

【关键词】《罗密欧与朱丽叶》;人物刻画;爱情观

【指导老师】

【专业】英语

【正文】

I. Introduction

William Shakespeare is considered as one of the greatest writers in the

history and shows his unique opinions of European Renaissance period. All of his works are based on the feudalism. So those works reflect his views on the society at that time. It was early in the middle 19th century when Shakespeare was first introduced to China. From then on,

his works have

influenced the Chinese literary production and stage. It is from the early 20th century when academic study of Shakespeare found its way into this country. And based on developments during nearly a hundred years, China’s

Shakespeare Society (now changed to China’s Shakespeare Academy)1 was founded in 1984. Many scholars, writers and artists have made their contributions to building up an individual, systematic study of Shakespeare and his works, which include his tragedies, literary background,

characterization, and so on.

Romeo and Juliet is a well-known literary creation in the western and Chinese history. It is classified as a great love tragedy in that

its heroes and heroines first struggled in the conflict between love and feudalism, and

at last coincidentally gave up their youthful lives for love. However, owing to the different attitude toward love at different times, a comparative study of these two generations deserves even greater appreciation. This thesis aims at a comparative analysis of some different views on love and the influences and significance of Romeo and Juliet. By doing research from several perspectives including their different background and quality on love, and applying theories concerning some research on this drama, this

paper analyzes the different views on love in different times.

To summarize, the author of the thesis argues that people’s views

on love in this drama are affected by the environment of feudalism, which resulted in their tragedy. Views on love are also closely related to the quality of human beings. Different qualities bring about

different views on love, which can influence the fate of people.

II. William Shakespeare and his Drama

English poet, dramatist, and actor, often called the English

national poet

and considered by many to be the greatest dramatist of all time, Shakespeare occupies a position unique in world

literature. Other poets, such as Homer and Dante, and novelists, such as Leo Tolstoy and Charles Dickens, have transcended national barriers; but

no writer’s living reputation can compare to that of Shakespeare, whose plays, written in the late 16th and early 17th centuries for a small repertory theatre, are now performed and read worldwide. He is a writer of great intellectual rapidity, perceptiveness, and poetic power. Shakespeare is astonishingly clever with words and images, so that his mental energy, when applied to intelligible human situations, finds full and memorable expression, convincing and imaginatively stimulating. The art form into

which his creative energies went involved the vivid stage impersonation

of human beings, commanding sympathy and inviting vicarious participation. Thus Shakespeare’s merits can survive translation into other languages and

into cultures remote from that of Elizabethan England.

A. William Shakespeare

Shakespeare was born in Stratford-upon-Avon in 1564 on April the

23rd. We

know little about Shakespeare’s early years. His father, John Shakespeare, was a merchant and a man of some importance in his local community. His

mother, Mary Arden, was of higher social class, so Shakespeare had a good upbringing. Although there are no records, it seems that Shakespeare attended the local grammar school but not university at Stratford-upon-Avon, where he was born. So Shakespeare is considered as “the swan of Avon”.2 In 1582, when Shakespeare was 18, he married Anne Hathaway, who was eight years older than he was. They had three children. Shakespeare wrote 38 plays and 154 sonnets. He began working

in his home

town of Stratford, but by 1592 he was writing in London. He became

rich enough to buy a house in the capital and one in Stratford. In 1594, Shakespeare became a leading member of the newly-formed acting company, the Lord

Chamberlain's Men. This company became the King's Men when James I was made king. Shakespeare stayed with them for the rest of his career.3 In 1599, the company occupied the now famous Globe theatre in London. Shakespeare lived and worked in London, while his family remained in Stratford. Built on the banks of the River Avon the Royal Shakespeare Theatre is the main base for the Royal Shakespeare Company. Many distinguished British actors and actresses have been associated

with the theatre. You can even see one of Shakespeare’s plays being performed in his “home town”.

Nowadays, Shakespeare becomes a symbol of national culture.

He wrote sad plays called tragedies, like Romeo and Juliet, funny stories or comedies, romantic stories and stories about historical figures such as

Julius Caesar. Shakespeare died on his birthday in 1616, almost 400 years ago. But why is his work still popular today? That is, Shakespeare can write skillfully in different poetic forms, and has an amazing wealth of vocabulary and idiom. Shakespeare's influence on the English language can

still be felt today. We t alk about “fair play”, meaning honest behavior

but this phrase was first used by Shakespeare. He coined the phrase “you

can have too much of a good thing”. And it was Shakespeare who came up with

the expression to disappear “into thin air” which we stil l use today when

we lose something.4 Shakespeare is above all writers in the past and in the present time.

B. Shakespeare’s Drama

Drama is very popular in Britain. It is the traditional

entertainment for

British people. As we know, England is a developed country. British people have much more free time and money to do what they like. Their good welfare makes them have a higher living standard and well educated.

But if we want to talk about British Drama, it cannot avoid mentioning Shakespeare, whom all British people regard as an honor. And perhaps

this is the real reason why they like drama so much.

Shakespeare is the most important representative in the Renaissance Period of English Literature. His drama looked at common human themes, such as betrayal, murder, lust, power, ambition and love. These themes are as much a part of human nature today as they were all those years ago and are the themes we see in modern soap operas and Hollywood films. Even though his

theatre, The Globe, burned down in 1613 it was rebuilt in London in 1997 and you can still see his drama performed there today. Shakespeare’s drama has been translated into every major language in the world. And perhaps we'll still be as fascinated by his drama.

Shakespeare’s tragedies were of a stonishing variety in presentment, dramatic movement, and in characterization. The characters differ in their sex, age, state of life, virtues and vices, but all of them show distinctive marks even if their parts were very short. Shakespeare’s greatest tragedies are: Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, and Macbeth. They have some characteristics in common. Each portrays some noble hero, who faces the injustice of human life and is caught in a difficult situation and whose fate is closely

connected with the fate of the whole nation. Each hero has his weakness of nature.

His comedies bring us into happy and ideal worlds with singing, dancing, harmony with nature and freedom from the vices of the world. They prove

Shakespeare to be a great humanist writer.

Taken as a whole, it could be said that Shakespeare’s early works showed optimism and his belief that love and benevolence will triumph over everything and concern for a peaceful and unified England whereas his later

works, with deep insight, brought to light contradictions between the humanists and the dark and brutal feudal and capitalist reality.

Shakespeare used his drama to narrate the happy and sad life of the world. All his literary works profoundly decayed feudal society. His drama is an

inexhaustible treasury. His dramas are the soul of British culture more than a kind of graceful and pure art only. British people are so proud of the

Man that many celebrations are set to commemorate him.

C. Romeo and Juliet

Romeo and Juliet was a product of the English Renaissance written by Shakespeare in 1595. And it embodied the life in the feudal society. It has the same theme as Shakespeare’s other works, that is, the conflict between love and feudalism. Although the main characters were faithful to love,

there existed simply too many obstacles on their ways to true love. In order to protect their love, they stood against their respective feudal families. But they failed and died for love in the end.

Romeo and Juliet’s families were deadly enemies. But they fell in deep love with each other at their first sight at the ball. And passion lent them power. They exchanged their faithful vow of love under the moonlight. Such love affairs between the families in feud certainly led to great conflict. In

order to protect their love, Romeo and Juliet took all kinds of actions to revolt against the feudalism. With the help of Priest Laurence, they got married very quickly without telling their parents. At the same time, the old Lord Capulet had been planning for his daughter Juliet’s future. He had chosen a nobleman named Paris to be her husband. He supposed that Juliet would feel honored and glad to accept him as a husband. But instead of cheering Juliet, this news served but to increase her misery. She perplexed

her mother by her plain distress. She refused to marry Paris. And her excuses made her parents exasperated. It seemed to her father that she was putting obstacles in the way of her own good fortune. So he sternly ordered her to

be ready by Thursday. In her extremity, Juliet decided to seek help of the kind priest. She said there was nothing she would not face, even the death by her own hands, rather than give up Romeo and marry Paris.

In order to be together with Romeo, Juliet took the medicine bravely on the

eve of the wedding day and lost consciousness. Romeo got the news of her “death” and felt an extremity of despair. He thought he would have no joy when Juliet was dead. So he kissed her and then drank the poison. When Juliet came to herself, she found her Romeo was dead, so she killed herself with a dagger.

The climax of the conflict resulted in this pair winning their love, but with the sacrifice of their lives.

III. The Characterization of the Protagonists

People are not isolated, especially for the leading roles in a play; living in specific environments, people tend to inherit part of their character traits from their surroundings. And their characters decide their will. Then they will take all kinds of actions under the control of their wills. This

part will examine how the characterizations in this drama contribute to the literature.

A. The Personalities of the Protagonists

The Personalities in Romeo and Juliet are direct and concrete: we know the inner world of the person by what they said and what they did. Because of

the different culture backgrounds and their influences, Romeo and Juliet saw each other at a banquet, they fell in love and Romeo kissed Juliet. She accepted and asked him to do that again.

Romeo: Thus from my lips, by thine my sin is purged.(kisses her) Juliet: Then have my lips the sin that they have took.

Romeo: Sin from my lips, O trespass sweetly urged!

Give me my sin again. (Kissed her)

Juliet: You kiss by the book. (Act one, Scene V)5

Romeo and Juliet were full of youthful spirit and bravery, and they were so naive and unaffected that people could feel romance from them. Romeo was an enthusiastic young man, both peace loving and courageous. When he saw a fight was happening between Tybalt and his friends, he did his best to intervene, beating down the swords of their opponents. When he saw Tybalt mortally wounded his friend on his account, he provoked Tybalt to a fight and instantly killed him. In order to show his

faithful love to Juliet, he

risked his life to climb over the walls of the orchard to meet her and exchange their love’s faithful vows.

Romeo: With love’s light wings did I o’er perch these walls;

For stony limits cannot hold love out,

And what love can do, that dares love attempt.

Therefore thy kinsmen are no stop to me.

Juliet: If they do see thee, they will murder thee.

Romeo: Alack, there lies more peril in thine eye

Then twenty of their swords! Look thou but sweet,

And I am proof against their enmity. (Act Two, Scene II)6

From Romeo’s own speech, we re cognize his courage to go see his Juliet, his cleverness to escape from the Capulet’s men and eagerness

to have Juliet as his wife. And then he was willing to throw away his family name. He could even give up his precious life for loving Juliet and staying together forever. Juliet was a naive and lively girl. She was brave and decisive, clever and resourceful. Being a strong character, she represented the power of hope. In the love affair with Romeo, she was the dominant part. It seems

that power of her love would never dry up.

Juliet: My bounty is as boundless as the sea,

My love as deep; the more I give to thee,

The more I have, for both are infinite. (Act Two, Scene II)

She loved Romeo and devoted all her heart into love.

Juliet: go ask his name. —If he be married,

My grave is like to be my wedding bed. (Act One, Scene V)7

In her secret rendezvous boundless with Romeo, in dealing with her parents’ forcing of her marriage to Paris, she showed extraordinary intelligence.

She put forward every plea she could think of to stop or delay the projected marriage. She pleaded that she knew too little of the proposed husband, that she was too young for marriage, that it was still too soon after the death of Tybalt. When she failed to persuade her parents to

d elay th

e wedding, she took Priest Laurence’s advice and drank the

phial bravely. Here Juliet’s brave character was shown through what she said and did.

She was a complete rebel of the feudalism society. She was bold enough to

seek love in defiance of the enmity of the two families. After the first sight of Romeo, she knew he was the only son of her father’s great enemy. But she was still determined to love him and made appointment for their tryst. Then she decided to arrange for marriage and lay all her f ortunes at Romeo’s foot and follow her husband throughout the world. When she found that her lover had died, she killed herself to show her loyalty to Romeo and the tenacity to pursue happy life. She would rather die than marry Paris,

whom she did not love at all. The enthusiastic love encouraged her

to throw away all the shyness and said directly to her lover: “Please tell me where

you go, I will dedicate myself to you, and go with you to any place.” 8 Both Romeo and Juliet went ahead without any hesitat ion. They just followed their natural instinct, never accommodated themselves to the feudal ethics. They vividly displayed the humanist spirit of the English Renaissance.

B. The Love of the Protagonists

Nothing can separate two people being in love. The love of the protagonists in Romeo and Juliet is very powerful. And it means that love can conquer everything. But love can also destroy many things. In

order to purify love, Romeo and Juliet broke through the obstruction of the family. And they eloped

with each other boldly.

Shakespeare said that every one of us is an actor, life is like a

play and the world is like a huge stage in the theater. 9 Every one has their own parts and scripts that can not be changed and they must follow. This is what

we call fate, an unchangeable process of life. In the play of Romeo and Juliet, Shakespeare describes them as two star-crossed lovers. Their story

was written on the star long before they were even born. They met each other,

they fell in love with each other then they died and ended the story. All those happened because of love. Love is a force that makes

everything changed including the story of Romeo and Juliet, in which it advanced the plot and brought the ultimate death of the protagonists. In this drama the love fate happened frequently.

After all the entire drama was full of chance, circumstance and coincidence on love, which pushed the plots to go on and controlled

Juliet and Romeo’s lives, controlled the story. Juliet and Romeo, two star-crossed lovers

blessed by fate where they meet; were also cursed by love fate where they died. The author of Romeo and Juliet, Shakespeare, was the most outstanding

writer in the period of the English Renaissance. And the feature of the

English Renaissance was humanity, which encouraged human being to enjoy the happiness in love in this life.

IV. The Views on Love in the Drama

A. The Main Characters’ Views on Love

Most of the traditional works must express characters’ feeling directly,

such as this drama, which also reflects views of all the characters on love.

1.Different Love Views of the Two Generations

Love is an everlasting topic. In this drama, different generations have different views on love. Julie’s parents made a misunderstanding and

thought that she was sad of her cousin’s death. Therefore, they ordered Juliet to get married with Paris. All this reflects that the old generations at that time were very despotic on love. They opposed free love because of the views of fogyism.

It was in vain for Juliet to stand against her parents, so she had

to turn to Priest Laurence for help. And Priest Laurence gave her a liquid medicine, which would make her sleep deeply and look like dead. So long as Romeo came back and took her away, their love and lives would be saved. But

unfortunately, the priest did not send the letter to Romeo in time because of the pestilence. After Romeo came to the Cemetery, he misunderstood that Juliet had died. As a result, he drank the poison.

After several minutes,

Juliet woke up but she also killed herself for love.

Romeo and Juliet’s love proved that the young generations can give

up something important to a complete love. It reflected the

contradictions existing between the advanced youth and the backward

social system that is

the ol d generations. And this drama stirred up people’s courage and confidence to pursue freedom and happiness, especially in the young generations at that time.

2. The Reasons for the Differences

Shakespeare’s major characters are individuals representing cer tain types. He succeeds in exploring the characters’ inner mind. The soliloquies in his plays fully reveal the inner conflict of his characters. Shakespeare also portrays his characters in pairs which will bring vividness to his

characters. Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet does not coincide with Aristotle's tragic theories; it is more like a comedy.10 During the

period when feudalism was declining, humanism was not totally established. Some obstinate feudalist conventions such as blood revenge still existed in the

former big feudal families, and became the last fortress to struggle.

From above, we can know that the main theme is the conflict between love and feudalism. So Romeo and Juliet was a product of feudalism. It objects feudalism and has a great influence on both the people and the society.

3. The Results of the Differences

In order to protect their love, Romeo and Juliet took all kinds of actions to revolt against the feudalism. With the help of Priest Laurence, they got

married very quickly without telling their parents. At the same time, the old Lord Capulet had been planning for his daughter Juliet’s future. He had chosen a nobleman named Paris to be her husband. He supposed that Juliet would feel honored and glad to accept him as a husband. But instead of

cheering Juliet, this news served but to increase her misery. She perplexed her mother by her plain distress. She refused to marry Paris. And her excuses made her parents exasperated. It seemed to her father

that she was putting

obstacles in the way of her own good fortune. So he sternly ordered her to be ready by Thursday. In her extremity, Juliet decided to seek help of the kind priest. She said there was nothing she would not face, even the death by her own hands, rather than give up Romeo and marry Paris.

In order to be together with Romeo, Juliet took the medicine bravely on the eve of the wedding day and lost consciousness. Romeo got the news

of her “death” and felt an extremity of despair. He thought he would have no joy when Juliet was dead. So he kissed her and then drank the poison. When Juliet came to herself, she found her Romeo was dead, so she killed herself with a dagger. If they would not fight for the views on love in the feudalism and adhere to their parents’ views, they woul d have another end.

Maybe they would live with other persons not considering their love. So they would not have sacrificed their precious lives.

B. The Author’s Views on Love

1. The Formation of His Views on Love

Although there are no records, it seems that Shakespeare attended

the local grammar school at Stratford-upon-Avon, where he was born. As we know that

in 1582, Shakespeare married Anne Hathaway, who was eight years

older than he was. All this reflects that he was also the casualty of that society of

feudalism. And he also had no choices to express his love at that time.

Shakespeare’s dramas are the product of the British social life during the Renaissance and cultural development. At that time, Shakespeare’s humanistic worldviews were graduall y taken shape. And his works were filled with humanism spirit of optimism and full of humanistic ideals. It is

in this great historical background that Shakespeare’s protagonists in the first image are rebellious character. Based on this, he formed his special

views on love.

2. The Ways He Expressed His Views on Love

Shakespeare expressed his views on love from the following aspects: Shakespeare’s major characters: In this drama, Shakespeare’s major characters are individuals representing certain types. Shakespeare succeeds in exploring the characters’ inner mind. The soliloquies

in Romeo and Juliet fully reveal the inner conflict of his characters. Shakespeare also portrays his characters in pairs which will bring vividness to his characters.

Shakesp eare’s plays’ plot construction: Shakespeare’s plays are well-known for their adroit plot construction. Shakespeare usually borrows

the plots from some old plays or storybooks, or from ancient Greek and Roman sources. To make the play more lively and compact, he would shorten the time and intensify the story.

Shakespeare’s language: Shakespeare wrote skillfully in different forms, either formal ones or informal ones. He has an amazing wealth of vocabulary and idiom in this drama. His coinage of new words and distortion

of the meaning of the old ones also create striking effects on the reader. Shakespeare is above all writers in the past and in the present time.

In this drama, Shakespeare used different ways to express the theme.

Besides, he had some other ways to transfer his views on love to us. He used his drama to narrate the happy and sad life of the world.

V. The Influences and Significance of Romeo and Juliet

A. The Influences

Romeo and Juliet has great influences both on that time and today. And it

has the realistic significance to the world.

Romeo and Juliet reflects the characteristics of Shakespeare’s

early creativity. And Romeo and Juliet eulogizes the faithfulness of

love and the spirit of pursuing happiness. The play, though a tragedy,

is permeated with

optimistic spirit. So it has a great influence on People’s view on love at that time. More and more people wanted to pursue a perfect love.

The opinions of love in this drama still have some inspiration to

the modern

society. Modern people are influenced by Romeo and Juliet, and what they pursue is the spirit of love, not the physical things. They are inspired with this kind of love.

Romeo and Juliet added a sad atmosphere to the whole play, which

made people think what the true love is. As time changes, it changes the

confusing interpretation of the drama. More and more people are

attracted by this drama because of this deep love in Romeo and Juliet. This drama is a great masterpiece in the world. So Romeo and Juliet is of permanent art value in

the literature. With this further investigation of this drama, we

can gain more direct views on love in the feudalism. And we can have a good understanding on love nowadays. But it does not mean that the views on love in Romeo and Juliet are right. We can have our respective views on love based on the modern times.

B. The Realistic Significance

In Romeo and Juliet, the leading roles’ families were the representatives of the feudal power. They would fight on the street even when they just

happened to meet each other, let alone permitting their posterity to love each other. It reflects the society of feudalism. Romeo and Juliet establishes an imaginative world, in which we are likely to enter and share the fortuity of these imaginative people. Compared to the accurate reports, this works could enjoy the people and compels them to follow the imaginative world created.

Romeo and Juliet as a creative of individual scholars, in the light of the

true story of many young men and women to the unfortunate stories and legends

中西方恋爱观比较

中西方恋爱观比较 恋爱观是指一个人对于爱情的认识与了解,对于恋爱的态度,看法及行为倾向。一个人的恋爱观很大一部分取决于他或她的人生观,世界观和价值观. 中国经历了两千多年的封建社会,在这样的传统下成长起来的男男女女,都有一个根深蒂固的爱情观:爱情是为婚姻服务的。爱情只是手段,婚姻才是目的。只要是良家子弟,婚前的任何男女交际,都只是不同程度的“相亲”。爱情而不能以婚姻作为结局则叫做“白搭”、“落空”或“没有结果”。 不得不指出,这样的恋爱观是相当功利而低俗的。恋爱只是为了谈成一桩买卖。但这样的恋爱观却是符合社会道德规范的,任何不为婚姻服务的爱情,在一定的程度上,是要受到舆论制裁的,并冠之以“奸情”等恶名。 在中国语文里,“情”字往往与“恩”、“义”两字并举,而有“恩情”与“情义”两词。中国男女成了眷属之后,年深日久,情渐淡而恩义转深,成立一个恩义有余而深情不足的局面。当然恩义都是好字,并无贬义,但由恩义所引出的一种取予和负欠的关系也是不容讳言的。许多夫妻往往在所谓“顾念恩义”的情况下,度过一辈子,厮守或有之,深情则绝无。任何一方的消失,对另一方毋宁是一种解脱。这样的夫妻关系,并不罕见。 恋爱如果只是婚姻的前奏,那么结婚就是恋爱的完成,往往也就是爱情萎缩和死亡的开始。婚前的朝思暮盼,辗转反侧,到了婚后全被穿衣吃饭所取代。“成眷属”之日,也往往就是“怨偶”萌蘖之时。 对于中国大学生来说中国的大学生在恋爱时经常会有这样的看法:恋爱与学习挂钩。我觉得中国的大学生应该把恋爱和学习分开,恋爱就是恋爱,学习就是学习,两者有着本质的区别。学业是自己的追求,而恋爱是双方的追求。我当然知道大学生普遍认为大学谈恋爱只是为以后热身而已,这无可厚非,但谈恋爱也绝非儿戏,我们要时刻本着对自己负责,对别人负责的态度,这样才是真正的为以后打基础。 恋爱就是共同学习”的观点是走不通的,你要知道,你爱的是他(她)本身,如果你的目的是共同学习,那我觉得你找个同性不是更方便吗?至此,有人可能

罗密欧与朱丽叶》赏析论文

《罗密欧与朱丽叶》赏析 摘要:《罗密欧与朱丽叶》是莎士比亚着名的浪漫爱情悲剧。罗密欧与朱丽叶这对恋人忠于自已的爱情和誓言。他们为了爱情,不顾残酷的现实,最后双双殉情。莎士比亚通过罗密欧和朱丽叶的爱情悲剧,把爱情题材和文艺复兴时期的社会矛盾联系起来,批判了封建道德观念,弘扬了人文主义的理想,表现了主人公追求爱情幸福和个人自由的理念。通过分析探讨我们发现,这一时期的封建制度和人文主义思想萌芽之间不可调和的矛盾是悲剧产生的一个重点,而作品中的人物性格也是悲剧产生的一个重要的因素。 关键词:爱情悲剧;社会背景;人物性格;人文主义 一、作品简介 《罗密欧与朱丽叶》(1595)是莎士比亚(1564—1616)早期创作的着名悲剧。它诗意盎然,热情充沛,洋溢着浓郁的浪漫气息和喜剧氛围。其艺术风格与作家早期创作的大多数喜剧相一致,被人们称为抒情悲剧。 悲剧的冲突是罗密欧与朱丽叶的恋情与两个家族间的仇恨和对立,它表现了自由的爱情与封建势力之间的尖锐的矛盾冲突。故事的发生地维洛那城实际上是英国16世纪末伊丽莎白女王鼎盛时期社会现实的艺术再现。一方面以亲王为代表,象征了王权统一的力量,它受到广大市民的拥护,另一方面是贵族蒙太古家族和凯布莱特家族世代的积仇结怨,它代表着从中世纪延续下来的相互争夺的封建集团的势力。但时代在前进,这两大世仇的新一代人竟在一次舞会上一见钟情,彼此相爱,于是家族的怨仇与个人爱情之间便形成了尖锐、巨大的戏剧冲突。罗密欧与朱丽叶都无视于家族的仇怨,他们轻蔑地觉得,妨碍他们结合的只是枉具虚名的姓氏。真正的爱情,使他们变得勇敢而无畏,他们背着父母到劳伦斯神父的寺院里秘密成婚,最后他们为了反抗封建家族势力和封建的包办婚姻不惜以死殉情,谱写了一曲最为悲壮动人的爱情颂歌。戏剧的结尾,蒙太古和凯普莱特两家终于因为这对情人的死而抛开

论中西方的爱情观

论中西方的爱情观 摘要:不同的国度,不同的地域,不同的文化,不同的语言,人们的宗教信仰、价值观念、看待事物的方式各不相同。人作为一个感性动物对情感的表达方式和经营方式也大不相同。本文将浅谈中西方在爱情方面存在的差异。 关键词:中国、西方、柏拉图、爱情观、等级制度、束缚 爱情是人类世界最为美好的感情,古往今来,无数人为之舍生忘死!古代陆游与唐婉的悲情故事,范蠡与西施的悲惨爱情,苏东坡对亡妻的思念之情至今成为千古绝唱。近代的罗丝与杰克,他们的爱情令人向往。同样的爱情却有着不同的结局,这是因为他们所处的国家不同、文化范围不同、对事物的方法不同所导致的,对待爱情也是有着不同的观点和立场。 一、中国的爱情观 (一)历史上,中国人对待爱情的观念与看法 “关关雎鸠,在河之洲,窈窕淑女,君子好逑”,这是《诗经》中关于爱情的经典绝句,充分表明了古代中国人对爱情的向往,对纯真爱情的期盼与执着。但是,中国古代的婚姻制度及习俗极大的约束了人们对爱情的追求。在古代,中国的嫁娶必须有父母之命,媒妁之言,如果少去了这些繁文缛节,男女双方的结合就是私定终身,是会被当时的人所唾弃的。男女双方没有自主选择对方的权利,在结合之前甚至都没有见面的机会,就更别说他们之间存在爱情了。古代的中国是极端的男权社会,女子“在家从父,出嫁从夫,老来从子”。妻子和丈夫的关系没有亲密和互助而言,而是上级对下级的一种从属关系,女子出嫁到夫家也可以说就是一个机器,一个工具,没有自由,更何谈爱情。 当然,中国古代也有令人向往的经典爱情。梁山伯与祝英台为爱化蝶的凄美爱情至今使人赞不绝口,曾有诗写到:“碧草青青花盛开,彩蝶双双久徘徊。千古传颂深深爱,山伯永爱祝英台。同窗共读整三载,促膝并肩两无猜。十八相送情切切,谁知一别在楼台。楼台一别恨如海,泪染双翅身化蝶,翩翩花丛来。历尽磨难真情在,天长地久不分开。”在古代,美好的爱情总是被无情的拆散,因为受到封建思想的束缚,受低级制度的制约,他们讲究的是“门当户对”。还有不少悲壮的爱情被某种政治因素无情的拆散,范蠡和西施就是被政治的替代品。那时的没有天长地久的爱情,有的只是永恒不变的利益。一个国家,一个帝王为了自己国家的利益,为了保住自己的地位,进行政治联姻,

浅谈罗密欧与朱丽叶

浅谈《罗密欧与朱丽叶》的矛盾冲突 摘要:爱情是文学作品中永恒的主题。悠长的文学历史长河中还是留下了许多凄恻哀婉的爱情故事。《罗密欧与朱丽叶》是莎士比亚著名的爱情悲剧之一。莎士比亚通过罗密欧和朱丽叶的爱情悲剧,把爱情题材和文艺复兴时期的社会矛盾联系起来,批判了封建道德观念,表现了人文主义追求个人自由和个人幸福的理念。这一时期的社会主义宗教改革和人文主义思想是悲剧产生的一个重点,而作品中的人物性格也是悲剧产生的一个重要因素。 关键词:《罗密欧与朱丽叶》人物性格悲剧原因人文主义 爱情是文学作品永恒的主题。古往今来,不知有多少人为之倾倒,用挚热的感情唱出一曲曲爱的赞歌。尽管我们都衷心祝愿有情人终成眷属,文学史上还是留下了许多凄恻哀婉的爱情故事。 《罗密欧与朱丽叶》的悲剧演绎深刻展示了命运的无常,阴差阳错中,造物弄人,在命运面前,爱情是那么无奈,就像是在茫茫大海上的小船,灯塔不断在远处闪烁,却似乎永远无法抵达。戏中的罗密欧与朱丽叶已永远解不开爱情这个谜底,作品深刻的社会意义首先在于它的鲜明的反封建倾向。作者把罗密欧与朱丽叶这对人文主义青年男女的爱情故事写成悲剧,而且明确地把悲剧的根源归咎于陈旧的封建意识,从而把爱情题材和文艺复兴时期的杜会矛盾联系起来,把批判的锋芒指向中世纪衰朽而野蛮的伦理观念,指向现实的封建势力。 倾心相爱的罗密欧与朱丽叶虽然未成眷属,但他们誓死捍卫爱情,追求幸福、

自由生活的信念却并没有被命运摧毁。当然,时代不同了,社会背景不同了,在今天,这种殉情的方式已不可取,但男女主人公坚韧、执著的精神却永远鼓舞着人们去追求幸福、自由,创造更加光明、美好的未来! 《罗密欧与朱丽叶》描写了一个爱情悲剧,主题却远远超越了爱情本身。许多文学作品都是这样,爱情只是载体,在它之上附载着更为深广的社会内容。所以大家在阅读同类作品时,要透过爱情的表面,挖掘出作品深刻的内涵。 一关于《罗密欧与朱丽叶》 (一)创作背景 此剧写于莎士比亚的第一个创作时期,也就是英国文艺复兴运动正盛之际。但血腥复仇传统仍在蒙、凯两个家族沿袭下来,阻碍了罗朱的结合。罗、朱不愿因上一辈的恩怨而放弃美好的感情,朱丽叶巧妙地应付了母亲的逼婚,与罗密欧结婚,实现了灵与肉的结合,他们的死消除了两家的仇恨。因而“构成悲剧冲突的不是两个家族,而是两种社会道德力量:一种是残酷、凶恶和复仇的封建精神,另一种是爱情、友谊、和谐的文艺复兴风尚”。 (二)主题内容 《罗密欧与朱丽叶》写于1595年,早于《哈姆莱特》。这是一部爱情悲剧,不过它完成于莎士比亚的喜剧期,这时的莎士比亚对人生还满怀希望,他主要写作浪漫喜剧,描画出一幅幅快乐的人生图景。《罗密欧与朱丽叶》也带上了浪漫精神,它不像《哈姆莱特》那样悲愤沉郁。剧中一对青年恋人的死亡给了两个家族血的教训,他们幡然悔悟,消弭宿怨,言归于好。爱情的力量终究战胜了封建的偏见,这同莎士比亚“爱战胜一切”的喜剧精神总体上是一致的,反映了这一时期莎士比亚人文主义的理想。 剧中特别使人感动的是两位主人公对爱情的坚贞:他们一旦相爱,就把自己的一切交给了对方,面对着封建的篱藩、家族的世仇、世俗的偏见,他们却毫无顾忌地冲破了这些似乎是不可逾越的障碍,走到了一起,他们的爱是那么大胆、那么热烈、那么真诚,他们不但以身相许,而且心心相印,罗密欧误认因药力而昏睡的朱丽叶已经死去,就拔剑自杀,醒后的朱丽叶也只能相随而去。这里有轻率和冒失,但这是一种纯粹的爱情,他们的爱情中没有任何世俗的考虑和自私的图谋,他们谱写了一曲流传千古的爱情颂歌。

爱情观的一些看法

中西方爱情观的差异 学号:2013510118 姓名:许联林 爱情,无论中西,无可异议的是在人生之中具有重要的意义。从政治学角度来说,爱情应该属于上层建筑。脱离衣食住行茶米油盐之外,可以说是属于一种精神享受。这种中西共有的精神享受,对人们来说不可或缺,无论是梁祝,还是罗密欧与朱丽叶,或是杜丽娘和柳梦梅,这些众人皆知的情爱典故,都告诉我们爱情可比生命,由生及死由死及生乃至生死恋。 地域,经济,政治格局以及文化这些关键因素都会影响人们爱情观的发展。一方水土一方人,中西双方,不同的地域不同气候不同的生活方式,自然而然使得二者爱情观上会有偏差。而经济政治则对任何一种上层建筑都会产生影响,爱情亦是不可避免,所有因素当中,直接作用的因素,应该是属于文化无疑。 对于西方人来说,爱情至上,男人为了爱情可以牺牲一切,女人为了爱情也会舍弃一切。这就是爱情至上。两性的选择与婚姻,完全是以爱情为基础,而不论出身、门第、年龄、社会地位和其它考虑。如《简爱》中的男女主人公就是最好的例证。长相平凡,毫无背景的家庭教师简爱爱上了庄园主罗切斯特,罗彻斯特也深爱着简爱。他们的婚恋,是感情的需要。因此,我认为,在西方人看来,爱情是至上的,爱情是最神圣的,它是人类情感中最神圣的部分,决不能被玷污。它具有了与宗教偶像一般的神圣性与绝对性。同时,它也是人类情感的极致,具有高度非理性的品格。 如果说西方人的爱情是精神的,是浪漫的,那么我们中国人的爱情则是物质的。自古以来,咱们中国人讲究的是“门当户对”。男方一定要比女方的家庭条件好,哪怕只好一点点;男的一定要比女的学历高;男的赚钱一定要比女的多,要不就有吃软饭的嫌疑,甚至在身高上面也有要求,就是男的一定要比女的高,哪怕只高一点点也行。如果哪个女的找的男朋友比她的条件“差”,那么立马会遭到家长的强烈反对;即使是冲破阻力结了婚,亲戚朋友的指指点点也是少不了的。只有双方“门当户对”了,双方家长才会认为他们能过上幸福的生活。他们考虑的是物质的“条件”,而没想到双方结合的基础应该是爱情,是志同道合的感情,所以我说中国的爱情里掺杂了许多物质的东西。我们知道爱情将最终走向婚姻。但对于中国男人们来说,事业高于爱情;对于女人来说,结婚不过是生存的保证。曾经有人形容过中国人的婚姻:爱情是精神的,婚姻则是物质的。婚姻是“经济共同体”,婚姻是“生活互助组”。看看身边的同事,哪个不是先打听清楚对方的工作单位,收入,家里有几套房子后才开始谈恋爱的呢?当然,每个人都有追求幸福生活,追求自己的生活方式的权利,但是,我们不难从中看出中国的婚恋观。长期流行于民间的“嫁汉、嫁汉,穿衣吃饭”、“嫁鸡随鸡,嫁狗随狗”更是有力地证明了中国人的爱情是物质多于精神的。还有,中国更是将爱情与孝悌、礼义相结合,而西方人更多的是讲究个人的感受。 古代的中国是极端的男权社会,女子“在家从父,出嫁从夫,老来从子”。因此妻子和丈夫之间是有从属关系的,在这种关系下,夫妻间的感情就是不平等的感情。没有离婚制度,只有男子能休妻。古代的中国是以农耕为主的社会,人口是家庭重要的资源,婚姻非常重要的目的就是繁衍后代。古代中国人的爱情,婚姻,家庭这几个概念是密不可分,相互重叠的。因此中国人崇尚终生不渝,长相厮守的爱情除了有主观意志外,也是有客观原因的。 与此相对,古代西方的阶级等级制度也很森严,婚配也讲究门当户对,可是在爱情的追求上就相对大胆和自由的多。首先,在配偶的选择上,个人有相对的自由。青年成年后,可以进入社交圈子,参加各种各样的宴会舞会。以这些聚会为平台,男女青年可以选择自己配

浅析《罗密欧与朱丽叶》

浅析《罗密欧与朱丽叶》 15汉语言文学1班郭莹莹莎士比亚一生最伟大的作品《罗密欧与朱丽叶》讲述了这样一个故事:在意大利的维洛城,罗密欧与朱丽叶在一次舞会上偶然相遇并恋爱,但他们两个家族却有世仇,朱丽叶听从神父的计策,服药假死24小时,等待远归的罗密欧把她唤醒与之私奔,可因故神父没有及时把假死的计策告诉罗密欧,罗密欧得知朱丽叶死后悲痛欲绝,服毒自杀,朱丽叶醒后看罗密欧已死也跟着殉情,而两家在血的教训中言归于好。《罗密欧与朱丽叶》堪称人间爱情的经典之作,两位主任公至死不渝的爱情化解了两家世代的恩怨,留下一段传世后人的人间佳话。 《罗密欧与朱丽叶》当中的故事情节的产生,有着特定的时代背景,那时期的西欧,经济上正处于迅速发展的阶段,资本主义经济与传统的种植园经济产生了巨大的矛盾,同时封建贵族与新兴资产阶级的矛盾也在不断的发展,从《罗密欧与朱丽叶》的背景来看,设定的就是在于蒙太古和凯普莱特两大封建贵族的多年的恩怨以及对抗关系,罗密欧与朱丽叶两人的爱情悲剧,某种意义上而言,实际上是这两大贵族家庭,恩怨的牺牲品,蒙太古和凯普莱特两大家族,只是那个时代,诸多的封建家族的一个浅显的缩影而已。从这个角度来看,《罗密欧与朱丽叶》作品本身也或多或少的被赋予了反封建的思想意义和思想价值。 《罗密欧与朱丽叶》虽然只是一出看似简单的戏剧,但是从很多角度上来看,这出戏剧不仅仅是单纯只是一部普通的戏剧,因为当中包含了许许多多与我们日常生活有多的道理,罗密欧和朱丽叶的爱情悲剧,绝不仅仅只是那一个时代的特定产物,在如今,这样类似的悲剧,又何尝不是在我们身边不断的反复上演呢?罗密欧和朱丽叶已经经历了那样的痛苦的生命悲剧,为何直到今日,棒打鸳鸯的悲剧依旧在继续。想到这里,我的心中,不由自主的填上了几分的忧愁与遗憾。 时光终究会掩埋起一起我们曾经经历过的痛苦事物,但是有些事物在历经了时光的洗礼之后,反而历久弥新,深深烙在我们的脑海深处,但愿人长久,千里共婵娟,这样的诗句,总会让我们想起一些曾经打动过、震撼过我们的一些人,总会让我们想起一些感动过、开心过的一些事,人生就像一首歌,不同的音符起起伏伏,构成不同的旋律,只是这样旋律,不管经历过多久,始终萦绕在我们的心头,那是属于我们生命的歌,属于我们每个人的歌。

高中语文 罗密欧与朱丽叶

罗密欧与朱丽叶 【教学目标】 1、了解莎士比亚生平及其戏剧创作; 2、体会剧中人物的思想情感; 3、认识罗密欧朱丽叶爱情悲剧的时代意义、社会意义。 【教学重点】 1、体会剧中人物的思想情感,特别是罗密欧听到朱丽叶死后的痛苦心情; 2、体会莎剧语言充满浓厚诗情的特点。 【教学难点】 罗密欧与朱丽叶爱情的悲剧性以及体现出的文艺复兴时期的人文主义思想。 【教学方法】 情境教学法、研究性学习法 【教学用具】 多媒体教学系统 【总体设计】 精心设计预习内容,把介绍文学常识、熟悉剧本情节放在预习环节中,培养学生自主学习的能力;在课堂教学的组织过程中,采用情境教学、研究性学习的方法,融戏剧常识、人物分析、情感体会于学生积极参与的各种语文活动之中,课堂调控要灵活,要让学生既能“入乎其内”,又能“出乎其外”;改变传统的练习巩固模式,课后设置更为开放的学习空间,充分体现学习的广延性和可持续性特点。

【教学时数】 1课时 【教学步骤】 一、预习设计(内容见前) 授课前3-4天发下预习设计内容,并提示学习要求及方法。 二、课堂导入: 由一块石头(此石头表面含有两个人物外形,投影显示)的命名入手,谈谈文学作品所表现的永恒主题:爱情。教师可以朗诵一首简短的爱情诗(或根据学过的文学作品编写)引出《罗密欧与朱丽叶》。 教师模仿莎剧人物出场念《开场诗》,投影显示: 故事发生在维洛那名城, 有两家门第相当的巨族, 累世的宿怨激起了新争, 鲜血把市民的白手污渎。 是命运注定这两家仇敌, 生下了一双不幸的恋人, 他们的悲惨凄凉的殒灭, 和解了他们交恶的尊亲。 这一段生生死死的恋爱,

还有那两家父母的嫌隙, 把一对多情的儿女杀害, 演成了今天这一本戏剧。 交代过这几句挈领提纲, 请诸位耐着心细听端详。 三、熟悉情节: 戏剧是一种在舞台上表演且综合性很强的艺术形式,它主要是通过剧中人物台词来体现和推动情节发展。借助于台词来把握戏剧情节是我们常用的主要方式。但是由于人物对话比较多,读完后情节并不能很清晰的呈现在读者的大脑中。而分析人物间的关系则可以帮助我们迅速的熟悉剧情、把握人物的心理及命运走向。 一、、熟悉情节: 1、第五幕第三场主要出现了哪几个人物?他们是什么身份?关系是怎样的? 2、用简要的语言概述课文节选部分内容。?帕里斯被罗密欧所杀;罗密欧为朱丽叶殉情;劳伦斯交待故事原委;亲王裁决两家终和解。 二、问题设计 1、当心爱的朱丽叶已长眠在冰冷的墓穴中。此时的罗密欧是怎样一番心情呢? (归纳)暴躁、狂怒。 如罗密欧一上场,就对他的仆人用了一连串的命令语言,甚至夹有恐吓。“把那锄头和铁钳给我。”“要是动一动,我就要你的命。”

中西方的爱情观

中西方的爱情观 记不清是在电影里或者小说里看过这样的情节:一个西方的男人(也许是成熟的绅士,也许是英俊的军官或者文雅的书生),遇见了一个东方女子(也许是大家闺秀,也许是小家碧玉,但都很美,而且不知道自己的美)。 终于在一个迷人的夜晚或者清晨,他对她说:“我爱你。”然后他们一起坠入情网。然后发生点什么,使他须面临金钱、前途、名誉(或者别的你能想得出来的对人有诱惑的东西)与爱情冲突。他们必须抉择。然后问题就来了:西方的男子觉得自己不应该放弃自己的理想与追求,相爱过了也就彼此付出也得到过,他准备放弃,他觉得女子应该理解并且有一个完美的告别——他并没有想伤害她,更不想毁掉可以成为美好回忆的爱情。 但是,女子的反应出乎他的意料。她不仅是惊讶、失望、悲伤,她简直是愤怒了——你怎么是这样的一个人!你怎么可以骗我!他说:我没有骗你呀,我确实爱你的。——那你怎么会要离开我,你怎么忍心让我的爱破碎,你这样做是毁了我的一生,你知道吗? 在深深的震惊和痛苦中,他们还是分手了。西方的男子觉得委屈——“她误解了我”,东方的女子觉得绝望

——“他骗了我。” 之所以选择不同文化背景的人来反映一种冲突,是因为这样才有必然性——那不是性格的冲突,也未必是人格。品质的冲突,而是“理想的冲突”。他们都在对方身上寄托了自己的理想,这对他们来说都是合理的。而这理想又如此不同,所以悲剧在所难免。 同样的一句“我爱你”,对于东方与西方,也许意义从来是不同的。 当一个东方人说“我爱你”时,不仅是一种表白,更是一种承诺、一种誓言,它表达的是:我现在爱你,将来爱你,永远爱你。我将只爱你一个人,我将和你生活在一起,同甘共苦、白头偕老。 而西方人说“我爱你”时,并没有这些附加的潜台词。那只是表达:我现在爱你,那更多的是表达感情达到了一个怎样的程度,或者此时此刻你在我心目中的地位。 东方人一旦说了“我爱你”(并且对方接受),就是两个人上了一条船,从此风雨同舟、生死与共了。

《罗密欧与朱丽叶》的爱情悲剧

《罗密欧与朱丽叶》的爱情悲剧 摘要:爱情是文学作品中永恒的主题。古往今来,不知有多少 人为之倾倒,用挚热的感情唱出一曲曲爱的赞歌。尽管我们都 衷心祝愿有情人终成眷属,文学史上还是留下了许多凄恻哀婉 的爱情故事。 《罗密欧与朱丽叶》是莎士比亚著名的爱情悲剧之一。罗密欧与朱丽叶这一对恋人相亲相爱,他们忠于自已的爱情,忠 于自己的誓言。他们为了获得幸福,不顾任何冷酷的现实,最 后他们双双殉情自杀。莎士比亚正是通过罗密欧和朱丽叶的爱 情悲剧,把爱情题材和文艺复兴时期的社会矛盾联系起来,批 判了封建道德观念,表现了人文主义追求个人自由和个人幸福 的理念。所以,这一时期的社会主义宗教改革和人文主义思想 是悲剧产生的一个重点,而作品中的人物性格也是悲剧产生的 一个重要的因素。 关键词:《罗密欧与朱丽叶》;人物性格;悲剧原因;宗教;人文主义

绪论 爱情是文学作品永恒的主题。古往今来,不知有多少人为之倾倒,用挚热的感情唱出一曲曲爱的赞歌。尽管我们都衷心祝愿有情人终成眷属,文学史上还是留下了许多凄恻哀婉的爱情故事。 《罗密欧与朱丽叶》的悲剧演绎深刻展示了命运的无常,阴差阳错中,造物弄人,在命运面前,爱情是那么无奈,就像是在茫茫大海上的小船,灯塔不断在远处闪烁,却似乎永远无法抵达。戏中的罗密欧与朱丽叶已永远解不开爱情这个谜底,作品深刻的社会意义首先在于它的鲜明的反封建倾向。作者把罗密欧与朱丽叶这对人文主义青年男女的爱情故事写成悲剧,而且明确地把悲剧的根源归咎于陈旧的封建意识,从而把爱情题材和文艺复兴时期的杜会矛盾联系起来,把批判的锋芒指向中世纪衰朽而野蛮的伦理观念,指向现实的封建势力。 倾心相爱的罗密欧与朱丽叶虽然未成眷属,但他们誓死捍卫爱情,追求幸福、自由生活的信念却并没有被命运摧毁。当然,时代不同了,社会背景不同了,在今天,这种殉情的方式已不可取,但男女主人公坚韧、执著的精神却永远鼓舞着人们去追求幸福、自由,创造更加光明、美好的未来! 《罗密欧与朱丽叶》描写了一个爱情悲剧,主题却远远超越了爱情本身。许多文学作品都是这样,爱情只是载体,在它之上附载着更为深广的社会内容。所以大家在阅读同类作品时,要透过爱情的表面,挖掘出作品深刻的内涵。 一、历史背景 (一)社会背景 1、由于红玫瑰之战,英国迎来了文艺复兴 向现代英国过渡(1455年-1485年) 的红玫瑰战争是指,从1455年到1485年,以红玫瑰为象征的兰开斯特大家族和以白玫瑰为象征的约克家族之间的战争。玫瑰战争是英国历史上两大王室间的封建混战。 15世纪,英国的封建领地经济日趋衰落,大贵族便利用在百年战争期间建立的私人武装,谋取权力与财富。1455年5月,约克公爵理查起兵反对兰开斯特家族的亨利大世,战争爆发。1460年理查战死。1461年3月,理查之子爱德华占领伦敦,废黜亨利六世,取得王位,称爱德华四世,建立约克王朝。1483年4月,爱德华四世卒,其子爱德华五世即位,由其弟理查摄政。6月,理查篡位,称理查三世。约克家族中拥护爱德华四世后裔的贵族和兰开斯特家族的余党联合,与理查抗衡。1485年8月22日,兰开斯特家族的后代亨利都铎击败理查,取得了博斯沃恩战役的胜利,自称为王,为亨利七世,建立都铎王朝。着标志着玫瑰战争结束。 这些战争使英国的封建主义受到致命打击,贵族阶层受到了削弱。当时的英国正处于伊丽莎白女王统治的鼎盛时期,王权稳固统一,经济繁荣。 2、伊利莎白一世的统治时期是一个政治和宗教相对稳定,经济繁荣的时期 伊莉莎白一世(Elizabeth I),1533年9月7日出生于格林尼治,即今日伦敦的

电影《罗密欧与朱丽叶》观后感范文推荐

电影《罗密欧与朱丽叶》观后感范文推荐 《罗密欧与朱丽叶》影片讲述了年轻少年罗密欧与一位可爱的少女茱莉叶的爱情故事。下面就是小编给大家带来的电影《罗密欧与朱丽叶》观后感,欢迎大家阅读! 电影《罗密欧与朱丽叶》观后感(一) 这部电影讲述的是两个家族的仇恨,导致了相爱的两人双双殉情。 在凯家的晚会上,罗密欧混了进去,邂逅了朱丽叶。两人秘密进行结婚,可命运总是捉弄人。罗密欧不慎开枪打死了朱丽叶的堂哥,两家的矛盾激化,罗密欧被放逐,朱丽叶将嫁给市长之子。朱丽叶不想再嫁,喝了神父给她的神奇的药水,当所有人以为她死亡的时候,罗密欧也相信了。罗密欧进城,带上毒药在朱丽叶的“尸体”旁边饮下。此时,朱丽叶苏醒,可毒药已下肚。悲痛之下,朱丽叶拿起身边的枪自尽。 这是因两家仇恨而引发的悲惨爱情故事,爱的力量远胜于恨的力量。善恶全在一念之间。有的事物可以是恶也可以是善,就像神父的药水般,可以治病也可以致毒,更像是罗密欧与朱丽叶的婚姻。既可以是缓和两家仇恨的良缘,也可以是加剧两家仇恨的毒药。 世间万事万物也都具有两面性,而爱的力量更具有包容性。 电影《罗密欧与朱丽叶》观后感(二) 这部影片可谓是风靡一时,作为那个年代最好的爱情片,让我们知道了什么叫凄惨的心酸,让我们一起祝福他们! 后现代主义的改编,优点在于视觉效果的唯美动人,还有惊心动魄的流光盛宴,赋予了故事更多浪漫的色彩;缺点在于削弱了原著的命运式悲怆,青春狂放的肆意也沦为闹剧,对白台词的格格不入严重影响了演员带入,而流行配乐更是出戏看这部片子的时候一直难以抑制地激动着......因为我发现,这样充满智慧和少许实验性的佳片居然在十几年前就有了......手边刚好有莎翁原著的原文,十分吃力地在关键点解读了他的古英文,结合原文谈谈对该片的感受。 这一版本的《罗密欧与朱丽叶》是由巴兹·鲁赫曼导演,莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥、克莱尔·丹尼斯等主演的爱情片,改编自莎士比亚同名小说。该片讲述

中西方传统爱情观比较

摘要:中西方的传统爱情现有着极大的不同.这在文学作品中得到了反映。西方人重视恋爱.中国人重视婚姻而轻视恋爱,其背后有深刻的原因,如民族文化、民族性格、社会开放程度等的迥然不同。中国的传统爱情观已经逐渐落伍僵化。时代要求结合中西爱情观的可取成分。形成一种健康向上、积极有为的爱情观。 关键:中西方传统爱情观不同之处原因 中西方有着不同的文化传承,这影响到社会的方方面面。直到二十一世纪的今天,现代社会仍然与传统文化有着千丝万缕无法割断的联系。爱情观也是文化的一部分,中西方的传统爱情观有着极大的不同,可比性极强。本文试以传统的中西文学为关照点。从中西方传统爱情观的主要不同点、不同的表现、其中原因与给我们的启示几个方面进行探讨。 一、中西方爱情观 中西方爱情观相差甚远。朱光潜对此有精辟论述:“西方人重视恋爱。有‘恋爱至上’的标语。中国人重视婚姻而轻视恋爱。” 爱情在中国传统社会文化结构中的地位很低.被认为是次要的。由于深受儒家政治伦理思想的影响,中国传统文化中爱情的功能被单一化.仅仅起繁衍后代的作用。爱情和婚姻建立在“父母之命,媒妁之言”上,目的性和功利性都很强。“中国式爱情”的关键在于婚姻。不管采用什么方式,如果最后能结婚,都可以被舆论道德接受为合法夫妇。如果没成婚,或者一方有配偶,则情感再真挚,不能被舆论道德所接受。《牡丹亭》里杜丽娘与柳梦梅经历了人鬼恋,被视为异端,但终因杜丽娘还魂为人,柳梦梅高中状元。二人受皇帝赐婚结为合法夫妇,他们之前的异端恋才被接受为“才子佳人”美满婚姻的预演和铺垫。 西方人认为爱情本身是一种价值.持“爱情至上”的观点。他们把爱情看得高于一切甚至生命,不懂爱就不懂生活。罗密欧与朱丽叶不顾家仇,为追求恋爱自由和幸福宁愿双双殉情。这在西方的爱情悲剧中并不少见。 二、不同的表现 中西方爱情观的不同之处具体表现在以下几个方面。 1.追求爱情的自由度 在中国封建社会,婚恋的顾虑和干涉颇多,特别注意门当户对.女子是否有德有貌,男子是否有才有功名。这样一来男女双方的爱情就绝非单纯的爱情了,其中掺和了许多门第功名等与封建社会政治制度相关的因素。婚姻通常是父母做主,如果父母不同意来往的话,子女要么妥协放弃自己的真爱。听从父母的婚姻安排,要么为爱抗争,但这样的抗争往往是软弱无力且难以成功的。 西方人表现在爱情观上就是“探究”心态。特征是爱独立自由,喜欢探究新奇,乐于冒险进取。男女在择偶上不管年龄大小、相貌美丑,不管是否已婚.只要能达到探究上的满足,一切都无所顾忌。而且西方人觉得恋爱是自己的事,不应受过多约束。 2.爱情的表达方式 中国男女表达爱情的方式都是含蓄、拘谨、谨慎的。文学作品中的男女经常用日用物品如绢帕、团扇、玉簪等求爱,或者用谐音寓意的东西,如莲子(怜子)、青丝(思)、红豆等表达心意,社会甚至还赋予某些物品(如绣球)具有公开的择偶功能。在伦理道德监管下中国人无法明确地用言语当面求爱。而只得求助于有爱情隐含意义的物品或者其他暗示行为。 西方人表达爱情的方式就显得直露、开放。有时甚至是异常狂热、不顾一切的。人们可以公开谈论自己的感情,社会舆论对此也予以容忍和支持。人们在个人生活中对自己倾心的对象往往公开表露爱意。而没有太多道德上的顾忌。经常是第一次见面,眼光就离不开对方,或者当夜就携琴在姑娘窗外弹奏,倾吐衷肠。 3.对性的看法

中西方爱情观比较

中西方爱情观比较 浙江理工大学王彬彬 Q10600132 爱情,从古至今都是一个神圣的精神平台。每一个人都怀着一种敬仰的心从她身旁走过。爱情,或者说是一个魔术师,只要哪里出现了爱情之花,哪里就是一幅春气盎然的无边无际的田野图,自由、舒畅。爱也让人迷糊,迷糊的不知方向,她存在,却又消隐着,提着看不见的细线,操纵着一对对迷失在爱情里的人。但是如果说爱是一个缘的,那么份就爱情的最终归属。一个完美的爱都是不可能的,或者说残缺的爱才是完美的。虽然爱都来自一个与世隔绝的内心里,但是一旦开放进了表面,那必然开始了一个面目的像变。正因为如此,中西方的爱情观便出现了差别。 中西方爱情观的差异主要在这么几个方面: 1:爱情在中西方民族文化中的地位。 很明显,西方的爱情就是一个人的一切,比如柏拉图把“爱”看作是对美的憧憬,提出了“精神之爱”;亚里士多德倡导“友情之爱”;希伯莱——基督教文明的核心概念是“神爱”;中世纪骑士文化张扬“骑士文化”等等,爱情在西方的地位就相当于西方人的神,是不可侵犯的。 但是相比之下,中国的爱情是低微的,在人们心中的地位是很低的,属于次位系统。但是从古代的诗歌比如《诗经。国风》,也有对爱的大量描写,只是由于儒家思想的影响,人们心中的爱情被一直压抑着。虽然在其中也出现大量突破封建理念的爱情事例出现,但是真正的改变是在清朝末年的时候。 2:社会结构对爱情的制约因素。 爱情不管在任何国界,都是存在局限性的,即使是西方那么崇敬爱情的地方,也少不了宗教的束缚。但是如果与中方进行比较,这一点是微乎其微的。西方的人们更容易为了爱情摆脱社会的一切束缚,在特洛伊战争就很好的表现了这一点。中国的历代史中都没有出现为了爱情,敢放弃爱情的皇帝,虽然在唐朝出现了一个桥段,但是却被朝中大臣们死死的压制下去了,杨贵妃也上吊自杀了。在中国,个人是出于宗法关系网包围中的人,缺乏主体意识,而家庭和封建专制国家则对个人有决定性的作用。并且大量的“三从四德”,“贤妻良母”等礼教,实际上已经扼杀了妇女的爱情。 3:爱情的不同表达方式和表现模式。 为什么把这两个放到一起写?因为中西方的的爱情表达方式实际上是在表现模式的基础上的。西方的爱情观建立在希腊民主制和基督教文化模式之上,主张爱情至上,所以西方的爱情都是直露、开放的。而中国古代的爱情观过早地渗入了国家、义利、善恶等道德因素,所以中国的爱情都是含蓄,低调的。不要相信古装剧里的爱情,在现实的中国古代是不存在的。 当然中西方的差异存在都是有原因的,主要是形成的文化土壤不同。 西方爱情观形成的文化土壤是古希腊-罗马文化与希伯莱-基督教文化。由此而产生了西方爱情观的两种形态:古希腊式的欲望之爱与古希伯莱——基督教式的圣爱。第一种宣扬尘世的欲求和渴望,以两性的结合为最终目的,但爱情的关系却是建立在自由和尊重的默契之中。而后者不惜牺牲自我,超越一切代价,只求对方的幸福,两性关系建立在神的绝对权威之下。不管怎么说,西方的爱情的土壤比较肥沃,孕育出的爱情都是灿然的。而中国,却一直压抑在无数的礼教中。中国爱情观形成的土壤是宗法制道德伦理政治文化。传统文化土壤上产生了中国爱情观的两种形态:“夫妻美和,人之大伦”与“父母之命,媒妁之言”。 第一种形态和古希腊有想通之处。爱情在这时期看作是自然、美好、纯洁的感情。但是却

《罗密欧与朱丽叶》读后感

《罗密欧与朱丽叶》读后感 《罗密欧与朱丽叶》读后感 罗密欧与朱丽叶可以说是千古佳话,他们本是应该享受爱情和纯 洁快乐天真生活的年龄,可是因为家族的仇恨而牺牲了各自年轻的生命.小说中的语句是那么的动人与甜美,特别是他们之间爱情表白的 方式是那么地直接,在众多人听来是那么的肉麻与让人心动,没错他 们的表白虽是肉麻但每个人都希望听到爱人对自己说一些甜言蜜语, 可是我们并不能真正地听到这些经典的对白呀!更何况这只是书本上 的对白罢了. 现实生活毕竟是现实生活,没有书中的故事那么动人与甜蜜,也没有书中的世界那么地温馨和可怕,生活中能够说得出这种肉麻的甜言 蜜语来的会让人感到是那么的可怕,蜜里藏刀让人躲闪不及在无形中、不知不觉中成为爱的奴隶,成为爱的牺牲品.我们可以想象甜言蜜语, 可以享受书中、电视剧中、电影中的甜言蜜语,可以和主人公们共同 分享他们甜蜜的爱情生活,可是现实中并不让我们拥有着太多的甜蜜 生活,只会让我们在刚尝到甜头的时候,在你不注意的时候再加上酸 甜苦辣或其他的味道,让你不知所措,甚至是迷失在爱的港湾,成为一 只孤独飘泊的小舟,也或许正是因为这些混杂的味道才能让我们更加 地感受到爱的甜美吧! 故事中的罗密欧对朱丽叶是忠贞的,为了自己的爱人、为了自己 的誓言本想放下自己内心的仇恨,用爱、用心去面对自己的仇人,可 是老天爷并不让他拥有美好甜蜜的未来,不想让他享受爱情的滋味. 爱人的表兄杀害了自己的亲密好友,他因好友的死而愤怒,自己被怒 气冲昏了头杀害了自己爱人的表兄,因为自己的一时之怒气而为自己 的爱情、生命和爱人生命的铺上了一条通向死亡的大 道https://www.360docs.net/doc/bf3649315.html,爱本身是纯洁美丽的,可是当它遇到怒与恨的时 候往往只会让爱消失,让爱成为它们的阶下囚.

从跨国婚姻看中西婚姻爱情观差异_图文.

从跨国婚姻看中西婚姻 爱情观差异 ——以女星沈丹萍与德国丈夫乌韦跨国婚姻为例 目录 1. 背景 (1) 2. 案例:女星沈丹萍与德国丈夫乌韦 (1) 3. 婚姻爱情观差异 (3) 3.1 集体主义与个人主义 3.2 求稳与求变 3.3 奔放与内敛 3.4 婚姻第一与爱情第一 4. 身边的跨国恋 (5) 5. 跨国恋离婚现象 (6) 6. 总结与建议 (7) 1. 背景 改革开放后,中国与世界联系越来越密切,逐渐加入到全球政治、经济、文化一体化的进程中。在济全球化浪潮的推动下各国交流频繁。世界各国的文化趋于融合,由此人们的价值观,人生观发生了变化。从保守,传统逐渐走向开放,过去难以接受的事情也能够试着容忍。同时,西方文化在世界得到了很好的传播,许多西

方书籍、电视和影片在中国出版、放映。在这种种因素的共同作用下,跨国婚姻出现在人们视野中。 不过,从许多跨国婚姻可以看出,跨国婚姻中夫妻两人更容易产生争吵和矛盾。首当其冲的原因就是中西方婚姻爱情观的差异。下面我们以一个跨国婚姻案例加以说明。 2. 案例:女星沈丹萍与德国丈夫乌韦 沈丹萍是中国80年代当红女星,曾主演 电影《被爱情遗忘的角落》;乌韦是德国人, 当时任外文出版社编辑。 号称“跨国恋”第一人的沈丹萍,1983年 嫁给了德国人乌韦,两人已经携手走过25 年,并有了两个女儿。

乌韦跟沈丹萍在一起后不久,签证面临 着到期的问题,于是他向沈丹萍提出了求婚,表示如果不结婚的话自己就必须返回德国,也就意味着不会有机会再见面了。可是当年的沈丹萍只有23岁,刚开始与乌韦恋爱,于是她对乌韦说让她考虑两年时间,并表示中国都是这样子的,没有一谈恋爱就结婚的事,她要考验乌韦的感情,还表示结婚将无法继续自己的演艺事业。听到这样的回答,乌韦吓坏了,十分不理解,说:“我不会让你考验我两年,也不会等你。为什么你谈这件事时像做买卖一样:我可以跟你结婚,但是我要考验你多长时间,但是我要拍几部戏。你应该说,我愿意跟你结婚,我可以 拍几部戏吗?”说完连声再见都没有,转身就走了。第二天一大早,沈丹萍一开 门突然看到乌韦在自己的宿舍门外候着,一脸的憔悴,对她说:“不管你跟不跟我结婚,但是我不能没有你。”也正是这句朴实的话,深深打动了沈丹萍。 后来,沈丹萍答应了乌韦的求婚。但是在80年代,与外籍人士结婚需要得到父母的签名同意。沈丹萍的父母对德国人的印象不好,认为德国人特残忍,是“法西斯”,坚决反对他们的婚事,并且警告沈丹萍说:“要么不要跟乌韦在一起,要么就不要再回家!”在这种情况下,沈丹萍写了一封将近10页纸的信给父母,坦诚讲述了自己与乌韦的感情。最后获得父母的同意,签上了名字。然而,每当父亲走在街上,都觉得抬不起头,因为80年代时人们认为所有嫁给外国人的都是作风有问题的女人。而且在她们家的胡同里,大家对这桩婚姻都是不认同的。 婚后,夫妻两人在北京居住了一段时间

最新中西方爱情观的差异(英文版)

Comparisons Of Chinese And Western Views On Love Definition and place of love Western countries: ?Love is the first, and men in love can sacrifice(牺牲)everything, and the woman in love also will give up everything. ?In western literature(文学)love is a kind of irresistible(不可抵制的)power. ?The admired(羡慕,赞美)is a perfect angel. China: Chinese people pay attention to marriage and despise(轻视)love。 love is more than the relationship of two persons. even if the special felling disappeared between them ,there is still a great chance that they choose to live together their relationship is not just about themselves, but the whole family including the child, parent, relatives, etc The choice of marriage partner Western countries: ?The choice of the sexes and marriage partner is based on love, regardless of background(背景), family, age, social status and other considerations. ?With emotion(情感,情绪)get close together. Without it ,they are divided (分裂的). China : Many factors are considered Eg: ?The Romance of Western Bower(西厢记) ?Impressive Plot(情节): Zhang Junrui had to meet secretly with Yingying, who was waiting for the moon over the Western Bower, by climbing over the wall into the garden. yingying is the daughter of a rich businessman , however,zhang is a poor intellectual. ?Their love was enthusiastic(热烈的)and sincere(真诚的,诚实的), but unacceptable.

中外恋爱观差异调研

中外恋爱观差异的调研 恋爱在一个人的一生中,占有极其重要的地位。社会上甚至有“恋爱至上主义者”,以恋爱的追求为人生的最高目的。这种观点固然过分,但也从另一面说明恋爱的可爱与尊贵。当今社会的恋爱观,既有西方文化恋爱观的影响,又深深地带着中国传统恋爱观的痕迹。将中西方恋爱观作一番比较,应是一件很有趣、很有意味的事。 在西方人眼中,恋爱是人生的至乐。人生如果没有了恋爱,那就失去了无限的趣味。所以西方人将宗教家的天堂,称之为“永远的蜜月”,即是此意。西方人认为人在热恋中时,所倾慕的对象就好比天使一样,是完美无缺的,是绝对纯粹的。所以一次真正的恋爱,会使人的灵魂得以净化,道德得以升华。用中国人的话来说,一次真心的恋爱,会使人大死大活一番,确使人有脱胎换骨之感。此所以西方的文人学者艺术家,无不重视恋爱,甚至于一生多次恋爱,以从中寻找灵感与激情。歌德每经过一次恋爱,就有一首好诗,即是此证。 中国人亦深知恋爱的美妙,但更知恋爱不能仅囿于生理的范围,所以将恋爱与孝悌、礼义相配合。中国人以前依父母之命、媒妁之言来定婚姻。一旦订亲,虽然男女双方从未见面,或仅见过一面,但都知道对方是自己的终身伴侣,所以不免要经常猜测、揣摩、打听,这样,心有所属,终身有托,时间久了,仍会有相思之苦,仍会产生纯真的恋爱。虽然没有西方人那样有形的恋爱对象,但无形的对象更易使人联想,使人美化对方,更易产生一超尘脱俗的纯粹美感。“恋爱使人高尚”,中国传统的恋爱方式仍会使人对此有深刻的体验,且比西方人更刻骨铭心。 其次,中国人的恋爱观中,不仅男女双方要亲密无间,水乳交融,而且要爱中有敬。爱而敬,使爱的境界得以拓展。西方男女夫妇只是爱而恋。只有爱恋,没有敬意,容易使对方视我为他的私有财产,产生一占有欲。更要命的是,视对方为我所喜爱的物品,平日里固然可以像喜爱收藏物一样予以欣赏、把玩,一旦时过境迁,不再喜爱对方,自然可以弃她(他)而去,像抛弃一件物品一样毫不可惜。此所以西方社会离婚率居高不下的原因之一,也就是只爱无敬的恋爱观之弊端。试想,我们对自己尊敬有加的长辈、领袖或偶像会轻易抛弃吗?忍心轻易抛弃吗?恐怕不会吧。不仅不会,而且对我们所尊敬的人,还要追随一生,效仿一生。

浅论《罗密欧与朱丽叶》的爱情悲剧

浅谈《罗密欧与朱丽叶》的爱情悲剧 摘要:爱情是文学作品中永恒的主题。古往今来,不知有多少 人为之倾倒,用挚热的感情唱出一曲曲爱的赞歌。尽管我们都 衷心祝愿有情人终成眷属,文学史上还是留下了许多凄恻哀婉 的爱情故事。 《罗密欧与朱丽叶》是莎士比亚著名的爱情悲剧之一。罗密欧与朱丽叶这一对恋人相亲相爱,他们忠于自已的爱情,忠 于自己的誓言。他们为了获得幸福,不顾任何冷酷的现实,最 后他们双双殉情自杀。莎士比亚正是通过罗密欧和朱丽叶的爱 情悲剧,把爱情题材和文艺复兴时期的社会矛盾联系起来,批 判了封建道德观念,表现了人文主义追求个人自由和个人幸福 的理念。所以,这一时期的社会主义宗教改革和人文主义思想 是悲剧产生的一个重点,而作品中的人物性格也是悲剧产生的 一个重要的因素。 关键词:《罗密欧与朱丽叶》;人物性格;悲剧原因;宗教;人文主义

绪论 爱情是文学作品永恒的主题。古往今来,不知有多少人为之倾倒,用挚热的感情唱出一曲曲爱的赞歌。尽管我们都衷心祝愿有情人终成眷属,文学史上还是留下了许多凄恻哀婉的爱情故事。 《罗密欧与朱丽叶》的悲剧演绎深刻展示了命运的无常,阴差阳错中,造物弄人,在命运面前,爱情是那么无奈,就像是在茫茫大海上的小船,灯塔不断在远处闪烁,却似乎永远无法抵达。戏中的罗密欧与朱丽叶已永远解不开爱情这个谜底,作品深刻的社会意义首先在于它的鲜明的反封建倾向。作者把罗密欧与朱丽叶这对人文主义青年男女的爱情故事写成悲剧,而且明确地把悲剧的根源归咎于陈旧的封建意识,从而把爱情题材和文艺复兴时期的杜会矛盾联系起来,把批判的锋芒指向中世纪衰朽而野蛮的伦理观念,指向现实的封建势力。 倾心相爱的罗密欧与朱丽叶虽然未成眷属,但他们誓死捍卫爱情,追求幸福、自由生活的信念却并没有被命运摧毁。当然,时代不同了,社会背景不同了,在今天,这种殉情的方式已不可取,但男女主人公坚韧、执著的精神却永远鼓舞着人们去追求幸福、自由,创造更加光明、美好的未来! 《罗密欧与朱丽叶》描写了一个爱情悲剧,主题却远远超越了爱情本身。许多文学作品都是这样,爱情只是载体,在它之上附载着更为深广的社会内容。所以大家在阅读同类作品时,要透过爱情的表面,挖掘出作品深刻的内涵。 一、历史背景 (一)社会背景 1、由于红玫瑰之战,英国迎来了文艺复兴 向现代英国过渡(1455年-1485年) 的红玫瑰战争是指,从1455年到1485年,以红玫瑰为象征的兰开斯特大家族和以白玫瑰为象征的约克家族之间的战争。玫瑰战争是英国历史上两大王室间的封建混战。 15世纪,英国的封建领地经济日趋衰落,大贵族便利用在百年战争期间建立的私人武装,谋取权力与财富。1455年5月,约克公爵理查起兵反对兰开斯特家族的亨利大世,战争爆发。1460年理查战死。1461年3月,理查之子爱德华占领伦敦,废黜亨利六世,取得王位,称爱德华四世,建立约克王朝。1483年4月,爱德华四世卒,其子爱德华五世即位,由其弟理查摄政。6月,理查篡位,称理查三世。约克家族中拥护爱德华四世后裔的贵族和兰开斯特家族的余党联合,与理查抗衡。1485年8月22日,兰开斯特家族的后代亨利都铎击败理查,取得了博斯沃恩战役的胜利,自称为王,为亨利七世,建立都铎王朝。着标志着玫瑰战争结束。 这些战争使英国的封建主义受到致命打击,贵族阶层受到了削弱。当时的英国正处于伊丽莎白女王统治的鼎盛时期,王权稳固统一,经济繁荣。 2、伊利莎白一世的统治时期是一个政治和宗教相对稳定,经济繁荣的时期 伊莉莎白一世(Elizabeth I),1533年9月7日出生于格林尼治,即今日伦敦的

相关文档
最新文档