党校研究生班毕业典礼发言稿_欢迎词.doc

党校研究生班毕业典礼发言稿_欢迎词

尊敬的各位领导、各位老师，亲爱的同学们：

十月，是一个成熟的季节，是一个收获的日子。在这稻穗飘香、硕果满枝的美好时刻，满载着领导和老师们的希望与嘱托，我们圆满完成了学业、即将顺利毕业了。此时此刻，我们既有对党校的眷恋与回忆，也有对领导和老师的感激与祝福，还有同学之间依依不舍之情。在此，我谨代表全班同学，向关心、教育、培养我们的各位领导和老师们表示衷心的感谢并致以崇高的敬礼！

回想三年来的学习时光，许多的场景依然历历在目。无论是领导的亲切讲话，还是老师的谆谆教诲；无论是课堂上的“润物无声”，还是课外活动中的“百般呵护”，特别是老师们侃侃而谈、风格各异深入浅出，妙趣横生的授课艺术，都给我们留下了极为深刻而又美好的印记。由于老师们都拥有博览群书、高屋建瓴的非凡学识和爱岗敬业、无私奉献的治学精神，才使得我们满载而归。

党校是马克思主义的大学堂，是党性煅炼的大熔炉，是培养人才的摇篮。回顾三年的学习，我们深感受益匪浅，收获很大。主要表现在：第一，通过对马克思主义经典著作、党和国家重大政治经济政策、全球政治经济形势分析等课程的学习，使我们全

面掌握了经济管理理论体系，政策理论水平得到明显提高。第二，通过对市场经济规律、增强创新思维、提高决策能力的学习，使我们更新了观念，思维方式得到进一步转变和优化。第三，通过开展到八公山、三清山、骛源实地考察，举办春节联欢晚会，到潘集区龙窝小学献爱心活动等，更加丰富、拓展了我们所学内容，大大提升了社会实践能力。第四，通过对淮南市经济形势的分析和学习，使我们深入了解到市委、市政府加快经济发展的战略部署，进一步增强了加快淮南跨越式发展的信心。第五，在学习期间，老师们平易近人，“传道、授业、解惑”，倍受学生尊敬；同学之间互相关心、互相爱护、互相帮助、互相支持，建立起“团结友爱、亲密无间、纯洁无暇、携手共进”纯洁友谊。

各位领导、老师和同学们：时光荏苒，岁月如梭。三年的学习时间转瞬即逝。然而，深厚浓郁的党校情、师生情和同学情，却是恒久的。

请领导和老师们放心：你们的谆谆教导，我们将永远牢记；你们的思想光辉，也将持久地释放出智慧的火花，并将结出一串串丰硕的果实。我们一定将在党校所学理论知识，自觉运用到实际之中，用理论指导实践、推动工作。我们将以更加饱满的工作热情、更加务实的工作作风、更加昂扬的精神状态，开拓进取，勇于创新，争先进位，争创一流，以优异成绩向省委、市委党校汇报，向各位领导和老师汇报！

这里，我要情不自禁地说一句：我们将永远感恩组织、感恩党校、感恩各们领导、感恩每一位老师！

最后，祝愿各位领导、老师和同学们身体健康、工作顺利、事业发达、幸福安康！

党校演讲稿范文3篇_演讲稿

there is an alternative, however, and it may be one that hasn't occurred to you. let me try to explain it by telling you a story about one of your peers, and the alternative that hadn't occurred to her. a couple of years ago, i participated in a panel discussion at harvard that dealt with some of these same matters, and afterward i was contacted by one of the students who had come to the event, a young woman who was writing her senior thesis about harvard itself, how it instills in its students what she called self-efficacy, the sense that you can do anything you want. self-efficacy, or, in more familiar terms, self-esteem. there are some kids, she said, who get an a on a test and say, "i got it because it was easy." and there are other kids, the kind with self-efficacy or self-esteem, who get an a on a test and say, "i got it because i'm smart."

不过，还有另外一种情况，或许中年危机并不会发生在

你身上。让我告诉你们一个同伴的故事来解释我的意思吧，还有一个她没有遇到过的可能。几年前，我在哈佛参加了一次小组讨论会，谈到这些问题。后来参加这次讨论的一个学生给我联系，这个哈佛学生正在写有关哈佛的毕业论文，讨论哈佛是如何给学生灌输她所说的“自我效能”，一种相信自己能做一切的意识。自我效能或更熟悉的说法“自我尊重”。她说有些在考试中得了优秀的有些学生会说“我得优秀是因为试题很简单。”但另外一些学生，那种具有自我效能感或自我尊重的学生，考试得了优秀会说“我得优秀是因为我聪明。”

again, there's nothing wrong with thinking that you got an a because you're smart. but what that harvard student didn't realize—and it was really quite a shock to her when i suggested it—is that there is a third alternative. true self-esteem, i proposed, means not caring whether you get an a in the first place. true self-esteem means recognizing, despite everything that your upbringing has trained you to believe about yourself, that the grades you get—and the awards, and the test scores, and the trophies, and the acceptance letters—are not what defines who you are.

再说一遍，认为得了优秀是因为自己聪明的想法并没有任何错，不过，哈佛学生没有认识到的是他们没有第三种选择。当我指出这一点时，她十分震惊。我指出，真正的自尊意味着最初根本就不在乎成绩是否优秀。真正的自尊意味着对此问题的足够认识：尽管你在成长过程中的一切都在教导你要相信自己，但你所等获得的成绩，还有那些奖励、成绩、奖品、录取通知书等所有这一切，都不能来定义你是谁。

she also claimed, this young woman, that harvard students take their sense of self-efficacy out into the world and become, as she put it, "innovative." but when i asked her what she meant by innovative, the only example she could come up with was "being ceo of a fortune 500." that's not innovative, i told her, that's just successful, and successful according to a very narrow definition of success. true innovation means using your imagination, exercising the capacity to envision new possibilities.

她还说，这个年轻的女孩子说哈佛学生把他们的自我效能带到了世界上，如她所说的“创新”。但当我问她“创新”意味着什么时，她能够想到的唯一例子不过是“世界大公司五百强的首席执行官”。我告诉她这不是创新，这只是成功，而且是狭义的成功而已。真正的创新意味着运用你的想象力，发挥你的潜力，创造新的可能性。

but i'm not here to talk about technological innovation, i'm here to talk about a different kind. it's not about inventing a new machine or a new drug. it's about inventing your own life. not following a path, but making your own path. the kind of imagination i'm talking about is moral imagination. "moral" meaning not right or wrong, but having to do with making choices. moral imagination means the capacity to envision new ways to live your life.

但这里我并不是在谈论技术创新，不是发明新机器或者制造一种新药，我谈论的是另外一种创新，是创造你自己的生活。不是走现成的道路，而是创造一条属于自己的道路。我谈论的想象力是道德想象力(moral imagination：心理学专业名词)。“道德”

在这里无关对错，而是与选择有关。道德想象力意味着创造自己新生的能力。

it means not just going with the flow. it means not just "getting into" whatever school or program comes next. it means figuring out what you want for yourself, not what your parents want, or your peers want, or your school wants, or your society wants. originating your own values. thinking your way toward your own definition of success. not simply accepting the life that you've been handed. not simply accepting the choices you've been handed. when you walk into starbucks, you're offered a choice among a latte and a macchiato and an espresso and a few other things, but you can also make another choice. you can turn around and walk out. when you walk into college, you are offered a choice among law and medicine and investment banking and consulting and a few other things, but again, you can also do something else, something that no one has thought of before.

它意味着不随波逐流，不是下一步要“进入”什么名牌大学或研究生院。而是要弄清楚自己到底想要什么，而不是父母、同伴、学校、或社会想要什么。即确认你自己的价值观，思考迈向自己所定义的成功的道路，而不仅仅是接受别人给你的生活，不仅仅是接受别人给你的选择。当今走进星巴克咖啡馆，服务员可能让你在牛奶咖啡、加糖咖啡、特制咖啡等几样东西之间做出选择。但你可以做出另外的选择，你可以转身走出去。当你进入大学，人家给你众多选择，或法律或医学或投资银行和咨询以及其他，但你同样也可以做其他事，做从前根本没有人想过的

事。

let me give you another counterexample. i wrote an essay a couple of years ago that touched on some of these same points. i said, among other things, that kids at places like yale or stanford tend to play it safe and go for the conventional rewards. and one of the most common criticisms i got went like this: what about teach for america? lots of kids from elite colleges go and do tfa after they graduate, so therefore i was wrong. tfa, tfa—i heard that over and over again. and teach for america is undoubtedly a very good thing. but to cite tfa in response to my argument is precisely to miss the point, and to miss it in a way that actually confirms what i'm saying. the problem with tfa —or rather, the problem with the way that tfa has become incorporated into the system—is that it's just become another thing to get into.

让我再举一个反面的例子。几年前我写过一篇涉及同类问题的文章。我说，那些在耶鲁和斯坦福这类名校的孩子往往比较谨慎，去追求一些稳妥的奖励。我得到的最常见的批评是：教育项目“为美国而教”如何?从名校出来的很多学生毕业后很多参与这个教育项目，因此我的观点是错误的。我一再听到tfa这个术语。“为美国而教”当然是好东西，但引用这个项目来反驳我的观点恰恰是不得要领，实际上正好证明了我想说的东西。“为美国而教”的问题或者“为美国而教”已经成为体系一部分的问题，是它已经成为另外一个需要“进入”的门槛。

in terms of its content, teach for america is completely different from goldman sachs or mckinsey or harvard medical school

or berkeley law, but in terms of its place within the structure of elite expectations, of elite choices, it is exactly the same. it's prestigious, it's hard to get into, it's something that you and your parents can brag about, it looks good on your résumé, and most important, it represents a clearly marked path. you don't have to make it up yourself, you don't have to do anything but apply and do the work-—just like college or law school or mckinsey or whatever. it's the stanford or harvard of social engagement. it's another hurdle, another badge. it requires aptitude and diligence, but it does not require a single ounce of moral imagination.

从其内容来看，“为美国而教”完全不同于高盛或者麦肯锡公司或哈佛医学院或者伯克利法学院，但从它在未来精英体系中的地位来说，完全是一样的。它享有盛名，很难进入，是值得你和父母夸耀的东西，如果写在简历上会很好看，最重要的是，它代表了清晰标记的道路。你根本不用自己创造，什么都不用做，只需申请然后按要求做就行了，就像上大学或法学院或麦肯锡公司或别的什么。它是社会参与方面的斯坦福或哈佛，是另一个栅栏，另一枚奖章。该项目需要能力和勤奋，但不需要一丁点儿的道德想象力。

moral imagination is hard, and it's hard in a completely different way than the hard things you're used to doing. and not only that, it's not enough. if you're going to invent your own life, if you're going to be truly autonomous, you also need courage: moral courage. the courage to act on your values in the face of what everyone's going to say and do to try to make you change your mind. because

they're not going to like it. morally courageous individuals tend to make the people around them very uncomfortable. they don't fit in with everybody else's ideas about the way the world is supposed to work, and still worse, they make them feel insecure about the choices that they themselves have made—or failed to make. people don't mind being in prison as long as no one else is free. but stage a jailbreak, and everybody else freaks out.

道德想象力是困难的，这种困难与你已经习惯的困难完全不同。不仅如此，光有道德想象力还不够。如果你要创造自己的生活，如果你想成为真正的独立思想者，你还需要勇气：道德勇气。不管别人说什么，有按自己的价值观行动的勇气，不会因为别人不喜欢而试图改变自己的想法。具有道德勇气的个人往往让周围的人感到不舒服。他们和其他人对世界的看法格格不入，更糟糕的是，让别人对自己已经做出的选择感到不安全或无法做出选择。只要别人也不享受自由，人们就不在乎自己被关进监狱。可一旦有人越狱，其他人都会跟着跑出去。

in a portrait of the artist as a young man, james joyce has stephen dedalus famously say, about growing up in ireland in the late 19th century, "when the soul of a man is born in this country there are nets flung at it to hold it back from flight. you talk to me of nationality, language, religion. i shall try to fly by those nets."

在《青年艺术家的肖像》中，詹姆斯·乔伊斯让主人公斯蒂芬·迪达勒斯就19世纪末期的爱尔兰的成长环境说出了如下名言：“当一个人的灵魂诞生在这个国家时，有一张大网把它罩住，防止它飞翔。你跟我谈论民族性、语言和宗教。我想冲

出这些牢笼。”

today there are other nets. one of those nets is a term that i've heard again and again as i've talked with students about these things. that term is "self-indulgent." "isn't it self-indulgent to try to live the life of the mind when there are so many other things i could be doing with my degree?" "wouldn't it be self-indulgent to pursue painting after i graduate instead of getting a real job?"

今天，我们面临的是其它的网。其中之一是我在就这些问题与学生交流时经常听到的一个术语“自我放任”。“在攻读学位过程中有这么多事要做的时候，试图按照自己的感觉生活难道不是自我放任吗?”“毕业后不去找个真正的工作而去画画难道不是自我放任吗?”

these are the kinds of questions that young people find themselves being asked today if they even think about doing something a little bit different. even worse, the kinds of questions they are made to feel compelled to ask themselves. many students have spoken to me, as they navigated their senior years, about the pressure they felt from their peers—from their peers—to justify a creative or intellectual life. you're made to feel like you're crazy: crazy to forsake the sure thing, crazy to think it could work, crazy to imagine that you even have a right to try.

这些是年轻人只要思考一下稍稍出格的事就不由自主地质问自己的问题。更糟糕的是，他们觉得提出这些问题是理所应当的。许多学生在毕业前夕的未来探索中跟我说，他们感受到

来自同伴那里的压力，需要为创造性的生活或思想生活辩护。好像自己已经走火入魔了似的：疯了般地抛弃确定无疑的东西，疯了般地认为思想生活可行，疯了般地想象你有尝试的权利。

think of what we've come to. it is one of the great testaments to the intellectual—and moral, and spiritual—poverty of american society that it makes its most intelligent young people feel like they're being self-indulgent if they pursue their curiosity. you are all told that you're supposed to go to college, but you're also told that you're being "self-indulgent" if you actually want to get an education. or even worse, give yourself one. as opposed to what? going into consulting isn't self-indulgent? going into finance isn't self-indulgent? going into law, like most of the people who do, in order to make yourself rich, isn't self-indulgent? it's not ok to play music, or write essays, because what good does that really do anyone, but it is ok to work for a hedge fund. it's selfish to pursue your passion, unless it's also going to make you a lot of money, in which case it's not selfish at all.

想象我们现在面临的局面。这是美国社会的贫困——思想、道德和精神贫困的最明显症状，美国最聪明的年轻人竟然认为听从自己的好奇心行动就是自我放任。你们得到的教导是应该上大学，但你们同时也被告知如果真的想得到教育，那就是“自我放任”。如果你自我教育的话，更糟糕。这是什么道理?进入证券咨询业是不是自我放任?进入金融业是不是自我放任?像许多人那样进入律师界发财是不是自我放任?搞音乐，写文章就不行，因为它不能给人带来利益。但为风险投资公司工作就可以。

追求自己的理想和激情是自私的，除非它能让你赚很多钱。那样的话，就一点儿也不自私了。

do you see how absurd this is? but these are the nets that are flung at you, and this is what i mean by the need for courage. and it's a never-ending proc-ess. at that harvard event two years ago, one person said, about my assertion that college students needed to keep rethinking the decisions they've made about their lives, "we already made our decisions, back in middle school, when we decided to be the kind of high achievers who get into harvard." and i thought, who wants to live with the decisions that they made when they were 12? let me put that another way. who wants to let a 12-year-old decide what they're going to do for the rest of their lives? or a 19-year-old, for that matter?

你看到这些观点是多么荒谬了吗?这就是罩在你们身上的网，就是我说的需要勇气的意思。这是永不停息的过程。在两年前的哈佛事件中，有个学生谈到我说的大学生需要重新思考人生决定的观点，他说“我们已经做出了决定，我们早在中学时就已经决定成为能够进入哈佛的高材生。”我在想，谁会打算按照他在12岁时做出的决定生活呢?让我换一种说法，谁愿意让一个12岁的孩子决定他们未来一辈子要做什么呢?或者一个19岁的小毛孩儿?

all you can decide is what you think now, and you need to be prepared to keep making revisions. because let me be clear. i'm not trying to persuade you all to become writers or musicians. being a doctor or a lawyer, a scientist or an engineer or an economist—

these are all valid and admirable choices. all i'm saying is that you need to think about it, and think about it hard. all i'm asking is that you make your choices for the right reasons. all i'm urging is that you recognize and embrace your moral freedom.

你能做出的决定是你现在想什么，你需要准备好不断修改自己的决定。让我说得更明白一些。我不是在试图说服你们都成为音乐家或者作家。成为医生、律师、科学家、工程师或者经济学家没有什么不好，这些都是可靠的、可敬的选择。我想说的是你需要思考它，认真地思考。我请求你们做的，是根据正确的理由做出你的选择。我在敦促你们的，是认识到你的道德自由并热情拥抱它。

and most of all, don't play it safe. resist the seductions of the cowardly values our society has come to prize so highly: comfort, convenience, security, predictability, control. these, too, are nets. above all, resist the fear of failure. yes, you will make mistakes. but they will be your mistakes, not someone else's. and you will survive them, and you will know yourself better for having made them, and you will be a fuller and a stronger person.

最重要的是，不要太过小心翼翼。去拒绝或否定我们社会给予了过高奖赏的那些卑怯的价值观的诱惑：舒服、方便、安全、可预测的、可控制的。这些，同样是罗网。最重要的是，去拒否失败的恐惧感。是的，你会犯错误。可那是你的错误，不是别人的。你将从错误中缓过来，而且，正是因为这些错误，你更好地认识你自己。由此，你成为更完整和强大的人。

it's been said—and i'm not sure i agree with this, but it's an idea that's worth taking seriously—that you guys belong to a "postemotional" generation. that you prefer to avoid messy and turbulent and powerful feelings. but i say, don't shy away from the challenging parts of yourself. don't deny the desires and curiosities, the doubts and dissatisfactions, the joy and the darkness, that might knock you off the path that you have set for yourself. college is just beginning for you, adulthood is just beginning. open yourself to the possibilities they represent. the world is much larger than you can imagine right now. which means, you are much larger than you can imagine.

人们常说你们年轻人属于“后情感”一代，我想我未必赞同这个说法，但这个说法值得严肃对待。你们更愿意规避混乱、动荡和强烈的感情，但我想说，不要回避挑战自我，不要否认欲望和好奇心、怀疑和不满、快乐和阴郁，它们可能改变你预设的人生轨迹。大学刚开始，成年时代也才刚开始。打开自己，直面各种可能性吧。这个世界的深广远超你现在想象的边际。这意味着，你自身的深广也将远超你现在的想象。