2018年数学建模论文写作技巧 论文自评(美赛一等奖获得者从获奖论文评述中总结的经验)word版本 (4页)

本文部分内容来自网络整理，本司不为其真实性负责，如有异议或侵权请及时联系，本司将立即删除！

== 本文为word格式，下载后可方便编辑和修改！ ==

数学建模论文写作技巧论文自评(美赛一等奖获得者从获奖论文评述中总结的经验)

论文自评

Successful teams would have to combine existing models, data, and new ideas in creative and original ways.

（成功的队伍会把现有的模型、数据和新的思想创造性地组合起来）

Here are some of the issues that kept papers from the final rounds:

（以下问题会使得论文无法进入最后一轮评审）

?Errors in mathematics, which quickly took them out of further consideration. （数学上的错误，使他们无法进行更深层次的思考）

?Including mathematics that didn’t fit the flow of the presentation. In a few cases, mathematics appears to have been inserted to make a paper look more credible or to take the place of other work that had led to a dead end. （数学方法被插入论文中是为了使论文看起来更可信或

是取代某些其他的工作将会使论文被淘汰）

?Changing notation, sometimes even within a single section. (改变符号，有时甚至在同一个章节中)

?Using undefined or poorly defined symbols, or using symbols before defining them. （用没有定义过的符号，或者在定义之前使用它

们） ?Incomplete expressions, either because the team made an error

or because the expression did not survive the word-processor. (One of the

Outstanding papers addressed in this commentary had a few incomplete, probably because they didn’t survive the word-processor, but the coherence of its model and the strength of its presentation overcame that defect.)

（不完整的表述）

Some models were difficult to understand; poor writing was the most common cause. Another cause was the use of inapposite mathematics. If

the mathematics was a result of a “drive-by” insertio n, fitting it into the model could be difficult.

（一些模型是很难理解,可怜的写作是最常见的原因。另一个原因是使用不合适

的数学。如果数学是由于“顺路”插入,拟合模型是很困难的。）

Here are a few of the modeling issues that hurt some papers’ chance

of entering the final rounds:

?Questionable, conflicting, or unjustifiably speculative assumptions. Good papers did not assume any spherical cows (“a metaphor for

highly simplified scientific models of complex real life phenomena”

[Wikipedia 201X]). 好论文用高度简化的科学模型复杂的隐喻现实生活现象

?Dependence ondeus ex machina: an assumption, equation, reference, or procedure invoked without explanation or context. Often the

invocation would start with the phrase “It is well-known that. . . ” It may be well-known to those who know it well, but that is unlikely

to be the customer or client.

（?一个假设,方程,引用,或过程调用没有解释或上下文。经常直接从“众所周

知开始写。“可能对于很了解的人来说它是众所周知的, 但这对客户来说不太

可能。）

?Confusing, missing, or misplaced model definitions; model

definitions are more complex and more important than mathematical ones, since they must not only name the definiendum but also specify what it is and what it is to be used for.

（混乱,缺失,或者错误的模型定义;模型定义更加复杂,比数学更重要,因为他们

不仅名字被下定义的词,但也必须指定它是什么,它是用于）

?Failure to reach a conclusion.

（没有得到结论）

?Conflicting subproble models with unexplained conflicts between assumptions.

（冲突的模型无法解释的假设之间的矛盾）

?Unexplained inconsistencies in data.