外研社杯辩论赛辩题分析

THW require all healthy citizens to register their bone marrow data and donate marrow when needed.

正方Government

1.save people’s lives;

2. register their bone narrow can help doctor’s find the potential diseases of the citizens;

3. according to research, donating marrow brings no harm to donators’health;

4.donating your marrow can help the doctor know the zygosity[zai'ɡ?s?ti, zi-] 配型of your own marrow. Once you need the marrow from others, the success of zygosity can be improved, so your behavior in turn also benefit for yourselves.

反方opposition

1. Registering every healthy citizens

bone marrow date may not protect

the privacy from intended

information disclosure;

2.Local medical condition should be

take into consideration. If the

condition is bad, we can not

promise that the donator’s health

after donation.

3.We should fight against the

monopoly of the marrow

resources. If a single

organization control all the

resources of marrow, it can lead to corruption.

THW grant t hose diagnosed with terminal illnesses t he right to access treatments that have not completed clinical testing.

绝症患者应有权选择使用尚未完成临床测试检验的新药物或疗法。

正方（governments）:

1.At a point when all ordinary medical

avenues have been expended, and the outcome appears bleak, new

treatments still undergoing trials can

be seen as the last hope.It is almost

impossible for those diagnosed

with terminal illnesses recover from

the diseases, so choosing treatments

that have not completed clinical testing at least can give them opportunity to

survive.

2.We live in a free society, and accept that

people have the right to do as they please;

including exposing themselves to risk, as long

as in so doing they do not harm others (Mill’s

harm principle).1Those diagnosed with

terminal illnesses are responsible for

their lives. As a patient, you can

choose your doctor and treatment, so

accessing treatments that have not

completed clinical testing is one of the

option for people who have free will.

3.Without the volunteers to access

treatments that have not completed

clinical testing, we cannot make

progress in terms of medical

development, and we cannot make

sure these treatments are safe for

human beings. So those diagnosed

with terminal illnesses, if they choose

to accept the treatment, whether

success or not, they make contribution to our society.

4.Nowadays, many regulations have

been made to protect the rights of

the patients. For example, before

you access treatments that have

not completed clinical testing, you

should informed consent to treatment, all

the privacy can not be leaked. If any

sequelae happened after the treatment, the

hospital is supposed to mitigate your

medical fee without any contidition,you can

even decide to quit during the

treatment .So those diagnosed with terminal illnesses have nothing to worry about.

反方（opposition）

1.We have no idea that what kind of effects the treatments that have not completed clinical testing may bring to the patient, what if it caused severe paralysis? What if the patients turned into the zombie just as in American TV the walking dead?Thus, to allow such drugs and treatments to be handed out during the testing process, there is a great risk of giving people false hope.

2.Not all the patients diagnosed with terminal illnesses have rights to choose their treatments. Such as juveniles 'd??v?nl, psychopath,they can

not think reasonable, may be they don’t know how to chose anything. 3.T his policy enhances the role of

drug reps and advertising, at the cost of evidence-based medicine. By allowing anyone who is critically ill to use experimental drugs you enhance the already dubious 可疑的role of drug company reps: there is already a problem of patterns of prescription being altered by the techniques of drug reps, rather than by evidence1 Where drugs are for sale before they have completed testing, there is even less evidence available, and therefore less ability for physicians to contest the claims of either reps or their own patients (who may have heard of the drug during their own research). Hence you magnify the problem of potentially ineffective of even harmful prescription