Glycemic Control in the ICU 胰岛素治疗

471

R. Chawla and S. Todi (eds.), ICU Protocols: A stepwise approach ,

DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-0535-7_60, ? Springer India 2012

A 45-year-old male patient was admitted to hospital with cough, breathlessness, dizziness, and fever for the past 5 days. He was hypoxemic (SpO 2 88% on a nonrebreathing mask) and hypotensive (blood pressure 82/34 mmHg after 2 L of IV ? u id). He was intubated and started on mechanical ventilation. His blood glucose was 350 mg/dL on the glucometer.

R . C hawla ,M .D., F.C.C.M. (*)

D epartment of Respiratory, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine , I ndraprastha Apollo Hospitals ,N ew Delhi ,I ndia

e-mail: d rchawla@https://www.360docs.net/doc/1e18119098.html,

S . T odi ,M .D., M.R.C.P.

C ritical Care & Emergency ,A .M.R.I. Hospital ,K olkata ,I ndia

60G lycemic Control in the ICU

Rajesh Chawla and Subhash Todi H yperglycemia is commonly seen in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients in ICUs. Hyperglycemia is also an independent risk factor for mortality and morbidity in medical and surgical ICU patients. Various factors contribute to hyperglycemia in the ICU. These include increased counterregulatory hormones (glucagon and corti-sol), hepatic insulin resistance, glucocorticoid therapy, dextrose-containing solu-tions, and high-calorie enteral and parenteral nutrition. It is also believed to be a marker of more severe disease.

S tep 1: Initiate resuscitation and check blood glucose I nitiate resuscitation as mentioned in Chap. ? 78 .

C heck venous or arterial glucose (in patients with the arterial line) in glucose ? analyzer. As an alternative, capillary glucose may be checked in correctly cali-brated glucometer.

472R. Chawla and S. Todi ?

T reatment for the underlying disease should not be withheld while one is waiting for a laboratory glucose value.

S tep 2: Assess glycemic risk

?

P atients should be asked about history of diabetes and current and past treatment and check for HbA1c to assess control of blood glucose.

?

C heck comorbidities such as hypertension, renal disease, liver disease, pancrea-

titis, chronic obstructive airway disease (COAD), obesity, and coronary artery disease.

?

L ook for medication history causing hyperglycemia—corticosteroids, octreotide, b-blockers, epinephrine, thiazide diuretics, niacin, pentamidine, protease inhibi-tors, and antipsychotic agents.

S tep 3: Decide on frequency of blood glucose measurement

?

A ll hemodynamically unstable patients, especially those on intravenous insulin

infusion, should have blood glucose checked every hour.

?

A s the condition stabilizes or in less sick patients, this interval may be prolonged. ?

W ith any change in patients’ condition or nutrition delivery regimen, initiate more frequent glucose monitoring.

S tep 4: Decide on the target blood glucose level

?

T he present recommendation in mixed medical/surgical ICU patients is to keep blood glucose between 140 and 180 mg/dL.

?

T his is mainly applicable to patients staying in the ICU for 3 days or more as they bene ?t from long-term control of hyperglycemia.

?

I n short-stay patients (staying less than 3 days), specially those who are eating,

one may have a more liberal approach.

S tep 5: Decide on insulin delivery route

?

A ll oral hypoglycemic agents and long-acting insulin should be discontinued

during initial days of instability.

?

I ntravenous infusion of regular insulin is the treatment of choice in critically ill

patients.

?

T he following groups of patients may be candidates for periodic subcutaneous insulin:

S tep-down therapy from intravenous insulin

–

–

L ess sick patients on oral diet

S tep 6: Decide on insulin delivery protocol (Tables 60.1 a nd 60.2 )

?

I nsulin protocol should be institution speci ?c and nurse driven.

?

A ll efforts should be made to educate nurses and residents and ensure compli-

ance by periodic audits.

D ynamic insulin protocols, ideally computerized, which can monitor trend of ?

rise or fall of blood glucose and adjust insulin doses, tend to keep blood glucose at a more desirable range.

47360 Glycemic Control in the ICU

S tep 7: Avoid hypoglycemia (blood glucose <70 mg/dL) R igorous blood glucose control (80–110 mg/dL) leads to hypoglycemic episodes ? in a mixed medical/surgical ICU, which may be detrimental to their outcome. T he following groups of patients are more prone to hypoglycemia:

? R enal failure

–D ialysis

–L iver failure

–M alnourished

–A drenal insuf ?c iency

– S top insulin infusion immediately and give 50 mL of 25% dextrose intravenously ? and repeat this till blood glucose is more than 90 mg/dL and the patient is asymptomatic.

C heck blood glucose every 15 min and then decrease frequency depending on ? clinical response.

T arget RBS: 140–180 mg/dL

T he patient should be started on a particular scale depending on initial sugar and clinical scenario. In this scale, in order to arrive at a target glucose level of 140–180 mg/dL, insulin infusion rate should be shifted horizontally to the next or previous scale in the same row if sugar remains within the range for that row. If sugar increases or decreases to the other range, the infusion rate should be shifted vertically for that range in the same scale

474R. Chawla and S. Todi ?

E nsure adequacy of carbohydrate calorie intake either enterally or parenterally

and avoid abrupt discontinuation.

S tep 8: Avoid large variations in glucose concentrations in ICUs

?

G lycemic variability is expressed as the standard deviation of each patient’s

blood glucose levels.

?

G lycemic variability is an independent predictor of mortality in a heterogeneous

population of ICU patients.

?

T he ef ?c acy of continuous or near-continuous glucose monitoring and/or new algorithms targeted more speci ?c ally to reduce glycemic variability as well as mean blood glucose requires further clinical studies in ICU patients before the ?n al recommendation is made.

S tep 9: Avoid under or overtreatment and safety issues

?

O vertreatment and undertreatment of hyperglycemia represent major safety concerns.

?

E ducation to hospital personnel is essential in engaging the support of those

involved in the care of inpatients with hyperglycemia.

?

C aution is required in interpreting results of point-of-care glucose meters in

patients with anemia, polycythemia, hypoperfusion, or use of medications.

?

B uy-in from hospital administration are required for promoting a rational system

approach to inpatient glycemic management.

S tep 10: Change to intermittent treatment before discharge

?

S witch over to subcutaneous insulin.

?

U se a sliding scale with short-acting insulin along with long-acting insulin (NPH or glargine), which will lead to better glycemic control.

?

L ong-acting insulin should overlap discontinuation of insulin infusion to prevent hyperglycemia.

?

C alculate the dosage taking into account the history of diabetes, type of diabetes,

stress level, steroid use, and general clinical status.

S uggested Reading

1. L ena D, Kalfon P, Preiser JC, Ichai C. Glycemic control in the intensive care unit and during the

postoperative period. Anesthesiology. 2011;114(2):438–44.

A comprehensive review article.

2. K avanagh BP, McCowen KC. Glycemic control in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2540–6.

A clinical problem-solving article with literature review.

3. M arik PE, Preiser JC. Toward understanding tight glycemic control in the ICU: a systematic

review and metaanalysis. Chest. 2010;137:544–51.

The goal of this systematic review was to determine the bene ?t s and risks of tight glycemic control in ICU patients and to explain the differences in outcomes in reported trials. There is no evidence to support the use of intensive insulin therapy in general medical/surgical ICU patients who are fed according to current guidelines. Tight glycemic control is associated with a high incidence of hypoglycemia and an increased risk of death in patients not receiving parenteral nutrition.

475 60 Glycemic Control in the ICU

4. A merican Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Diabetes Association.

Consensus statement on inpatient glycemic control. Endocr Pract. 2009;15(4):1–17.

This article discusses a recent guideline on glucose control from an endocrinologist’s perspective.

5. T he NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in criti-

cally ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1283–97.

Within 24 h after admission to an ICU, adults who were expected to require treatment in the ICU on three or more consecutive days were randomly assigned to undergo either intensive glucose control, with a target blood glucose range of 81–108 mg/dL (4.5–6.0 mmol/L), or con-ventional glucose control, with a target of 180 mg/dL or less ( ￡10.0 mmol/L). Intensive glucose control increased mortality in adults in the ICU:a blood glucose target of 180 mg/dL or less resulted in lower mortality than did a target of 81–108 mg/dL.

6. K rinsley JS. Glycemic variability: a strong independent predictor of mortality in critically ill

patients. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:3008–13.

Previously published interventional studies of glycemic control may be reinterpreted using the metric of glycemic variability. Measures to ensure a low degree of glycemic variability may improve outcomes in intensive care units implementing glycemic control.

7. V an den Berghe G, Wilmer A, Hermans G, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU.

N Engl J Med. 2006;354:449–61.

Intensive insulin therapy signi ?c antly reduced morbidity but not mortality in all patients in the medical ICU. Although the risk of subsequent death and disease was reduced in patients treated for three or more days, and these patients could not be identi ?e d before therapy.

8. V an den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients.

N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1359–67.

Intensive insulin therapy to maintain blood glucose at or below 110 mg/dL reduces morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients in the surgical intensive care unit.