如何写case brief

如何写case brief~早看了这个上课就不至于那么迷茫了555~~

case brief writing 在英美法的学习中可谓是最常用的基本功了，由于面对的经常是洋洋洒洒的万言判决书，如何抓住case的重点，比如案件事实（facts）、争议点(issues)、法院认定(holding)、推理过程或者判决理由（reasoning），一个简明扼要的case brief 就非常重要了。那怎如何写呢？总结起来差不多有这样几种：

一、FPIHRC写法（如下所述）

Title (e.g. Roe v. Wade)

Citation (e.g. 410 U.S. 113 (1973))

Facts: Summarize the facts of the case. List only the essential facts that you need to understand the holding and reasoning of the case.

Procedure: Most of the cases that you'll read in law school will be appellate court d ecisions. In this section, you want to list what happened in the lower court(s). Do not go into too much detail. One or two sentences are sufficient for this section. Issue(s): What is/are the question(s) facing the court? Form the issue questions in a way that they can be answered by yes or no.

Holding: How did the court answer the issue question(s)? YES/NO?

Reasoning: This is the most important section of your case brief. Here you want to list the reasoning of the majority in reaching its decision. You can actually be quit e detailed in this section. List what the law was before this case was decided and how the law has changed after this decision. Law professors love to discuss the rea soning of a case in class discussions.

Concurring/dissenting opinions: Even though I read the concurring and dissenting op inions, I rarely brief them. However, there are some cases (e.g. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer) where the concurring or dissenting opinions end up becomin g more important than the majority's opinions. In such cases, you should add this s ection to your case brief.

二、FIHRQ写法（注意：下面第一条的citation是每个case brief都必须要有的，另外还应当包含the case's title）

I. CITATION

From what specific source is the case taken?

For example, was the case reported in the U.S. Supreme Court Reports?

II. THE FACTS

A. Material

·What materially happened?

·Was there, for example, a collision on the high seas? A dispute over territory?

B. Legal

·From what legal circumstances did the case originate?

·Did two states agree, for example, to submit their dispute to an arbitral tribunal? Was an opinion sought from the I.C.J.?

III. LEGAL ISSUES

A. Specific

·What specific legal questions does this case raise?

·For example, does the proximity of Ruritania to Zombie Island give Ruritania a l egal basis for making a territorial claim for Zombie Island?

B. General

·What more general legal questions does this case raise?

·For example, is "proximity" a legitimate basis under international law for making a territorial claim for an island?

IV. THE HOLDING

·What decision was made? That is, in support of which side did the court hold? ·For example, in Missouri v. Holland, did the court decide in favor of "Missouri" o r "Holland?"

V. LEGAL RATIONALE

·What legal reasoning informed the court's decision?

·What rules of law, for example, did it apply?

·How did it interpret legal principles, documents?

·How did it construe the facts?

VI. QUESTIONS

·What existing legal questions, if any, are unresolved by this case?

·What new questions, if any, does it raise?

三、FIHR写法

四、FIRAC写法

Writing a Case Brief Case briefs are documents prepared by students as a study aid when trying to capture the essence and importance of appellate court decisions. A case brief summarizes a court decision by outlining, at a minimum, the facts of th e case, the legal issues raised, and the rationale for the court’s decision.

There are many ways to organize a case brief and each structure may include and exclude items different than those requested here. The references listed at the end of this handout show the variation in how a case might be briefed, but they also p rovide additional information to help you complete a brief. So, in addition to the ite ms and explanations below, you should consult the references for additional clarity. For purposes of the assignment, follow the structure provided here in preparing you r case brief.

Case Name and Roles

As you learned in the citing cases assignment, the case name will typically show tw o parties. In a criminal case the first party is invariably the government (probably s tate or federal) and the second party is the defendant. However, a case before an appellate court (which are the cases you will brief) may result in a switch when a defendant (now the appellant or petitioner) seeks action against the state (now the appellee or respondent). See Ferdico (p. viii) for a review of determining who’s wh o in a case name. So, in addition to providing the proper case citation, this section of the brief will also specify the role of each party.

Procedural Background

Appellate cases have, by definition, already had a trial stage. In fact, depending on what appeal level the case now being briefed is at, it may already have been to s everal appellate courts. The case brief should identify the courts that have dealt wit h the case and indicate the decisions those courts have made. (See Ferdico’s exam ple (bottom of p. viii and top of p. ix) using Bond v. United States.) The sections o f the court opinion that help identify the procedural background will also provide inf ormation for the “roles” section above. As a warning—based on briefs provided in o ther classes—some students confuse the court opinion for the case now being briefe d with opinions from earlier courts. This is another good reason to include the proc edural background as part of a case brief since it helps you clarify how your case got to the U.S. Supreme Court (the court for all briefs in this assignment). Rememb er, the brief you are writing summarizes the facts, issues, holding, and rationale in the U.S. Supreme Court opinion for the case name you have identified at the start of the brief. Don’t confuse those items (especially the court’s holding, rationale, and disposition) with ones relevant to court opinions on this case at earlier stages.

Facts

In one or two paragraphs, provide a concise summary of the incident that brought the case before the court. This will include a description of the crime and the circu mstances causing the earlier court’s decision to be appealed. This is actually one of the more difficult parts of the brief since requires you to clearly identify and conci sely state ONLY that information needed to understand the case. The decision itself usually includes a lot more information than is needed for the brief.

The issues being addressed in the case (see the following section) will help you det ermine what facts are especially important for your brief. In fact, some authors sug gest you write the issues section first to help you more clearly identify the facts. Ferdico (bottom of column A and top of column B on p. ix) suggests the type of q uestions that should be answered in this section. As he notes, the behavior of the police during their investigation, confrontation, apprehension, detention, etc. of the d efendant will probably constitute important facts in most of the cases you are briefi ng. It is important for you to remember, however, that behavior by magistrates, pr osecutors, defense attorneys, trial judges, wardens, etc. can also be claimed to hav e violated right of the defendant (appellant/petitioner).

Legal Issue

Phrase, in your own words, the legal question the court has tried to answer in this case. State the issue as a question (e.g., “Can a police officer. . .?”). Sometimes t he issue is made very clear in the opi nion (e.g., “This case presents the question. . .”, “The issue in this case is . . .”) but at other times it is not quite so “in your f ace.” Even when the issue is blatantly presented in the opinion, you should still phr ase it in your own words. There are several reasons for this. First, court opinions o ften address several legal issues. In this class we are concentrating on procedural is sues so you need to identify the specific issue related to the procedure followed by the police (in most of your cases). Second, court opinions are often long, wordy, a nd filled with terms unfamiliar to undergraduates. As a result, putting the issue in y our own words (use the Ferdico’s glossary to help understand some of the court’s l egal terminology) will help all of us understand it better.

Decision or Holding

How has this court resolved the issue? What was the outcome? What action did the court take? Like the legal issue, the court’s decision or holding is probably clearly stated in the opinion (e.g., “We hold . . .”).

This should be a brief summary of the court’s decision (see Ferdico’s examples in t he various “Key Holdings” at the end of Chapters 3-14) and will, of course, resembl e aspects of the legal issue statement. In this sense, the holding tells the answer t o the question phrased as the legal issue. One could even claim the decision is a o ne-word or simple-sentence response to the legal question. For example, Ferdico (p. ix) uses this quote from Chief Justice Rehnquist:

Obviously, your case brief needs to provide more information than “it did.” As Ferdi co explains, you will probably find a more complete statement of the court’s “holdin g further along in the opinion or at the end, after discussing its reasoning” (p. ix). Reasoning

Why did the court reach the decision it did? What arguments justify the holding? B ecause judges often write many pages when justifying and explaining their decisions, this can be a difficult section for student’s to write. The doctrine of stare decisis r equires judges to align their decision with legal principles established in previously d ecided cases. As a result, court opinions take considerable space to show how the current decision is consistent with the established principles. Your job is to state, as succinctly as possi ble, the rationale provided by the court’s majority in support of t heir decision.

Disposition

So, what happened as a result of the court’s decision? You will find a specific dispo sition somewhere in the opinion. Ferdico (p. x) highlights the three most common d ispositions:

Affirmed —The appellate court agree with the opinion of the lower co urt from which the appeal came.

Reversed —The appellate court disagrees with the opinion of the lowe r court from which the appeal came and sets aside or invalidates that opinion. Rev ersals are often accompanied by a remand.

Remanded —The case is sent back to the court from which it came for further action consistent with the appellate court opinion. Remand often accompani es a reversal.

How to Brief a Case"

by John M. Scheb II

for Political Science 430, 431 (“U.S. Constitutional Law”)

Most instructors of constitutional law require students to prepare "briefs" of a numb er of assigned cases. Even in the absence of such a requirement, students may fin d that briefing a case helps one "digest" its contents. Preparing briefs is also an ex cellent means of studying for an examination that covers court cases. Below is an example of a case brief prepared in the style that we recommend to students. Stu dents will note that the "brief" below is exactly that: a very brief summary of the c ase. It highlights the basic issue, the essential facts, the decision of the Court, and the arguments set forth in the majority and dissenting opinions. We also encourag e students to include a brief comment on the significance of the case.

Sample Case Brief

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

Issue: Is a state law requiring "equal but separate" facilities for whites and blacks a violation of the Thirteenth and/or Fourteenth Amendment?