gre写作超经典范文鉴赏!

gre写作超经典范文鉴赏!

想要知道gre写作考试满分作文是肿么写出来的，就非常有必要参考、分析相关范文。出于这样的考虑，在接下来的文章中，天道小编将与您分享一份堪称经典的gre写作范文，相信备战新

gre写作的朋友一定会需要!

以下就是小编准备的gre写作范文啦，备战gre写作的考生们不知道你们准备好了么?提前预祝大家能够在新gre写作考试中取得佳绩!

A nationshould require all its students to study the same national curriculum until theyenter college ratherthan allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses tooffer.

The speaker would prefer a nationalcurriculum for all children up until college instead of allowing schools in different regionsthe freedom to decide on their own curricula. I agree insofar as some common core curriculumwould serve useful purposes

for any nation. At the same time, however, individual statesand communities should have some freedom to augment any such curriculum as theysee fit; otherwise, a nation's educational system might defeat its own purposes in the long term.

A national core curriculum would bebeneficial to a nation in a number of respects. First of all,by providing all children withfundamental skills and knowledge, a common core curriculum would help ensure that our childrengrow up to become reasonably informed, productive members of society. In addition, acommon core curriculum would provide a predictable foundation upon which collegeadministrators and faculty could more easily build curricula and select course materials for freshmenthat are neither below nor above their level of educational experience. Finally, a core curriculumwould ensure that all school-children are taught core values upon which any democraticsociety depends to thrive, and even survive--values such as tolerance of others with differentviewpoints, and respect for others.

However, a common curriculum that isalso an exclusive one would pose certain problems,which might outweigh the benefits,noted above. First of all, on what basis would certain course work be included or excluded,and who would be the final decision- maker? In all likelihood these decisions would be inthe hands of federal legislators and regulators, who are likely to have their own quirkynotions of what should and should not be taught to children--notions that may or may notreflect those of most communities, schools, or parents.

Besides, government officials arenotoriously susceptible to influence-peddling by lobbyists who do not have the best interests ofsociety's children in mind.

Secondly, an official, federallysanctioned curriculum would facilitate the dissemination of propaganda and other dogma whichbecause of its biased and one-sided nature undermines the very purpose of true education: toenlighten. I can easily foresee the banning of certain text books, programs, and websites whichprovide information and perspectives that the government might wish to suppress--assome sort of threat to its authority and power.

Although this scenario might seemfar-fetched, these sorts of concerns are being raised already at the state level.

Thirdly, the inflexible nature of auniform national curriculum would preclude the inclusion of programs, courses, and materials that areprimarily of regional or local significance. For example, California requires childrenat certain grade levels to learn about the history of particular ethnic groups who make upthe state's diverse population.

A national curriculum might not allow for this feature, andCalifornia's youngsters

would be worse off as a result of their ignorance about the traditions,values, and cultural contributions of all the people whose citizenship they share.

Finally, it seems to me that imposinga uniform national curriculum would serve to undermine the authority of parentsover their own children, to even a greater extent

than uniform state laws currently do.Admittedly, laws requiring parents to ensure that their children receive an education that meetscertain minimum standards are well-justified, for the reasons mentioned earlier. However, when suchstandards are imposed

by the state rather than at the community level parents are left withfar less power to participate meaningfully in the decision-making process. This problemwould only be exacerbated were these decisions left exclusively to federal regulators.

In the final analysis, homogenizationof elementary and secondary education would amount to a double-edged sword. While itwould serve as an insurance policy against a future populated with illiterates andignoramuses, at the same time it might serve to obliterate cultural diversity and tradition. The optimalfederal approach, in my view,

is a balanced one that imposes a basic curriculum yet leavesthe rest up to each state--

or better yet, to each community.

为了助备考生们一臂之力，在上面的文章中，天道小编与童鞋们分享了一份经典的gre写作范文，大家在准备知识不妨仔细分析一下哦!至此，关于新gre写作的内容就全部告一段落啦，感谢您的阅读!

天道教育留学方案结合天道六步曲服务体系，首创留学精英课程，科学理性规划，提升背景，

强调团队沟通和个性辅导，重在全面提升申请人综合竞争力。我们拥有上千成功案例，庞大的海外

名校数据库资源，华人领域最专业顾问团队和海内外广大的天道校友网络的支持。天道留学方案形

式讲究重在参与，采用互动分享的Workshop，多对一的个性化辅导。我们确保拿到满意申请结果的

同时，加强申请者团队意识，自我认知和沟通能力，系统掌握求职、面试以及海外生存技巧，积累受益终生的人脉资源。