论文投稿问题集锦 SCI投稿必备

论文投稿问题集锦 SCI投稿必备
论文投稿问题集锦 SCI投稿必备

1. 修改了3次都是因为参考文献有问题

参考文献是很重要的

你应该找篇要投期刊的已发表文章做参考,看文中是按作者年,还是按序号引用,另外,如果是多个作者,第一个作者后面是否有逗号;

在参考文献列表中,要注意

1、参考文献姓后面是否需要逗号,名的缩写后是否有逗号,是否有空格

2、三个及以上参考文献应该全部列出;

3、期刊是全写还是缩写,是正体还是斜体,是否是黑体

4、引用文章的题名第一个字母是否大写

5、页码后面是否有点号;

6、引用书或报告等是否需要列出页码;

7、页码之间是用-还是用~;

8、你需要注意的是大小写,正斜体、标点符号、空格、缩写、等,一定要把每个参考文献都仔细对一次;

编辑很看重参考文献的格式是否正确,因为决定你是否认真,所以还是要好好修改

目前我也只能提供这么多,你自己还是仔细看一下期刊的说明,和期刊中的文章。不要恢心,仔细修改,一定没什么问题。

2. 论文被退回来了!要改不知道怎么改,请教高人!

However, before we can proceed with your submission we ask you to address the following:

1) Corresponding author information should be included in the title page.

2) Please type your whole manuscript with double line spacing.

3) In text citation of figures should be in sequential order.

这些都是什么意思哦?呵呵!该怎么改呢?请教高人!

1)标题页应该含有通讯作者信息(单位,email,有的期刊要留电话等);

2)两行间距

3)整个文章的图片连续编号

3. 论文投稿中的一些套话(emuch)

一、投稿信

1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:

I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .

Y ours sincerely

2. Dear Dr. A:

Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest

to the journal’s readers.

3. Dear Dr. A:

Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.

We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.

二、询问有无收到稿件

Dear Editors,

We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.

三、询问论文审查回音

Dear Editors,

It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.

四、关于论文的总体审查意见

1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.

2.This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification.There are given below.

3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –

4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.

5.This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of –because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in are putable journal of - .

6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.

7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.

8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.

9.Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.

10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?

五、给编辑的回信

1. In re ply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –

One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2(line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.

2.I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data.I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.

3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.

4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. Y ou will see that our original findings are confirmed.

5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.

6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript

7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.

8.Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.

9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.

10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.

11. I feel that the review er’s comments concerning Figures 1 and 2 result from a misinterpretation of the data.

12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.

13.We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.

14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.

15. The running title has been changed to “”.

16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.

17.The concentration of HA T media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their

error.

18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).

19.We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.

20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.

21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:

22.We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript is acceptable for publication.

23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitable for publication.

24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.

25.I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees.

本帖内容来自https://www.360docs.net/doc/f812140571.html,,欢迎访问原帖!本贴地址:https://www.360docs.net/doc/f812140571.html,/viewthread.php?tid=9114

SCI论文投稿有关各类回复信的写法

英文投稿中有关信件的写法 一、投稿信 1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML: I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - . Yours sincerely 2. Dear Dr. A: Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for pu blication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers. 3. Dear Dr. A: Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb. All author s have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source. We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. 二、询问有无收到稿件 Dear Editors, We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help. 三、询问论文审查回音 Dear Editors, It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible. 四、关于论文的总体审查意见 1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below. 2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit p ublication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below. 3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our

SCI论文投稿状态解析、修稿处理、拒稿后对策及接受后总结等全程荟萃

(一)投稿前准备工作和需要注意的事项、投稿过程相关经验总结 投稿前准备工作和需要注意的事项: 总结提示语:1)第一作者和通信作者的区别: 通信作者(Corresponding author)通常是实际统筹处理投稿和承担答复审稿意见等工作的主导者,也常是稿件所涉及研究工作的负责人。 通信作者的姓名多位列于论文作者名单的最后(使用符号来标识说明是Corresponding author),但其贡献不亚于论文的第一作者。 通讯作者往往指课题的总负责人,负责与编辑部的一切通信联系和接受读者的咨询等。 文章的成果是属于通讯作者的,说明思路是通讯作者的,而不是第一作者。 第一作者仅代表是你做的,且是最主要的参与者! 通信作者标注名称:Corresponding author,To whom correspondence should be addressed,或The person to whom inquiries regarding the paper should be addressed

若两个以上的作者在地位上是相同的,可以采取“共同第一作者”(joint first author)的署名方式,并说明These authors contributed equally to the work。 2)作者地址的标署: 尽可能地给出详细通讯地址,邮政编码。有二位或多位作者,则每一不同的地址应按之中出现的先后顺序列出,并以相应上标符号的形式列出与相应作者的关系。 如果第一作者不是通讯作者,作者应该按期刊的相关规定表达,并提前告诉编辑。期刊大部分以星号(*)、脚注或者致谢形式标注通讯联系人。 3)挑选审稿人的几个途径: 很多SCI杂志都需要作者自己提出该篇论文的和您研究领域相关的审稿人,比较常见的是三名左右,也有的杂志要求5-8人。介绍几个方法: ①利用SCI、SSCI、A&HCI、ISTP检索和您研究相关的科学家; ②文章中的参考文献; ③相关期刊编委或学术会议的主席、委员;

SCI科技论文的写作与发表_刘占德

西北农业学报 2006,15(4):212~216 Acta A griculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica SCI科技论文的写作与发表 刘占德,刘光哲 (西北农林科技大学,陕西杨凌 712100) 摘 要:在对SCI系统分析研究的基础上,分别与不同学科的SCI论文作者,通过问卷调查、采访、座谈等形式进行了广泛的调查研究,归纳总结了一系列有关SCI源期刊标准、科研选题、论文写作、投稿与发表等环节的技术要领和策略,对广大科教人员在确定投稿方向、规范科技论文写作,提高SCI命中率方面提供借鉴和参考。 关键词:SCI;科技论文;写作;投稿 中图分类号:G255.2;H315 文献标识码:B 文章编号:1004-1389(2006)04-0212-05 Writing and Publication of the SCI-oriented S cientific Papers LIU Zhan-de and LIU Guang-zhe (Northw es t A&F University,Yangling,S haanxi 712100) A bstract:Based o n the systema tic analy sis of SCI,interview s with o r surv ey of the autho rs from dif-ferent disciplines w hose scientific paper hav e been collected into SCI,some critical issues with the source journals for SCI collectio n such as criteria,to pic selection,fo rmat o f w riting and co ntribution of paper fo r publication are fully addressed,providing a guideline o r reference fo r teache rs and re-searche rs to w rite regulated scientific pape rs that can be collected by SCI. Key words:SCI;Scientific paper;Writing;Paper contributio n 美国SCI(Science Citation Index)通过严格的选刊标准和同行专家评估制度,从而使SCI收录的文献能较为客观、全面地覆盖全世界最重要和最有影响力的研究成果。通过它独特的“引文索引”(Citation lndex),使科教人员既可以及时了解相关领域最新科学研究前沿,也可以方便地通过引文链接了解该领域研究的历史沿革和最新动态。SCI这一突出的特点,决定了SCI不仅作为一部文献检索工具使用,而且成为评价科研成就、学术水平的一种权威依据[1]。大学、科研机构、个人被SCI收录的论文总量及被引用的次数,基本可以反映大学、科研机构、个人科学研究,尤其是基础研究的能力与学术水平。为此,我国许多重点高校,特别是“211”和“985”高校,在建设国际知名高水平研究型大学的过程中,科学研究竞相与世界最新科学R&D前沿同步,学科建设和发展力争与国际接轨。这就要求借助SCI 这一世界级高水平学术平台,发表和展示最新学术观点与科研成果,进行国际学术交流,扩大影响,提高科学研究水平,SCI论文的写作与发表因此而受到了各方面的高度重视和关注。很多高校晋升教授(研究员)、授予博士学位、甚至授予硕士学位的先决条件之一就是必须发表一定数量的SCI论文。然而,不少科教人员并不了解掌握SCI,缺乏SCI论文写作和发表的基本知识和技能,在投稿、写作、提高SCI论文命中率等方面深感困惑和迷茫,致使许多科研成果、不少很有造诣的学术见解不能在高水平的国际期刊上发表交流。有鉴于此,笔者在多年对SCI收录统计和分析研究的基础上,通过问卷调查、采访、座谈等形 收稿日期:2005-11-01 修回日期:2005-12-28 基金项目:西北农林科技大学教学改革项目资助。 作者简介:刘占德(1965-),男,陕西横山人,高级农艺师。主要从事科技情报、项目决策分析与评价工作。

SCI论文投稿经验!

SCI论文投稿经验! 2009年,我代表本课题组共投递7篇SCI论文(主要是生殖和神经方向),分别投往IF2.5—10分的杂志,经历了许多坎坷。不过,现在可喜的是已经accept了5篇,均在3分左右,revised 了2篇。在修稿和投稿过程中,本人学习了不少相关知识和积累了一些经验,现与各位战友 分享,并请大家批评指正。 内容清单: 1、本人2009年SCI投稿经验总结(含SCI投稿程序) 2、本版众多投稿相关精华帖汇聚 3、众多战友的2009年投稿经历汇总 一、本人2009年SCI论文投稿步骤及其经验总结 (一)投稿程序 1、选择合适的SCI期刊-Choose a journal。结合专业知识、2008或2007年度影响因子 表和他人经验来综合选择要投递的期刊,并进入该期刊查询系统查询近年来的文章走向。 2、下载Introduction for submission。只要到每个杂志的首页,打开submit paper一栏,点击Introduction查看或下载即可。 3、稿件及其相关材料准备-Preparation:Manuscript.doc、Tables.doc、Figures.tiff(jpg 等)、Cover letter,有时还有Title page、Copyright agreement、Conflicts of interest等。 4、网上投稿-Submit a manuscript:先到每个杂志的首页,打开submit paper一栏,先 以通讯作者的身份register一个账号,然后以author login身份登录,按照提示依次完成:Select Article Type、Enter Title、Add/Edit/Remove Authors、Submit Abstract、Enter Keywords、Select Classifications、Enter Comments、Request Editor、Attach Files,最后下载pdf,查看无误后,即可到投稿主页approve submission或直接submit it。 5、不定期关注稿件状态-Status:Submit New Manuscript、Submissions Sent Back to Author、Icomplete Submissions、Sbmissions Waiting for Author's Approval、Submissions Being Processed、Submissions Needing Revision、Rvisions Sent Back to Author、Icomplete Submissions Being Revised、Risions Waiting for Author's Approval、Revisions Being Processed、Declined Revisions。 6、修回稿的投递-Submitted the revised manuscript:主要修改revised manuscript、response to the reviewers、cover letter,还有其他修改的相关材料。程序是进入投稿主页main menu,点击revise,仍然按照原先程序投递(近似于4),切记把修改的标题、摘要和回复信等内容要修改。最后上传附件时,先把留下来且未修改的材料前打钩(表示留下不变),然 后点击next,再上传已经修改的材料(主要包括revised manuscript、response to the reviewers、cover letter等),最后下载pdf,查看无误后,即可到投稿主页approve submission或直接submit it。

SCI论文投稿步骤

SCI论文投稿步骤 当科研新手们写出一篇论文准备投稿SCI时,往往却为怎样遵守SCI论文的投稿步骤以及如何避免发表SCI论文的主要问题而发愁,在此小编参考多方资料特此总结出以下SCI论文投稿步骤,与您一同分享。 1、选择合适的SCI期刊-Choose a journal。结合专业知识、2018或2017年度影响因子表和他人经验来综合选择要投递的期刊,并进入该期刊查询系统查询近年来的文章走向。 2、下载Introduction for submission。只要到每个杂志的首页,打开submit paper一栏,点击Introduction查看或下载即可。 3、稿件及其相关材料准备-Preparation:Manu.doc、Tables.doc、Figures.tiff(jpg等)、Cover letter,有时还有Title page、Copyright agreement、Conflicts of interest等。 4、网上投稿-Submit a manu:先到每个杂志的首页,打开submit paper一栏,先以通讯作者的身份register一个账号,然后以author login身份登录,按照提示依次完成:Select Article Type、Enter Title、Add/Edit/Remove Authors、Submit Abstract、Enter Keywords、Select Classifications、Enter Comments、Request Editor、Attach Files,最后下载pdf,查看无误后,即可到投稿主页approve submission或直接submit it。

辑思编译:SCI论文投稿步骤

辑思编译:SCI论文投稿步骤 当科研新手们写出一篇论文准备投稿SCI时,往往却为怎样遵守SCI论文的投稿步骤以及如何避免发表SCI论文的主要问题而发愁,在此小编参考多方资料特此总结出以下SCI论文投稿步骤,与您一同分享。 1、选择合适的SCI期刊-Choose a journal。结合专业知识、2018或2017年度影响因子表和他人经验来综合选择要投递的期刊,并进入该期刊查询系统查询近年来的文章走向。 2、下载Introduction for submission。只要到每个杂志的首页,打开submit paper一栏,点击Introduction查看或下载即可。 3、稿件及其相关材料准备-Preparation:Manu.doc、Tables.doc、Figures.tiff(jpg等)、Cover letter,有时还有Title page、Copyright agreement、Conflicts of interest等。 4、网上投稿-Submit a manu:先到每个杂志的首页,打开submit paper一栏,先以通讯作者的身份register一个账号,然后以author login身份登录,按照提示依次完成:Select Article Type、Enter Title、Add/Edit/Remove Authors、Submit Abstract、Enter Keywords、Select Classifications、Enter Comments、Request Editor、Attach Files,最后下载pdf,查看无误后,即可到投稿主页approve submission或直接submit it。

SCI 论文投稿全过程(Elsevier在线投递)

1.投稿前询问(p r e s u b m i s s i o n i n q u i r i e s)为了节省时间,一些杂志要求作者在投稿前先询问杂志编辑对论文内容是否感兴趣。询问时提交的材料包括重要性介绍(可用coverletter内容)和论文摘要。编辑也许会很快邀请您递交完整的论文(这并不意味着发表的任何承诺),或许告诉您这篇论 文不适合在该杂志发表。如果确认论文重要,即使编辑有否定的回复,作者也可以继续向该杂志投稿。 2.投稿信(coverletter) coverletter主要向编辑介绍论文题目、主要内容,突出论文的创新性和价值,希望发表在个该杂志的什么栏目或类型,为什么要发表这篇论文,声明没有一稿两投。还可以简要指出目前该领域的发展方向,说明该杂志什么领域的读者群对这篇论文感兴趣。 例如:“Wewouldliketosubmitourmanuscript“xxxxxxxx(manuscripttitle)”foryourreviewandconsiderationforpublicationinthexxx(journalname)Journala sa“xxxx(papertype)”.Thismanuscriptdescribesoriginalwork,。 3.准备论文(preparationformanuscript) 多数杂志要求双倍行距,每一部分最好另起一页,具体格式依据各杂志“投稿须知(Instructionsforauthors)”中的要求而定。论文修改定稿之前要仔细阅读所投杂志的“投稿须知”,规定了杂志的范围、论文类型、提交方式、审稿过程、格式要求、版权转让等信息。 标题页(titlepage):包括题目(title)、作者(author)、单位(institution)、通讯作者信息(correspondingauthor)、大标题(runninghead)、统计数据(字数、页码、图表数)、资金来源(grantorsupport)等。

SCI论文投稿全过程信件模板

SCI 投稿全过程信件模板一览 一、最初投稿Cover letter Dear Editors: We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed. In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”. The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration: 1) Name A E-mail: ××××@×××× 2) Name B E-mail: ××××@×××× We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have a ny queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below. Thank you and best regards. Yours sincerely, ×××××× Corresponding author: Name: ××× E-mail: ××××@×××× 二、催稿信 Dear Prof. ×××: Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not? I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments. Thank you very much for your consideration. Best regards! Yours sincerely, ×××××× Corresponding author: Name: ××× E-mail: ××××@×××× 三、修改稿Cover letter Dear Dr/ Prof..(写上负责你文章编辑的姓名,显得尊重,因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑,只能用通用的Editors): On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).

关于SCI论文投稿,你得注意这些

关于SCI论文投稿,你得注意这些 好不容易写好文章,撸起袖子看准了一个杂志,准备投稿时,突然发现杂志要求太多了,Cover Letter就不用说了,还有什么Running Head,Checklist,Reviewer suggestions等等一系列的附件,而且大多都是必须上传的,那么这些附件是什么,而且到底应该写些什么、怎么写呢?下面我们来分享关于投稿附件中的那些事儿。 一、Cover Letter 简言之,Cover Letter就是需要将文章介绍给杂志编辑。当然Cover Letter需要包含的内容包括以下几点: 1.表明以什么为题的文章拟投贵杂志,简要介绍文章的主要发现和重要意义; 2.表明所有作者均已经知晓拟投本期刊,且没有一稿多投; 3.最后附上通讯作者的电话、邮箱、地址等信息。 一般来说Cover Letter只需要这三部分,但是如果有些杂志的Cover Letter有特殊要求,比如要求表明是否已经有审稿人已经审阅过、要求表明伦理规范等,那就需要适时在第二部

分进行添加和描述。 二、Running Head Running Head可以翻译成短标题,就是在原来的题目上进一步简明,一般限制在50个字符。这样的Running Head在最终出版的时候一般会放在每一页的最上方,目的是让读者一目了然这篇文章大概是讲什么。 那么如何能让人看到Running Head就有读下去的兴趣和冲动,这里面的学问还是有讲究的。有些期刊硬性要求是Running Head必须不超过50个字符,且每一个字母都应该为大写形式。 Running Head应该是一个意思完整并通顺的短语,因为Running Head来源于文章题目,如果文章标题本身就很简短,那么直接用文章标题作为Running Head;如果文章题目较长,那么就进行归纳,所以好的文章题目也就是Running Head取得成功的一半了。其他需要注意的就是冠词去掉是否通顺、是否表达恰当的小问题了。

SCI论文写作全攻略——修回与退稿(转载)

SCI论文写作全攻略——修回与退稿(转载) 一、正确对待审稿意见和退稿: 国际核心刊物的审稿人大多是各领域权威学者,杂志出版社经常征询编委意见,选择最佳审稿队伍。审稿是无报酬的,审稿人的工作态度大多极其认真。因此,对审稿意见要十分尊重,对每一条批评和建议,都要认真分析,并据此修改论文。自己认为不正确的意见,要极其慎重和认真地回答,有理有据地与审稿人探讨。 如何对待杂志拒文,是作者犯难的问题。这里必须分析被拒绝的理由。第一类拒绝是“完全的拒绝”,主编通常会表达个意见,对这类文章永远不愿再看到,再寄送这类文章是没有意义的;第二是文章包含某些有用数据和信息,主编拒绝是因数据或分析有严重缺陷,这类文章不妨先放一放,等找到更广泛的证据支持或有了更明晰的结论后,再将经过修改的“新”文章寄给同一杂志,主编通常会考虑重新受理该文。 有审稿人抱怨,个别中国作者在论文被一家杂志拒绝后又原封不动地寄给另外一家杂志,而他们再次被邀请审稿并对此非常反感,论文理所当然地被拒绝。《宇宙物理学》(The,Astrophysical,Journal)的科学主编Thomas提出:“论文被一家杂志拒绝后不经修改,又寄给另一个杂志,这是很糟的错误。通常,审稿人做了很认真的工作指出论文的问题,并建议修改;如果作者忽视这些忠告,是对时间和努力的真正浪费;同时,寄一篇坏的文章,对作者的科学声望是严重的损害。”影响因子不同的刊物接受论文的标准和要求差别很大。如果被拒论文不是由于文稿中的错误,而是重要性或创新性不够,作者仔细考虑审稿人意见并认真修改文稿后,可以寄给影响因子较低的刊物。 值得注意的是,审稿人由于知识限制和某种成见,甚至学术观点不同,判断错误并建议退稿常会发生。如何处理情况?最近某青年的论文被杂志拒绝,经反复讨论检验,判断审稿人是错误的;为了论文及时发表,我们建议作者礼貌和认真地回信给主编并指出审稿人的错误,要求主编将意见转给审稿人,然后撤回论文再做必要改进,改寄影响因子更高的杂志;结果论文立即接受,并得到很好评价。另篇论文在某重要杂志经两年半才得以发表,主要原因是第一位审稿人对我国向量磁场测量的可靠性提出质疑,不同意发表。通过向权威同事请教和反复思考,我们确认所进行的研究及所采用测量都充分准确可靠;作者花了近两年时间与审稿人讨论,不但论文得以发表,还与审稿者和主编建立了良好关系,论文发表后得到良好的国际引述。 二、投稿后若干事宜:

SCI论文投稿常见状态

SCI 论文投稿常见状态 1. Submitted to Journal 刚提交的状态 2. Manuscript received by Editorial Office 就是你 的文章到了编辑手里了,证明投稿成功 3. With editor 如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择 编 辑,就先到主编那,主编会分派给别的编辑。这当中就会有另两个状态: 1) .Awaiting Editor Assignment 指派责任编 辑 Editor assigned 是把你的文章分给 个编辑处理了。 2) .technical check in progress 检查你的 文章符 不符合期刊投稿要求 3) .Editor Declined Invitation 如果编辑接 手处理 了就会邀请审稿人了。 4. 随后也会有2 种状态 1) . Decision Letter Being Prepared 就是编 辑没

找审稿人就自己决定了,那根据一般经验,对学生来说估计会挂了1)英文太差,编辑让修改。2 )内容太差,要拒了。 除非大牛们直接被接收。 2) . Reviewer(s) invited 找到审稿人了,就 开始 审稿

5. Under review 这应该是一个漫长的等待。当然前面各步骤也可能很慢的,要看编辑的处理情况。 如果被邀请审稿人不想审,就会decline ,编辑 会重 新邀请别的审稿人。 6.R equired Reviews Completed 审稿人的意见已上传,审稿结束,等待编辑决定 7.E valuating Recommendation 评估审稿人的意见,随后你将收到编辑给你的 decision 8.M inor revision/Major revision 这个时候 可以稍微 庆祝一下了,问题不大了,因为有修改就有可能。具体怎么改就不多说了,谦虚谨慎是不可少的。 9.R evision Submitted to Journal 又开始了一 个循 环。 10. Accepted 恭喜了 11. Transfer copyright form 签版权协议 12.u ncorrected proof 等待你校对样稿 13.I n Press, Corrected 文章在印刷中,且该

SCI期刊论文写作的方法和步骤

SCI期刊论文写作的方法和步骤 SCI期刊论文写作的方法和步骤 医学论文是传播精神文明,推进科学发展的载体,是医学科研和临床的书面总结、交流和提高医疗技术水平的重要工具。具体来说医学论文是医药卫生科研工作人员通过科学思维运用书面语言,准确概括医学科研过程,客观表达科学实验或临床观测结果的论证文章。医学论文写作时作者对其学术成果与科技信息运用文字、数据、符号、图表等加以表达的创造性思维活动,同时对其进行概括并上升为理论性的文章。医学论文水平的高低,直接影响科研成果的价值和水平,也是科研工作者能力和作风的具体反应,因此撰写医学论文是医学工作者的基本功之一,也是医学科研不可缺少的组成部分。医学论文属于科技论文的一种,由于医学专业的特点,医学论文写作有其惯用格式和特点。文章将就常见的医学论文写作的有关问题进行简单的阐述。 一、准备资料 资料的准备包括直接和间接资料的收集、资料的整理以及资料的评价与取舍等方面。直接资料的主要有①现有的医药卫生工作记录文件,如病案、健康查体记录、专业防治机构的记录;②经常性的统计报表如疫情报告表、医院工作年报表、职业病报告卡、出生与死亡登记;③专门试验研究或进行特殊检查所得的资料;④实际调查所得的资料如流行病、地方病、职业病的调查等。间接资料的有①参考书包括各种医学教科书、专注学术会议论文集;②期刊;③工具书医学辞典、医学百科全书、年鉴、文献索引、主题索引等。而资料收集的方法主要有:①进行相关的调查;②对研究对象进行持续客观的观察;③进行相关的实验研究,以及④文献检索扥更,其中较为重要的文献检索部分,因为必须对本课题研究的国内外学术动态及相关资料由全面的了解,才能为论文的撰写开拓思路,提供理论依据。具体的做法是根据研究课题选择检索工具,确定检索方法,查阅原始文献,检索过程中应特别注意这几方面的内容:在方法上沿用前人研究结论与已不同需要加以说明的,前人对本文所研究的问题存在争议和正在探讨的。资料的整理过程是对资料进行科学综合以及加工过程,整理原始资料时,要重点保存那些能阐明正式研究涉及中提出的假设或观点部分,是原始资料得以系统化、条理化,其中包括对统计数据的检查审核,分组涉及,归纳汇总,以及图表的应用等。在科研实践中,由于各种主客观原因,收集到的资料难免有失偏颇,这就需要对资料的真实性准确性进行分析和比较,以求去芜存菁,去伪存真。对于资料的评价和取舍,一般会出现三种情况:资料可以说明说明研究结果的;资料基本完整,但不够充分的;与原研究结果基本相悖的。对于最后一种情况需认真对待,应仔细寻找原因,检查设计是否考虑周详,实验方法是否妥当,数据是否可靠,若都不存在,则需要改变思路,建立新的假设,切不可为片面追求符合研究结果而随意丢弃原始数据,主观臆造,因

SCI论文投稿全过程(Elsevier在线投递)

1 .投稿前询问(presubmi ssi oni nqui r i es) 为了节省时间,一些杂志要求作者在投稿前先询问杂志编辑对论文内容是否感兴趣。询问时提交的材料包括重要性介绍(可用coverletter 内容)和论文摘要。编辑也许 会很快邀请您递交完整的论文(这并不意味着发表的任何承诺),或许告诉您这篇论文不适合在该杂志发表。如果确认论文重要,即使编辑有否定的回复,作者也可以继续向该杂志投稿。 2. 投稿信(coverletter) coverletter 主要向编辑介绍论文题目、主要内容,突出论文的创新性和价值,希望发 表在个该杂志的什么栏目或类型,为什么要发表这篇论文,声明没有一稿两投。还可以简要指出目前该领域的发展方向,说明该杂志什么领域的读者群对这篇论文感兴趣。 例女口:“Wewouldliketosubmitourmanuscript “xxxxxxxx(manuscripttitle) ”foryourreviewa ndcon siderati on forpublicatio nin thexxx(journal nameJournala sa “xxxx(papertype) ” .Thismanuscriptdescribesoriginalwork, 。 3. 准备论文(preparati on forma nu script) 多数杂志要求双倍行距,每一部分最好另起一页,具体格式依据各杂志“投稿须知 (In structio nsforauthors) ”中的要求而定。论文修改定稿之前要仔细阅读所投杂 志的“投稿须知”,规定了杂志的范围、论文类型、提交方式、审稿过程、格式要求、版权转让等信息。 标题页(titlepage): 包括题目(title)、作者(author)、单位(institution) 、通讯作者信息(correspondingauthor)、大标题(runninghead)、统计数据(字数、页码、图表

SCI论文投稿发表全攻略

SCI论文投稿发表全攻略 SCI不仅我们国内很多科研工作者的一个很大的追求,也是一个让他们最头疼的重要 问题,下面是搜集整理的SCI论文发表全攻略,欢迎阅读查看。 (一)投稿前准备工作和需要注意的事项: 总结提示语: 1)第一作者和通信作者的区别: 通信作者(Corresponding author)通常是实际统筹处理投稿和承担答复审稿意见等工 作的主导者,也常是稿件所涉及研究工作的负责人。 通信作者的姓名多位列于论文作者名单的最后(使用符号来标识说明是Corresponding author),但其贡献不亚于论文的第一作者。 通讯作者往往指课题的总负责人,负责与编辑部的一切通信联系和接受读者的咨询等。 文章的成果是属于通讯作者的,说明思路是通讯作者的,而不是第一作者。 第一作者仅代表是你做的,且是最主要的参与者! 通信作者标注名称:Corresponding author,To whom correspondence should be addressed,或 The person to whom inquiries regarding the paper should be addressed 若两个以上的作者在地位上是相同的,可以采取“共同第一作者”(joint first author)的 署名方式,并说明These authors contributed equally to the work。 2)作者地址的标署: 尽可能地给出详细通讯地址,邮政编码。有二位或多位作者,则每一不同的地址应按之中出现的先后顺序列出,并以相应上标符号的形式列出与相应作者的关系。 如果第一作者不是通讯作者,作者应该按期刊的相关规定表达,并提前告诉编辑。期刊大部分以星号(*)、脚注或者致谢形式标注通讯联系人。 3)挑选审稿人的几个途径: 很多SCI杂志都需要作者自己提出该篇论文的和您研究领域相关的审稿人,比较常见的是三名左右,也有的杂志要求5-8人。介绍几个方法: ①利用SCI、SSCI、A&HCI、ISTP检索和您研究相关的科学家;

写作sci论文投稿回复信

写作sci论文投稿回复信 1.感谢到底原则 对于审稿人的意见,不论对错,都要先表示感谢及肯定。俗话说,“礼多人不怪”,先把礼数做足了,再来与审稿人讨论comments的对错。写作sci论文回复信开头、回复信正文,信件最后结束语都要体现出我们的感恩之心,一谢到底。另外,有个铁一样的原则是:编辑们的意见要百分百的遵守并执行,没有讨价还价的余地。 2. 毛举缕析原则 具体说来就是要达到:审稿人不需要看修改稿,只需看回复信即可清楚了解作者几乎所有的修改,包括修改后的图、表、加入的参考文献,每个修改的前后句子及其所属的页、段及行数。如果关于写作sci论文修改太多,我们无法在回复信中一一展示时,也要举几个改动大的例子。 3.一条不少原则 所有问题必须逐条认认真真回答。Point-by-point,one by one。即使两个审稿人的意见是重复的也要分别回答,详细具体。各审稿人的问题和我们的回复要显著区分开。凡是缺点我们都要逐个改正,凡是夸奖,我们都要一一感谢。 另外,附上几个写作sci论文常用的感谢词,供大家参考: Thanksfor your kind suggestion Weare very sorry for our poor English. Thankyou very much for your comments and suggestions. Thankyou for your technical review. Withall due respect to the reviewer, we felt that this point is not correct. 写作sci论文相关知识,请关注【辑文编译】高质量的sci论文发表网。广州【辑文编译】汇聚了来自全球着名100多所顶尖高等教育学府的600多名各专业博士团队的雄厚学术力量,主要为非英语国家科研工作者提供SCI论文写作发表﹑医学论文润色编辑和各类科研设计相关服务。

SCI论文投稿全过程Elsevier在线投递

1. 投稿前询问( presubmission inquiries) 为了节省时间,一些杂志要求作者在投稿前先询问杂志编辑对论文内容是否感兴趣。询问时提交的材料包括重要性介绍(可用cover letter 内容) 和论文摘要。编辑也许会很快邀请您递交完整的论文(这并不意味着发表的任何承诺) ,或许告诉您这篇论文不适合在该杂志发表。如果确认论文重要,即使编辑有否定的回复,作者也可以继续向该杂志投稿。 2. 投稿信( cover letter) cover letter 主要向编辑介绍论文题目、主要内容,突出论文的创新性和价值,希望发表在个该杂志的什么栏目或类型,为什么要发表这篇论文,声明没有一稿两投。还可以简要指出目前该领域的发展方向,说明该杂志什么领域的读者群对这篇论文感兴趣。 例如:“We would like to submit our manuscript“xxxxxxxx ( manuscript title ) ”for your review and consideration for publication in the xxx ( journal name) Journal as a “xxxx ( paper type ) ”. This manuscript describes original work ,and neither the entire nor any part of its content has been published previously or has been accepted elsewhere. It is not being submitted to any other journal and all authors have read the manuscript and approved to submit to your journal . We believe the manuscript may be of particular interest to the readers of your journal as it is the first time to introduce the ???”。 3. 准备论文( preparation for manuscript)

相关文档
最新文档