差异基因 GO分析

差异基因 GO分析
差异基因 GO分析

Analysis of differentially expressed genes in placental tissues of preeclampsia patients using microarray combined with

the Connectivity Map database

Y.Song a,J.Liu a,*,S.Huang a,L.Zhang b

a Department of Obstetrics&Gynecology,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Science,Peking Union Medical College, Beijing,PR China

b BioChain(Beijing)Science&Technology Inc.,No.7A,Yongchang North Rd,Business Development Area,Beijing,PR China

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:

Accepted19September2013

Keywords:

Preeclampsia

Microarray

Expression pro?les Connectivity Map database a b s t r a c t

Preeclampsia(PE),which affects2e7%of human pregnancies,causes signi?cant maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.To better understand the pathophysiology of PE,the gene expression pro?les of placental tissue from5controls and5PE patients were assessed using microarray.A total of224tran-scripts were signi?cantly differentially expressed(>2-fold change and q value<0.05,SAM software). Gene Ontology(GO)enrichment analysis indicated that genes involved in hypoxia and oxidative and reductive processes were signi?cantly changed.Three differentially expressed genes(DEGs)involved in these biological processes were further veri?ed by quantitative real-time PCR.Finally,the potential therapeutic agents for PE were explored via the Connectivity Map database.In conclusion,the data obtained in this study might provide clues to better understand the pathophysiology of PE and to identify potential therapeutic agents for PE patients.

ó2013Elsevier Ltd.All rights reserved.

1.Introduction

One of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity amongst pregnant women and their offspring is PE,which affects2e7%of all pregnancies,depending on the diagnostic criteria and the patients’ethnicity[1].PE is generally de?ned as new hyperten-sion and substantial proteinuria at or after20weeks gestation.It is generally accepted that PE involves two pathophysiological stages.The?rst stage occurs when impaired trophoblasts invade the myometrial arteries,leading to reduced uteroplacental arte-rial?ow and episodes of irregular placental perfusion,followed by ischemic hypoxia and oxidative stress.The second stage of PE is thought to be the maternal response to abnormal placentation. An intrinsic failure in trophoblast differentiation at different time points of ontogeny may lead to either a mild disorder with late-onset appearance or to intrauterine growth retardation,poten-tially complicated with maternal symptoms[2].Systemic endothelial dysfunction appears to be an important common factor[3,4].

Despite breakthroughs in the understanding of the patho-genesis of PE,the mechanisms that ultimately trigger the disease are still not clearly elucidated[5].It seems clear that the development of PE requires the placenta,given that PE can occur in molar pregnancies wherein a placenta,but no fetus,is present.Furthermore,the only effective treatment of PE is de-livery of the placenta[6,7].Previous studies also showed that PE has a strong familial predisposition,and it has been concluded that a hereditary element may exist.Therefore,it is clinically useful to compare the gene expression pro?les of placentas with and without PE to better understand the pathophysiology of this disease and to aid in the development of new therapies [8,9].

Microarray technology is a powerful tool for simultaneously assessing the expression of a high number of genes and to pinpoint the patterns of gene expression associated with a disease[10].To date,a number of microarray studies have been conducted on the global gene expression pro?les of the PE placenta,and several important genes have been identi?ed using this strategy[11e18]. However,a comparison of different studies performed using DNA microarrays has shown poor overlap,and therefore,only a minority of DEGs are shared between these studies.The resulting differences may be due to the diverse genetic backgrounds of the study pop-ulation,the use of different platforms and protocols,and the impact of individual differences on expression signatures[16].Therefore, to better understand the events leading to PE,it is necessary to

*Corresponding author.

E-mail address:juntao_liu@https://www.360docs.net/doc/fe7107863.html,(J.

Liu).Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Placenta

journal homepage:www.elsev https://www.360docs.net/doc/fe7107863.html,/locat e/placen

ta

0143-4004/$e see front matteró2013Elsevier Ltd.All rights reserved.

https://www.360docs.net/doc/fe7107863.html,/10.1016/j.placenta.2013.09.013

Placenta34(2013)1190e1195

continue the search for genes involved in the pathophysiology of the disease.

The Connectivity Map(CMAP)is a collection of genome-wide transcriptional expression data collected from cultured human cells treated with bioactive small molecules.Its purpose is to identify associations between gene expression pro?les due to the disease state and drug treatment state.The biological connection between disease and drug treatment states can be established by comparing the genome-wide expression pro?ling of the two states. Despite the fact that CAMP was established on cultured cell lines due to the ease of such an operation,wherein DEGs were identi?ed by comparing the microarray hybridization signal between drug-treated cell lines and controls,CAMP was also found to be an ef?-cacious method to query the DEGs originating from disease tissues vs.control tissues.It is believed that the strategy of using ratio values can diminish any sample differences.For example,if the gene-expression signature of a small molecular compound is found to be the opposite of that characterizing a disease state,then the compound might be used as a drug to treat that disease.CMAP has previously been used to discover mechanisms of drug action and disease pathogenesis,as well as to identify new potential thera-peutics[19e22].

To explore novel genes involved in the development of PE in the Chinese Han population,as well as to seek potential therapeutic agents for PE,we generated a global gene expression pro?le via DNA oligonucleotide microarrays for placental tissues from PE and control pregnancy tissues.Moreover,the resultant PE gene expression signature was used in silico by employing CMAP analysis to identify therapeutic agents that could potentially be effective against this disease.

2.Materials and methods

2.1.Patient clinical de?nitions

This case-control study was approved by the local ethics committee.Placental samples were collected from women whose pregnancies were complicated by se-vere preeclampsia(n?5)and from women without PE(n?5)at Peking Union Medical College Hospital.Given that gene expression in placental tissues may be in?uenced by gestational age and uterine contractions,we chose5preterm controls complicated with premature rupture of membranes(PROM).All?ve control cases were in good condition before PROM.After fetal lung maturating,C-sections were performed due to malpresentation(n?4)and previous C-section(n?1).None of the mothers were in https://www.360docs.net/doc/fe7107863.html,plete blood count and C-reactive protein monitoring showed no signs of infection prior to C-section.Bacterial cultures of uterine cavity swabs during operation were negative.Severe preeclampsia was de?ned as blood pressure!160/100mmHg,measured at least6h apart,in combination with pro-teinuria!3g/24h or!2t(dipstick),developing after20weeks of pregnancy. Women who had a history of cardiovascular,renal,and other hypertension-associated diseases were excluded;however,family history of PE was not recor-ded.C-sections were performed in all preeclampsia cases due to medical indications. All patients provided informed consent for the study.Patient data are summarized in Table1.2.2.Sample collection

Placental biopsies were obtained immediately after deliveries.Samples of approximately0.2e0.5cm3were excised from central cotyledons close to the um-bilical cord to reduce the possible bias due to regional differences in gene expres-sion.After extensive washing in saline solution to remove excess blood,the samples were stored in RNAlater reagent(Qiagen,Valencia,CA,USA).

2.3.RNA extraction from tissue samples

Total RNA was extracted from placental tissues using Trizol reagent(Life Tech-nologies,Gaithersburg,MD,USA).RNA quality was evaluated using formaldehyde agarose gel electrophoresis and was quanti?ed via spectrophotometry(NanoDrop, Wilmington,DE,USA).

2.4.Microarray analysis

RNA was ampli?ed and labeled according to a previous protocol.Brie?y,total RNA was used to synthesize the double stranded cDNA.RNA was ampli?ed by in vitro transcription using Ambion’s MessageAmp?II aRNA Ampli?cation Kits(Life Tech-nologies,Austin,TX,USA).Then,aRNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA and further labeled with Klenow enzyme.cDNA from PE placental tissue was labeled with Cy5-dCTP,and cDNA from control placental tissue was labeled with Cy3-dCTP. Fluorescent dye-labeled cDNA was hybridized to an Agilent SurePrint G3Human GE 8?60K Microarray(Agilent Technologies,Santa Clara,CA,USA).Hybridization, scanning and washing were performed on Agilent’s Microarray Platform according to Agilent’s standard protocols.The array data were analyzed with Agilent Feature Extraction software.Although the dual-color microarray method was adopted here, which can save microarray slides,we extracted the single channel intensity instead of the ratio value from each dual-color slide for DEGs analysis.The strategy to extract hybridization signals from dual-color microarray for DEGs analysis has been re-ported in a few previous studies[23,24].

After global mean normalization,probes with an intensity<400were?ltered out for further analysis.SAM(Signi?cance analysis of microarrays)software[25]was used to identify DEGs with a threshold set at a fold change>2and a q value<0.05. DEGs were further analyzed with function enrichment of the GO terms using R language package software.

2.5.Validation of differentially expressed genes

To validate the results of the microarray,ten DEGs involved in oxidative stress were selected for analysis by quantitative real-time PCR(qRT-PCR).Total RNA used in the microarray analysis was treated with DNase,and1m g of DNase-treated RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA with oligo(dT)15using M-MLV reverse tran-scriptase(Life Technologies)in a total volume of20m L.After the reverse tran-scription reaction,1m L of the reaction mixture was used for a qPCR program of45 cycles consisting of melting(30s at94 C),annealing(30s at58 C)and extension (30s at72 C).The20m L reaction mixture contained1?PCR Buffer(Mg2tPlus), 0.5m M forward primer0.5m M reverse primer,200m M of each dNTP,and Eva Green Master Mix in a LightCyclerò480Real-Time PCR System(Roche Applied Science). The primers in this assay were designed with the primer software version5.0and

Table1

Maternal and fetal clinical characteristics.

Characteristic Controls(n?5)Preeclampsia

patients(n?5)

P value

Maternal age,years30.6?3.626.6?5.40.208 Gestational age,weeks32.0?1.931.7?3.10.854 Prepregnancy body mass index22.6?2.124.2?3.20.760 Body mass index at delivery27.8?2.829.9?3.30.344 Systolic blood pressure,mmHg121?8168?11<0.001 Diastolic blood pressure,mmHg68?9113?6<0.001 24h Proteinuria(g)Not tested 6.5?3.2e Proteinuria(dipstick)Negativettt<0.001 Multipara22 1.000 Nullipara33 1.000 Fetal sex:male/female5/04/1 1.000 Infant birth weight(g)1886?5811482?7450.367 Small for gestational age030.167Table2

Primers used for quantitative real-time RT-PCR.

Gene symbol Sequences(50e30)Product sizes(bp)

FLT1F GTCAGTCCAAGAAGTGACACCG150

R GTTACACCACTGTCGGCCAA

LEP F CTGCTCTGGAAAATGTGACCC248

R CGCCATCTAGTGACCTTGTGAT

CXCL12F TCCAAATCCCCTAAGCAGACC177

R CCTTCTCCTGGACCATTTTCAC

SLC8A1F AAAGCTAGCCTAGAAGCACCAA163

R TGAAATCGACCAATGCAAGAA

TFRC F TGGTTCGGGTGTTACGCA181

R CAGGAATATTGAGCCTGTTAGCA

CYBB F CACTTAGGTCCAGCCTGTTCAC177

R TAGAAAGGGCCAATATTCTCAGA

SH3PXD2A F CCAGAATCAATGGTGGTGCTAA168

R CCAAAGAGTCCCGTCAAAGTG

CD36F AAACGGCTGCAGGTCAACC186

R CATTTCTATCAGGCCAAGGAGG

CYP11A1F TCAACCTCATTCTGATGCCTG161

R GGGACAGACGACTGAAGATGC

SEPP1F ACTGAAAGGTGATTGCAGCTTT151

R TCTTTGTTGTTCTTCCTCCATTC

b-actin F CCATCGTCCACCGCAAAT194

R GCTGTCACCTTCACCGTTC

F:forward primer;R:reverse primer.

Y.Song et al./Placenta34(2013)1190e11951191

were synthesized by Invitrogen (Invitrogen,Beijing,China),as shown in Table 2.Data were analyzed by the 2àDD Ct method.b -actin was used as a reference gene.All other results are shown as fold-change relative to the b -actin https://www.360docs.net/doc/fe7107863.html,parison of gene expression pro ?les with the CMAP database

The DEGs of PE and control placental tissues were used to query the CMAP database (build 02),which contains more than 7000expression pro ?les representing 1309compounds [26].The similarity between the gene expression pro ?le of the query signature and that of a CMAP instance is measured by the connectivity score,which ranges from à1to 1.A high positive connectivity score indicates that the corre-sponding drug induces the expression of the query signature.A high negative con-nectivity score indicates that the corresponding drug reverses the expression of the query signature.Prior to the query in the CMAP database via the Internet (https://www.360docs.net/doc/fe7107863.html,/cmap ),the probe ID of Agilent SurePrint G3Human GE 8?60K Microarray was transformed into the probe ID de ?ned by the AffymetrixGeneChip Human Genome U133A array according to the probe ’s corresponding gene.

3.Results 3.1.DEGs in PE

We compared the global gene expression pro ?les of placental tissues from the PEs and controls using oligonucleotide micro-arrays.The original microarray data were submitted to GEO with an accession number of GSE47187.After normalization,DEGs were assessed using one class analysis in the SAM software,with the signi ?cance threshold set to fold changes greater than 2.0and a q value less than 0.05.A total of 224transcripts were identi ?ed as

being signi ?cantly differentially expressed (a full list of DEGs is presented in the Supplementary Material ).The heat map of DEGs is shown in Fig.1.Of these DEGs,91genes were up-regulated,and 133genes were down-regulated in PE placentas compared to control placentas.Speci ?cally,LEPTIN,FLT1,CRH,INHBA,INHA,BCL6,and pappalysin 2were signi ?cantly up-regulated in the PE group,which is consistent with their previously described association with this disease.After function enrichment analysis,the top three signi ?-cantly functional group genes that explain the molecular mecha-nisms of PE were found to be involved in immune response,in ?ammatory response and chemotaxis.We also found that genes involved in oxidative stress were signi ?cantly changed.These genes are listed in Table 3.

3.2.Validation of DEGs using qRT-PCR

To further validate the microarray results,especially the func-tional genes involved in oxidative stress as identi ?ed by microarray,ten of the DEGs related to oxidative stress were chosen for further validation using quantitative RT-PCR.The ratio of the average expression levels of each gene between the PE placentas and control placental tissues was measured using the same batch of samples used in the microarray.As shown in Fig.2,fold changes measured by microarray were closely correlated with those measured by quanti-tative RT-PCR,which con ?rmed that large differences in gene expression are present between the PE and control https://www.360docs.net/doc/fe7107863.html,parison of gene expression pro ?les with the CMAP database

To better understand the pathogenesis of PE and to identify potential therapeutic agents,the DEGs were used to compare the expression signatures of 1309compounds in the CMAP

database.

Fig.1.Heat map of the 224genes that were signi ?cantly increased and decreased in ?ve preeclamptic placentas,as compared with ?ve control placentas (fold change >2and q <0.05in the SAM software).The red color indicates up-regulation and green indicates down-regulation.

Table 3

List of altered genes related with oxidative stresses.Gene symbol Fold change GO molecular function FLT1

8.6

GO:0001666(response to hypoxia);GO:0008284

(positive regulation of cell proliferation);GO:0045766(positive regulation of angiogenesis)

LEP 124.5

GO:0001666(response to hypoxia);GO:0001819

(positive regulation of cytokine production);GO:0008284(positive regulation of cell proliferation)

CXCL120.27

GO:0001666(response to hypoxia);GO:0006955

(immune response);GO:0006874(cellular calcium ion homeostasis);GO:0008284(positive regulation of cell proliferation)

SLC8A10.49

GO:0001666(response to hypoxia);GO:0006874(cellular calcium ion homeostasis);GO:0042542(response to hydrogen peroxide)

TFRC 0.39GO:0001666(response to hypoxia);GO:0010035(response to inorganic substance)

CYBB

0.36

GO:0006954(in ?ammatory response);GO:0006801(superoxide metabolic process);GO:0022900(electron transport chain)

SH3PXD2A 2.5GO:0006801(superoxide metabolic process);GO:0007154(cell communication)

CD36

0.46

GO:2000121(regulation of removal of superoxide radicals);GO:0007263(nitric oxide mediated signal transduction);GO:2000379(positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic process)CYP11A1 2.7GO:0042542(response to hydrogen peroxide);GO:0042493(response to drug)

SLC8A1

0.49

GO:0001666(response to hypoxia);GO:0006874(cellular calcium ion homeostasis);GO:0042542(response to hydrogen peroxide)

SEPP10.34

GO:0006979(response to oxidative stress)

GO:gene ontology.

Y.Song et al./Placenta 34(2013)1190e 1195

1192

The similarity of the gene expression pro ?le between the query signature and that of a CMAP instance was measured by the con-nectivity score,which ranges from à1to 1.A connection score of c ?1signi ?es that the gene signature has the maximum positive connection strength with the reference pro ?le,which indicates that the experimental condition that gives rise to this gene signature had the strongest possible correlation with the reference pro ?le.A connection score of c ?à1indicates that the two experimental permutations were most inversely correlated.Because we intended to screen drugs that can reverse the disease status,we identi ?ed ?ve compounds,cinchonine,hesperidin,probenecid,nifuroxazide and primidone,with an average connectivity scores less than à0.7(listed in Table 4),indicating their potential molecular signatures that may counteract that of PE.4.Discussion

The present study represents a comprehensive analysis of the expression pro ?les of placental tissues from ?ve patients with PE and ?ve healthy controls,and the ?ndings provide further valida-tion of signi ?cant DEGs using quantitative real-time RT-PCR.We identi ?ed 91genes that were up-regulated and 131genes that were down-regulated in PE placentas,compared to control placentas.GO enrichment analysis revealed that these genes were involved in regulating the immune response,in ?ammatory response,chemo-taxis,and hypoxia response,among other actions.These ?ndings not only add to a growing body of literature demonstrating dys-regulated genes and biological pathways in PE pregnancies,but it also provides the basis for the identi ?cation of new biomarkers in PE that are worthy of future in-depth studies to elucidate their roles in PE.

Microarray technology has been widely used for identifying genes responsible for PE.These studies identi ?ed many genes associated with PE;however,the results of the different studies have shown varying degrees of overlap,which highlights the heterogeneity of PE.Potential explanations for the discrepancies include differences in maternal ethnicities,as well as variations in platforms and protocols [16].In addition,the placental sam-ples from the previous studies are mainly derived from Caucasian subjects [27].As the rates of PE are lower among Asian women compared to Caucasian women,it would be worth repeating the expression pro ?le analysis with placentas from Chinese women.As expected,our studies identi ?ed many of the same genes as highlighted by previous studies,such as LEPTIN,FLT1,CRH,INHBA,INHA,BCL6,and pappalysin 2.However,the CXCL12and CXCL9

genes that were reported previously to be up-regulated in PE [28,29]were identi ?ed as down-regulated genes in our present analysis.This discrepancy may be due to the complexity of the placenta.The placental samples consisted mainly of trophoblasts,as well as blood vessels,macrophages and ?broblasts.The dif-ferences in CXCL12expression between the present study and other experiments may re ?ect the different tissue components involved.In addition,the DEGs in PE placentas,which are known to be affected by oxidative stress,were also identi ?ed.These genes included SLC8A1,TFRC,CYBB,SH3PXD2A,CD36,CYP11A1,and SEPP1.Our results are consistent with previous studies and may highlight an important role for oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of PE [30].

The pathogenesis of PE,which represents a serious pregnancy complication,is not fully understood;however,it is obvious that oxidative stress and in ?ammation are important mechanisms in the development of this disease [6].Therefore,antioxidant sup-plementation or anti-in ?ammatory agents may be potential treatments for prevention or amelioration of PE.One small trial has evaluated high doses of vitamins C and E as anti-oxidant agents for prevention of PE [31].Unfortunately,the bene ?ts of these treatments were not con ?rmed in several subsequent studies [32,33].Therefore,new methods of preventing PE are still needed.

Increased uric acid level is also a key clinical feature of PE.Higher levels of uric acid are positively correlated with signi ?cant maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality [34,35].Because high levels of uric acid can promote in ?ammation,oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction,the hypothesis that hyperuricemia con-tributes to vascular damage in PE is generally accepted [34],despite the fact that its speci ?c role in the pathogenesis of PE remains unclear.

In this study,we employed CMAP analysis to identify potential therapeutic agents for PE.These agents would reverse the gene expression signature of PE placental tissue to control levels.The top ?ve compounds that demonstrated opposite correlations with DEGs in PE vs.control placentas include cinchonine,hesper-idin,probenecid,nifuroxazide and primidone.Hesperidin is one

of

https://www.360docs.net/doc/fe7107863.html,parison of gene expression changes obtained with microarray and quan-titative real time RT-PCR.

Table 4

The top ?ve agents showing highly negative correlations with PE in the CMAP database.Rank Agent P value a Score

Speci ?city b Function

1Cinchonine 0.00034à0.8890.0062It has been used for treatment of malaria 2

Hesperidin

0.00064à0.8630

It acts as an antioxidant and also can reduced cholesterol and blood pressure

3Probenecid 0.00131à0.8350

It increases uric acid excretion in the urine and was primarily used in treating gout and hyperuricemia.

4Nifuroxazide 0.00328à0.7980.0213It was used to treat colitis and diarrhea 5

Primidone

0.00559à0.7710

It is a mainstay anticonvulsant in

the treatment of partial and generalized seizures

a

The two tailed p value was calculated between a random gene signature and the speci ?c gene signature in CMAP database,which indicated the proportion of random connection scores that are greater than the observed score [45].b

Speci ?city is an estimate of the uniqueness of the connectivity between the interrogated gene signature and a speci ?c gene signature in CMAP.High speci ?city scores indicate that the extent of connectivity found between the interrogated in-stances and the interested signature in CMAP is unexceptional and/or the investi-gated agents have multiple biological effects.

Y.Song et al./Placenta 34(2013)1190e 11951193

the most abundant natural?avonoids[36]and has anti-in?ammatory and analgesic activities[37].Some reports indicate that hesperidin could also prevent oxidant injury by several mechanisms,such as scavenging for oxygen radicals,protecting against lipid peroxidation and chelating metal ions[38].Currently, it remains unclear whether vitamins C and E can prevent PE.One matter of debate is the optimal antioxidant dose.For daily sup-plements,40mg/day,45mg/day and60e95mg/day vitamin C are recommended by UK Food Standards Agency,World Health Orga-nization and US National Academy of Science,respectively.How-ever,some studies demonstrated that the lower doses of vitamin C were not con?rmed as effective antioxidants,whereas the higher doses are effective.Levine and colleagues reported an improve-ment in endothelium-dependent vasodilation after administration of2000mg/day ascorbic acid[39],but kinetic studies show that plasma saturation occurs at1000mg/day[40].Polidori and col-leagues also reported that plasma and body saturation with 1000mg/day vitamin C in humans appears desirable to maximize antioxidant protection and lower risk of oxidative damage[41]. These?ndings suggest that the sole intake of a higher dose of vitamin C above1000mg/day does not increase the ascorbic acid concentration in plasma.Interestingly,a previous study has shown that certain?avonoids increase the biological value of ascorbic acid [42].Another study also showed that a daily supplement consisting of a commercial bio?avonoid mixture,at a dose of200mg three times a day for a month,resulted in a signi?cant increase in the ratio of reduced to oxidized ascorbic acid in pregnant women compared to controls,who received lactose placebo capsules[43]. One potential explanation for this?nding is that?avonoids can increase ascorbic acid storage.A second explanation is that?avo-noids may reduce the absorption of heavy metal ions or increase the levels of reduced glutathione.Therefore,it is interesting to consider the possibility that a combination of vitamin C and?a-vonoids can increase the biological value of vitamin C in PE clinical management.

CMAP analysis also indicated that probenecid showed an opposite correlation with DEGs in PE vs.control tissues.Probenecid restrains the active reabsorption of urate in the renal tubular,in-creases the excretion of urate,and reduces the concentration of urate in the blood.Thus,probenecid can promote the excretion of uric acid and reduce the deposition of uric acid in serum[44].The CMAP analysis found that the two compounds that are most effective in reversing the PE phenotype were also related to in?ammation,oxidation or hyperuricemia.These data indirectly imply that genes involved in oxidative stress and in?ammation also play an important role in PE pathophysiology.However,given the design principles of CMAP,potential compounds were identi?ed based on similarity comparisons of gene expression signatures. Therefore,the method is,so far,unable to identify genes that are key-points of pathogenesis or therapeutic targets.

In conclusion,we identi?ed a DEGs signature in PE using Chinese Han placental tissues.These observations con?rm and expand upon the current knowledge of the pathophysiology of PE and may provide the basis for developing novel diagnostic bio-markers of PE to improve reproductive outcomes.We also used the CMAP to identify compounds with molecular signatures that can counteract those of PE.The expression pro?ling,combined with the CMAP analysis,suggest possible therapeutic agents for clinical trials to develop novel prevention strategies and treat-ments for PE.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China(81100446).Appendix A.Supplementary data

Supplementary data related to this article can be found at http:// https://www.360docs.net/doc/fe7107863.html,/10.1016/j.placenta.2013.09.013.

References

[1]Steegers EA,von Dadelszen P,Duvekot JJ,Pijnenborg https://www.360docs.net/doc/fe7107863.html,ncet

2010;376(9741):631e44.

[2]Huppertz B.Placental origins of preeclampsia:challenging the current hy-

pothesis.Hypertension2008;51(4):970e5.

[3]Roberts JM,Cooper DW.Pathogenesis and genetics of https://www.360docs.net/doc/fe7107863.html,ncet

2001;357(9249):53e6.

[4]Sun CJ,Zhang L,Zhang WY.Gene expression pro?ling of maternal blood in

early onset severe preeclampsia:identi?cation of novel biomarkers.J Perinat Med2009;37(6):609e16.

[5]James JL,Whitley GS,Cartwright JE.Pre-eclampsia:?tting together the

placental,immune and cardiovascular pieces.J Pathol2010;221(4):363e78.

[6]Young BC,Levine RJ,Karumanchi SA.Pathogenesis of preeclampsia.Ann Rev

Pathol2010;5:173e92.

[7]Kajii T,Ohama K.Androgenetic origin of hydatidiform mole.Nature

1977;268(5621):633e4.

[8]Salonen Ros H,Lichtenstein P,Lipworth L,Cnattingius S.Genetic effects on the

liability of developing pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension.Am J Med Genet2000;91(4):256e60.

[9]Moses EK,Fitzpatrick E,Freed KA,Dyer TD,Forrest S,Elliott K,et al.Objective

prioritization of positional candidate genes at a quantitative trait locus for pre-eclampsia on2q22.Mol Hum Reprod2006;12(8):505e12.

[10]Schadt EE,Zhang B,Zhu J.Advances in systems biology are enhancing our

understanding of disease and moving us closer to novel disease treatments.

Genetica2009;136(2):259e69.

[11]Centlow M,Wingren C,Borrebaeck C,Brownstein MJ,Hansson SR.Differential

gene expression analysis of placentas with increased vascular resistance and pre-eclampsia using whole-genome microarrays.J Pregnancy2011;2011: 472354.

[12]Han JY,Kim YS,Cho GJ,Roh GS,Kim HJ,Choi WJ,et al.Altered gene expression

of caspase-10,death receptor-3and IGFBP-3in preeclamptic placentas.Mol Cells2006;22(2):168e74.

[13]Gack S,Marme A,Marme F,Wrobel G,Vonderstrass B,Bastert G,et al.Pre-

eclampsia:increased expression of soluble ADAM12.J Mol Med(Berl) 2005;83(11):887e96.

[14]Heikkila A,Tuomisto T,Hakkinen SK,Keski-Nisula L,Heinonen S,Yla-

Herttuala S.Tumor suppressor and growth regulatory genes are overex-pressed in severe early-onset preeclampsia e an array study on case-speci?c human preeclamptic placental tissue.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84(7):679e89.

[15]Herse F,Dechend R,Harsem NK,Wallukat G,Janke J,Qadri F,et al.Dysre-

gulation of the circulating and tissue-based renin-angiotensin system in preeclampsia.Hypertension2007;49(3):604e11.

[16]Kang JH,Song H,Yoon JA,Park DY,Kim SH,Lee KJ,et al.Preeclampsia leads to

dysregulation of various signaling pathways in placenta.J Hypertens 2011;29(5):928e36.

[17]Nishizawa H,Ota S,Suzuki M,Kato T,Sekiya T,Kurahashi H,et https://www.360docs.net/doc/fe7107863.html,parative

gene expression pro?ling of placentas from patients with severe pre-eclampsia and unexplained fetal growth restriction.Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2011;9:107.

[18]Meng T,Chen H,Sun M,Wang H,Zhao G,Wang X.Identi?cation of differential

gene expression pro?les in placentas from preeclamptic pregnancies versus normal pregnancies by DNA microarrays.OMICS2012;16(6):301e11. [19]Fayad W,Fryknas M,Brnjic S,Olofsson MH,Larsson R,Linder S.Identi?cation

of a novel topoisomerase inhibitor effective in cells overexpressing drug ef?ux transporters.PLoS One2009;4(10):e7238.

[20]Gheeya J,Johansson P,Chen QR,Dexheimer T,Metaferia B,Song YK,et al.

Expression pro?ling identi?es epoxy anthraquinone derivative as a DNA topoisomerase inhibitor.Cancer Lett2010;293(1):124e31.

[21]Hieronymus H,Lamb J,Ross KN,Peng XP,Clement C,Rodina A,et al.Gene

expression signature-based chemical genomic prediction identi?es a novel class of HSP90pathway modulators.Cancer Cell2006;10(4):321e30.

[22]Slonim DK,Koide K,Johnson KL,Tantravahi U,Cowan JM,Jarrah Z,et al.

Functional genomic analysis of amniotic?uid cell-free mRNA suggests that oxidative stress is signi?cant in Down syndrome fetuses.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2009;106(23):9425e9.

[23]t Hoen PA,Turk R,Boer JM,Sterrenburg E,de Menezes RX,van Ommen GJ,

et al.Intensity-based analysis of two-colour microarrays enables ef?cient and ?exible hybridization designs.Nucleic Acids Res2004;32(4):e41.

[24]Xia Q,Cheng D,Duan J,Wang G,Cheng T,Zha X,et al.Microarray-based gene

expression pro?les in multiple tissues of the domesticated silkworm,Bombyx mori.Genome Biol2007;8(8):R162.

[25]Tusher VG,Tibshirani R,Chu G.Signi?cance analysis of microarrays applied to

the ionizing radiation response.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2001;98(9):5116e21.

[26]Lamb J,Crawford ED,Peck D,Modell JW,Blat IC,Wrobel MJ,et al.The con-

nectivity map:using gene-expression signatures to connect small molecules, genes,and disease.Science2006;313(5795):1929e35.

Y.Song et al./Placenta34(2013)1190e1195 1194

[27]Hansson SR,Chen Y,Brodszki J,Chen M,Hernandez-Andrade E,Inman JM,

et al.Gene expression pro?ling of human placentas from preeclamptic and normotensive pregnancies.Mol Hum Reprod2006;12(3):169e79.

[28]Hwang HS,Kwon HS,Sohn IS,Park YW,Kim YH.Increased CXCL12expression

in the placentae of women with pre-eclampsia.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2012;160(2):137e41.

[29]Schanz A,Winn VD,Fisher SJ,Blumenstein M,Heiss C,Hess AP,et al.Pre-

eclampsia is associated with elevated CXCL12levels in placental syncytio-trophoblasts and maternal blood.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011;157(1):32e7.

[30]Siddiqui IA,Jaleel A,Tamimi W,Al Kadri HM.Role of oxidative stress in the

pathogenesis of preeclampsia.Arch Gynecol Obstet2010;282(5):469e74. [31]Chappell LC,Seed PT,Briley AL,Kelly FJ,Lee R,Hunt BJ,et al.Effect of anti-

oxidants on the occurrence of pre-eclampsia in women at increased risk:a randomised https://www.360docs.net/doc/fe7107863.html,ncet1999;354(9181):810e6.

[32]Poston L,Briley AL,Seed PT,Kelly FJ,Shennan AH.Vitamin C and vitamin E in

pregnant women at risk for pre-eclampsia(VIP trial):randomised placebo-controlled https://www.360docs.net/doc/fe7107863.html,ncet2006;367(9517):1145e54.

[33]Rumbold AR,Crowther CA,Haslam RR,Dekker GA,Robinson JS.Vitamins C

and E and the risks of preeclampsia and perinatal complications.N Engl J Med 2006;354(17):1796e806.

[34]Bainbridge SA,Roberts JM.Uric acid as a pathogenic factor in preeclampsia.

Placenta2008;29(Suppl.A):S67e72.

[35]Culleton BF,Larson MG,Kannel WB,Levy D.Serum uric acid and risk for

cardiovascular disease and death:the Framingham Heart Study.Ann Intern Med1999;131(1):7e13.[36]Garg A,Garg S,Zaneveld LJ,Singla AK.Chemistry and pharmacology of the

Citrus bio?avonoid hesperidin.Phytother Res2001;15(8):655e69.

[37]Galati EM,Monforte MT,Kirjavainen S,Forestieri AM,Trovato A,Tripodo MM.

Biological effects of hesperidin,a citrus?avonoid.(Note I):antiin?ammatory and analgesic activity.Farmaco1994;40(11):709e12.

[38]Kalpana KB,Srinivasan M,Menon VP.Evaluation of antioxidant activity of hes-

peridin and its protective effect on H2O2induced oxidative damage on pBR322 DNA and RBC cellular membrane.Mol Cell Biochem2009;323(1e2):21e9. [39]Levine GN,Frei B,Koulouris SN,Gerhard MD,Keaney Jr JF,Vita JA.Ascorbic

acid reverses endothelial vasomotor dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease.Circulation1996;93(6):1107e13.

[40]Levine M,Conry-Cantilena C,Wang Y,Welch RW,Washko PW,Dhariwal KR,

et al.Vitamin C pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers:evidence for a rec-ommended dietary allowance.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A1996;93(8):3704e9.

[41]Polidori MC,Mecocci P,Levine M,Frei B.Short-term and long-term vitamin C

supplementation in humans dose-dependently increases the resistance of plasma to ex vivo lipid peroxidation.Arch Biochem Biophys2004;423(1):109e15. [42]Clark WG,Mac KE.The absorption and excretion of rutin and related?avonoid

substances.J Am Med Assoc1950;143(16):1411e5.

[43]Clemetson CA,Andersen L.Plant polyphenols as antioxidants for ascorbic acid.

Ann N Y Acad Sci1966;136(14):341e76.

[44]Jain AK,Ryan JR,McMahon https://www.360docs.net/doc/fe7107863.html,parison of ticrynafen and probenecid in

patients with elevated uric acid levels.Nephron1979;23(Suppl.1):46e50. [45]Zhang SD,Gant TW.A simple and robust method for connecting small-

molecule drugs using gene-expression signatures.BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:258.

Y.Song et al./Placenta34(2013)1190e11951195

基因表达的分析技术

第二篇细胞的遗传物质 第三章基因表达的分析技术 生物性状的表现均是通过基因表达调控实现的。对基因结构与基因表达调控进行研究,是揭示生命本质的必经之路。在基因组研究的过程中,逐步建立起一系列行之有效的技术。针对不同的研究内容,可建立不同的研究路线。 第一节PCR技术 聚合酶链反应(polymerase chain reaction,PCR)技术是一种体外核酸扩增技术,具有特异、敏感、产率高、快速、简便等突出优点。。PCR技术日斟完善,成为分子生物学和分子遗传学研究的最重要的技术。应用PCR技术可以使特定的基因或DNA片段在很短的时间内体外扩增数十万至百万倍。扩增的片段可以直接通过电泳观察,并作进一步的分析。 一、实验原理 PCR是根据DNA变性复性的原理,通过特异性引物,完成特异片段扩增。第一,按照欲检测的DNA的5'和3'端的碱基顺序各合成一段长约18~24个碱基的寡核苷酸序列作为引物(primer)。引物设计需要根据以下原则:①引物的长度保持在18~24bp之间,引物过短将影响产物的特异性,而引物过长将影响产物的合成效率;②GC含量应保持在45~60%之间;③5'和3'端的引物间不能形成互补。第二,将待检测的DNA变性后,加入四种单核苷酸(dNTP)、引物和耐热DNA聚合酶以及缓冲液。通过95℃变性,在进入较低的温度使引物与待扩增的DNA链复性结合,然后在聚合酶的作用下,体系中的脱氧核苷酸与模板DNA链互补配对,不断延伸合成新互补链,最终使一条DNA双链合成为两条双链。通过变性(92~95℃)→复性(40~60℃)→引物延伸(65~72℃)的顺序循环20至40个周期,就可以得到大量的DNA片段。理论上循环20周期可使DNA扩增100余万倍。

基因差异表达的研究方法

基因差异表达的研究方法 摘要寻找差异表达基因成为目前基因研究的一个非常重要的手段。寻找差异表达基因的方法有消减杂交法、mRNA 差异显示、代表性差异分析法、基因表达的序列分析、抑制消减杂交、表达序列标签、cDNA微阵列、半定量PCR、定量PCR。特综述以上各种方法的原理、方法过程、优缺点及其应用,随着科学技术的发展对差异表达基因的研究会更加完善。 关键词基因;差异表达;消减杂交;差异显示;研究方法 在真核生物的生命现象中,从个体的发育、生长、衰老、死亡,到组织、细胞的分化、凋亡或肿瘤的恶化以及细胞对各种生物、理化因子的应答,本质上都涉及基因在时间上或空间上的选择性表达,即基因的差异表达。基因的差异表达与组织、细胞的生物学性状和功能密切相关,成为生命科学的重要研究课题(潘美辉等,1997)。比较不同细胞或不同基因型在基因表达上的差异,不仅是研究生命过程分子机制的基础,亦是分离克隆目的基因的前提(胡昌华,2001)。寻找差异表达基因成为目前基因研究的一个非常重要的内容。差异表达的基因通常用稳定状态下mRNA的丰度高低有无来比较。差异表达基因有2个含义,即表达基因的种类改变和基因表达量的变化。通过它能找到疾病不同阶段、不同状态下表达不同丰度的基因,从而为进一步研究打下基础。分离和鉴定差异表达基因是了解各项生命活动和疾病分子调控机制的重要手段(梁自文,2001)。笔者拟对目前现有的寻找差异基因的方法作一综述。 1消减杂交法(subtractive hybridization) 消减杂交在1984年由Palmer和Lamer(Lamar EE et at.,1984)提出,其目的是分离出两类同源分子间差异表达的基因,关键是利用分子杂交原理去除共同序列,保留差异序列,通过PCR多次循环扩增而分离,从而能进一步研究其差异表达基因。 具体做法:首先以oligo-dT为引物,从tester中制备放射性标记的单链cDNA 文库。然后将这些cDNA探针与过量的来自driver的mRNA(其poly-A尾已与生物素耦联)杂交,大部分单链cDNA探针和driver中的mRNA形成异源双链,并通过羟基磷灰石柱层除去cDNA×mRNA杂交体,以此富增tester中特异的cDNA。消减杂交法的最大优点是它适用于未被克隆的基因组片段;其次它特别适于寻找那些由于缺失造成突变的基因。但这一方法需要大量的driver mRNA才能使消减杂交充分进行,所回收的cDNA量也很低,而且操作步骤复杂、耗资

基因表达谱芯片的数据分析

基因表达谱芯片的数据分析(2012-03-13 15:25:58)转载▼ 标签:杂谈分类:生物信息 摘要 基因芯片数据分析的目的就是从看似杂乱无序的数据中找出它固有的规律, 本文根据数据分析的目的, 从差异基因表达分析、聚类分析、判别分析以及其它分析等角度对芯片数据分析进行综述, 并对每一种方法的优缺点进行评述, 为正确选用基因芯片数据分析方法提供参考. 关键词: 基因芯片; 数据分析; 差异基因表达; 聚类分析; 判别分析 吴斌, 沈自尹. 基因表达谱芯片的数据分析. 世界华人消化杂志2006;14(1):68-74 https://www.360docs.net/doc/fe7107863.html,/1009-3079/14/68.asp 0 引言 基因芯片数据分析就是对从基因芯片高密度杂交点阵图中提取的杂交点荧光强度信号进行的定量分析, 通过有效数据的筛选和相关基因表达谱的聚类, 最终整合杂交点的生物学信息, 发现基因的表达谱与功能可能存在的联系. 然而每次实验都产生海量数据, 如何解读芯片上成千上万个基因点的杂交信息, 将无机的信息数据与有机的生命活动联系起来, 阐释生命特征和规律以及基因的功能, 是生物信息学研究的重要课题[1]. 基因芯片的数据分析方法从机器学习的角度可分为监督分析和非监督分析, 假如分类还没有形成, 非监督分析和聚类方法是恰当的分析方法; 假如分类已经存在, 则监督分析和判别方法就比非监督分析和聚类方法更有效率。根据研究目的的不同[2,3], 我们对基因芯片数据分析方法分类如下: (1)差异基因表达分析: 基因芯片可用于监测基因在不同组织样品中的表达差异, 例如在正常细胞和肿瘤细胞中; (2)聚类分析: 分析基因或样本之间的相互关系, 使用的统计方法主要是聚类分析; (3)判别分析: 以某些在不同样品中表达差异显著的基因作为模版, 通过判别分析就可建立有效的疾病诊断方法. 1 差异基因表达分析(difference expression, DE) 对于使用参照实验设计进行的重复实验, 可以对2样本的基因表达数据进行差异基因表达分

工作分析方法的评价与选择策略研究.doc

工作分析方法的评价与选择策略研究 [摘要]工作分析,是人力资源开发与管理的基础和平台,是整个人力资源管理职能工作的依据和参考。工作分析作为一种最基本的工具,对它的方法研究就显得尤为重要。本文对各工作分析方法给予了评价,并提出了选择的依据和参考因素,以期切实提高人力资源管理工作的效率和科学性,提高企业人力资源管理的整体水平,赢得竞争优势。 [关键词]工作分析;工作分析方法;人力资源管理 The Evaluation and Choice On Job Analysis Methods Job analysis is the basis and the platform of human resource development and management as well as the foundation and reference for the work of human resource management. As a fundamental tool, The research on position analysis methods is of vital importance. In this thesis, I evaluate each job analysis method, and finally list out the basis and reference factors choice so as to enhance the efficiency and becoming more scientific for human resource management, and improve the the whole level of human resource management, gaining the edge of competition. Job Analysis Job Analysis Methods Human Resource Management 工作分析,亦称岗位分析,职务分析,是人力资源管理的基础和平台,是整个人力资源管理的依据和参考,离开了工作分析,一切的管理工作都是感性的行为,毫无科学性可言。工作分析,是指对企业各类岗位的性质、任务、职责、劳动条件和环境,以及员工承担本岗位任务应具备的资格条件所进行的系统分析和研究,并制定出岗位规范、工作说明书等劳动人事文件的过程(安鸿章,2001)。它作为一种最基本的工具和技术,对其理论的探讨和方法的开发有诸多的研究文献,但是对其方法的评价选择在理论和实践上的探讨都很少,显得较为薄弱,而企业在实践中进行工作分析时,必然面临对其方法的选择问题,本文就此问题予以简略的探讨。 一、工作分析方法的评价 工作分析的目标就是为人力资源管理中的规划、招聘与选拔、绩效评估、培训和开发、薪酬设计、职业生涯设计等服务的。进行工作分析,面临多种方法之间的选择问题,而这一选择涉及到对各种技术方法的适用范围和应用价值的评价。 1、非结构化工作分析方法的评价 从理论上分析,非结构化的工作分析的方法普遍拥有以下的一些不足:①耗费时间和资金,所获得资料往往也只适用于一定时期和一定用途;②搜集的资料往往以叙述性的偏多,会因主观因素产生偏差;③以数据说明的不多,缺乏数量化;④着重于工作本身的细分和叙述,属于以工作为本的分析,对人员特质的了解有限;⑤只能比较不同工作实际内容的异同,但是工作性质与人员所需要特质无法由此详细地知道。

联合利华的SWOT分析及战略选择

SWOT 分 析 理 论 在 联 合 利 华 的 应 用 系别:工商管理学院 专业:人力资源管理 班级:1142 学号:201111210229 姓名:钟倩

SWOT分析理论在联合利华的应用 摘要:SWOT分析是把组织内外环境所形成的机会(Opportunities),风险(Threats),优势(Strengths),劣势(Weaknesses)四个方面的情况,结合起来进行分析,以寻找制定适合组织实际情况的经营战略和策略的方法。联合利华集团是由荷兰人造奶油公司和英国Lever Brothers香皂公司于 1929年合并而成。总部设于荷兰鹿特丹和英国伦敦,分别负责食品及洗剂用品事业的经营。是全球第二大消费用品制造商,从联合利华本身发展状况出发,运用SWOT战略分析方法,确定联合利华目前面临的重要外部机会和威胁,以及内部存在的主要优势和劣势,从而对联合利华进行战略选择。 关键字:联合利华SWOT分析战略对策战略选择 一、联合利华的SWOT分析 (一)联合利华的内部优势(S) 1、丰富的经验和技术,联合利华是最早进入中国市场的日化行业之一,对中国市场有着一定的了解。联合利华拥有1500多个品牌,并且一些领先产品具有全球性和区域性,部分产品由于其先进的技术从而获得一定的成本优势。 2、品牌知名度高,世界上最大的日化企业之一,有着悠久的历史和知名度。 3、良好的企业形象,不断致力于公益事业有良好的公众形象。 4、优秀的人力资源,联合利华在上海设立了全球研发中心,能够吸引、收纳更多优秀人才,研发更好的产品。研发水平是联合利华所拥有的最好的技术资源。 (二)联合利华的内部劣势(W) 1、管理模式松散,联合利华是一个缓慢移动,不宽泛,并且固有的、保守的安格鲁——德意志等级管理模式,而且,联合利华在大部分的合资公司中没有控股,因此在内部管理上存有一定问题,其合资企业数量已超过14家,常常陷入意见产生不一致的争论之中。 2、经营成本高,内部还存在资源浪费现象,企业的经营成本相对较高。 3、品牌认知不清楚,一系列不知名,低卷入的品牌导致品牌层次过多;具

模块3_作业媒体选择分析表

《乘法分配律》媒体选择分析表 . .

《乘法分配律》教学设计 - 一、比赛激趣,提出猜想. (1)同学们,学习新课前,我们先来一个小小的数学热身赛。请大家准备好纸和笔。 (请看大屏幕,左边的两组同学做A组的题,右边的两组做B组的题,看谁做的又对又快,开始) 9×( 37+63)9×37 + 9×63 (2)评出胜负。(做完的同学请举手,汇报计算过程。可以看出左边的同学做得比较快,(问同学)你们有什么意见吗?)刚才的计算中你发现这两道题有什么关系吗? 教师让学生比较两个算式的异同点,并指名说一说自己找出的规律。 引导学生发现:这两个算式的运算顺序不同,但结果相同,两道题其实可以互相转化,可以用一个等式表示:9×( 37+63) =9×37 + 9×63 (3)将学生的发现以他(她)的名字命名为“**猜想”。 【设计意图:在课的开始,组织数学热身赛能调动学生的学习积极性。】 二、引导探究,发现规律。 1、(我们下面就一起来验证一下这位同学的猜想在其它的题里也是否成立?请看大屏幕。)昨天,老师去超市里买东西,看到下面这些物品。橙子每箱28元,苹果每箱22元。如果橙子和苹果各买3箱,一共需要多少钱? (1)全班同学独立完成。 (2)谁愿意把自己的方法说给大家听听。(生回答,师板书) 还有不一样的方法吗?谁来说说看?(生回答,师板书) . .

板书:(28+22)×3 28×3+22×3 =50×3 =84+66 =150 =150 评讲:算式(28+22)×3 和28×3+22×3的每一步各表示什么?谁能说给大家听听? (3)观察这两个算式,你有什么发现? 引导学生比较两个算式异同点,并指名学生说一说 生:这两个算式的得数是一样的。 师:是的,虽然他们的格式不同,但他们的得数相同,所以我们可以用一个符号把这两个算式联系起来。 生:等于号 师:对,用等于号相连,表示这两个式子是相等的,一起读一读,认识这两种方法的结果是一样的,所以( 35+25)×3=35× 3+25×3 师:再和前面的一组式子一起观察, 9×( 37+63)=9×37 + 9×63 (让学生通过读,感悟到左边是两个数的和乘一个数,右边的两个数的积加上两个数的积) 2、举例验证,进一步感受 认真观察屏幕上的这个等式,你还能举出几个类似的例子来验证吗?(板书:举例) (1)验证方法:要求每人出两组算式,数字随意举例,可以使用计算器进行计算,验证你举的例子是否相等。然后拿到小组内交流(学生小组合作交流,教师巡视指导。) (2)学生回报:谁来说一说自己举的例子。 . .

基因差异表达技术

基因差异表达技术 真核生物中,从个体的生长、发育、衰老、死亡,到组织的得化、调亡以及细胞对各种生物、理化因子的应答,本质上都涉及基因的选择性表达。高等生物大约有30000个不同的基因,但在生物体内任意8细胞中只有10%的基因的以表达,而这些基因的表达按特定的时间和空间顺序有序地进行着,这种表达的方式即为基因的差异表达。其包括新出现的基因的表达与表达量有差异的基因的表达。生物体表现出的各种特性,主要是由于基因的差异表达引起的。 由于基因的差异表达的变化是调控细胞生命活动过程的核心机制,通过比较同一类细胞在不同生理条件下或在不同生长发育阶段的基因表达差异,可为分析生命活动过程提供重要信息。研究基因差异表达的主要技术有差别杂交(differential hybridization)、扣除(消减)杂交(subtractive hybridization of cDNA,SHD)、mRNA差异显示(mRNA differential display,DD)、抑制消减杂交法(suppression subtractive hybridization,SSH)、代表性差异分析(represential display analysis,RDA)、交互扣除RNA差别显示技术(reciprocal subtraction differential RNA display)、基因表达系列分析(serial analysis of gene expression,SAGE)、电子消减(electronic subtraction)和DNA微列阵分析(DNA microarray)等。 一、差别杂交与扣除杂交 差别杂交(differential hybridization)又叫差别筛选(differential screening),适用于分离经特殊处理而被诱发表达的mRNA的cDNA克隆。为了增加这种方法的有效性,后来又发展出了扣除杂交(subtractive hybridization)或扣除cDNA克隆(subtractive cDNA cloning),它是通过构建扣除文库(subtractive library)得以实现的。 (一)差别杂交 从本质上讲,差别杂交也是属于核酸杂交的范畴。它特别适用于分离在特定组织中表达

选择结果分析方法

选择结果分析方法 您在产品成本控制的客户化设置中通过确定以下参数选择结果分析方案: ·结果分析代码 ·结果分析方案 ·评估方法 若要检查销售订单中的结果分析代码,选择销售订单及项目科目设置。成 果分析代码依需求类别而定。 另参见: 对销售订单相关的生产要求 对于每个结果分析代码,您可以定义多个结果分析方案以从不同的角度评估销售订单项目。 举例 在德国是利用实际收入计算销售订单项目的销售成本。您创建一个联 接订单的结果分析代码与相应评估方法的结果分析方案。把此值的结 果转入财务会计核算中。 由于内部原因,您想从所发生的实际成本中计算一项订单收入。您创 建一个次级结果分析方案,它连接订单的结果分析代码与相应评估方 案中。这种评估结果不转入财务会计核算中。 这两种评估结果在销售订单项目上被更新并随时可在信息系统中加以 分析。 利用评估方法的结果分析类型,指定使用什么样的结果分析方案(例如基于收入或基于数量的结果分析)。 为产品成本控制客户化设置中的结果分析代码和成本分析方案的组合确定评估方法。 某些评估参数依据订单的状态而定。这意味着。 ·您可以使用计划成本和计划收入作为订单早期的评估基础 ·在最终开票之后(状态为最终开票) -您可以为评估使用实际收入 -您可以取消为订单创建的存货 ·在上次成本记帐之后(状态为技术完成) -您可以显示实际成本和实际收入

-您可以取消为订单创建的准备金 因此,您必须为每一个影响结果分析的状态确定一个评估方法。 也参见 结果分析的要求:评估方法 结果分析的要求:行标识 结果分析要求:结果分析代码和方案结果分析代码 结果分析的阶段 2

寻找差异表达的基因

基因表达谱数据 基因表达谱可以用一个矩阵来表示,每一行代表一个基因,每一列代表一个样本(如图1)。所有基因的表达谱数据在“gene_exp.txt ”文件中存储,第一列为基因的entrez geneid ,第2~61列是疾病样本的表达,第62~76列是正常样本的表达。 图1 基因表达谱的矩阵表示 寻找差异表达的基因: 原理介绍: 差异表达分析是目前比较常用的识别疾病相关miRNA 以及基因的方法,目前也有很多差异表达分析的方法,但比较简单也比较常用的是Fold change 方法。它的优点是计算简单直观,缺点是没有考虑到差异表达的统计显著性;通常以2倍差异为阈值,判断基因是否差异表达。Fold change 的计算公式如下: normal Disease x x c Fold = _ 即用疾病样本的表达均值除以正常样本的表达均值。 差异表达分析的目的:识别两个条件下表达差异显著的基因,即一个基因在两个条件中的表达水平,在排除各种偏差后,其差异具有统计学意义。我们利用一种比较常见的T 检验(T-test )方法来寻找差异表达的miRNA 。T 检验的主要原理为:对每一个miRNA 计算一个T 统计量来衡量疾病与正常情况下miRNA 表达的差异,然后根据t 分布计算显著性p 值来衡量这种差异的显著性,T 统计量计算公式如下: n s n s x x t normal Disease normal Disease miRNA //22+-= 对于得到的显著性p 值,我们需要进行多重检验校正(FDR ),比较常用的是BH 方法(Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995)。

LCMS谱图的判断及分析方法的选择

LCMS谱图的判断及分析方法的确定 一、LCMS谱图的相关标准及MS棒图判断: a)LCMS合格谱图的标准: 1、UV谱图主峰的保留时间应大于2T (进样峰时间),并小于全部运行时间的4/5; 2、UV谱图的吸收波长以客户指定波长为准(一般为220nm),弱紫外样品(紫外吸 收在220nm是波谷,MS信号相对较强)可用ELSD谱图交货或以客户要求为准; 3、UV谱图主峰吸收一般应高于100mau。 对信噪比良好的样品,可以适当降低峰 高要求到高于50mau, 当所有可见的UV峰都积分后仍合格的,可认为合格; 4、UV谱图中,主峰理论塔板数在10000以上(即峰宽小于0.5分钟),峰对称因 子应在0.9-1.2(即对称性较好)。 5、MS谱图应保证准分子离子峰可见,其它峰是二聚峰,以及合理的碎片或加合峰。 6、MS范围:通常在100-1000之间,对分子量很小或很大的样品,应调整MS范围, 保证最大值超过2M+23, 最小值小于M/2。 7、紫外积分超过2%的杂质,如果杂质的MS和主峰一致,需检查结构是否有异构 体。如客户确认有异构体并同意可以合并纯度交货,方能判断合格,否则应重 新分离或用其它手段如NMR确定结构。 8、紫外无积分或积分结果小于1%的色谱峰,在TIC中峰高不得超过主峰的1/2。 (特殊情况除外:难电离样品;Agilent LCMS TIC中杂质绝对吸收小于50000) b)MS棒图的判断(正离子检测): 1、MS谱图中分子离子峰的值应为:EM+1(Exact Mass)(即[M+H]+) 2、常见的合理的加合离子有:[M+Na]+、[M+K]+、[2M+H]+、[2M+Na]+、[M/2+H]+ 3、加有缓冲溶液或溶剂的体系还可引进[M+X]+(X=溶剂或缓冲溶液中的阳离子) 如:用碱性体系方法分析时常见的加合离子有:[M+NH 4 ]+(我们的碱性体系用的铵盐缓冲溶液)(用岛津仪器分析时常可见到的加合离子还有:[M+Na+X]+) 4、若有小于分子离子峰的碎片离子,要根据化合物结构来判断是否是其合理的碎 片,碎片M 1所出碎片峰的MS值应为M 1 或M 1 +2(出M 1 还是M 1 +2由断裂机理决定) 5、同位素效应:一般带Cl或Br的样品,棒图中同位素效应比较明显(见附图);

基因表达分析

基因表达分析 1、EST(Expressed Sequence Tag)表达序列标签(EST)分析 1、EST基本介绍 1、定义: EST是从已建好的cDNA库中随机取出一个克隆,进行5’端或3’端进行一轮单向自动测序,获得短的cDNA部分序列,代表一个完整基因的一小部分,在数据库中其长度一般从20到7000bp不等,平均长度为400bp。 EST来源于一定环境下一个组织总mRNA所构建的cDNA文库,因此,EST也能说明该组织中各基因的表达水平。 2、技术路线: 首先从样品组织中提取mRNA,在逆转录酶的作用下用oligo(dT)作为引物进行RT-PCR 合成cDNA,再选择合适的载体构建cDNA文库,对各菌株加以整理,将每一个菌株的插入片段根据载体多克隆位点设计引物进行两端一次性自动化测序,这就是EST序列的产生过程。

3、EST数据的优点和缺点: (1)相对于大规模基因组测序而言,EST测序更加快速和廉价。 (2)EST数据单向测序,质量比较低,经常出现相位的偏差。 (3)EST只是基因的一部分,而且序列里有载体序列。 (4)EST数据具有冗余性。 (5)EST数据具有组织和不同时期特异性。 4、EST数据的应用 EST作为表达基因所在区域的分子标签因编码DNA序列高度保守而具有自身的特殊性质,与来自非表达序列的标记(如AFLP、RAPD、SSR等)相比,更可能穿越家系与种的限制。因此,EST标记在亲缘关系较远的物种间比较基因组连锁图和比较质量性状信息是特别有用的。同样,对于一个DNA序列缺乏的目标物种,来源于其他物种的EST也能用于该物种有益基因的遗传作图,加速物种间相关信息的迅速转化。具体说,EST的作用表现在:

基因表达差异分析方法进展

高等真核生物的基因组一般具有80 000~100 000个基因,而每一个细胞大约只表达其中的15%[1]。基因在不同细胞间及不同生长阶段的选择性表达决定了生命活动的多样性,如发育与分化、衰老与死亡、内环境稳定、细胞周期调控等。比较细胞间基因表达的差异为我们揭示生命活动的规律提供了依据。 由于真核细胞mRNA 3′端一般含有Poly(A)尾,因此现有的方法基本上都是利用共同引物将不同的mRNA反转录成cDNA,以cDNA为对象研究基因表达的差异。1992年Liang等[2]建立了一种差异显示反转录PCR法(differential display reverse transcription PCR,DDRT-PCR),为检测成批基因表达的差异开辟了新天地。迄今为止已出现了大量应用该技术的研究报道[3,4]。然而,尽管应用DDRT-PCR方法已经取得了不少成果,而且该方法还在不断改进之中,但它仍然存在几个难以解决的问题:(1) 重复率低,至少有20%的差异条带不能被准确重复[5];(2) 假阳性率可以高达90%[6];(3) 获得的差异表达序列极少包含编码信息。近年来,针对DDRT-PCR方法的不足,又有几种新的检测差异表达基因的方法出现,现仅就这方面的进展做一简要介绍。 1.基因表达指纹(gene expression fingerprinting,GEF):GEF技术使用生物素标记的引物Bio-T13合成cDNA第一链,用dGTP对其进行末端加尾,再以富含C的引物引发合成cDNA第二链。用限制性内切酶消化双链cDNA,以交联有抗生物素蛋白的微球捕获cDNA3′端,以T4DNA连接酶连接同前述内切酶相对应的适配子,并以Bio-T13及适配子中的序列作为新的引物进行特异的PCR 扩增,得到大量的特异cDNA片段。适配子末端被32P-dATP标记后,固定于微球上的cDNA片段经过一系列酶切,产生的酶切片段从微球表面释放出来,其中那些含有标记末端的片段经凝胶电泳后构成mRNA指纹图谱。通过分析不同细胞间的指纹图谱就能得到差异表达的序列[7]。GEF技术所需的工作量较DDRT-PCR明显减少,由于用酶切反应替代了条件不严格的PCR反应,其重复性也较好,假阳性率低,并且所获得的片段中包含有一定的编码信息。GEF技术最大的缺点在于电泳技术的局限。由于它的指纹图谱要显示在同一块电泳胶上,经过几轮酶切之后常会得到1 000~2 000条电泳带,而现有的PAGE电泳很少能分辨超过400条带,故只有15%~30%的mRNA能够被辨认出来,因此得

浅析工作分析和方法选择

浅析工作分析和方法选择 一、什么是工作分析及概述: 一个组织的建立最终会导致一批工作的出现,而这些工作需要由特定的人员来承担。工作分析就是与此相关的一道程序,通过对工作内容与工作责任的资料汇集、研究和分析,可以确定该项工作的任务、性质和相对价值,以及哪些类型的人适合从事这一工作。工作分析的过程主要调研完成工作的要求、周期和范围,并着眼于工作本身的特点,而不是工作者的状况。 工作分析的主要任务:明确“6W+1H”。 What——做什么?工作分析需要明确任职者所从事的工作,具体指工作内容、岗位需求、组织结构。 Why——为什么?工作分析需要明确任职者的工作目的,具体指工作存在价值及存在条件。 Who——谁来做?工作分析需要明确对任职者的要求,具体指岗位任职要求。

When——何时做?工作分析需要明确对工作活动的时间要求,具体指工作性质。 Where——在哪里?工作分析需要明确对工作环境的要求,具体指工作环境。 For Whom——为谁做?工作分析需明确工作中与哪些人发生关系,具体管理权限。 How——如何做?工作分析需明确任职者应该如何从事工作活动,具体指工作流程。 总而言之,工作分析是一个了解任职者应该做什么工作和为什么需要做的 过程,工作分析是一个收集让别人对该职位做出判断的信息的过程。 工作分析的作用: 1、为制定的有效的人力资源配置计划奠定基础:工作分析的结果,可以有效地为人力资源配置预测和计划提供可靠的依据,我们可以预测在未来的一段时间里有待完成的工作量,并分析每个员工可承担的工作量。如果预测表明,现有 工作量已大于员工可承担能力,那么人力资源部就要帮助业务部门做好未来人员配置计划并上报批准。

《企业战略分析》答案

《企业战略分析》答案 图示说明--恭喜,答对了!--抱歉,答错了!--您选择了此项 [第1题](单选题)SWOT矩阵分析属于()分析工具。 A.战略 B.机会 C.环境 D.威胁 [第2题](单选题)在特定的产品与市场领域中,企业与竞争对手相比所具有的优势的特征和条件是()。 A.竞争战略 B.竞争优势 C.核心能力 D.无形资源 [第3题](单选题)对于钢铁行业来说,最明显的竞争特征是:()。 A.价格 B.规模经济 C.转换成本 D.库存成本 [第4题](单选题)在保健品和化妆品产业中,最重要的进入障碍是()。 A.规模经济 B.转换成本

C.产品差异 D.资本需求 [第5题](单选题)甲为一进出口公司,就其外部环境而言,最主要的宏观影响因素是()。 A.政治法律因素 B.经济因素 C.人文社会因素 D.科技因素 [第6题](单选题)企业核心能力分析的内容正确的有() A.主营业务分析 B.企业内部环境分析 C.价值链分析 D.经济效益分析 [第7题](单选题)价值链中的价值活动可以分为基本活动和支持性活动两大类,以下不属于支持活动要素的是() A.采购 B.生产 C.人力资源管理 D.企业基础设施 [第8题](单选题)判断企业的资源和能力是否形成核心能力的惟一标准,是看其能否产生持久性()优势。 A.对比 B.创造 C.竞争

D.潜在 [第9题](单选题)柯达公司的产品与市场领域该定义为以下哪个领域()。 A.照片胶卷 B.数码相机 C.信息记录 D.摄影产品 [第10题](单选题)宏观外部环境包括下面一些因素和力量() A.技术因素 B.资源因素 C.思维因素 D.效率因素 [第11题](多选题)SWOT分析法中的SWOT分别是指() A.优势 B.劣势 C.机会 D.威胁 E.价值 [第12题](多选题)企业外部环境的特点包括()。 A.惟一性 B.变化性

基因表达系列分析(Serial Analysis of Gene Expression,SAGE)技术

SAGE 技术 MRNA 结合到微珠子上(Microscopic Bead and mRNA) mRNA 转录成DNA(mRNA binds to bait and is copied into DNA)

用酶切开DNA的一小段(An enzyme cuts the DNA) 另一个酶定在DNA末端以便切下一小段(An enzyme locks onto the DNA and cuts off a short tag),这一小段就被视为这个基因的标签 两个标签连在一起(Two tags are linked together)

在末端的定位分子被切掉(Enzymes cut off the "Docking Molecules") 都连成一条线(Di-Tags are combined into large concatemers)

DNA上所携带的遗传信息,需要通过RNA为中介体,合成出组织和正常生理功能所需要的蛋白质,这个过程被称为基因的表达。在生物体中不同的组织和器官所表达的基因群是不一样的,我们把基因群的表达状况称为基因表达谱。目前,高通量地研究基因表达谱的方法主要有两种,即生物芯片和基因表达串联分析(serial analysis of gene expression, SAGE)。基因芯片所能检测的基因必须是已知的基因,放在芯片上几种基因的探针就只能检测这几种基因的表达谱;相比之下,SAGE能以远高于DNA芯片的精确度和重复性来检测在病理条件下基因表达谱的改变,而不必考虑所检测的基因是已知的还是未知的。因此在检测疾病相关的新基因,特别是无法用基因芯片进行检测的低表达量致病基因时,SAGE是目前的最佳手段,无可取代。 SAGE技术为Genzyme公司所拥有的专利技术。其技术简介如下: SAGE技术得以建立的理论基础 首先,一段来自于任一转录本特定区域的"标签"(Tag),即长度仅9-14bp的短核苷酸序列,就已包含足够的信息以特异性地确定该转录本。例如:一个9碱基的序列能有49=262144种不同的排列组合,而人类基因组据估计仅编码80000种转录本,因此在理论上每一个9碱基标签就能够代表一种转录本的特征序列。 第二,如果将短片段标签相互连接、集中形成长的DNA分子,则对该克隆进行

基因表达及分析技术

基因表达及其分析技术 生命现象的奥秘隐藏在基因组中,对基因组的解码一直是现代生命科学的主流。基因组学研究可以说是当今生命科学领域炙手可热的方向。从DNA 测序到SNP、拷贝数变异(copy number variation , CNV)等DNA多态性分析,到DNA 甲基化修饰等表观遗传学研究,生命过程的遗传基础不断被解读。 基因组研究的重要性自然不言而喻。应该说,DNA 测序技术在基因组研究 中功不可没,从San ger测序技术到目前盛行的新一代测序技术(Next Gen eration Seque ncing NGS)到即将走到前台的单分子测序技术,测序技术是基因组解读最重要的主流技术。而基因组测序、基因组多态性分析、DNA 甲基化修饰等表观遗传分析等在基因组研究中是最前沿的课题。但是基因组研究终究类似“基因算命”,再清晰的序列信息也无法真正说明一个基因的功能,基因功能的最后鉴定还得依赖转录组学和蛋白组学,而转录作为基因发挥功能的第一步,对基因功能解读就变得至关重要。声称特定基因、特定SNP、特定CNV、特定DNA修饰等与某种表型有关,最终需要转基因、基因敲除、突变、 RNAi 、中和抗体等技术验证,并必不可少要结合基因转录、翻译和蛋白修饰等数据。 基因实现功能的第一步就是转录为mRNA或非编码RNA,转录组学主要研究基因转录为RNA 的过程。在转录研究中,下面几点是必须考虑的: 1,基因是否转录(基因是否表达)及基因表达水平高低(基因是低丰度表达还是中、高丰度表达)。特定基因有时候在一个细胞中只有一个拷贝的表达,而表达量会随细胞类型不同或发育、生长阶段不同或生理、病理状态不同而改变。因此任何基

调查方法选择分析(2)

抽样调查法 一含义 指从研究对象的全部单位中抽取一部分单位进行考察和分析,并用这部分单位的数量特征去推断总体的数量特征的一种调查方法。其中,被研究对象的全部单位称为“总体”;从总体中抽取出来,实际进行调查研究的那部分对象所构成的群体称为“样本”。在抽样调查中,样本数的确定是一个关键问题。抽样的方式,有随机抽样和非随机抽样两大类。 二抽样方法分类 1简单随机抽样 这是一种最简单的一步抽样法,它是从总体中选择出抽样单位,从总体中抽取的每个可能样本均有同等被抽中的概率。抽样时,处于抽样总体中的抽样单位被编排成 1~n编码,然后利用随机数码表或专用的计算机程序确定处于1~n间的随机数码,那些在总体中与随机数码吻合的单位便成为随机抽样的样本。 这种抽样方法简单,误差分析较容易,但是需要样本容量较多,适用于各个体之间差异较小的情况。 2系统抽样法 这种方法又称顺序抽样法,是从随机点开始在总体中按照一定的间隔(即“每隔第几”的方式)抽取样本。此法的优点是抽样样本分布比较好,有好的理论,总体估计值容易计算。 3分层抽样法 它是根据某些特定的特征,将总体分为同质、不相互重叠的若干层,再从各层中独立抽取样本,是一种不等概率抽样。分层抽样利用辅助信息分层,各层内应该同质,各层间差异尽可能大。这样的分层抽样能够提高样本的代表性、总体估计值的精度和抽样方案的效率,抽样的操作、管理比较方便。但是抽样框较复杂,费用较高,误差分析也较为复杂。此法适用于母体复杂、个体之间差异较大、数量较多的情况。 4整群抽样法 群体抽样是先将总体单元分群,可以按照自然分群或按照需要分群,在交通调查中可以按

统计学 照地理特征进行分群,随机选择群体作为抽样样本,调查样本群中的所有单元。整群抽样样本比较集中,可以降低调查费用。例如,在进行居民出行调查中,可以采用这种方法,以住宅区的不同将住户分群,然后随机选择群体为抽取的样本。此法优点是组织简单,缺点是样本代表性差。 5多阶段抽样法 多阶段抽样是采取两个或多个连续阶段抽取样本的一种不等概率抽样。对阶段抽样的单元是分级的,每个阶段的抽样单元在结构上也不同,多阶段抽样的样本分布集中,能够节省时间和经费。调查的组织复杂,总体估计值的计算复杂。 三抽样的主要优点是: 1抽样调查可以减少调查的工作量,调查内容可以求多、求全或求专,可以保证调查对象的完整性。 2可以从数量上以部分推算总体,利用概率论和数理统计原理,以一定的概率保证推算结果的可靠程度,起到全面调查认识总体的功能,可以保证调查的精度。 3因为抽样调查是针对总体中的一部分单位进行的,抽样调查可以大大减少调查费用,提高调查效率。 4收集、整理数据、综合样本的速度快,保证调查的时效性。 四误差 抽样调查结果和真实值之间存在的差异称为误差。抽样调查理论的中心任务之一,便是研究抽样调查中的误差。在抽样调查误差理论中将全部误差分解为随机误差和系统误差两部分。随机误差是由于样本与总体之间的随机差异导致的,它存在于所有取样过程中,是无法避免的,这种类型的误差不会影响估计参数的均值,通常所计算的抽样误差就是这部分随机误差。对随机误差的研究,由于有强有力的概率论与数理统计理论和方法的支持,其理论已非常成熟,只要能设计出样本估计量,就能给出相应估计量的随机误差公式。但是对抽样调查中的系统误差,由于导致系统性误差的原因很多,而且多属非随机性因素,主要受主观因素的影响,致使系统性误差的出现是无规律的。 构成系统误差的因素有多种,大致可归纳为四种类型: 1设计误差,是指因在抽样调查方案设计过程中的错误而导致产生的系统性误差。在抽样方案的设计中,涉及抽样框的编制、目标量和估计量的设计、样本容量的确定和抽样方式的选择等,抽样方案的设计还直接关系到在样本的抽取过程中是否严格地遵循随机性原则,若破坏了随机性原则,必然会产生系统性误差。 2估计量的偏误,是指所选择的估计量(实则是估计方法)破坏了估计的优良标准之一——无偏性,致使产生统计性误差。

市场竞争策略分析与最佳策略的选择

市场竞争策略分析与最佳策略选择★课程提纲 ——通过本课程,您能学到什么? 第一讲资源、能力和竞争分析 1.引言 2.资源与竞争 3.核心竞争力的表达 第二讲资源利用与竞争策略的选择 1.引言 2.资源的集中、有效、弹性利用 3.市场竞争策略的选择 第三讲最佳策略选择注意点之 ——战略与战术的关系 1.战略与战术的区别 2.避免战略与战术的抽象、空泛、表面和虚无 3.现有策略的盲点及低效率 第四讲最佳策略选择注意点之 ——核心产品与产品定位 1.注意核心利益,显示核心价值 2.产品定位依据――消费者的心 3. 核心产品与产品定位案例分析 第五讲最佳策略选择注意点之 ——服务品质与CIS 1.服务,多走一步 2.不怕做不到,只怕想不到 3.力求满意,更重忠诚 4.企业识别系统CIS 5.课程总回顾 第1讲资源、能力和竞争分析【本讲重点】 资源的概念 对策略的理解 无形资源的要点

成功策略的要点 竞争优势——能力——资源的关系 核心竞争力的五种表达 五种竞争动力 资源的概念 资源与竞争 现在,国内流行着一个名词叫核心竞争力。一般来说,先有资源才有竞争力。资源分为有形和无形这两种资源。 有形资源,就是通常提到的人力、物力、财力; 无形资源包括技术、品牌、声誉,甚至包括人际关系。 有形和无形的资源构成了一家企业的所有资源。根据这些资源来发展核心竞争力,展现出来的就是企业的竞争优势。反过来说,竞争优势,就是核心竞争力所反映的方面,也就是企业所具备的资源。 图1-1 表示出了竞争优势、能力、资源之间的相互关系。 图1-1 竞争优势——能力——资源关系图 在发展企业的竞争优势时,通常都会用策略来执行。所采用的策略要紧密地适应周围的环境,与企业的资源息息相关,因为资源是企业成功的条件,要与它契合,如图1-2所示。 图1-2 策略、公司与环境之间的结合 企业要发展竞争优势,离不开一个好的策略。那么,成功的策略应包括哪些要素呢?一般来说,必须具备三个要素:①一个长期、单纯并一致的目标,不能朝令夕改,更不能没有目标;②要对竞争环境有深刻的了解,做到知己知彼,百战不殆;③要对资源做一个客观的评估。当然,策略制订出来后,要有效率地执行,否则,就达不到目标。

提高分析方法的选择性

提高分析方法的选择性 迄今,人们所认识的化合物已超过1000万种,而且新的化合物仍在快速增长。复杂体系的分离和测定已成为分析化学家所面临的艰巨任务。由液相色谱、气相色谱、超临界流体色谱和毛细管电泳等所组成的色谱学是现代分离、分析的主要组成部分并获得了很快的发展。以色谱、光谱和质谱技术为基础所开展的各种联用、接口及样品引入技术已成为当今分析化学发展中的热点之一。在提高方法选择性方面,各种选择性试剂、萃取剂、离子交换剂、吸附剂、表面活性剂、各种传感器的接着剂、各种选择检测技术和化学计量学方法等是当前研究工作的重要课题。 (三)扩展时空多维信息 现代分析化学的发展已不再局限于将待测组分分离出来进行表征和测量,而是成为一门为物质提供尽可能多的化学信息的科学。随着人们对客观物质的认识的深入,某些过去所不甚熟悉的领域,如多维、不稳态和边界条件等也逐渐提到分析化学家的日程上来。例如现代核磁共振波谱、红外光谱、质谱等的发展,可提供有机物分子的精细结构、空间排列构型及瞬态等变化的信息,为人们对化学反应历程及生命过程的认识展现了光辉的前景。化学计量学的发展,更为处理和解析各种化学信息提供了重要基础。 (四)微型化及微环境的表征与测定 微型化及微环境分析是现代分析化学认识自然从宏观到微观的延伸。电子学、光学和工程学向微型化发展、人们对生物功能的了解,促进了分析化学深入微观世界的进程。电子显微技术、电子探针X射线微量分析、激光微探针质谱等微束技术已成为进行微区分析的重要手段。在表面分析方面,电子能谱、次级离子质谱、脉冲激光原子探针等的发展,可检测和表征一个单原子层,因而在材料科学、催化剂、生物学、物理学和理论化学研究中占据重要的位置。此外,对于电极表面修饰行为和表征过程的研究,各种分离科学理论、联用技术、超微电极和光谱电化学等的应用,为揭示反应机理,开发新体系,进行分子设计等开辟了新的途

相关文档
最新文档