(完整版)美国联邦民事诉讼规则(内含中文目录)

(完整版)美国联邦民事诉讼规则(内含中文目录)
(完整版)美国联邦民事诉讼规则(内含中文目录)

《美国联邦地区法院民事诉讼规则》简称《美国联邦民事诉讼规则》

目录美国联邦民事诉讼规则

导论美国联邦民事诉讼规则

第1章本规则的适用范围和一种诉讼形式

第1条本规则的适用范围和目的

第2条一种诉讼形式

第2章诉讼开始;传唤令状、诉答文书、申请书及命令的送达

第3条诉讼开始

第4条传唤状

第4条之1其他令状的送达

第5条诉答文书和其他文件的送达与提交

第6条期间

第3章诉答文书和申请书

第7条允许提出的诉答文书;申请书的格式

第8条诉答文书的一般规则

第9条诉答文书的特别事项

第10条诉答文书的格式

第11条诉答文书、申请书及其他文件的签名;向法院的陈述;制裁

第12条抗辩和异议——提出的期间和方式——通过诉答文书或申请书——基于诉答文书请求判决的申请

第13条反请求和交叉请求

第14条第三当事人诉讼程序

第15条修改和补充诉答文书

第16条审理前会议;日程;管理第4章当事人

第17条原告和被告;当事人能力

第18条请求和救济方法的合并

第19条为公正审判而必要合并的人

第20条当事人的许可合并

第21条当事人的合并错误及不合并

第22条互争权利诉讼

第23条集团诉讼

第23条之1股东的派生诉讼

第23条之2关于非法人团体的诉讼

第24条诉讼参加

第25条替代当事人

第5章庭外证言与发现程序

第26条规范发现程序的一般规定;出示义务

第27条诉讼之前和上诉系属期间的庭外证言

第28条参与作成庭外证言的人员

第29条关于发现程序的约定

第30条口头询问的庭外证言

第31条书面质问的庭外证言

第32条在法院的诉讼程序中庭外证言的使用

第33条对当事人的质问书

第34条提供文件和物件以及为调查或其他目的而进入房地产

第35条身体和精神状态的检查

第36条要求自认

第37条不出示或不协助发现:制裁

第6章开庭审理

第38条要求陪审团审判的权利

第39条陪审团审判或法院审判

第40条为开庭审理而分配案件

第41条撤销诉讼

第42条合并;分开审理

第43条证言的取得

第44条官方记录证明

第44条之1外国法的确定

第45条传票

第46条不需要提出异议

第47条选定陪审团成员

第48条陪审团成员人数——参与裁决

第49条特别裁决和质问书

第50条在陪审团审判的案件中作为法律问题作出的判决;选择重新审理的申请;有条件的裁定

第51条对陪审团的指示:异议

第52条法院认定事实;部分认定事实的判决

第53条主事官第7章判决

第54条判决;费用

第55条缺席

第56条简易判决

第57条宣告判决

第58条登记判决

第59条重新审理;判决的修改

第60条对判决或命令的救济

第61条无害的错误

第62条执行判决程序的中止

第63条法官不能继续执行职务

第8章临时性和终局性财产救济方法

第64条对人或财产的扣押

第65条禁止令

第65条之1担保:对保证人的诉讼程序

第66条被联邦法院任命的财产管理人

第67条向法院提存

第68条判决方案要约

第69条执行

第70条特定行为的判决;赋予权限

第71条有利于或不利于非当事人的第三人的令状

第9章特别程序

第71条之1不动产征收

第72条补助法官;审理前命令

第73条补助法官;同意审判及上诉的选择权

第74条根据《美国法典》

第28编第636条第3款(4)项和本规则

第73条第4 款的规定,对补助法官作出的决定向地区法院法官提起上诉的方式

第75条根据本规则第73条第4款的规定,对补助法官作出的决定向地区法院法官提起上诉的程序

第76条根据本规则第73条第4款的规定向地区法院法官提起上诉案件的判决和诉讼费用

第10章地区法院及其书记官

第77条地区法院及其书记官

第78条申请期日

第79条书记官保管的登记簿和记录以及登记

第80条速记员;用作证据的速记员报告及速记译回文字

第11章一般条款

第81条一般适用性

第82条管辖区域及审判地不受影响

第83条地区法院的规则;法官的指令

第84条诉讼文书格式

第85条本规则的称谓

第86条生效日期

附件一:诉讼文书格式

附件二:《美国联邦民事诉讼规则》中的词汇英中文语义对照表

美国联邦证据规则

导言《美国联邦证据规则》介绍

第1章一般规定

第101条适用范围

第102条目的和结构

第103条关于证据的裁定(a)错误裁定的后果(1)异议(2)提供证明(b)关于提供证据和裁定的记录(c)陪审团审理(d)显见错误

第104条初步询问(a)关于可采性的一般询问(b)以事实为条件的相关性(c)陪审团审理(d)被告人作证(e)重要性和可信性

第105条有限的可采性

第106条书面或录音证词的剩余部分或相关部分

第2章司法认知

第201条关于裁判事实的司法认知(a)适用范围(b)事实种类(c)任意采用(d)强制采用(e)被听证的机会(f)采用司法认知的时间(g)指示陪审团

第3章民事诉讼中的推定

第301条民事诉讼中推定的一般规定

第302条民事诉讼中州法的适用性第4章相关性及其限制

第401条“相关证据”的定义

第402条相关证据一般可以采纳;无相关性的证据不能采纳

第403条因偏见、混淆或浪费时间而排除相关证据

第404条品格证据不能采纳来证明行为;例外;其他犯罪(a)品格证据的一般规定(1)被告人的品格(2)被害人的品格(3)证人的品格(b)其他犯罪、错误或行为

第405条证明品格的方法(a)名声或评价(b)特定行为实例

第406条习惯;日常工作

第407条随后的补救措施

第408条和解和要求和解

第409条支付医疗或类似费用

第410条答辩、答辩讨论和有关陈述不可采纳

第411条责任保险

第412条性犯罪案件;与被害人过去行为相关

第5章特权

第501条一般规则

第6章证人

第601条关于证人能力的一般规则

第602条缺乏亲身体验

第603条宣誓或郑重声明

第604条译员

第605条法官作为证人的能力

第606条陪审员作为证人的能力(a)参加审理(b)对陪审团裁决或起诉书合法性的调查

第607条谁可以提出质疑

第608条关于证人品格和行为的证据(a)关于品格的评价证据和名声证据(b)行为的具体实例

第609条以曾被定罪的证据提出质疑(a)一般规则(b)时间限制(c)赦免、撤销或证明恢复名誉的效果(d)未成年人的裁判(e)上诉未决

第610条宗教信仰或主张

第611条询问和举证的方式和次序(a)法庭控制(b)交叉询问的范围(c)诱导性问题

第612条使用书面材料来唤醒记忆

第613条证人先前的陈述(a)就证人先前的陈述进行询问(b)有关证人先前陈述不一致的外部证据

第614条法庭传唤和询问证人(a)法庭传唤证人(b)法庭询问(c)异议

第615条排除证人

第7章意见证据和专家证词

第701条一般证人的意见证词

第702条专家证词

第703条专家意见证词的基础

第704条关于最终争议的意见

第705条公开专家意见所依据的事实和数据

第706条法庭指定专家(a)指定(b)补偿(c)将指定公开(d)当事人自己选择专家

第8章传闻证据

第801条定义(a)陈述(b)陈述者(c)传闻(d)不是传闻的陈述(1)证人的先前陈述(2)为对立当事人承认

第802条传闻证据规则

第803条传闻证据的例外;陈述者可否作证无关紧要(1)表达感觉印象(2)刺激的发泄(3)当时存在的精神、感情或身体状态(4)出于医疗诊断或治疗目的的陈述(5)被记录的回忆(6)关于日常行为、活动的记录(7)在第(6)项规定的记录中缺乏记载(8)公共记录或报告(9)重要统计资料(10)缺乏公共记录或没有记载(11)宗教组织的记录(12)婚姻、洗礼或类似证明(13)家庭记录(14)反映财产利益的文件记录(15)文件中反映财产利益的陈述(16)在陈年文件中的陈述(17)市场报告商业出版物(18)学术论文(19)关于个人或家庭历史的名声(20)关于边界和一般历史的名声(21)性格方面的名声(22)先前定罪的判决(23)关于个人、家庭、或一般历史、或边界的判决(24)其他例外

第804条传闻证据的例外;陈述者不能到庭作证(a)不能出庭的定义(b)传闻证据的例外(1)先前证词(2)临终陈述(3)对己不利的陈述(4)关于个人或家史的陈述(5)其他例外

第805条传闻中的传闻…

第806条攻击和支持陈述者的可信性

第9章鉴定和辨认

第901条要求鉴定或辨认(a)一般规定(b)说明(1)具有知识的人的证明(2)对笔迹的非专家意见(3)由审判者或专家证人进行比较(4)与众不同的特征或类似品质(5)声音辨认(6)声音通话(7)公共记录或报告(8)陈年文件或数据汇编(9)过程或系统(10)法律或规则规定的方法

第902条自我鉴定(1)国内盖有印章的公文(2)国内未盖印章的公文(3)外国公文(4)经证实的公共记录的副本(5)官方出版物(6)报纸和期刊(7)商品注册或类似标记(8)被承认的文件(9)商业票据和相关文件(10)根据国会立法推定

第903条不必要有补强证人证词

第10章文字、录音和照相的内容

第1001条定义(1)文字和录音(2)照相(3)原件(4)复制品

第1002条要求原件

第1003条复制品的可采性

第1004条其他关于内容的证据的可采性(1)原件遗失或毁坏(2)原件无法获得(3)原件在对方掌握中(4)附属事项

第1005条公共记录

第1006条摘要

第1007条当事人的证词或书面承认

第1008条法庭和陪审团的职能

第11章综合规则

第1101条规则的适用性(a)法院和治安法院(b)诉讼范围(c)关于特权的规则(d)不适用规则的情况(e)部分适用的规则

第1102条修改

第1103条标题

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

I.SCOPE OF RULES ONE FORM OF ACTION

Rule1 Scope and Purpose of Rules

These rules govern the procedure in the United States district courts in all suits of a civil nature whether cognizable as cases at law or in equity or in admiralty, with the exceptions stated in Rule 81. They shall be construed and administered to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action.

Rule 2 One Form of Action

There shall be one form of action to be known as civil action.

II. COMMENCEMENT OF ACTION; SERVICE OF PROCESS, PLEADINGS, MOTIONS, AND ORDERS

Rule 3 Commencement of Action

A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the court.

Rule 4 Summons

(a) Form. The summons shall be signed by the clerk, bear the seal of the court, identify the court and the parties, be directed to the defendant, and state the name and address of the plaintiff's attorney or, if unrepresented, of the plaintiff. It shall also state the time within which the defendant must appear and defend, and notify the defendant that failure to do so will result in a judgment by default against the defendant for the relief demanded in the complaint. The court may allow a summons to be amended.

(b) Issuance. Upon or after filing the complaint, the plaintiff may present a summons to the clerk for signature and seal. If the summons is in proper form, the clerk shall sign, seal, and issue it to the plaintiff for service on the defendant. A summons, or a copy of the summons if addressed to multiple defendants, shall be issued for each defendant to be served.

(c) Service with Complaint; by Whom Made.

(1) A summons shall be served together with a copy of the complaint. The plaintiff is

responsible for service of a summons and complaint within the time allowed under subdivision

(m) and shall furnish the person effecting service with the necessary copies of the summons

and complaint.

(2) Service may be effected by any person who is not a party and who is at least 18 years of age. At the request of the plaintiff, however, the court may direct that service be effected by a United States marshal, deputy United States marshal, or other person or officer specially appointed by the court for the purpose. Such an appointment must be made when the plaintiff is authorized to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to28 U.S.C. §1915 or is authorized to proceed as a seaman under 28 U.S.C. §1916

(d) Waiver of Service; Duty to Save Costs of Service; Request to Waive.

(1) A defendant who waives service of a summons does not thereby waive any objection to the venue or to the jurisdiction of the court over the person of the defendant.

(2) An individual, corporation, or association that is subject to service under subdivision

(e), (f), or (h) and that receives notice of an action in the manner provided in this paragraph has a duty to avoid unnecessary costs of serving the summons. To avoid costs, the plaintiff may notify such a defendant of the commencement of the action and request that the defendant waive service of a summons. The notice and request.

(A) shall be in writing and shall be addressed directly to the defendant,

if an individual, or else to an officer or managing or general agent (or other

agent authorized by appointment or law to receive service of process) of a

defendant subject to service under subdivision (h) ;

(B) shall be dispatched through first-class mail or other reliable means;

(C) shall be accompanied by a copy of the complaint and shall identify the

court in which it has been filed;

(D) shall inform the defendant, by means of a text prescribed in an official

form promulgated pursuant to Rule 84, of the consequences of compliance and

of a failure to comply with the request;

(E) shall set forth the date on which request is sent; (F) shall allow the

defendant a reasonable time to return the waiver, which shall be at least

30 days from the date on which the request is sent, or 60 days from that date

if the defendant is addressed outside any judicial district of the United

States; and

(G) shall provide the defendant with an extra copy of the notice and request,

as well as a prepaid means of compliance in writing.

If a defendant located within the United States fails to comply with a request

for waiver made by a plaintiff located within the United States, the court

shall impose the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service on the

defendant unless good cause for the failure be shown.

(3) A defendant that, before being served with process, timely returns a waiver so requested is not required to serve an answer to the complaint until 60 days after the date on which the request for waiver of service was sent, or 90 days after that date if the defendant was addressed outside any judicial district of the United States.

(4) When the plaintiff files a waiver of service with the court, the action shall proceed, except as provided in paragraph (3), as if a summons and complaint had been served at the time of filing the waiver, and no proofs of service shall be required.

(5) The costs to be imposed on a defendant under paragraph (2) for failure to comply with

a request to waive service of a summons shall include the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service under subdivision (e), (f), or (h), together with the costs, including a reasonable attorney's fee, of any motion required to collect the costs of service.

(e) Service Upon Individuals Within a Judicial District of the United States. Unless otherwise provided by federal law, service upon an individual from whom a waiver has not been obtained and filed, other than an infant or an incompetent person, may be effected in any judicial district of the United States:

(1) pursuant to the law of the state in which the district court is located, or in which

service is effected, for the service of a summons upon the defendant in an action brought

in the courts of general jurisdiction of the State; or

(2) by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the individual personally

or by leaving copies thereof at the individual's dwelling house or usual place of abode

with some person of suitable age and discretion then residing therein or by delivering

a copy of the summons and of the complaint to an agent authorized by appointment or by

law to receive service of process.

(f) Service Upon Individuals in a Foreign Country. Unless otherwise provided by federal law, service upon an individual from whom a waiver has not been obtained and filed, other than an infant or an incompetent person, may be effected in a place not within any judicial district of the United States:

(1) by any internationally agreed means reasonably calculated to give notice, such as those

means authorized by the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial

Documents; or

(2) if there is no internationally agreed means of service or the applicable international

agreement allows other means of service, provided that service is reasonably calculated

to give notice:

(A) in the manner prescribed by the law of the foreign country for service

in that country in an action in any of its courts of general jurisdiction;

or

(B) as directed by the foreign authority in response to a letter rogatory

or letter of request; or

(C) unless prohibited by the law of the foreign country, by

(i) delivery to the individual personally of a copy of the

summons and the complaint; or

(ii) any form of mail requiring a signed receipt, to be

addressed and dispatched by the clerk of the court to the party

to be served; or

(3) by other means not prohibited by international agreement as may be directed by the

court.

(g) Service Upon Infants and Incompetent Person. Service upon an infant or an incompetent person in a judicial district of the United States shall be effected in the manner prescribed by the law of the state in which the service is made for the service of summons or like process upon any such defendant in an action brought in the courts of general jurisdiction of that state. Service upon an infant or an incompetent

person in a place not within any judicial district of the United States shall be effected in the manner prescribed by paragraph (2)(A) or (2)(B) of subdivision (f) or by such means as the court may direct.

(h) Service Upon Corporations and Associations. Unless otherwise provided by federal law, service upon a domestic or foreign corporation or upon a partnership or other unincorporated association that is subject to suit under a common name, and from which a waiver of service has not been obtained and filed, shall be effected:

(1) in a judicial district of the United States in the manner prescribed for individuals

by subdivision (e)(1), or by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to an

officer, a managing or general agent, or to any other agent authorized by appointment or

by law to receive service of process and, if the agent is one authorized by statute to

receive service and the statute so requires, by also mailing a copy to the defendant, or

(2) in a place not within any judicial district of the United States in any manner prescribed

for individuals by subdivision (f) except personal delivery as provided in paragraph

(2)(C)(i) thereof.

(i) Serving the United States, Its Agencies, Corporations, Officers, or Employees.

(1) Service upon the United States shall be effected

(A) by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the United

States attorney for the district in which the action is brought or to an

assistant United States attorney or clerical employee designated by the

United States attorney in a writing filed with the clerk of the court or by

sending a copy of the summons and of the complaint by registered or certified

mail addressed to the civil process clerk at the office of the United States

attorney and

(B) by also sending a copy of the summons and of the complaint by registered

or certified mail to the Attorney General of the United States at Washington,

District of Columbia, and

(C) in any action attacking the validity of an order of an officer or agency

of the United States not made a party, by also sending a copy of the summons

and of the complaint by registered or certified mail to the officer or agency.

(2)(A) Service on an agency or corporation of the United States, or an officer or employee

of the United States sued only in an official capacity, is effected by serving the United

States in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 (i)(1) and by also sending a copy of the summons

and complaint by registered or certified mail to the officer, employee, agency, or

corporation.

(B) Service on an officer or employee of the United States sued in an

individual capacity for acts or omissions occurring in connection with the

performance of duties on behalf of the United States whether or not the

officer or employee is sued also in an official capacity is effected by

serving the United States in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 (i)(1) and by

serving the officer or employee in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 (e), (f),

or (g).

(3) The court shall allow a reasonable time to serve process under Rule 4 (i) for the purpose

of curing the failure to serve:

(A) all persons required to be served in an action governed by Rule 4 (i)(2)(A),

if the plaintiff has served either the United States attorney or the Attorney

General of the United States, or

(B) the United States in an action governed by Rule 4 (i)(2)(B), if the

plaintiff has served an officer or employee of the United States sued in an

individual capacity.

(j) Service Upon Foreign, State, or Local Governments.

(1) Service upon a foreign state or a political subdivision, agency, or instrumentality

thereof shall be effected pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1608

(2) Service upon a state, municipal corporation, or other governmental organization subject

to suit, shall be effected by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to

its chief executive officer or by serving the summons and complaint in the manner prescribed

by the law of that state for the service of summons or other like process upon any such

defendant.

(k) Territorial Limits of Effective Service.

(1) Service of a summons or filing a waiver of service is effective to establish jurisdiction

over the person of a defendant

(A) who could be subjected to the jurisdiction of a court of general

jurisdiction in the state in which the district court is located, or

(B) who is a party joined under Rule 14 or Rule 19 and is served at a place

within a judicial district of the United States and not more than 100 miles

from the place from which the summons issues, or

(C) who is subject to the federal interpleader jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1335, or

(D) when authorized by a statute of the United States.

(2) If the exercise of jurisdiction is consistent with the Constitution and laws of the

United States, serving a summons or filing a waiver of service is also effective, with

respect to claims arising under federal law, to establish personal jurisdiction over the

person of any defendant who is not subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of general

jurisdiction of any state.

(l) Proof of Service. If service is not waived, the person effecting service shall make proof thereof to the court. If service is made by a person other than a United States marshal or deputy United States

marshal, the person shall make affidavit thereof. Proof of service in a place not within any judicial district of the United States shall, if effected under paragraph (1) of subdivision (f), be made pursuant to the applicable treaty or convention, and shall, if effected under paragraph (2) or (3) thereof, include a receipt signed by the addressee or other evidence of delivery to the addressee satisfactory to the court. Failure to make proof of service does not affect the validity of the service. The court may allow proof of service to be amended.

(m) Time Limit for Service. If service of the summons and complaint is not made upon a defendant within 120 days after the filing of the complaint, the court, upon motion or on its own initiative after notice to the plaintiff, shall dismiss the action without prejudice as to that defendant or direct that service be effected within a specified time; provided that if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court shall extend the time for service for an appropriate period. This subdivision does not apply to service in a foreign country pursuant to subdivision (f) or (j)(1).

(n) Seizure of Property; Service of Summons Not Feasible.

(1) If a statute of the United States so provides, the court may assert jurisdiction over

property. Notice to claimants of the property shall than be sent in the manner provided

by the statute or by service of a summons under this rule.

(2) Upon a showing that personal jurisdiction over a defendant cannot, in the district

where the action is brought, be obtained with reasonable efforts by service of summons

in any manner authorized by this rule, the court may assert jurisdiction over any of the

defendant's assets found within the district by seizing the assets under the circumstances

and in the manner provided by the law of the state in which the district court is located.

Rule 4.1. Service of Other Process

(a) Generally. Process other than a summons as provided in Rule 4 or subpoena as provided in Rule 45 shall be served by a United States marshal, a deputy United States marshal, or a person specially appointed for that purpose, who shall make proof of service as provided in Rule 4 (1). The process may be served anywhere within the territorial limits of the state in which the district court is located, and, when authorized by a statute of the United States, beyond the territorial limits of that state.

(b) Enforcement of Orders: Commitment for Civil Contempt. An order of civil commitment of a person held to be in contempt of a decree or injunction issued to enforce the laws of the United States may be served and enforced in any district. Other orders in civil contempt proceedings shall be served in the state in which the court issuing the order to be enforced is located or elsewhere within the United States if not more than 100 miles from the place at which the order to be enforced was issued.

Rule 5 Service and Filing of Pleadings and Other Papers

(a) Service: When Required. Except as otherwise provided in these rules, every order required by its terms to be served, every pleading subsequent to the original complaint unless the court otherwise orders because of numerous defendants, every paper relating to discovery required to be served upon a party unless the court otherwise orders, every written motion other than one which may be heard ex parte, and every written notice, appearance, demand, offer of judgment, designation of record on appeal, and similar paper shall be served upon each of the parties. No service need be made on parties in default for failure to appear except that pleadings asserting new or additional claims for relief against them shall be served upon them in the manner provided for service of summons in Rule 4.

In an action begun by seizure of property, in which no person need be or is named as defendant, any service required to be made prior to the filing of an answer, claim, or appearance shall be made upon the person having custody or possession of the property at the time of its seizure.

(b) Same: How Made. Whenever under these rules service is required or permitted to be made upon a party represented by an attorney the service shall be made upon the attorney unless service upon the party is ordered by the court. Service upon the attorney or upon a party shall be made by delivering a copy to the attorney or party or by mailing it to the attorney or party at the attorney's or party's last known address or, if no address is known, by leaving it with the clerk of the court. Delivery of a copy within this rule means: handing it to the attorney or to the party; or leaving it at the attorney's or party's office with a clerk or other person in charge thereof; or, if there is no one in charge, leaving it in a conspicuous place therein; or, if the office is closed or the person to be served has no office, leaving it at the person's dwelling house or usual place of abode with some person of suitable age and discretion then residing therein. Service by mail is complete upon mailing.

(c) Same: Numerous Defendants. In any action in which there are unusually large numbers of defendants, the court, upon motion or of its own initiative, may order that service of the pleadings of the defendants and replies thereto need not be made as between the defendants and that any cross-claim, counterclaim, or matter constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense contained therein shall be deemed to be denied or avoided by all other parties and that the filing of any such pleading and service thereof upon the plaintiff constitutes due notice of it to the parties. A copy of every such order shall be served upon the parties in such manner and form as the court directs.

(d) Filing; Certificate of Service. All papers after the complaint required to be served upon a party, together with a certificate of service, must be filed with the court within a reasonable time after service, but disclosures under Rule 26 (a)(1) or (2) and the following discovery requests and responses must not be filed until they are used in the proceeding or the court orders filing: (i) depositions, (ii) interrogatories, (iii) requests for documents or to permit entry upon land, and (iv) requests for admission.

(e) Filing With the Court Defined. The filing of papers with the court as required by these rules shall be made by filing them with the clerk of court, except that the judge may permit the papers to be filed with the judge, in which event the judge shall note thereon the filing date and forthwith transmit them to the office of the clerk. A court may by local rule permit papers to be filed, signed, or verified by electronic means that are consistent with technical standards, if any, that the Judicial Conference of the United States establishes. A paper filed by electronic means in compliance with a local rule constitutes a written paper for the purpose of applying these rules. The clerk shall not refuse to accept for filing any paper presented for that purpose solely because it is not presented in proper form as required by these rules or any local rules or practices.

Prospective amendment:

Amendment of Rule 5, effective December 1, 2001. By order dated April 23, 2001, the Supreme Court of the United States approved the following amendments to Rule 5, effective December 1, 2001, and authorized their transmission to Congress in accordance with 28 USCS § 2072

Rule 5. Service and Filing of Pleadings and Other Papers

(b) Making Service.

(1) Service under Rules 5(a) and 77(d) on a party represented by an attorney is made on

the attorney unless the court orders service on the party.

(2) Service under Rule 5(a) is made by:

(A) Delivering a copy to the person served by:

(i) handing it to the person;

(ii) leaving it at the person's office with a clerk or other

person in charge, or if no one is in charge leaving it in a

conspicuous place in the office; or

(iii) if the person has no office or the office is closed,

leaving it at the person's dwelling house or usual place of

abode with someone of suitable age and discretion residing

there.

(B) Mailing a copy to the last known address of the person served. Service

by mail is complete on mailing.

(C) If the person served has no known address, leaving a copy with the clerk

of the court.

(D) Delivering a copy by any other means, including electronic means,

consented to in writing by the person served. Service by electronic means

is complete on transmission; service by other consented means is complete

when the person making service delivers the copy to the agency designated

to make delivery.

If authorized by local rule, a party may make service under this subparagraph

(D) through the court's transmission facilities.

(3) Service by electronic means under Rule 5(b)(2)(D) is not effective if the party making service learns that the attempted service did not reach the person to be served.

Rule 6 Time

(a) Computation. In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by these rules, by the local rules of any district court, by order of court, or by any applicable statute, the day of the act, event, or default from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period so computed shall be included, unless it is a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday, or, when the act to be done is the filing of a paper in court, a day on which weather or other conditions have made the office of the clerk of the district court inaccessible, in which event the period runs until the end of the next day which is not one of the aforementioned days. When the period of time prescribed or allowed is less than 11 days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays shall be excluded in the computation. As used in this rule and in Rule 77 (c), legal holiday includes New Year's Day, Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr., Washington's Birthday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day, and any other day appointed as a holiday by the President of the Congress of the United States, or by the state in which the district court is held.

(b) Enlargement. When by these rules or by a notice given thereunder or by order of court an act is required or allowed to be done at or within a specified time, the court for cause shown may at any time in its discretion (1) with or without motion or notice order the period enlarged if request therefor is made before the expiration of the period originally prescribed or as extended by a previous order, or (2) upon motion made after the expiration of the specified period permit the act to be done where the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect; but it may not extend the time for taking any action under Rules 50 (b) and (c)(2), 52 (b), 59 (b), (d), and (e), and 60(b), except to the extent and under the conditions stated in them.

(c) Unaffected by Expiration of Term. [Rescinded Feb. 28, 1966, eff. July 1, 1966.]

(d) For Motions Affidavits. A written motion, other than one which may be heard ex parte, and notice of the hearing thereof shall be served not later than 5 days before the time specified for the hearing, unless a different period is fixed by these rules or by order of the court. Such an order may for cause shown be made on ex parte application. When a motion is supported by affidavit, the affidavit shall be served with the motion; and, except as otherwise provided in Rule 59 (c), opposing affidavits may be served not later than 1 day before the hearing, unless the court permits them to be served at some other time.

(e) Additional Time After Service by Mail. Whenever a party has the right or is required to do some act or take some proceedings within a prescribed period after the service of a notice or other paper upon the party and the notice or paper is served upon the party by mail, 3 days shall be added to the prescribed period.

Prospective amendment:

Amendment of Rule 6, effective December 1, 2001. By order dated April 23, 2001, the Supreme Court of the United States approved the following amendments to Rule 6, effective December 1, 2001, and authorized their transmission to Congress in accordance with 28 USCS§ 2072

Rule 6. Time

(e) Additional Time After Service under Rule 5(B)(2)(B), (C), or (D). Whenever a party has the right or is required to do some act or take some proceedings within a prescribed period after the service of a notice or other paper upon the party and the notice or paper is served upon the party under Rule 5(b)(2)(B), (C), or (D), 3 days shall be added to the prescribed period.

III. PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS

Rule 7 Pleadings Allowed : Form of Motions

(a) Pleadings. There shall be a complaint and an answer; a reply to a counterclaim denominated as such; an answer to a cross-claim, if the answer contains a cross-claim; a third-party complaint, if a person who was not an original party is summoned under the provisions of Rule 14; and a third-party answer, if a third-party complaint is served. No other pleading shall be allowed, except that the court may order a reply to an answer or a third-party answer.

(b) Motions and Other Papers

(1) An application to the court for an order shall be by motion which, unless made during

a hearing or trial, shall be made in writing, shall state with particularity the grounds

therefor, and shall set forth the relief or order sought. The requirement of writing is

fulfilled if the motion is stated in a written notice of the hearing of the motion.

(2) The rules applicable to captions and other matters of form of pleadings apply to all

motions and other papers provided for by these rules.

(3) All motions shall be signed in accordance with Rule 11.

(c) Demurrers, Pleas, etc., Abolished. Demurrers, pleas, and exceptions for insufficiency of a pleading shall not be used.

Rule 8 General Rules of Pleading

(a)Claims for Relief. A pleading which sets forth a claim for relief, whether an original

claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, shall contain (1) a short and

plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends, unless

the court already has jurisdiction and the claim needs no new grounds of jurisdiction

to support it, (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader

is entitled to relief, and (3) a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks.

Relief in the alternative or of several different types may be demanded.

(b) Defenses; Form of Denials. A party shall state in short and plain terms the party's

defenses to each claim asserted and shall admit or deny the averments upon which the

adverse party relies. If a party is without knowledge or information sufficient to

form a belief as to the truth of an averment, the party shall so state and this has

the effect of a denial. Denials shall fairly meet the substance of the averments denied.

When a pleader intends in good faith to deny only a part or a qualification of an averment,

the pleader shall specify so much of it as is true and material and shall deny only

the remainder. Unless the pleader intends in good faith to controvert all the averments

of the preceding pleading, the pleader may make denials as specific denials of

designated averments or paragraphs or may generally deny all the averments except such

designated averments or paragraphs as the pleader expressly admits; but, when the

pleader does so intend to controvert all its averments, including averments of the

grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends, the pleader may do so by general

denial subject to the obligations set forth in Rule 11.

(c) Affirmative Defenses. In pleading to a preceding pleading, a party shall set forth affirmatively accord and satisfaction, arbitration and award, assumption of risk, contributory negligence, discharge in bankruptcy, duress, estoppel, failure of consideration, fraud, illegality, injury by fellow servant, laches, license, payment, release, res judicata, statute of frauds, statute of limitations, waiver, and any other matter constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense. When a party has mistakenly designated a defense as a counterclaim or a counterclaim as a defense, the court on terms, if justice so requires, shall treat the pleading as if there had been a proper designation.

(d) Effect of Failure To Deny. Averments in a pleading to which a responsive pleading is required, other than those as to the amount of damage, are admitted when not denied in the responsive pleading. Averments in a pleading to which no responsive pleading is required or permitted shall be taken as denied or avoided.

(e) Pleading to be Concise and Direct; Consistency.

(1) Each averment of a pleading shall be simple, concise, and direct. No technical forms

of pleading or motions are required.

(2) A party may set forth two or more statements of a claim or defense alternately or

hypothetically, either in one count or defense or in separate counts or defenses. When

two or more statements are made in the alternative and one of them if made independently

would be sufficient, the pleading is not made insufficient by the insufficiency of one

or more of the alternative statements. A party may also state as many separate claims or

defenses as the party has regardless of consistency and whether based on legal, equitable,

or maritime grounds. All statements shall be made subject to the obligations set forth

in Rule 11.

(f) Construction of Pleadings. All pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial justice.

Rule 9 Pleading Special Matters

(a) Capacity. It is not necessary to aver the capacity of a party to sue or be sued or the authority of a party to sue or be sued in a representative capacity or the legal existence of an organized association of persons that is made a party, except to the extent required to show the jurisdiction of the court. When a party desires to raise an issue as to the legal existence of any party or the capacity of any party to sue or be sued or the authority of a party to sue or be sued in a representative capacity, the party desiring to raise the issue shall do so by specific negative averment, which shall include such supporting particulars as are peculiarly within the pleader s knowledge.

(b) Fraud, Mistake, Condition of the Mind. In all averments of fraud or mistake, the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake shall be stated with particularity. Malice, intent, knowledge, and other condition of mind of a person may be averred generally.

(c) Conditions Precedent. In pleading the performance or occurrence of conditions precedent, it is sufficient to aver generally that all conditions precedent have been performed or have occurred. A denial of performance or occurrence shall be made specifically and with particularity.

(d) Official Document or Act. In pleading an official document or official act it is sufficient to aver that the document was issued or the act done in compliance with law.

(e) Judgment. In pleading a judgment or decision of a domestic or foreign court, judicial or quasi-judicial tribunal, or of a board or officer, it is sufficient to aver the judgment or decision without setting forth matter showing jurisdiction to render it.

(f) Time and Place. For the purpose of testing the sufficiency of a pleading, averments of time and place are material and shall be considered like all other averments of material matter.

(g) Special Damage. When items of special damage are claimed, they shall be specifically stated.

(h) Admiralty and Maritime Claims. A pleading or count setting forth a claim for relief within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction that is also within the jurisdiction of the district court on some other ground may contain a statement identifying the claim as an admiralty or maritime claim for the purposes of Rule 14 (c),38(e), 82, and the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims. If the claim is cognizable only in admiralty, it is an admiralty or maritime claim for those purposes whether so identified or not. The amendment of a pleading to add or withdraw an identifying statement is governed

by the principles of Rule 15. A case that includes an admiralty or maritime claim within this subdivision is an admiralty case within 28 U.S.C.§1292(a)(3).

Rule 10 Form of Pleadings

(a) Caption; Names of Parties. Every pleading shall contain a caption setting forth the name of the court, the title of the action, the file number, and a designation as in Rule 7 (a). In the complaint the title of the action shall include the names of all the parties, but in other pleadings it is sufficient to state the name of the first party on each side with an appropriate indication of other parties.

(b) Paragraphs; Separate Statements. All averments of claim or defense shall be made in numbered paragraphs, the contents of each of which shall be limited as far as practicable to a statement of a single set of circumstances; and a paragraph may be referred to by number in all succeeding pleadings. Each claim founded upon a separate transaction or occurrence and each defense other than denials shall be stated in a separate count or defense whenever a separation facilitates the clear presentation of the matters set forth.

(c) Adoption by Reference; Exhibits. Statements in a pleading may be adopted by reference in a different part of the same pleading or in another pleading or in any motion. A copy of any written instrument which is an exhibit to a pleading is a part thereof for all purposes.

Rule 11 Signing of Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to Court; Sanctions

(a) Signature. Every pleading, written motion, and other paper shall be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney's individual name, or, if the party is not represented by an attorney, shall be signed by the party. Each paper shall state the signer's address and telephone number, if any. Except when otherwise specifically provided by rule or statute, pleadings need not be verified or accompanied by affidavit. An unsigned paper shall be stricken unless omission of the signature is corrected promptly after being called to the attention of attorney or party.

(b) Representations to Court. By presenting to the court (whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating) a pleading, written motion, or other paper, an attorney or unrepresented party is certifying that to the best of the person's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances,

(1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause

unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation;

(2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions therein are warranted by existing

law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing

law or the establishment of new law;

(3) the allegations and other factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if

specifically so identified, are likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable

opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and

(4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically

so identified, are reasonably based on a lack of information or belief.

(c) Sanctions. If, after notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond, the court determines that subdivision (b) has been violated, the court may, subject to the conditions stated below, impose an

appropriate sanction upon the attorneys, law firms, or parties that have violated subdivision (b) or are responsible for the violation.

(1) How Initiated.

(A) By Motion. A motion for sanctions under this rule shall be made separately

from other motions or requests and shall describe the specific conduct

alleged to violate subdivision (b). It shall be served as provided in Rule

5, but shall not be filed with or presented to the court unless, within 21

days after service of the motion (or such other period as the court may

prescribe), the challenged paper, claim, defense, contention, allegation,

or denial is not withdrawn or appropriately corrected. If warranted, the

court may award to the party prevailing on the motion the reasonable expenses

and attorney's fees incurred in presenting or opposing the motion. Absent

exceptional circumstances, a law firm shall be held jointly responsible for

violations committed by its partners, associates, and employees.

(B) On Court's Initiative. On its own initiative, the court may enter an order

describing the specific conduct that appears to violate subdivision (b) and

directing an attorney, law firm, or party to show cause why it has not violated

subdivision (b) with respect thereto.

(2) Nature of Sanction; Limitations. A sanction imposed for violation of this rule shall

be limited to what is sufficient to deter repetition of such conduct or comparable conduct

by others similarly situated. Subject to the limitations in subparagraphs (A) and (B),

the sanction may consist of, or include, directives of a nonmonetary nature, an order to

pay a penalty into court, or, if imposed on motion and warranted for effective deterrence,

an order directing payment to the movant of some or all of the reasonable attorneys' fees

and other expenses incurred as a direct result of the violation.

(A) Monetary sanctions may not be awarded against a represented party for

a violation of subdivision (b)(2).

(B) Monetary sanctions may not be awarded on the court's initiative unless

the court issues its order to show cause before a voluntary dismissal or

settlement of the claims made by or against the party which is, or whose

attorneys are, to be sanctioned.

(3) Order. When imposing sanctions, the court shall describe the conduct determined to

constitute a violation of this rule and explain the basis for the sanction imposed.

(d) Inapplicability to Discovery. Subdivisions (a) through (c) of this rule do not apply to disclosures and discovery requests, responses, objections, and motions that are subject to the provisions of Rules 26 through 37.

Rule 12 Defenses and Objections –When and How Presented – By Pleading or Motion- Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

(a) When Presented.

美国民事诉讼的真谛

《美国民事诉讼的真谛》读书笔记 美国学者史蒂文.苏本玛格瑞特.伍法律出版社02年版 序——江伟 1.规则的动态创设P5 事实上,制度规则都是在发展过程中由人们对规则的利用和改进以及对价值的优选取舍二使其成为今天的模样,制度从来都不是单纯的理论创设,而是在微观的实务中由人们不断提出观念,不断创智和改进制度儿磨合出来的。因此,仅仅依靠思辨的理念式研究是不可能降司法改革的探讨引入纵深,我们必须关注对于实证的研究。 2.民事诉讼程序的目标和价值P6 纠纷的解决方法体现出社会价值和优先性,以及社会在如何处理不同的选择方法中的模糊性——解决私人纠纷或者设定公共规范标准,规范的程序正义或自由裁量的个别正义,效率或者公平。 民事诉讼被看作是一个国家的社会——经济——政治构造中的一部分,人们不能在没有明确其所寻求的目标的情况下去评价诉讼程序。 耶林说“目的是所有法律的创造者”。法治不是单纯的形式,而只是适合特定价值选择的形式。美国民事诉讼制度如此纷繁复杂的原因之一就在于其力图同时实现多重互相对抗的目标。导论 “民事”一词 对美国法律人士而言,“民事”一词的确切含义是“非刑事”。民事诉讼案件,则是指刑事案件之外的所有的案件。其中也包括美国公民对其政府提起的民事诉讼,或者美国政府对某人提起诉讼以获得民事的而非刑事的救济。 第一章美国法律制度——多元化,不信任以及对平衡秩序的探求 1.迈克尔.考曼写的书《自相矛盾的人民——对美国文明起源的探究》 美国人意识和观念中的矛盾: 与法院和法律秩序的建立最为相关的是,祈求安定和秩序与相信个人应享有行动自由之间的互相矛盾;殖民主义赞成人人享有尊严与自由,但他们同时又征服土著美国人并拥有奴隶;既崇信法律又需要偶尔的无法无天,与对法院的需要相伴的是对法院的不信任,如果说不是对法院厌恶的话。 2.社会多元与平衡制约 “起源的多重性,种族的多元化和社会异质性导致了令人不适的紧张和压力”。在一个人民渊源多元化,意识形态与思维方式又极端矛盾的未成形的国家中,一定的秩序和平衡是极其重要的。 对宪法起草者而言,他们既不信任人性,又不信任人民,同样也不信任权力集中于少数人,同时,州之间也互不信任。但在各州纸上具有一个享有一定主权的国家是十分必要的,因为宪法以及基于法律所建立的制度无疑将为各州和极为缺乏共同传统,利益团体和明确疆域的民族带来秩序和界限。——对平衡秩序的探求:联邦制和国家机构中的三大机关。 美国几组对权力抑制因素: A联邦制; B.三权分立及三机关内部的制约平衡

关联性规则——外国证据规则系列之二

关联性规则——外国证据规则系列之二 证据规则渊源于英国普通法,十七、十八世纪后,以两种途径传播到世界各地。其途径之一是,伴随着在世界范围内的殖民扩张,英国开始在其殖民地强制推行包括证据法在内的英国法律制度,逐渐形成了一个以继受普通法为特征的英美法系。现在,在英美法系国家里,基本上沿袭了普通法上的证据规则,一些国家甚至根据本国的需要对证据规则进行较大的发展,如美国通过宪法判例确立了非法证据排除规则。其二是,基于完善本国刑事诉讼制度的需要,欧洲大陆的一些国家主动吸收、借鉴英国法的一些合理做法,也开始确立了一定数量的证据规则。经过数世纪的发展,证据规则已经超出了某一个特定国家,并在一定程度上形成了一些为多数国家所共认的证据规则。 在我国证据规则体系的建设中,西方国家尤其是英美法系国家的一般作法具有较大的借鉴价值。因为“这些规则的基本内容不仅反映对抗制诉讼的要求,也体现了发现客观真实的一般规律”。结合我国建立、健全证据规则的立法需求,本文以下将对西方国家普遍认同的一些主要证据规则予以介绍。由于英美法系国家规范证据能力的证据规则历史悠久、形式完备,在具体论述时,将主要以英美法系国家为主,同时兼及大陆法系国家。 相关性规则,又称关联性规则,是英美法系的一项基础性证据规则。美国学者格雷厄姆。C.雷丽认为,“证据的相关性,是融汇于证据规则中带有根本性和一贯性的原则。……由于相关性这一涵义适用于所有所举出的证据,因此,也渗透于庭审的全部过程。所有具备可采性的证据必须先与要证事实具有相关性,至少当对方举证就证据的相关性质疑时,必须首先证实其具有相关性。”相关性规则的基础性地位体现于以下两个方面:第一,相关性规则涉及的是特定证据材料与待证事实之间的关系,而不是该证据的存在形式。因此,相关性规则适用于任何形式的证据资料,在适用范围上具有广泛性。第二,相关性是具有证据资格的基础条件。尽管具有相关性的证据并不必然具有证据资格(或曰可采性),但是,没有相关性的证据却必然不具证据资格。 理解相关性规则的关键在于正确地认识何谓“相关性”。在英美法国家,由于相关性问题属于法官负责的事项,判例很少关心相关性的语义界定。事实上,学者一般是在日常语义上使用该术语的。在判例中,相关性被理解为“被提出的证据对于被证明的事实具有‘逻辑上的可能性(Logically Probative)’,或者说,就此目的而言具有‘逻辑上的相关性’(Logically relevant)”。“有关

美国联邦证据规则2016版

美国联邦证据规则 介绍:首席大法官沃伦于1965年任命一个顾问委员会为联邦法院起草证据规则。该委员会起草的初稿于1969年发表以征求意见。修订稿于1971年公布。1972年,联邦高等法院将其命名为《联邦证据规则》,于1973年7月1日生效。道格拉斯大法官持不同意见。根据有关授权法案,首席大法官伯格将该证据规则提交国会审议,国会将其搁置以作进一步的研究。经过广泛详尽的研究,国会将该规则作有关修改后颁布为法律。1975年1月2日批准,1975年2月1日生效。这样,联邦证据规则是联邦高等法院制订规则的程序与国会的立法程序相结合的产物。至少,广泛收集普通法的案例与有关的制订法是同等重要,两者共同构成证据规则演进的背景。在理解证据规则时,这些立法渊源都必须加以考虑。 -----爱德华特W.克利瑞 第一章总则 规则101 范围和定义 (a)范围 本规则适用于联邦法院程序,具体法院、程序及其例外,从规则1101之规定。 (b)定义 在本证据规则中: (1)“民事案件”是指民事诉讼或者程序; (2)“刑事案件”包括刑事程序; (3)“公共机构”包括公共机关; (4)“记录”包括备忘录、报告或者数据汇编; (5)“高等法院指定的规则”是指高等法院根据国会立法授权制定的规则; (6)以电子数据格式存储的书面材料和其他。 规则102 目的 本规则将用以保证公正的施行,消除不合理耗费和延误,促进证据法的发展壮大,以实现查明事实真相,公正处理诉讼。 规则103 关于证据的裁定 (a)错误裁定的后果 只有在重大权利遭受影响,且符合以下条件时,当事人方可主张采纳或者排除证据的裁定存在错误:(1)如系采纳证据的裁定,依审判之记录,当事人: (A)已及时提出异议或者申请删除证据;并且 (B)已说明具体理由,除非该理由能从上下文中体现出来;或者 (2)如系排除证据的裁定,当事人已通过提出证明的方式告知法院具体理由,除非该理由能从上下文中体现出来。 (b)不需要重新提出异议或者提出证明 无论在审判时还是在审判前,一旦法院已作出明确裁定并记录在案,当事人不需要为上诉该裁定而重新提出异议或者提出证明。 (c)法院关于裁定的陈述,对提供证明进行指示 法院可以就证据的性质、形式、提出的异议和裁定进行任何陈述。 法院可以指示以提问和回答的方式来提出证明。 (d)防止陪审团听见不可采的证据 在可行的范围内,法院在进行陪审团审判时,必须防止以任何方式将不可采的证据暗示给陪审团。

美国统一继承法典

《美国统一继承法典》概述 周强刘晓星 美国是一个联邦制的国家,法律制度实行的是双轨制,即联邦颁布的法律和各州颁布的法律。由于诸多原因,各州所颁布的法律极不统一,因而常常引起相互间的法律冲突。为了克服这种现象,自本世纪初以来,美国一些非官方机构在致力于统一美国各州法律的问题上作出了很大的努力。迄今为止,已制定了大量的统一法律规范供名洲采角或立法参考,其中有些法律规范已为各州采用或修改采用,‘发生法律效力。一九六八年八月美国州法律全国统一委员会和美国律师协会批准的《美国统一继承法典》(以下简称法典)就是在统一美国各州继承法律制度方面起着重要作用的一部示范性的法典。该法典的特点是:内容详尽,立法精巧,实体法与程序法紧密结合,法典既保留了各州原来实行的普通法中的一些继承制度,又兼收了罗马法的一些原则。所以,自该法典获批准以来,巳有十几个州采用或在不同程度上修改后采用。 法典共有三百零四条,主要内容如下: 一、无遗嘱继承。 无遗嘱继承,是指被继承人死亡时未立遗嘱,其遗产依无遗嘱继承的法律规定转移给无遗嘱继承人。 l、无遗嘱继承人的范围和顺序:法典规定,配偶、子女、父母、兄弟姐妹、祖父母、外祖父母均为无遗嘱法定继承人..对配偶、子女、父母的定义,法典又作了特殊的规定。对配偶的规定中指出,凡与被继承人离婚或与被继承人的婚姻宣告无效的人,得到或同意在本州尚未被承认有效的与被继承人离婚或宣告他们婚姻无效的最终判决的人,同意法院依被继承人提议作出的离婚或宣告他们婚姻无效的判决的人,均不属于被继承人的配偶。子女是指有权根据法律规定通过无遗嘱继承从与其有血缘关系的父母处取得遗产的一切子女。但继子女和非婚生子女不包括在内。父母是指在子女无遗嘱死亡时,有权根据无遗嘱继承从与其有血缘关系的已亡子女处取得财产的人。但继父母不包括在内。 由此可见,法典真接规定的无遗嘱继承人的范围,要比原来各州所规定的范围小得多。由此法典规定,无遗嘱继承人的继承顺序是:(1)子女、(2)父毋、(3)兄弟姐妹、(4)祖父母、外祖父母。被继承人的配偶未列入任何具体的顺序,由法律另行单独规定继承权。 2、遗产继承份额.法典采用法定份额和同一继承人均分遗产的混合制度。所谓法定应继份额,是指法律对某些继承人的应继遗产份额直接作出规定。相同顺序继承人均分制,是指享有法定份额以外的其他同一顺序继承人依照法律的规定平等地分配遗产。 享有法定份额的人,包括配偶和未成年的子女以及未独立生活的成年子女。配偶的法定遗产份额,是在被继承人没有第一、第二顺序无遗嘱继承人的情况下,继承全部遗产,如在被继承人留有父母的情况下,先继承五万美元的遗产后,再继承剩余遗产的二分之一,如在被继承人留有子女的情况下,先继承五万美元的遗产后,再继承剩余遗产的二分之一卜在被继承人留有亲生子女,但该子女并非与生存配偶所生的子女时,则生存配偶只能继承遗产 的二分之一。此外,法典还废除了某些州实行的寡妇产和鳏夫产制度,而赋予生存配偶选择权和取得宅园特留份、

美国统一电子交易法案

美国统一电子交易法案 发布日期:1999-08-04 生效日期: 1999-08-04统一州法全国会议委员会起草 第一条标题 本法案名称定为“统一电子交易法案 第二条定义 本法案所称: 1、“协议”系指事实上的当事人以语言明示的交易或根据适用于特定交易的法律从特定场所或赋予合意效力的规则、规定和程序所推定的交易。 2、“自动交易”系指一项交易全部或部分通过电子手段或电子记录进行或履行,其中一方或双方的在订立合同、履行既有合同或交易义务的行为或记录未经参与其中的个人审查。 3、“计算机程序”系指为达到一定结果直接用于或间接用于信息处理系统的一系列语句或指令。 4、“合同”系指当事人根据本法案和其他适用法订立的协议所产生的全部法律义务。 5、“电子方式”系指采用电学、数字、磁、无线、光学、电磁或相关手段的技术。 6、“电子代理”系指非经人的行为或审核,全部或部分独立地发起某种行为或应对电子记录或履行的计算机程序、电子手段或其他自动化手段。 7、“电子记录”系指通过电子手段创制、生成、发送、传播、接收或存储的记录。 8、“电子签名”系指附着于或逻辑地关联于一项记录并意欲签署该记录的人采纳的电子声音、符号或程序。 9、“政府部门”系指联邦政府、州、郡、市或其他州属政治机构的行政、立法或司法行署、部门、理事会、委员会、当局、研究院或其它机构。 10、“信息”系指数据、文本、图象、声音、代码、计算机程序、软件、数据库或类似事物。 11、“信息处理系统”系指创制、生成、发送、接收、存储、显示或处理信息的系统。 12、“某人”系指个人、公司、商业信托、地产、信托、合伙、有限责任公司、联合体、合资企业、政府部门、上市公司或其它任何法律上或商业上的实体。 13、“记录”系指写入有形媒介或存储于电子媒介或其他媒介,并且能够以可认知的形式恢复的信息。 14、“安全程序”系指用于确认一项电子签名、电子记录或电子履行确属特定某人所为,或用于侦测一项电子记录中信息变动或信息错误的程序,它包括需要使用算法或其他代码、鉴别词句和数字、加密、回叫或其他的识别程序。 15、“州”系指美国的一个州、哥伦比亚特区、波多黎哥、美属维尔京群岛或其他美国拥有管辖权的地区或孤岛:也包括联邦政府认可或州政府正式承认的印地安部落或家族

对我国民事诉讼审前程序与审理程序对接的功能_省略__从比较法的视野看我国_民事诉

对我国民事诉讼审前程序与审理程序对接的 功能性反思与建构 ———从比较法的视野看我国《民事诉讼法》的修改 毕玉谦* 一、引论 自1982年《民事诉讼法(试行)》颁布以来,我国《民事诉讼法》经历了三次修订,分 别发生在1991年、 2007年和今年(即2012年)。其中,1991年是一次全面修订,2007年是一次局部修订(仅涉及再审程序和执行程序),今年最新的一次属于较大的局部性修订。 我国现行《民事诉讼法》并未将审前程序作为一种完全独立于审判程序来加以规定的,而是将审理前的准备工作作为一种相对独立的诉讼阶段与开庭审理相区别,并一并规 定在法典第二编“审判程序”的第一审普通程序项下,这种立法模式主要体现的是强调开庭的实体审理而忽略庭前准备程序潜在功能的特点。 应当说,1991年《民事诉讼法》是在对我国1982年《民事诉讼法(试行)》全面补充完善基础上的产物。当时我国深化经济体制改革为市场经济大发展提供了必要的条件并开辟了广阔的前景。该法在1991年开始实施以后,因社会发展的不平衡,审判方式改革的 热潮首先在经济较为发达的地区悄然兴起, 并且对《民事诉讼法》所规定的审前准备程序带来极大冲击。这一审判方式改革体现了“私权意识”、“主体意识”、“程序意识”等新兴 思想,为改革的持续发展不断注入活力。自1991年《民事诉讼法》颁行之后,最高人民法 院相继出台了有关民事诉讼司法解释, 〔1〕对审判方式改革起了有力的推动作用,同时引发了一波波新的改革浪潮,其根本动因在于当时的审判方式已远远不能适应市场经济发展所提出的时代要求以及社会公众对于通过司法正义(作为社会正义的核心内容之一)来维护其物质权益、精神权益的迫切需求。 · 61·*〔1〕中国政法大学教授,法学博士。 例如, 1993年最高人民法院《第一审经济纠纷案件适用普通程序开庭审理的若干规定》、1998年最高人民法院《关于民事经济审判方式改革问题的若干规定》、1999年最高人民法院《人民法院五年改革纲要》等。

《美国统一商法典》对中国商法发展的启示

《美国统一商法典》对中国商法发展的启示 《美国统一商法典》被认为是西方世界最先进的商法,是商法跨入现代商法的时代标志,其现代性表现为美国调整市场交易的法律是内外一体的,是与国际交易规则相对接的。我国对《美国统一商法典》经验的吸取,更多不是具体法律制度、条文和形式,而是把注意力集中于其所体现的现代商法的精神上,这是具有实质意义的。因为我们一旦掌握了商法的现代化精神,就可以在对传统商法精神的整合中处于主动状态,就可以有效地抵制来自传统商法精神的排斥、侵蚀和破坏,主动采取有计划、有步骤地化解措施,借鉴现代商法精神,实现我国商法后来居上的目标。 一、法律移植 对于国外已有的立法成功经验,法律移植不失为一种简捷而有效的借鉴方式。但移植需要技巧,移植不得法,不仅原有的法律制度的特性和优点会消失殆尽,而且可能破坏已有的经济程序,起到适得其反的作用。国际比较法法学会主席克雷波教授关于法律移植论述道:“在某些领域,特别是在人、婚姻、家庭等法律领域,法律规则是基于根本不同的道德宗教价值观念的,在财产法或劳动关系法领域的某些社会价值也是如此。在这两个领域的法律移植,即将具有某种社会价值的法律引入不存在这种价值的其他法律管辖区中,必然是相当困难的。但是,在商务活动领域,并不具有如此根本差别。以至于不同国家的观念就不能交错繁殖。”大多数现代市场经济国家的立法经验表明,商法是直接调整和规范市场经济的法律,能直接地反映经济生活的需求,符合经济主体的利益。《美国统一商法典》虽为美国法律的产物,更是美国的市场经济和商事交易发展到一定历史阶段的必然。联合国的一个法律专家小组在对《统一商法典》进行研究后指出:《统一商法典》作为一个基础可以适用于任何一个市场经济的国家,其第九篇(即担保篇)无疑是当今世界各国中最为现代化、最为合理和最为完整的担保制度。我国尚未制定民法典,法律体系的模式选择亦不明确,因而在商事立法模式上有更大的选择余地。因此,选择以商法为核心的市场经济体系的立法模式,则在立法技术上不必拘泥于民法中基于家庭人身和财产关系形成的各种伦理性原则,而是更直观地反映经济关系的本质属性,使之受之于商法基本原则及调整手段的约束,真正体现市场经济的需求,消除计划经济的残余影响。正如施米托夫所论述:“从实质上看,商法是或者至少应该是有理智的商人们的共识。这个法律部门相

英美法系证据规则

英美法系证据规则 传闻证据规则又称反传闻规则,是指在审判中一般不能采纳传闻证据,已 经在法庭上提出的,不得交陪审团作为评议的依据。美国《联邦证据规则》第802条规定:“传闻证据,除本法或联邦最高法院依法定授权制定的其它规则或国会立法另有规定外,不予采纳”。澳大利亚《1995年证据法典》第59条规定:“不得采纳他人先前陈述的证据,以证明该人陈述所宣称的事实”。 米兰达规则 1、你有权保持沉默,你对任何一个警察所说的一切都将可能被作为法庭对你不利的证据。 2、你有权利在接受警察询问之前委托律师,他(她)可以陪伴你受询问的全过程。 3、如果你付不起律师费,只要你愿意,在所有询问之前将免费为你提供一名律师。 4、如果你愿意回答问题,你在任何时间都可以终止谈话。 5、如果你希望跟你的律师谈话,你可以在任何时间停止回答问题,并且你可以让律师一直伴随你询问的全过程。 自白规则,是指“被指控实施犯罪的人对另一人自愿作出的承认自己犯有指 控罪行,并披露罪行实施的情况或参与实施的情况的陈述”。也就是说,自白仅指被告人就其被指控的犯罪所作的对自己不利的供述。自白有广义和狭义之分。广义上的自白包括自认,即对所涉嫌的犯罪事实的部分承认或有保留的承认。狭义上的自白则专指对于所涉嫌的犯罪事实的全部供认。自白规则所针对的是狭义上的自白。 非法证据排除规则,是对非法取得的供述和非法搜查扣押取得的证据予以排 除的统称,也就是说,司法机关不得采纳非法证据,将其作为定案的证据,法律另有规定的除外。 非法证据的范围包括: 1、执法机关违反法定程序制作的调查收集的证据材料; 2、在超越职权或滥用职权时制作或提查收集证据材料; 3、律师或当事人采取非法手段制作或调查收集的证据材料; 4、执法机关以非法的证据材料为线索调查收集的其他证据。

美国产品责任法归责原则的演进

美国产品责任法归责原则的演进 来源:作者:发布时间:2010-05-04 产品责任法是在科学技术不断转化为生产力而进行的社会化生产的推动下产生的一个特殊侵权法领域。因产品致害产生的利益冲突作为制造商、销售商和消费者间的矛盾之一,其此消彼长或平衡的发展动向广受关注。美国不但经济实力处于世界第一位,而且对消费者的保护也是法律制度最为完备的国家。对其产品责任法的考察,应从他的襁褓时期开始,“应当追溯他的过去,应当考察他在母亲怀抱中的婴儿时期,应当观察他最初目击的事物,应当听一听唤醒他启动沉睡的思维能力的最初话语,最后,还应当看一看显示他顽强性的最初奋斗。”[1]在美国产品责任法的发展过程中,其归责原则的变迁明显地体现了时代进程尤其是经济发展的要求。 一、产品责任的萌芽——“契约责任”原则 现代意义的产品责任是英国判例法首先确立的。美国的侵权行为法是以英国的侵权行为法体系为基础而创设的,因而在侵权行为法的基本理论和规则上与英国法是一致的。美国在早期产品责任法中沿袭了1842年英国最高法院“温特博特姆诉怀特”(Winterbottom V.Wright)案判决确立的“无契约无责任”原则,依据契约关系对受害人的权利给予救济。 该案案情是:被告怀特是邮车制造商和修理商,和某驿站站长订有契约,约定由其提供合格安全的马车以运送邮件。原告温特博特姆是驿站雇用的马车夫,在驾驶邮车运送邮件时车辆发生故障严重受伤,原告向被告提起诉讼要求赔偿,被告以原告不是契约当事人为由抗辩,法院最终判决原告败诉[2]。法院认为,被告保证马车处于良好状态的责任是向另一签约方驿站长承担的契约责任,被告无需对马车夫温特博特姆负有责任。审理此案的大法官Abinger认为,原告与被告无契约关系,如果被告败诉的话,每个乘客或任何一个经过路旁的人,只要因邮车受到损害,都可以提起同样的诉讼。在判决理由中他特别强调:“如果责任要扩展到没有契约关系的人,那就会出现最荒谬和最可悲的后果,而对此后果尚看不到任何限制的可能”[3]。由此“无契约无责任”原则确立,即因缺陷产品致害的人不能起诉与其没有契约关系的生产者和销售者,无契约关系的产品提供者不承担契约责任亦不承担侵权责任。 “契约责任”原则的产生有各个层面的原因。19世纪,工业革命促进社会生产力迅猛发展,新兴资产阶级要求自由宽松的经济环境。就侵权行为法来说,一方面法律要对被害人提供保护,另一方面,又要保护企业不被侵权责任所束缚,不被侵权赔偿所拖累,保证整个社会经济的迅速发展。与此相适应的“契约自由”理论成为法律的主流。而依据当时的契约相对性理论,契约的效力是绝对的,仅约束契约当事人,非契约当事人不能因契约取得权利或者负担义务。另一方面,工业革命使越来越复杂的科学技术应用于产品制造,人们对产品的危险性愈难发现,随着产品致害事件的增多,产品责任问题显现出来。受自由资本主义经济价值取向和“契约自由”原则、契约相对性理论的渗透,产品责任自然适用了契约关系理论。该原则在客观上保护了新兴资产阶级利益,推动了自由资本主义的发展。 应当指出的是:依据契约关系对受害人提供救济,以契约责任认定产品责任,只是产品责任

美国统一商法典UCC

美国统一商法典中英双语文本UCC 发表时间:2009-12-29 15:41:00 阅读次数: 1480 所属分类:政策法规 美国统一商法典 (1912年3月1日颁布1912年3月1日实施) 第一篇总则 第一章本法的简称、解释和适用 第1—101条简称 本法称为并可被引用为《统一商法典》。 第1—102条宗旨;解释原则;通过协议改变本法条款的效力 1.本法应作灵活的解释和适用,以促进本法之基本宗旨的实现。 2.本法之基本宗旨为: a.使调整商业交易的法律更加简洁、明确并适应现代要求; b.使商业作法能够通过习惯、行业惯例和当事方协议不断获得发展; c.使各州调整商业交易的法律归于统一。 3.在本法没有相反规定的情况下,本法各条款的效力可以通过当事方的协议加以改变。本法规定的善意、勤勉、合理和注意的义务,不得通过协议加以排除;但是,当事方可以通过协议确定履行这些义务的标准。所确定的标准不得明显不合理。 4.本法某些条款包含有“除非另有协议”或类似词句,这并不意味着未包含此类词句的其它条款的效力就不可以通过本条第3款所规定的协议加以改变。 5.除上下文另有所指外,在本法中, a.单数词包含复数含义,复数词包含单数含义; b.阳性词包含阴性含义和中性含义;在可以得到合理解释时,中性词包含任何词性的含义。 第1—103条一般法律原则应作为本法的补充 在本法没有具体条款予以排除的情况下,普通法和衡平法的各项原则,包括商人法和涉及合同能力、本人和代理人、禁止反悔、欺诈、虚伪说明、胁迫、强制、错误或破产的法律,或其它使合同生效或失效的法律,应作为本法的补充。 第1—104条不作默示废除之解释 本法是一部旨在统一其领域内法律规范的一般法。在可以合理避免的情况下,本法的任何部分均不应被认为被本法以后的立法所默示废除。 第1—105条本法的地域效力;当事方选择适用法的权力 1.除本条后述另有规定外,如果一项交易同时与本州和它州或它国有合理联系,当事方可以协议选择本州法律或它州或它国法律作为确定他们权利和义务的法律。如果无协议,本法适用于与本州有适当联系的交易。 2.当本法下列任何条款对适用法作出规定时,应按条款之规定适用有关的适用法;相反之协议,只在所规定之适用法(包括冲突法规范)允许的范围内才有效: 债权人对已售出之货物的权利第2—402条; 银行存款和收款篇的适用第4—102条; 受大宗转让篇约束的大宗转让第6—102条;

美国联邦民事诉讼规则(内含中文名目)

《美国联邦地区法院民事诉讼规则》简称《美国联邦民事诉讼规则》 目录美国联邦民事诉讼规则 导论美国联邦民事诉讼规则 第1章本规则的适用范围和一种诉讼形式 第1条本规则的适用范围和目的 第2条一种诉讼形式 第2章诉讼开始;传唤令状、诉答文书、申请书及命令的送达 第3条诉讼开始 第4条传唤状 第4条之1其他令状的送达 第5条诉答文书和其他文件的送达与提交 第6条期间 第3章诉答文书和申请书 第7条允许提出的诉答文书;申请书的格式 第8条诉答文书的一般规则 第9条诉答文书的特别事项 第10条诉答文书的格式 第11条诉答文书、申请书及其他文件的签名;向法院的陈述;制裁 第12条抗辩和异议——提出的期间和方式——通过诉答文书或申请书——基于诉答文书请求判决的申请 第13条反请求和交叉请求 第14条第三当事人诉讼程序 第15条修改和补充诉答文书 第16条审理前会议;日程;管理第4章当事人 第17条原告和被告;当事人能力 第18条请求和救济方法的合并 第19条为公正审判而必要合并的人 第20条当事人的许可合并 第21条当事人的合并错误及不合并 第22条互争权利诉讼

第23条集团诉讼 第23条之1股东的派生诉讼 第23条之2关于非法人团体的诉讼 第24条诉讼参加 第25条替代当事人 第5章庭外证言与发现程序 第26条规范发现程序的一般规定;出示义务 第27条诉讼之前和上诉系属期间的庭外证言 第28条参与作成庭外证言的人员 第29条关于发现程序的约定 第30条口头询问的庭外证言 第31条书面质问的庭外证言 第32条在法院的诉讼程序中庭外证言的使用 第33条对当事人的质问书 第34条提供文件和物件以及为调查或其他目的而进入房地产第35条身体和精神状态的检查 第36条要求自认 第37条不出示或不协助发现:制裁 第6章开庭审理 第38条要求陪审团审判的权利 第39条陪审团审判或法院审判 第40条为开庭审理而分配案件 第41条撤销诉讼 第42条合并;分开审理 第43条证言的取得 第44条官方记录证明 第44条之1外国法的确定 第45条传票 第46条不需要提出异议 第47条选定陪审团成员 第48条陪审团成员人数——参与裁决

美国统一商法典

美国统一商法典(证券收购节选) 第三章购买 第8-301条购买人取得的权利;“对抗性主张”;善意购买人取得的所有权 1.证券交付后,购买人取得转让人所拥有的或依实际授权可以转让的对证券的权利;但如果购买人本人为涉及证券之欺诈或非法活动的参与方,或购买人作为前手执票人得到存在对抗性主张的通知,他不能因从后手善意购买人手中取得证券而改善自己的地位。“对抗性主张”包括声称转让已构成或将构成非正当转让的主张,或声称某个对抗人对证券享有所有权或享有权益的主张。 2.善意购买人取得证券后,除了可以取得购买人的权利,还可以不受对抗性主张的对抗。 3.购买某种特定权益的购买人,只就购买的特定权益取得权利。 第8-302条“善意购买人” 善意购买人指以善意支付了对价且未得到对抗性主张之通知而取得不记名证券的交付或取得以其姓名登记或以其为被背书人之记名证券的交付或取得空白背书之记名证券的交付的人。 第8-303条“经纪人” “经纪人”指以全部或部分时间从事证券买卖的人,他在有关交易中,代表客户进行买卖,或从客户处买进或向客户售出证券。如果任何人为其所受到约束之其它法律或条例的目的而作为,他的能力不受本篇任何部分的影响。 第8-304条购买人得到对抗性主张的通知 1.在下列情况下,证券购买人(包括代表卖方或买方的经纪人,但不包括中间银行)被视为得到对抗性主张的通知: a.证券签有“用于收款”或“用于交还”的背书或其它与转让无关的背书,不论证券是记名式还是不记名式;或 b.证券为不记名式且明确说明该证券为转让人以外之其他人的财产;证券上只注有姓名,并不构成此种说明。 2.即使购买人(包括代表卖方或买方的经纪人)得到通知,即证券系为第三人的利益所持有,或系以诚信受托人的名义登记,或系由其作出背书,他也不因此而承担调查转让是否为正当的义务,也不应被视为得到对抗性主张的通知。但是,如果购买人(不包括中间银行)知道证券收益正被诚信受托人用于个人利益,或收益之使用以其它方式违反了任何义务,购买人即被视为得到对抗性主张的通知。 第8-305条不构成对抗性主张的通知 即使某种行为或事件提供了可以要求即时履行某项以证券证明之主债务的权利,或即使某种行为或事件规定为赎回或交换证券应在某日或某日以后提示或交还证券,该行为或事件本身也不构成对抗性主张的通知,除非: a.所涉及的购买距为赎回或交换证券所规定之提示或交还证券的日期已超逾1年;或 b.所涉及的购买距提示或交还证券以取得付款的日期已超逾6个月,只要在付款日期确有可供付款之资金存在。 第8-306条提示和转让中的担保 1.任何人为转让登记或为付款或为交换而提示证券时,均向发行人担保,他有权获得

一般到特殊——论美国民事诉讼对缺席判决的救济

一般到特殊:论美国民事诉讼对缺席判决的救济 刘秀明 (西南科技大学法学院,四川绵阳621010) 摘要:美国民事诉讼对缺席判决的救济一般规定了缺席登记的救济和缺席判决登记的救济,同时,被告 还有权提起附带异议。《德克萨斯州民事诉讼规则》对缺席判决救济的规定很特殊,有三种不同的方式予以救济,并对中间缺席判决的救济进行了规制。与大陆法系国家不同的是,缺席判决的救济理由规定了颇具特色的意思表示瑕疵诉讼行为。 关键词:美国民事诉讼;缺席判决;救济;意思表示瑕疵诉讼行为中图分类号:D971.251 文献标识码:A 文章编号:1002-3291(2010)04-0149-06 英美法系国家的缺席判决具有程序性结案的 特点,出于对案件实体真实的考虑,法律同样规定了缺席人一定的救济方式。我国民事诉讼法学者傅郁林认为,“在普通法国家,基于对抗制司法理念,作出不利于缺席被告的判决被认为是一种行政行为,因为没有对抗即无所谓审判。司法所审查的是原告所主张事实的真实性。被告有权向作出这一判决的法院申请将原判决撤销是自然的事。” 〔1〕鉴于美国的联邦制特色,论文对缺席判决救济 的分析遵循了从一般到特殊的逻辑思路,同时,对 颇具特色的救济理由,即意思表示瑕疵诉讼行为予以特别关注。把握美国缺席判决救济的各种方式和救济理由,有助于深刻地理解其缺席判决救济的本质特征。 一、缺席判决救济的一般规定 (一)撤销缺席的登记 美国联邦民事诉讼规则规定,如果当事人能 收稿日期:2010-04-10 作者简介:刘秀明,男,辽宁喀左人,西南科技大学法学院副教授,法学博士。研究方向:民事诉讼法。基金项目:四川省教育厅项目“民事缺席审判制度研究”(08SA127)。证明有正当理由,法院可撤销缺席的登记。①那问题的关键就是满足正当理由的条件有哪些。判例 认为,满足正当理由的因素有三个:原告是否会受到损害;被告是否进行了实质性防御;是否被告的 有责行为导致了缺席的发生〔2〕。在以上的3个因素中,最重要的就是被告对自己的不应诉行为是 否负有责任,而在考察归责性的问题上,一般是考虑是否为被告的故意行为所致,但是有时被告即使不是故意的,但却是有责的。例如,在Roger v.Hartford Life &Accident Ins.Co.一案中,Hartford 声称自己没有进行答辩并非是故意行为,而是自己的一种过失行为,法院最后认定,无论故意或过 失,被告的不答辩行为都是有责的 〔3〕。可见,在决定是否撤销缺席登记的问题上法院具有自由裁量权,而且法院一般倾向于采用宽松的审查标准,依 据缺席登记获得的救济比缺席判决获得的救济更容易得到法院的准许②。美国著名学者摩尔1985年在《联邦诉讼规程》中阐述:“法院一般倾向于采 ①目前,笔者发现申请撤销缺席登记中的good cause 有三种译法,一是正当理由;二是有效的理由;三是充分的理由。笔者认为,由于美国对撤销缺席的登记采用的是较为缓和的政策,因而正当理由的翻译较为准确。 ②有很多案例表明对缺席登记的救济较为容易。See Peebles v.M oore,302N .C .351(N .C .1981);Jackson v.B eech;R appleyea v.C am pbell.转引自〔美〕杰克·H ·弗兰德泰尔等:《民事诉讼法》(第3版),夏登峻等译,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003年版,第443页。 第38卷第4期 2010年7月辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版) Journal of Liaoning University (Philosophy and Social Sciences ) Vol.38No.4 Jul.2010

比较中美两国产品责任法的区别

比较中美两国产品责任法的区别 产品责任法是调整产品的制造者或销售者因所制造或销售的产品具有某种瑕疵或缺陷给消费者或第三人造成损害而引起的赔偿关系的法律规范的总称。我从以下六个方面来分析中美两国产品责任法的区别。 第一,法律体系的构成不同。美国产品责任法由一系列判例和《侵权行为法重述》、《第二次侵权行为法重述》、《美国统一商法典》、《消费者产品安全法》、《美国统一产品责任示范法》、《美国民事诉讼规则》等成文法组成;中国由《民法通则》、《产品质量法》、《消费者权益保护法》、《中华人民共和国诉讼法》等一系列与产品责任相关的法律法规构成。 第二,产品范围的区别。美国《统一产品责任法》第102条规定“产品是具有真正价值的,为进入市场而生产的,能够作为组装整体或作为部件交付的物品,但人体组织除外”。由此可见,美国的“产品”涵义十分广泛。我国法律对“产品”的定义较为简单,《产品质量法》第2条第二、三款规定“产品是指经过加工、制作,用于销售的产品,建筑工程不适用本法规定”。该法第五十条还规定“军工产品质量监督管理办法,由国务院、中央军事委员会另行规定”。这就排除了未经过加工的天然物品及初级农产品和不动产。 第三,责任主体不同。美国的产品责任法主体包括:产品制造者和销售者。具体指产品制造者、动产和不动产销售者、零件制造者、动产出租者、提供服务者、赠送者。中国的产品责任主体包括:生产者和直接销售者、服务者、营业执照持有人和借用人、展销会举办者或柜台出租者、广告经营者。 第四,产品缺陷标准的不同。在美国,目前关于“产品缺陷”尚无明确定义,但根据美国《第二次侵权行为法重述》,将缺陷定义为“对使用者、消费者或者其财产有不合理危险的缺陷状态”是一种“产品离开卖方时,直接消费者无法预期的不合理危险”,即消费者期望标准。我国《产品质量法》对产品缺陷作了定义“本法所称缺陷,是指产品存在危及人身、他人财产安全的不合理的危险;产品有保证人体健康和人身、财产安全的国家标准、行业标准的,是指不符合该标准”。可见我国采用了双重标准会在实践中带来一些问题:首先,在实践中可能出现符合质量标准,但却具有危险性的情况。其次,容易偏袒生产者和销售者,不利于消费者,因为产品质量的制定往往有生产者的参与。 第五,产品责任归责的原则不同。美国产品责任法归责原则:1.疏忽责任原则,2.担保责任原则,3.严格责任原则。消费者可以根据具体情况选择对自己有利的原则来维护自己的利益。我国《产品质量法》规定“因产品存在缺陷造成人身、缺陷产品以外的其他财产损害的,生产者应当承担赔偿责任”,“由于销售者的过错使产品存在缺陷,造成人身、他人财产损害的,销售者应当承担赔偿责任。

美国统一商法典中英

美国统一商法典Uniform Commercial Code 2008-7-29【大中小】 U.C.C. - ARTICLE 1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS PART 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS [Table of Contents] § 1-101. Short Titles. (a)This [Act] may be cited as the Uniform Commercial Code. (b)This article may be cited as Uniform Commercial Code-General Provisions. § 1-102. Scope of Article. This article applies to a transaction to the extent that it is governed by another article of [the Uniform Commercial Code]. § 1-103. Construction of [Uniform Commercial Code] to Promote its Purposes and Policies: Applicability of Supplemental Principles of Law. (a)[The Uniform Commercial Code] must be liberally construed and applied to promote its underlying purposes and policies, which are: (1)to simplify, clarify, and modernize the law governing commercial transactions; (2)to permit the continued expansion of commercial practices through custom, usage, and agreement of the parties; and (3)to make uniform the law among the various jurisdictions. (b)Unless displaced by the particular provisions of [the Uniform Commercial Code], the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relative to capacity to contract, principal and agent, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, bankruptcy, and other validating or invalidating cause supplement its provisions. 第1—101条简称 本法称为并可被引用为《统一商法典》。 第1—102条宗旨;解释原则;通过协议改变本法条款的效力 1.本法应作灵活的解释和适用,以促进本法之基本宗旨的实现。 2.本法之基本宗旨为: a.使调整商业交易的法律更加简洁、明确并适应现代要求; b.使商业作法能够通过习惯、行业惯例和当事方协议不断获得发展; c.使各州调整商业交易的法律归于统一。 3.在本法没有相反规定的情况下,本法各条款的效力可以通过当事方的协议加以改变。本法规定的善意、勤勉、合理和注意的义务,不得通过协议加以排除;但是,当事方可以通过协议确定履行这些义务的标准。所确定的标准不得明显不合理。 4.本法某些条款包含有“除非另有协议”或类似词句,这并不意味着未包含此类词句的其它条款的效力就不可以通过本条第3款所规定的协议加以改变。 5.除上下文另有所指外,在本法中, a.单数词包含复数含义,复数词包含单数含义; b.阳性词包含阴性含义和中性含义;在可以得到合理解释时,中性词包含任何词性的含义。 § 1-104. Construction Against Implied Repeal. [The Uniform Commercial Code] being a general act intended as a unified coverage of its subject matter, no part of it shall be deemed to be impliedly repealed by subsequent legislation if such construction can reasonably be avoided. § 1-105. Severability. If any provision or clause of [the Uniform Commercial Code] or its application to any person

美国联邦证据规则中文版

美国联邦证据规则 介绍:首席大法官沃伦于1965年任命一个顾问委员会为联邦法院起草证据规则。该委员会起草的初稿于1969年发表以征求意见。修订稿于1971年公布。1972年,联邦最高法院将其命名为《联邦证据规则》,于1973年7月1日生效。道格拉斯大法官持不同意见。根据有关授权法案,首席大法官伯格将该证据规则提交国会审议,国会将其搁置以作进一步的研究。经过广泛详尽的研究,国会将该规则作有关修改后颁布为法律。1975年1月2日批准,1975年2月1日生效。 这样,联邦证据规则是联邦最高法院制订规则的程序与国会的立法程序相结合的产物。至少,广泛收集普通法的案例与有关的制订法是同等重要,两者共同构成证据规则演进的背景。在理解证据规则时,这些立法渊源都必须加以考虑。-----爱德华特W.克利瑞 美国联邦证据规则 第一章一般规定 第101条适用范围 本规则根据第1101条规定的范围和例外,适用于在联邦法院、联邦破产法院和联邦治安法院进行的诉讼。 (根据1987年3月2日的修改,同年10月1日生效;1988年4月25日的修改,同年11月1日生效) 第102条目的和结构 本规则将用以保证公正施行,消除不合理的耗费和延误,促进证据法的发展壮大,以实现确定事实真相,公正处理诉讼。 第103条关于证据的裁定 (a)错误裁定的后果 除非影响到当事人的实体权利和具有下列情况,否则错误可以不作为采纳或排除证据的依据: (1)异议对于一项采纳证据的裁定,适时提出要求撤消的异议,或申请记录在案并阐明异议的具体理由,如果该理由未能从上下文中显露出来;或者 (2)提供证明对于一项排除证据的裁定,可以提供该证据的要旨使法庭了解或者使其从所提问题的内容中显露出来。 (b)关于提供证据和裁定的记录 法庭可以增加任何与表明证据特征、证据被提供的方式、提出的异议和相关的裁定有关的其他的或进一步的证词,可以指示用提问和回答的方式来提供。 (c)陪审团审理 在陪审团审理的情况下,法官将指导诉讼,以防止不能采纳的证据通过各种手段,如作出陈述、提供证明或进行提问等,对陪审团产生影响。 (d)显见错误 本规则不妨碍对涉及实体权利的显见错误提请注意,虽然这些显见错误未引起法庭注意。 第104条初步询问

相关文档
最新文档